Fawad S. Niazi Geosystems Engineering Division Civil & Environmental Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology April 27, 2010 Spatial Variability of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 MAJOR FINDINGS OF THE PROJECT AND THEIR POSSIBLE INCLUSION IN EUROPEAN STANDARD -Major findings -Major findings suitable for inclusion in European Standard.
Advertisements

Soil Exploration Part II
AN INNOVATIVE METHOD TO EVALUATE DEGREE OF COMPACTION OF RIVER EMBANKMENTS USING CPT BARBARA COSANTI N. SQUEGLIA D.C.F. LO PRESTI University of Pisa –
Hypothesis Testing Steps in Hypothesis Testing:
INTRODUCTION Session 1 – 2
RETAINING EARTH STRUCTURE Session 11 – 16
Pore-Pressure Generation During CPT Probe Advancement By Michael Fitzgerald.
Impacts of Seismic Stress on Pore Water Pressure in Clayey Soil By: Qazi Umar Farooq Lecturer Civil Engineering Dept Univ of Engg & Tech Taxila.
Chapter (1) Geotechnical Properties of Soil
Correlation and Regression
OUTLINE SPATIAL VARIABILITY FRAGILITY CURVES MONTE CARLO SIMULATIONS CONCLUSIONS EFFECTS DESIGN RECOMMEND BEARING CAPACITY OF HETEROGENEOUS SOILS APPENDIXOUTLINE.
In Situ Testing CPT & SPT.
Geotechnical Site Characterization by Cone Penetration Testing
Application of CPT data for evaluation of ground liquefaction in Chi-Chi Earthquake, Taiwan D.H. Lee 1, C.S. Ku 2, C.S. Chen 1, C.H. Juang 3 &J.H. Wu 3.
LANDFILL PROFILING FOR GAS, LIQUIDS AND VACUUM & ENHANCED STEAM BIOREACTORS STI Engineering By Reg Renaud.
Basic design of stilts based on the CPT Julio R. Valdes Geo-Innovations Research Group Civil Engineering SDSU.
Determination of Soil Stiffness Parameters
Wavelet Transform Modulus Maxima ridge and its application on Stratigraphic Profiling STUDENT: R CHUN-HSIANG WANG LECTURER: JIAN-JIUN DING DATE:
Time-dependent increase in CPT tip resistance following explosive compaction. Time-dependent increase in V s following explosive compaction, as measured.
In-Situ Bali In-Situ 2001 Bali A Few Closing Comments by Paul W. Mayne at Banquet.
Hydro-Mechanical Properties and Stability Analysis of Four Landslide-Prone Hillslopes in Western North Carolina 30 October 2013 York W. Lewis 1, Alexandra.
Field Borings and Cone Penetration Testing
Session 13 – 14 SHEET PILE STRUCTURES
Simple Linear Regression Analysis
GEO-MECHANICS (CE2204) Shear Strength of Soils
SEMBODAI RUKMANI VARATHARAJAN ENGINEERING COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING FOUNDATION ENGINEERING BY KARTHIVELU.
Subsurface Investigation Building structure system.
ECGD 4122 – Foundation Engineering
Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundations
1 Asia Singapore Building and Construction Authority (Building Engineering Division) Managing Geotechnical Risks – are we learning from our failures 29.
Allowing for Uncertainty in Site Response Analysis
Safety assessment of weathered slopes by measuring shear wave velocity Mohsin U. Qureshi, Ikuo Towhata and SuguruYamada Department of Civil Engineering,
A Study on Liquefaction Evaluation Using Shear Wave Velocity for Gravelly Sand Deposits Ping-Sien Lin, National Chung-Hsing University Fu-Sheng Chen, China.
Geotechnical Exploration for Reach 2B of the San Joaquin River Restoration Program Nicholas Hightower Division of Engineering, Project Geology 2011 DWR.
14th Crisp user meeting at UCL1 Numerical analysis of a piled foundation in granular material using slip element Yongjoo Lee Soil Mechanics Group Department.
An Easy Method of Determining Hydraulic Conductivity of Soils using Pore Pressure Response of Piezocone Penetration Test Chung R Song, Ph.D., University.
Byron Gangnes Econ 427 lecture 3 slides. Byron Gangnes A scatterplot.
Part 2: Model and Inference 2-1/49 Regression Models Professor William Greene Stern School of Business IOMS Department Department of Economics.
Why Model? Make predictions or forecasts where we don’t have data.
FACTOR OF SAFETY Determining slope stability in Holtwood, PA in the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy Kristina Lofman November 27, 2012 EPS 109.
Design of Experiments DoE Antonio Núñez, ULPGC. Objectives of DoE in D&M Processes, Process Investigation, Product and Process Q-improvement, Statistical.
MICROPILES RESEARCH AT WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY Dr. Adrián Rodríguez-Marek, Dr. Balasingam Muhunthan, and Dr. Rafik Itani Civil and Environmental Engineering.
Geotechnical Exploration for Reach 2B of the San Joaquin River Restoration Program Nicholas Hightower Division of Engineering, Project Geology 2011 DWR.
Post-processing of Continuous Shear Wave Signals April 28, 2011 Taeseo Ku Civil & Environmental Engineering EAS 4480.
ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY SOUNDING TO STUDY WATER CONTENT DISTRIBUTION IN HETEROGENEOUS SOILS 1 University of Maryland, College Park MD; 2 BA/ANRI/EMSL, USDA-ARS,
FHWA CPT Workshop Goal Assist DOT’s to start and increase use of CPT in Highway applications by developing, presenting and discussion information on CPT.
Chapter 11: Linear Regression and Correlation Regression analysis is a statistical tool that utilizes the relation between two or more quantitative variables.
The Relationship of Weather and Movie Ticket Sales An analysis to show if temperature and precipitation influence ticket sales of Atlantic Station Regal.
Course : S0484/Foundation Engineering Year : 2007 Version : 1/0
AQUARadar Identification of temporally stable Z-R relationships using measurements of micro-rain radars M. Clemens (1), G. Peters (1), J. Seltmann (2),
Chapters 8 Linear Regression. Correlation and Regression Correlation = linear relationship between two variables. Summarize relationship with line. Called.
SOIL MECHANICS AND FOUNDATION ENGINEERING-II (CE 311)
SOIL MECHANICS AND FOUNDATION ENGINEERING-II (CE 311)
Two-Variable Data Analysis
Site Investigation and Field Tests
The Engineering of Foundations
Why Model? Make predictions or forecasts where we don’t have data.
Piezocone Penetration
Emily Saad EAS 4480 Oral Presentation 27 April 2010
QuakeCoRE Project Update
Presented By: Sanku Konai
The Hungtsaiping landslides- from a rock slide to a colluvial slide
CHAPTER fourteen Correlation and Regression Analysis
Jili Qu Department of Environmental and Architectural College
BIVARIATE REGRESSION AND CORRELATION
CHAPTER 4 SOIL STRESSES.
Results and Discussion
Discussers (alphabetical order):
Global Temperature Increases – Does Cooling Have a Statistical Basis for the last Three Decades? By Thomas Christian EAS 4803.
Modern Comparative Methods
Presentation transcript:

Fawad S. Niazi Geosystems Engineering Division Civil & Environmental Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology April 27, 2010 Spatial Variability of CPT Data and Soil Parameters at NGES, Texas A&M et al. 2010

2 Spatial variability of CPT readings for horizontal & vertical variability in soil profiles (all soundings, each 10 cm depth):  Mean, min, max  Moment statistics (variance, skewness, kurtosis)  Residuals of principal comp. analysis of CPT readings (space and depth)  Test of normality ( χ 2 test) Comparison of measured and evaluated soil unit weight,  t  LS regression, correlation coefficient  LS, principal component and reduced major axis regression  Higher order regression and residuals analysis Scope of Study

3 qcqc u2u2 fsfs VsVs Site characterization:  Conventional boring/sampling methods  Lab investigations on disturbed samples Cone penetration test:  Fast, economical, and continuous data  up to 4 separate readings in one sounding  Soil parameter interpretation I c,  t, OCR,  p ', K o, s u,  ', D R, G max q c, f s, u 2, V s Cone Penetration Test – a Hybrid Method

qtqt fsfs u2u2 VSVS Typical Cone Penetration Sounding 4

National Geotechnical Experimentation Site Riverside Campus, Texas A&M University Geotechnical Experimentation Site College Station Texas A&M University

Location of Clay and Sand Sites on Riverside Campus, Texas A&M University Clay Site Sand Site

Field Investigations at NGES Clay Site, Texas A&M University 1997 Twelve MCPT Six CPT Three SCPT Testing Program 1977 to 1995 Nine CPT 1995 to 1996 Three CPTu CPT: 10 cm 2 Cone Penetration Test CPTu:Piezocone Penetration Test MCPT:2 cm 2 Mini Cone Penetration Test SCPT: 15 cm 2 Seismic Piezocone Penetration Test BH:Borehole 15 m Clay Control N CPT CPTu MCPT SCPT BH Legend

Horizontal Variability of Tip Resistance Profiles Critical χ2 Value = 11.08

Spatial Variability Trend of Tip Resistance Profiles for 33 CPT Soundings Critical χ2 Value = 11.08

Horizontal Variability of Sleeve Friction Profiles Critical χ2 Value = 11.08

Spatial Variability Trend of Sleeve Friction Profiles for 33 CPT Soundings

Residuals of Principal Comp. Analysis of q t at 0.16 m Critical χ2 Value = 11.08

Residuals of Principal Comp. Analysis of q t at m Critical χ2 Value = 11.08

Residuals of Principal Comp. Analysis of Tip Resistance at CPT4 Critical χ2 Value = 11.08

Residuals of Principal Comp. Analysis of Tip Resistance at MCPT13 Critical χ2 Value = 11.08

Results of Horizontal Variability Study 0 – 1.1 m 4.9 – 8.7 m 10.5 – 13.6 m

1997 Twelve MCPT Six CPT Three SCPT Testing Program 1977 to 1995 Nine CPT 1995 to 1996 Three CPTu CPT: 10 cm 2 Cone Penetration Test CPTu:Piezocone Penetration Test MCPT:2 cm 2 Mini Cone Penetration Test SCPT: 15 cm 2 Seismic Piezocone Penetration Test BH:Borehole 15 m Clay Control N CPT CPTu MCPT SCPT BH Legend A A’ Results of Vertical Variability Study

18  t = Total unit weight (kN/m 3 )  w = Unit weight of water (kN/m 3 ) q t = Cone tip resistance (kPa) f s = Sleeve friction (kPa) z = Depth (m)  vo ’ = Effective vertical overburden stress (kPa)  atm = Atmospheric pressure (kPa) Correlations: CPT Readings and Soil Unit Weight,  t Mayne et al. 2010

Measured and Evaluated Soil Unit Weight Profiles

Least Square Regression, Correlation Coefficient, 95% Confidence Bounds r = r =

1997 Twelve MCPT Six CPT Three SCPT Testing Program 1977 to 1995 Nine CPT 1995 to 1996 Three CPTu CPT: 10 cm 2 Cone Penetration Test CPTu:Piezocone Penetration Test MCPT:2 cm 2 Mini Cone Penetration Test SCPT: 15 cm 2 Seismic Piezocone Penetration Test BH:Borehole 15 m Clay Control N CPT CPTu MCPT SCPT BH Legend Results of Vertical Variability Study

Least Square Regression, Correlation Coefficient, 95% Confidence Bounds p = p =

Least Squares, Principal Component And Reduced Major Axis Regression Analyses

Higher Order Regression Analysis

25 Horizontal and vertical variability of CPT readings for better site characterization CPT-based relationship for evaluating soil unit weight Conclusions Mayne et al. 2010

Fawad S. Niazi Geosystems Engineering Division Civil & Environmental Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology April 27, 2010 Spatial Variability of CPT Data and Soil Parameters at NGES, Texas A&M et al. 2010

Depth (m) Very Stiff Clay Sand Very Stiff Clay Hard Clay (Shale)  t = 19.6 kN/m 3 s u = 110 kPa  t = 19.5 kN/m 3 s u = 140 kPa  t = 18.9 kN/m 3 s u = 160 kPa After Briaud 2000 Stratigraphy at the NGES TAMU Clay Site

Autocorrelation of Residual Higher Order Regression