ICOPA XII Howard League for Penal Reform Creating a scandal: Prison abolition and the policy agenda King’s College London, 23-25 July 2008 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Theoretical balancing of sanction systems More humane Less humane neutralisation retribution deterrence Restorative justice Human rights Grazia Mannozzi.
Advertisements

Three different types of Sanctions
Issues Facing the Criminal Justice System
The Good, The Bad and the Community: Restorative Justice Dan Ellingworth Troubles of Youth 2 nd February 2009.
In cooperation with the Chapter 9 The use of non-custodial measures in the administration of justice Facilitator’s Guide.
Recent Changes to London Probation service and the London CRC’s response to the gang agenda Middlesex University Conference 5 th September 2014 Patsy Wollaston.
Aims of Sentencing The judge / magistrates will have to decide what they are trying to achieve by the punishment they give. For example, should they simply.
Capital Punishment Punishment: The deliberate and authorized causing of pain or harm to someone thought to have broken a rule, code, law etc. Punishment:
Topic 10 Sentencing Topic 10 Sentencing. Topic 10 Sentencing Introduction to sentencing aims of sentencing types of sentences youth sentencing.
ADR Alternative Dispute Resolution. Criminal Law vs. Civil Law Criminal LawCivil Law Deals with crime Deals with disputes between individuals/organizations.
Breaking the Cycle: Reducing Reoffending
Universität Hamburg Restorative Justice 01/2009 Universität Hamburg Restorative Justice Seite 5.
Presentation to the Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission April 13, 2015 Judy Clarke, Executive Director, Virginia Center For Restorative Justice Mark.
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Alternative dispute resolution is the term used for a number of dispute resolution processes that are an alternative.
“Criminal Justice System” Training Session 21 Nov 2014.
Intro to Law Criminal Process: Sentencing. Sentencing Options Suspended Sentence – given, but does not have be served at that time, but may have to serve.
PURPOSES AND PRINCIPLES OF SENTENCING. Goals of Sentencing  In Section 718 of the Criminal Code a statement is found that gives judges some direction.
AJ 50 – Introduction to Administration of Justice
Community-Based Corrections Generally CBC Generally Offender Selection The State of Modern CBC.
Restorative Justice and mediation in Europe Ivo Aertsen K.U.Leuven European Forum for Victim-Offender Mediation and Restorative Justice Angers, May 6,
Introduction to Restorative Justice Borbala Fellegi Training for Commissioners in Serbia 12 June 2007, Belgrade.
The Legal Framework. Law Morality, Justice. Law. A set of public rules that apply throughout the community and are usually considered by everybody as.
Role of the Courts Court decides what sentence should be imposed on the offender. The Judge or magistrates decide on an appropriate punishment in each.
Sentencing Theories of sentencing: Retribution Retribution Denunciation Denunciation Incapacitation Incapacitation Deterrence Deterrence Rehabilitation.
Chapter 11 SENTENCING AND SANCTIONS 1. Purpose of Criminal Sanctions  Criminal Sanctions – A penalty imposed for violating accepted social norms. A sanction.
Chapter 4 Sentencing and punishment. In this chapter, you will look at the purposes and process of sentencing and the different factors affecting a sentencing.
Sentencing Criminal Courts © The Law Bank The Criminal Courts: Procedure and Sentencing Sentencing 1.
Violence against children in conflict with the law: developing international indicators ICOPA XII - International Conference on Penal Abolition Rosie Meek:
Criminal Justice System. Police Have immediate control over who is arrested “Police discretion” Size of U.S. population and number of police officers.
Juvenile Delinquency in Latvia Dr. Andrejs Judins, senior researcher of the Centre for Public Policy Providus
VICTIM SUPPORT: The International Context Bali Process Workshop on Victim Support 7 – 9 November 2006 Michel Bonnieu, Senior Regional Legal Advisor UNODC.
AS Level Law Machinery of Justice Sentencing. AS Level Law What you need to know and discuss: the need for a criminal justice system the main aims of.
Criminal Law. Criminal law deals with the most serious kinds of harm that people can cause each other, or society. Although it is true that there are.
(POST – TRIAL). The Act states that the sentencing judge is obliged to consider the following when sentencing:  Maximum penalty  Current sentencing.
The criminal courts: Procedure and sentencing Sentencing.
Lachlan, Steven, Genevieve. Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999, Section 3A  To ensure that the offender is adequately punished for the crime.  To.
SENTENCE:  punishment imposed on a person convicted of committing a crime.
Clear & Cole, American Corrections, 8 th Chapter 22 Community Justice.
Crime reduction policies An assessment. Policies Prison Electronic tagging Anti social behaviour orders Community sentencing Intensive Supervision and.
Capital Punishment Punishment by execution of someone officially judged to have committed a serious or capital crime Punishment by execution of someone.
DEVIANCE. Learning Goals You will: -Describe theories related to deviance -Summarize and interpret statistics on deviant behaviour -Describe methods of.
Desistance from crime and the potential role of restorative justice European Forum for Restorative Justice Belfast, June 2014 Joanna Shapland 1.
Justice freedom security S t a k e h o l d e r C o n f e r e n c e – M a r c h NATIONAL PROSECUTING AUTHORITY Community Prosecution and Restorative.
Children in court & Diversionary Schemes By Maddie.
Copyright … Strode’s College Laws students are free to make use of ‘Pdf Print files’ for study purposes (they should print them off and take them to class).
The Aims of Punishment Reformation
Why restorative justice needs research Martin Wright.
Purpose of Sentencing. Denunciation  express society’s disapproval of the offence.  “Send a message”  the action is against the law and the values.
Convention on the Rights of the Child Justice Renate Winter.
SENTENCING AND CORRECTIONS CHAPTER 15 PAGES
Grade 11 Canadian Law Youth Criminal Justice Act.
Sentencing and the Correctional Process
1. (1.) What are the key objectives of the Howard League for Penal Reform? 2.
Sentencing. Sentencing - General Underlying principle that there must be consistency in sentencing – similar crimes committed under similar circumstances.
Paper 2 – Court Procedures Questions. Possible Questions Court Procedures: Outline the procedural differences between an either-way and an indictable.
THE AIMS OF PUNISHMENT AND PRINCIPLES OF SENTENCING 1 Lady Justice Hallett DBE and Dame Linda Dobbs DBE.
University of Ulster and Restorative Practices Hugh Campbell, Tim Chapman and Derick Wilson.
Criminal Justice BHS Law Related Education Chapter 4: A Separate System for Juveniles LESSON OBJECTIVES 4-1 Analyze and define the legal doctrine of parens.
Transition from Prison to Community: the German Case
Theories of Sentencing
Goals of Punishment.
Theories and objectives of sentencing
Chapter 9. The use of non-custodial measures
Crime and the Law The Prison System in Scotland
Restorative group conferences with violent juveniles preparation of young offender, his/her family, and victim for conference, their experience with.
Victim-offender mediation (VOM) in case of adult offenders in Hungary
Restorative Justice Potentials and key questions
CLU 3MR Lesson 65.
European Model for Restorative Justice with Children and Young People
Presentation transcript:

ICOPA XII Howard League for Penal Reform Creating a scandal: Prison abolition and the policy agenda King’s College London, July

What is punishment for? Time for a restorative philosophy of sentencing? Martin Wright 2

What is crime? an action or omission (usually harmful) where the legislature authorizes the state to take action against the perpetrator if the parties cannot resolve it themselves; and which, in addition, a court has classified as falling within that definition. 3

What is punishment? deliberate infliction of a measure intended to be painful, such as a fine or imprisonment. measures such as rehabilitation, reparation or containment may deprive a person of time or money, but that is not their primary purpose 4

Purposes of sentencing CJA 2003, s. 142(1) a)The punishment of offenders [? incl. to express condemnation, impose retribution] b)The reduction of crime, incl. deterrence [?individual and general] c)The reform and rehabilitation of offenders d)The protection of the public e)Reparation by offenders to persons affected 5

Problems with punishment Doesn’t work unless … (see Restoring respect for justice, chapter 2) No fair way to decide how much (ibid. Ch. 5, 6) Unintended consequences Collateral damage Makes compliance harder Especially prison 6

Prison doesn’t work Previous 1-yr re-offending rate, custodial adults convicted in Q sentences: total n = 44, Source: MoJ 7

Amount of conventional sentences a)condemnationno logical basis b)retributionno logical basis c)deter individualconviction, 48 hours, ∞ d)deter othersconviction, ∞ e)rehabilitate individual? weeks, months, not nec. prison f)heal victimnot relevant g)public protectionno logical basis 8

Reform conventional system Justice re-investment Gatekeeper: pre-sentence report Identify offenders’ needs Establish programme to meet needs Funding linked to reduction in prison pop. (transfer from prison budget) Safeguards: clear selection criteria, independent evaluation 9

Restorative basis for sentences a)heal victim R J, reparation, not nec. prison b)hold individual R J, conviction accountable c)rehabilitate individ.Rehab, not nec. prison, ? RJ d)public protection,restrict liberty, restorative enforcement detention e)condemnationreparation, c’ty service [? corrective (reparative) labour] f)reparationR J, work for victim or c’ty g)deter othersprevention, conviction 10

Aims: Sentencing Act 2002, NZ a)Promote sense of responsibility for it b)Hold offender accountable for harm c)Provide for interests of victim d)Provide reparation for harm e)Denounce conduct f)Deter offender or others, protect community, assist rehab, reintegration g)Take account of any restorative outcomes 11

How it would work Bring case straight to mediation centre, or Prosecutor diverts from CJS to R J conf., or For serious cases, court conviction, then R J conference before sentence, which normally endorses conference agreement, or R J before release from prison Use insights from R J process as impetus for social reforms (see Froestad & Shearing in Mackay et al., below) 12

What it needs R J services available nationwide (largely provided by Third Sector) Learn from R J meetings about social deficits, and tackle them Community resources to enable offender to make reparation New philosophy of social relationships 13

New philosophy of social relationships Not control by fear, force, threat of punishment, stigma, ‘Don’t do as I do, do as I tell you’, but Persuade, enable, include, role models, deliberative decisions (coercion as last resort) Beginning with restorative problem-solving in schools. -=oOo=- 14

Websites [Restorative Justice Consortium] [Prison Fellowship International, US] [European Forum for Restorative Justice] 15

Recent publications L Walgrave. Restorative justice, self-interest and responsible citizenship G Maxwell and J H Liu, eds. Restorative justice and practices in New Zealand: towards a restorative society. Wellington, NZ, 2007 M Liebmann. Restorative justice: how it works M Zernova. Restorative justice: ideals and realities

Publications (cont’d) R Mackay et al., eds. Images of restorative justice theory. Frankfurt am Main, 2007 M Wright. Making good: prisons, punishment and beyond. Reprinted with foreword by Vivien Stern “ -Restoring respect for justice. 2 nd ed with foreword by Howard Zehr, “ -Justice for victims and offenders: a restorative response to crime. 2 nd ed,