In Situ Testing CPT & SPT.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 MAJOR FINDINGS OF THE PROJECT AND THEIR POSSIBLE INCLUSION IN EUROPEAN STANDARD -Major findings -Major findings suitable for inclusion in European Standard.
Advertisements

Soil Exploration Part II
SITE INVESTIGATION.
Soil Property Characterization by In-Situ Tests
Educational Resource Library
PILE FOUNDATION.
Simplified Critical-State Soil Mechanics
Critical-State Soil Mechanics For Dummies
The standard penetration test (SPT) is an in-situ dynamic penetration test designed to provide information on the geotechnical.
8. Axial Capacity of Single Piles
Wave Equation Applications 2011 PDCA Professor Pile Institute Patrick Hannigan GRL Engineers, Inc.
4.3 STONE OR SAND COLUMNS IN SOFT CLAYEY MATERIALS :
Course : S0705 – Soil Mechanic
SOFT SOIL (PROBLEMS & STABILISATION METHOD) Session 2 - 7
INTRODUCTION Session 1 – 2
Pore-Pressure Generation During CPT Probe Advancement By Michael Fitzgerald.
Chapter (1) Geotechnical Properties of Soil
Session 25 – 26 DRILLED SHAFT And CAISSON FOUNDATION
The Liquefaction Resistance and Maximum Shear Modulus of Frozen Samples Yao-Chung Chen Department of Construction Engineering National Taiwan University.
Geotechnical Site Characterization by Cone Penetration Testing
Basic design of stilts based on the CPT Julio R. Valdes Geo-Innovations Research Group Civil Engineering SDSU.
Fawad S. Niazi Geosystems Engineering Division Civil & Environmental Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology April 27, 2010 Spatial Variability of.
“LIQUEFACTION” Prepared By: Husni M. Awwad Talal Z. Zammar
In-Situ Bali In-Situ 2001 Bali A Few Closing Comments by Paul W. Mayne at Banquet.
Liquefaction: Behavior Evidence, Prediction, and Prevention.
Field Borings and Cone Penetration Testing
Liquefaction: Behavior Evidence, Prediction, and Prevention Richard P. Ray, Ph.D, P.E.
SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS Spread footings Mat (Raft) foundations Square
Foundation Engineering CE 483
Bearing Capacity Theory
Pile Foundations پي هاي شمعي.
Soils Investigation Soil Investigation
Session 17 – 18 PILE FOUNDATIONS
SEMBODAI RUKMANI VARATHARAJAN ENGINEERING COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING FOUNDATION ENGINEERING BY KARTHIVELU.
SOIL EXPLORATION Module 1 -2K6 -March GCEK.
Subsurface Investigation Building structure system.
ECGD 4122 – Foundation Engineering
Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundations
Kamal Tawfiq, Ph.D., P.E., F.ASCE
Additional Design Considerations 2011 PDCA Professor Pile Institute Patrick Hannigan GRL Engineers, Inc.
Session 15 – 16 SHEET PILE STRUCTURES
Lateral Earth Pressure
Class A Centrifuge Prediction of future SG1 of Full Scale Test with Pile Foundation by Marcelo Gonzalez Tarek Abdoun Ricardo Dobry Rensselaer Polytechnic.
OMAE 2009 Honolulu, HI - May 31 to June
FHWA CPT Workshop Goal Assist DOT’s to start and increase use of CPT in Highway applications by developing, presenting and discussion information on CPT.
SITE INVESTIGATION.
Kamal Tawfiq, Ph.D., P.E., F.ASCE
BEARING CAPACITY OF SOIL Session 3 – 4
Example: Cc = 0.72 Void Ratio (e) Cs = 0.1 Po Log (p) Cc Cs Figure 1
PILE FOUNDATIONS UNIT IV.
SUB SURFACE INVESTIGATION. PREPAID BY : (1) LAD PARTH J: (2) PATEL RIYA K: (3) RATHWA AARTI : (4)TANDEL HETAL J:
SOIL MECHANICS AND FOUNDATION ENGINEERING-II (CE 311)
Site exploration and characterization
SITE INVESTIGATION ARUN MUCHHALA ENGINEERING COLLEGE-DHARI
SOIL MECHANICS AND FOUNDATION ENGINEERING-II (CE 311)
Chapter 15 Soil-Bearing Capacity for Shallow Foundations
GLE/CEE 330: Soil Mechanics Settlement of Shallow Footings
Pile Foundation Reason for Piles Types of Piles
SOIL MECHANICS AND FOUNDATION ENGINEERING-III (CE 434)
Prepared by:- Barham Jalal
CHAPTER 1: Soil Exploration. Contents : 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Boring of Holes Auger Method Hand Operated Augers Power Driven Augers.
Site Investigation and Field Tests
Mr. Vedprakash Maralapalle, Asst. Professor
The Engineering of Foundations
SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS BY, Babariya Ashish Gondaliya Ronak Gondaliya akshay Javiya hardik
DARSHAN INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY
Piezocone Penetration
S S SUBMITTED BY:- CHARU BHARDWAJ civil engineering
Soil Shear Strength.
Roger A. Failmezger, P.E., F. ASCE, D. GE
Presentation transcript:

In Situ Testing CPT & SPT

CPT Testing

CPT Testing Three Measurements qC = Cone-tip resistance uP = Penetration pore pressure (piezocone) fS = sleeve friction Ratios FR = friction ratio = fS / qC Bq = pore pressure ratio = (uP-uh) / (qT –  'vo)

SCPTu Sounding, Memphis, Tennessee Real-Time readings in computer screen Penetration at 2 cm/s Sand Clay Crust

qT Corrected cone-tip resistance qT = qc + (1-an)uP only for type 2 (type B) cones an = 0.8 = fn(cone) net area ratio

CPT-parameters ´ (Sands) See page 129 fig. 4.16 ´ = 17.6 + 11 log ( qC / (´vo.pa)0.5 ) Kulhawy & Mayne(1990) ´ = arctan[(0.1 +0.38 log (qC / ´vo))] qC1= qC/(´vo.pa)0.5

CPT-parameters Dr = relative density (sands) Dr = 100 (qC1 / 305·OCR0.2 )0.5  if unknown, use OCR = 1 e = void ratio e = 1.152 – 0.233·log(qC1) + 0.043 log(OCR)

CPT-parameters OCR (iterative) Ko = 0.192 ( qC / pa)0.22 (´vo / pa)-0.31 OCR 0.27 (1) Ko = ( 1 - sin´)OCR sin ´ (2) (1) Mayne,CPT’95 (2) Mayne & Kulhawy,1982 a)Find ´ b)Vary OCR will both Ko values are similar

SPT Testing

SPT Testing Procedure 1) Drill boring (hole) 2) Insert SPT sampler (hollow) 3) Drive sampler into the ground 18” & count N of blows to drive each 6” interval if N for 6” > 50 if N for all 18” >100 Refusal

SPT Testing 4) NSPT = N for last two 6 “ intervals 5) Retrieve sampler & save soil 6) Drill to next depth & go to step 2 NSPT = fn (Method of drilling, how clean boring is, hammer location, hammer type, “hangover level” of technician……..) see p.117-118

SPT Testing Efficiency corrections: From “ NSPT” to “N60” N60 = (E mCBCSCRNSPT) / .60 Em = hammer efficiency = fn (hammer type )  Table 4.3 P.119 CB = borehole dia. correction - table 4.4 Cs = sampler correction - table 4.4 CR = rod length correction - table 4.4

SPT Testing More corrections: NSPT  as   , so pa = 100 kpa (N1 )60  2N 60 N’s have been correlated with everything !! (N1)60 = N60 ( pa/z)0.5

N Is One Number Enough??? p' = preconsolidation SAND CLAY cu = undrained strength gT = unit weight IR = rigidity index ' = friction angle OCR = overconsolidation K0 = lateral stress state eo = void ratio Vs = shear wave E' = Young's modulus Cc = compression index qb = pile end bearing fs = pile skin friction k = permeability qa = bearing stress CLAY DR = relative density gT = unit weight LI = liquefaction index ' = friction angle c' = cohesion intercept eo = void ratio qa = bearing capacity p' = preconsolidation Vs = shear wave E' = Young's modulus  = dilatancy angle qb = pile end bearing fs = pile skin friction SAND N