Monopolization Predatory or Exclusionary (Entry Deterring) Acts or Practices.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Market Structure Conduct and Performance A2 Economics – May 2009.
Advertisements

Week 2: Market Power, Market Definition & (Horizontal) Mergers Francis O'Toole Department of Economics Trinity College Dublin 11 th October.
Competition Policy Vertical restraints – Interbrand Competition.
1 Antitrust Rules against: 1. Monopolization. 2. Price Discrimination. 3. Predatory Pricing. 4. Tie-In Sales.
1 COPYRIGHT © 2007 West Legal Studies in Business, a part of The Thomson Corporation. Thomson, the Star logo, and West Legal Studies in Business are trademarks.
Lynne Pepall Dan Richards George Norman
HKKK TMP 38E050 © Markku Stenborg Predation Predation = firm drives rival out of market by making it incur enough losses and then raises prises.
Competition Policy Predation. Exclusion  Exclusionary practices: deter entry or forcing exit of a rival  Legal concept. Monopolisation (US) – Abuse.
1. Credible commitments 2. Preemption 3. Predation 4. Taxonomy of strategic commitments 5. Some Examples of Entry Deterrence Lecture 5: Strategic commitment.
Predatory Conduct What is predatory conduct?
STR 421 Economics of Competitive Strategy Michael Raith Spring 2007.
1 Business Economics (A) Researcher training course 9th week Yuji Honjo Faculty of Commerce Chuo University.
BSc Economics and related programmes Economics of Competition and Regulation EC 3015 Week 5: Abuse of dominance.
6 Competitive Strategy and the Industry Environment.
Course Wrap-up. What is IO? Study of how firms behave in markets Key role of strategic interaction Tools: – Neoclassical comparative static analysis e.g.
Competitive Strategy and the Industry Environment
16. Antitrust Regulation Regulation Antitrust Law & Cases Regulation Antitrust Law & Cases.
6 Chapter 6: Competitive Strategy and the Industry Environment BA 469 Spring Term, 2007 Prof. Dowling.
Limit Pricing and Entry Deterrence
Oligopoly chapter 19 Copyright © 2014 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of.
Price Discrimination Prof. Dr. Murat Yulek. Market structures There are different market structures with varying effects on the consumer and total welfare.
U.S. Antitrust Policy: Cartels, Consumer Welfare and International Convergence University of La Rochelle 27 Janvier, 2006 John S. Martin Fulbright Visiting.
Copyright © 2010, All rights reserved eStudy.us Market Structure – A classification system for the key traits of a market, including.
Sherman Act Section 2 Committee Hot Topics in Monopolization Law “Section 2 in the Antitrust Division” J. Bruce McDonald March 31, 2005 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT.
Copyright McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2002 Antitrust Policy and Regulation The Antitrust Laws Types of Mergers Industrial Regulation Social Regulation Key.
London 22 Nov 2005 Modernization of Article 82 Lars-Hendrik Röller * Chief Competition Economist European Commission CLA and BIICL Conference on Article.
Chapter 1: Industrial Organization and Imperfect Competition 1 Contemporary Industrial Organization: A Quantitative Approach Lynne Pepall Dan Richards.
19 McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.. Antitrust Policy and Regulation.
Chapter Key Points Identify the goals of antitrust laws Understand the analysis of monopolization Identify both the potential benefits and harms of mergers.
Introductory course on Competition and Regulation Pál Belényesi University of Verona October 2006.
Antitrust Purpose Protect “perfect competition” Sherman Act Historical context (oil, steel, railroads) Section Differences §1 = concerted actions that.
Monopolistic competition and oligopoly. Monopolistic competition Many firms compete in open market Products are similar but not identical Low barriers.
Copyright © 2010, All rights reserved eStudy.us Market Structure – A classification system for the key traits of a market, including.
Competition Policy and Law Presentation to Study Tour for Russian Member Universities of the Virtual Institute Network 26 March 2009.
ESNIE 2005 ANTI-TRUST: from theories to practices Competition & Transaction Costs ANTONIO NICITA (UNIVERSITY OF SIENA, FACULTY OF ECONOMICS)
A monopolistically competitive market is characterized by three attributes: many firms, differentiated products, and free entry. The equilibrium in a monopolistically.
Russell Pittman “Economics at Community Colleges” October 5, 2012 The views expressed are not purported to reflect the views of the U.S. Department of.
Law Antitrust - Instructor: Dwight Drake United States v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co (1956) Basic Facts: During period , Dupont controlled.
The Modernization of Article 82 : an Economic Perspective Dr Valérie RABASSA* Chief Economist Office DG COMPETITION EUROPEAN COMMISSION *The views expressed.
UNCTAD The interface between competition policy, trade, investment and development Geneva, 23 July 2007 Abuse of Market Power Presentation by: Ursula Ferrari.
Business Economics (A) Researcher training course 9-10th week
Chapter 13: Predatory Conduct: recent developments 1 Predatory Conduct: Recent Developments.
By: Serenity Hughes ECONOMICS 101.  The markets for many important products are dominated by a small number of very large firms. IMPERFECT COMPETITION.
© Hogan & Hartson LLP. All rights reserved. Monopoly Power: Getting it and keeping it US Perspective Sharis Pozen, Partner ACCE Seminar 13 May 2008.
EU Discussion Paper on Exclusionary Abuses Michael Albers European Commission DG Competition 54th Antitrust Law Spring Meeting Washington DC, 30 March.
More on Competition and Government Policy. Cartels l A cartel is an agreement among a group of sellers to regulate prices or restrict output l To be successful.
Jeopardy Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q $400 Q $500 Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q $400 Q $500 Final Jeopardy Vocab 1Vocab 2Perfection Mono e mono Put em up.
Entry and Exit New firm (Bill Porter develops E*TRADE) Diversifying firm (Microsoft offers Internet Browsers)
Ch THE LEGAL ENVIRONMENT OF BUSINESS A Critical Thinking Approach Fourth Edition Nancy K. Kubasek Bartley A. Brennan M. Neil Browne Nancy K. Kubasek.
© 2004 West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning 1 Chapter 26 Antitrust and Monopoly.
© 2004 West Legal Studies in Business, a Division of Thomson Learning 20.1 Chapter 20 Antitrust Law.
Anti-Competitive Behavior Monopolies (Ch. 15) & Oligopolies (Ch.17)
Copyright McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2005 Antitrust Policy and Regulation The Antitrust Laws Types of Mergers Industrial Regulation Social Regulation Key.
Oligopoly Graphs.
Competitive Strategy and the Industry Environment
Marketing & Competitiveness
Chapter 15 Monopoly.
Limit Pricing and Entry Deterrence
Starter Discussion point pg13.
Economics September Lecture 16 Chapter 15 Oligopoly
Limit Pricing and Entry Deterrence
Abuse of Dominance Case Studies.
Chapter 6 Business-Level Strategy and the Industry Environment
Contemporary Industrial Organization: A Quantitative Approach
Chapter 7 Section 4.
Market Structure.
Limit Pricing and Entry Deterrence
Chapter 6 Business-Level Strategy and the Industry Environment
Collusion and f0reclosure (predatory pricing)
Presentation transcript:

Monopolization Predatory or Exclusionary (Entry Deterring) Acts or Practices

Legal Requirements Sherman Act Sherman Act To “monopolize or attempt to monopolize” a market is illegal, not just having a monopoly To “monopolize or attempt to monopolize” a market is illegal, not just having a monopoly Courts’ current approach requires Courts’ current approach requires One or more exclusionary acts One or more exclusionary acts Intent to monopolize Intent to monopolize “Dangerous probability of success” “Dangerous probability of success”

Difficulties Distinguishing predatory pricing behavior from honest pro-competitive conduct by large firms Distinguishing predatory pricing behavior from honest pro-competitive conduct by large firms When is P < MC? When is P < MC? Areeda-Turner Rule: P < AVC Areeda-Turner Rule: P < AVC Market Definition Market Definition Merger guidelines approach won’t work Merger guidelines approach won’t work The Cellophane Fallacy The Cellophane Fallacy Harm to competitors vs. Harm to competition Harm to competitors vs. Harm to competition U.S. Steel compared to Alcoa U.S. Steel compared to Alcoa Utah Pie Utah Pie

Is Predatory Pricing Rational? Economists skeptical of classic predation Economists skeptical of classic predation P profits later P profits later Requires barriers to entry when P > MC Requires barriers to entry when P > MC Other forms may make sense Other forms may make sense Reputation building: Price low in one market to deter entry/competitors elsewhere or in the future Reputation building: Price low in one market to deter entry/competitors elsewhere or in the future “Deep Pockets”: large firms have better financial resources due to differential access to capital markets “Deep Pockets”: large firms have better financial resources due to differential access to capital markets Signaling: low pricing used as a signal of the dominant firm’s low costs to rivals/entrants Signaling: low pricing used as a signal of the dominant firm’s low costs to rivals/entrants

Other Predatory, Exclusionary, or Entry Deterring Strategies Predation by a non-dominant firm (differentiated products) Predation by a non-dominant firm (differentiated products) Price cuts or advertising aimed at specific niches or rivals Price cuts or advertising aimed at specific niches or rivals Strategic product innovation or placement Strategic product innovation or placement Product proliferation Product proliferation Long-term contracts, tie-ins or bundling Long-term contracts, tie-ins or bundling Raising rivals’ costs Raising rivals’ costs Threats must be credible to deter entry Threats must be credible to deter entry

Special Cases Capacity expansion to deter entry Capacity expansion to deter entry Du Pont in titanium dioxide, Alcoa Du Pont in titanium dioxide, Alcoa Deny access to “essential facilities” in networks Deny access to “essential facilities” in networks Microsoft, Airlines Microsoft, Airlines Price discrimination Price discrimination Identify and separate groups/markets Identify and separate groups/markets Prevent arbitrage Prevent arbitrage May improve social welfare May improve social welfare