Quadrennial Defense Review Results February 3, 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Air Force Core Functions
Advertisements

Building a Strategy for Combating Terrorism. “We have to fight terrorists as if there were no rules, and preserve our open society as if there were no.
DEFENSE SUPPORT OF CIVIL AUTHORITIES (DSCA)
Unified Land Operations
Special Operations Center of Excellence
1 NMIA/FAOA Symposium 18 September, 2012 RDML Doug Venlet, USN OPNAV N52 Director, International Engagement Defense Attaché System: A View from the Field.
ARSOF WARFIGHTING CHALLENGES
April 6, NPR in Context Third comprehensive review of U.S. nuclear policies and posture –Previous reviews in 1994 and 2001 Conducted by DoD.
Applications in Acquisition Changing Defense Environment.
Sea Air Space Symposium PB16 Budget Issues RADM Barry Bruner Director, Programming Division OPNAV N8O April 2015.
Deterrence and Dissuasion for the 21st Century Ryan Henry Principle Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Policy IFPA-Fletcher Conference December 14,
U. S. Fleet Forces Command
ASRR 2011/10/05 Page-1 Distribution Statement A – Cleared for public release by OSR, distribution unlimited. Affording Defense Capability: An SE- Centric.
Distribution Statement A: Approved for Public Release; Distribution is unlimited. 1 Electronic Warfare Information Operations 29 MAR 2011 Val O’Brien.
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Headquarters U.S. Air Force 1 Meeting Strategic Challenges: Balancing Capabilities With Priorities.
Hungarian Defence and Security Policy Mr. György RÁBAI Counsellor HU MoD, Defence Policy Department.
PPA 573 – Emergency Management and Homeland Security Lecture 9b - Department of Homeland Security Strategic Plan.
ADP 1 The Army.
1 UNCLASSIFIED National Military Strategy Precision Strike Association Winter Roundtable January 26, 2005 CAPT Jeff Hesterman Chief, Strategy Division.
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Industry Day Brief 18 September 2014.
Overview of NIPP 2013: Partnering for Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience October 2013 DRAFT.
U.S. Navy & Marine Corps Program
Advanced Systems and Concepts Office 20-Sep-15 What are National Security Threats? 2 nd Annual JTAC Workshop 4 April 2006 ASCO and DTRA Update and Welcome.
Deliberative Working Document - Predecisional FOUO Supporting the Secretary’s Top Priorities Eric Coulter, Deputy Director OSD Program Analysis and Evaluation.
Critical Infrastructure Protection Overview Building a safer, more secure, more resilient America The National Infrastructure Protection Plan, released.
Australia’s National Security Apparatus Ms Vikki Templeman Director Strategic Assessments and Long Range Planning.
0 Peter F. Verga U.S. Department of Defense 2 Definitions Homeland Security – A concerted national effort to prevent terrorist attacks within the United.
1 Finding the Appropriate Mix: Balancing Capabilities with Priorities Major General Darren McDew, USAF Vice Director, Strategic Plans & Policy 20 January.
1 The U. S. Coast Guard Maritime Strategy for Homeland Security Captain Dan Deputy Chief of Cutter Forces, U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters Captain Dan Deputy.
Joint Training Challenges of Irregular Warfare/COIN and Full Spectrum Training Requirements Brief for WJTSC LtCol John Merna, J7/9-TJ 23 September.
Import of New Security Environment Keys to Transformation: Exploit Technology Exploit DOD ability to integrate processes Result: JV2010 Vision shall.
OVERALL CLASSIFICATION OF THIS BRIEFING IS UNCLASSIFIED United States Southern Command SOUTHCOM’s Role and Responsibilities in Foreign Humanitarian Assistance.
DSAM-08 Acquisition Management: Issues and Trends.
1. 2 USAF CONOPS & AIR AND SPACE POWER REVIEW Chap 23 & 24.
Air Force Strategy to Resources
Strategic Implications of Virtual Warfare: by Captain Terry C. Pierce USN Explaining Virtual Warfare as a Strategic Disruptive Innovation Explaining Virtual.
United States Air Force: Air Doctrine – Provide Global Capability
Mr. Tom Matthews OUSD(I) The overall classification of this brief is UNCLASSIFIED Discussion with the Intelligence Community Officer Course 10 April 2006.
AT&L Goals and Objectives Honorable Michael Wynne Acting Under Secretary of Defense (AT&L) March 2004.
Supporting the Secretary’s Top Priorities
Navy International Programs Office Mr. Rino Pivirotto Executive Director 15 April 2005 Presentation to the Homeland Security – Maritime Domain Awareness.
Microsoft in Defence Michel van der Bel Vice President Microsoft International.
Warfare Communities of the Fleet and Marine Forces
1 Power to the Edge Agility Focus and Convergence Adapting C2 to the 21 st Century presented to the Focus, Agility and Convergence Team Inaugural Meeting.
Latest Strategies for IT Security Margaret Myers Principal Director, Deputy CIO United States Department of Defense North American Day 2006.
1 DoD Role in Shaping Special Operations NDIA SO/LIC Symposium 6 February 2004 Honorable Thomas W. O’Connell ASD-SOLIC.
The Navy’s Strategy VADM John Morgan 9 March 2006.
Chapter 17: Foreign Policy and National Defense Section 2.
Emerging Global Trends and Strategic Challenges in the Coming Decade Marvin J. Cetron, President, Forecasting International June 12, 2012 Emerging Global.
Winning the Next War 1 Winning the Next War: Institutionalizing Lessons Learned from Today’s Regional Conflicts The American Institute of Engineers Conference.
November 19, 2002 – Congress passed the Homeland Security Act of 2002, creating a new cabinet-level agency DHS activated in early 2003 Original Mission.
DHS/ODP OVERVIEW The Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Office for Domestic Preparedness (ODP) implements programs designed to enhance the preparedness.
Threat into Risk: A Challenge for Security Guidance AusRAIL 2006 Tony Beard Office of Transport Security Department of Transport and Regional Services.
WARFARE COMMUNITIES OF THE FLEET AND MARINE FORCES.
2 Agenda Command Mission ……………………………… Command Relationships ……………………..…….4 Fleet Assets……………………..……………………. 6 Sailors and Civilians………..……………………….
Week 4 Tina Mainwaring. VERY IMPORTANT!!! NO SEMINAR NEXT WEEK!!! NO SEMINAR NEXT WEEK!!! NO DISCUSSION BOARDS NEXT WEEK!! NO DISCUSSION BOARDS NEXT WEEK!!
Sergeant Major of the Army Kenneth O. Preston Kenneth O. Preston Soldiers Families Army Civilians.
GOVT Module 16 Defense Policy.
“Existing world order is being redefined.” Henry Kissinger Jan 2015
DSAM-08 Acquisition Management: Issues and Trends.
EFFECTIVE COOPERATION: THE BEDROCK OF ANY SECURITY ARCHITECTURE
Assessing the 2010 QDR: a guide to key issues
Joint Protection of the Sea Base
Quadrennial Defense Review Results February 3, 2006
The Future of Coalition Warfare
FY 2007 Department of Defense Budget
S&T Main Focus Areas Linkages to 2018 NDS
Small unit proficiency
Director - Mr. Wayne Raabe
Presentation transcript:

Quadrennial Defense Review Results February 3, 2006

2  A wartime QDR: conducted during 4th year of a “long war”  20 year look – must prevail in current war and also prepare for wider range of challenges  Twin imperatives of review: Continue reorientation of capabilities to address asymmetric challenges (more irregular, catastrophic and disruptive in character)… …while changing the Defense enterprise to support and accelerate that reorientation  Interim product in continuum of transformation Introduction

3  Capitalized on lessons learned from operational experiences of the past 4 yrs in an age of uncertainty and unpredictability  “Long war”  Key lessons from these operations informed QDR – importance of Fighting a Long War – Lessons Learned Prolonged irregular conflict (Afghanistan and Iraq) Wider irregular operations “long war” (Philippines, Horn of Africa, Georgia, Pan-Sahel, elsewhere) Humanitarian (tsunami, Pakistani earthquake) and anticipatory actions (Haiti, Liberia) Operations in support of civil authorities at home (9/11, Katrina) Building partnership capacity – indirect approach and enabling others Early anticipatory measures Unity of effort Uncertainty and unpredictability

4 QDR Objective – Shift in Focus Post-9/11 Security Challenges. DisruptiveTraditional Catastrophic LIKELIHOOD VULNERABILITY LowerHigher Lower Non-state and state actors employing “unconventional” methods to counter stronger state opponents; terrorism insurgency, etc. Irregular Terrorist or rogue state employment of WMD or methods producing WMD-like effects against U.S. interests States employing military forces in well-known forms of military competition and conflict Competitors employing technology or methods that might counter or cancel our current military advantages Defeat terrorist networks Defend homeland in depth Prevent acquisition or use of WMD Shape choices of countries at strategic crossroads (Assure, Dissuade, Deter, Defeat) Capabilities for COCOMs Provide more options for President, capabilities for CoComs Capability Focus Areas Options for President

5 QDR Objective – Shift in Focus Disruptive Traditional Catastrophic Irregular Shape Choices Defeat Terrorist Extremism Counter WMD Defend Homeland Today's Capability Portfolio “Shifting Our Weight” Continuing the reorientation of military capabilities and implementing enterprise-wide reforms to ensure structures and process support the President and the warfighter

6 Current State  Our Nation and its allies and partners are in a long irregular war with a distributed, multiethnic network of terrorist extremists who use indiscriminate violence to advance their ends End State  Terrorist networks no longer have the ability or support to strike globally and catastrophically, and their ability to strike regionally will be outweighed by the capacity of local governments to defeat them Method of Victory  Victory will necessitate orchestrating all elements of national and international power to find, disrupt and destroy terrorist networks; discredit their ideology; and deny them physical and information sanctuary Capabilities… Reorienting capabilities and forces: Defeating Terrorist Networks Disruptive Traditional Catastrophic Irregular Defeat Terrorist Extremism

7 DoD Capabilities  Human intelligence; language and cultural awareness  Persistent surveillance; fusion of time-sensitive intelligence with operations  Capabilities to locate, tag and track terrorists in all domains, and prompt global strike to rapidly attack fleeting enemy targets  SOF to conduct direct action, foreign internal defense, counterterrorist operations and unconventional warfare  Multipurpose forces to train, equip, and advise indigenous forces; conduct irregular warfare; and support security, stability, transition, and reconstruction (SSTR) operations  Riverine warfare capabilities  Authorities to develop the capacity of nations to participate effectively in disrupting and defeating terrorist networks Reorienting capabilities and forces: Defeating Terrorist Networks Disruptive Traditional Catastrophic Irregular Defeat Terrorist Extremism

8 Reorienting capabilities and forces: Defending the Homeland In Depth Current State  Our and our partners’ homelands are vulnerable to the transnational movement of the enemy’s terrorists, their extremist ideologies and advanced weapons, as well as disease and natural disasters. End State  Potential aggressors are deterred, threats are defeated at a distance, and the consequences of any attack or natural disaster are mitigated. Method of Victory  Our Department will work as part of a unified interagency effort with the Department of Homeland Security and other federal agencies to address threats to the U.S. homeland, using an active and layered defense strategy. Capabilities… Disruptive Traditional Catastrophic Irregular Defend Homeland

9 DoD Capabilities  Air and maritime domain awareness capabilities to provide increased situational awareness and shared information on potential threats  Tailored deterrence, including prompt global strike capabilities to defend and retaliate against any WMD attack, and air and missile defenses  Broad spectrum medical countermeasures to defend against genetically-engineered pathogens  Joint C2 for homeland defense and civil support mission sets including systems that are interoperable with other agencies, state & local govts  Capabilities to manage the consequences of major catastrophic events  New or expanded authorities to improve access to Guard and Reserve forces for use in the event of a man-made or natural disaster Reorienting capabilities and forces: Defending the Homeland In Depth Disruptive Traditional Catastrophic Irregular Defend Homeland

10 Reorienting capabilities and forces: Preventing the Acquisition and Use of WMD Current State  Hostile regimes and terrorist networks are seeking to acquire and use Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD). These actors may not respond to traditional tools of deterrence. End State  Preventing hostile states and non-state actors from acquiring or using WMD Method of Victory  We and our allies and partners must cooperate closely and further develop capabilities to: detect, identify, locate, tag and track key WMD assets, and development infrastructure in hostile or denied areas, and to interdict WMD, their delivery systems, and related materials in transit Capabilities… Disruptive Traditional Catastrophic Irregular Counter WMD

11 DoD Capabilities  Human intelligence, language skills and cultural awareness  Persistent surveillance over wide areas  Special operations forces to locate, characterize and secure WMD  Locate, tag and track WMD; detect fissile materials at stand-off ranges  Interdiction capabilities to stop air, maritime, and ground shipments of WMD, their delivery systems and related materials  Joint command and control tailored for the WMD elimination mission  Capabilities and specialized teams to render safe and secure WMD  Capability to shield critical systems from catastrophic effects of EMP  Non-lethal weapons to secure WMD sites  Capability to deploy, sustain, protect, support SOF in hostile environments Reorienting capabilities and forces: WMD Disruptive Traditional Catastrophic Irregular Counter WMD

12 Reorienting capabilities and forces: Shaping Choices at Strategic Crossroads Current State  Choices by major and emerging powers affect the future strategic position and freedom of action of our Nation and its allies. End State  America and its allies foster cooperation and enhance mutual security interests, and an appropriate hedge against the possibility of a major or emerging power choosing a hostile path. Method of Victory  A balanced approach, including closer integration with allies and partners, and building the capacity of partner states, while hedging against the possibility that cooperative approaches may fail. Capabilities… Disruptive Traditional Catastrophic Irregular Shape Choices

13 DoD Capabilities  Language and cultural awareness  Security cooperation and engagement activities  Persistent surveillance, including systems that can penetrate and loiter in denied or contested areas  Joint command and control capabilities that are survivable  Secure broadband communications into denied or contested areas  Capabilities to shape and defend cyberspace  Air dominance capabilities to defeat advanced threats  Integrated defenses against short-, intermediate-, and intercontinental- range ballistic and cruise missile systems  Undersea warfare capabilities to exploit stealth and enhance deterrence  Prompt and high-volume global strike Reorienting capabilities and forces: Shaping Choices Disruptive Traditional Catastrophic Irregular Shape Choices

14 Achieving Unity of Effort  Expand collective capabilities to plan and conduct stability, security, transition and reconstruction operations  Extend the concepts and constructs enabling the Proliferation Security Initiative to domains other than WMD proliferation, including cyberspace  Create more flexible authorities to support training, equipping and advising the security forces of new partner states  Develop Nat’l Security Planning Guidance and Nat’l Homeland Security Plan  Create National Security Officer (NSO) corps and transform National Defense University to National Security University  Overhaul traditional foreign assistance and export control activities and laws The United States, and in particular DoD, cannot win this war alone alkdjf Success requires integration of all USG capabilities, and greater cooperation with allies and partners

15 Re-shaping the Defense Enterprise and Developing a 21 st Century Total Force Management  Portfolio-based approach to planning and building the capabilities the Department needs  Reforms at three levels: governance, management, and execution Human Capital  Language and cultural skills throughout the force  Reduce stress on the force: Rebalancing Active/Reserve component mix and civilian/ contractor workforce A more operational Reserve component  Build on National Security Personnel System DoD must transform itself into an enterprise whose organization and processes can support an agile fighting force

16  Steady-state & surge operations Homeland Defense Irregular Warfare Conventional Campaigns  Tailored Deterrence Advanced military competitors, rogue states, terrorist networks Strengthened deterrence against opportunistic aggression/coercion  Two-war capacity Varying levels of effort Stress-on-the-force elasticity Refined Force Planning Construct Construct for shaping the future force Frequency Number Scale / Intensity Concurrency Ops Risks Duration Policy Environment Partner Capabilities Sizing Variables:

17 Way Ahead  Key outputs QDR Report Chairman’s Assessment FY07 budget request  Applying QDR strategic direction to FY08-13 future year defense program  Managing implementation – 100+ action items under direction of DSD/VCJCS  Execution Roadmaps  Outreach efforts and consultative agenda Put in place capabilities for next generation of leaders

18