© Copyright Ovum 2004 www.ovum.com The role of the BTA and competition law A presentation to the Stakeholders’ Forum on further liberalisation David Lewin.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Joint Initiative on Mutual Accountability: Cambodia, Lao PDR and Vietnam November 2009 Joint Initiative on Mutual Accountability: Cambodia, Lao PDR and.
Advertisements

Division: EIDD WTO TBT Workshop on Good Regulatory Practice March 2008 Focus on Transparency and Consultation.
SUVA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE &INDUSTRY FIJI BUSINESS FORUM Embracing Challenges and Identifying Opportunities RON BOX CEO Taf - TELECOMMUNICATIONS AUTHORITY.
Value for Money – new requirements and challenges
Regulators’ Code July Regulators’ Code A statutory Code Came into effect in April 2014, replacing the Regulators’ Compliance Code All local authorities.
COMPETITION POLICY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PRESENTATION AT CUTS-ARC CAPACITY BUILDING WORKSHOP, LUSAKA 7 TH MARCH, 2011 BY SAJEEV NAIR, COMPETITION POLICY.
Financial Services and Consumer redress Unit DG SANCO The Commission‘s initiative on Collective Redress.
Non-Tariff Barriers in the Trade of Transport Services – Final Report TPT 02/2002T Steering Committee on More Competitive Transportation (including infrastructure)
Tele2 5 March 2008 EPP-ED Public Hearing Mikael Grape.
Completing the EU internal energy market
The EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) Rationale and Lessons learnt Artur Runge-Metzger Head of International Climate Negotiations, European Commission.
The White Paper Ian Moss. THE COMMUNICATIONS WHITE PAPER  In May of this year the Government announced that it was planning a Communications White Paper.
©Ofcom Review of the Framework Some issues under discussion by regulators Jim Niblett International Policy Director 22 December 2005.
ITS Biennal Conference September 4-7, 2004 Berlin 1 Power and discretion in independent regulation. The Portuguese case. João Confraria School of Economics.
CEET Conference 2008 Is Quality Assurance Improving? Rob Fearnside, Deputy Director VRQA.
Session 3 - Plenary on implementing Principle 1 on an Explicit Policy on Regulatory Quality, Principle 3 on Regulatory Oversight, and Principle 6 on Reviewing.
Tralac and European Commission Workshop on Services and Investment February 2008 Cape Town BUSINESS PERSPECTIVE By Catherine Grant Director: Trade.
The Sixth Annual African Consumer Protection Dialogue Conference
ENTELA SHEHAJ Albanian Energy Regulator (ERE) DOES MONITORING METHODOLOGY MATTERS? Electricity Market Monitoring in Albania.
Click to edit Master title style Digitalisation and Beyond: Media freedom in a new reality Professor Katrin Nyman-Metcalf Chair of Law and Technology.
An Investigation into the Optimum way Forward for the South African Telecommunications Industry By: Luke Hardman Supervisor: John Ebden 2 November 2004.
1 National Electronic Commerce Strategies The Malaysian Experience Ho Siew Ching Ministry of International Trade and Industry Malaysia Expert Meeting on.
Nov/Dec 2003ElectraNet BSP-2 Workshop (khb) 1 EU Telecoms Regulatory Status Governing Legislation Package 2002  Directive 2002/19/EC Access to, and interconnection.
Radio Frequency Spectrum Management in Indonesia - 3G/IMT 2000, TV Digital and other Wireless Activities And Issues - 3G/IMT 2000, TV Digital and other.
1 THE THIRD ENERGY PACKAGE – THE ENERGY COMMUNITY APPROACH Energy Community Secretariat 20 th Forum of the Croatian Energy Association and WEC National.
Telecoms Services Sector in the Caribbean Derek Browne Information Technology Specialist CIF November 5, 2007.
Market reviews in Oftel Elaine Axby 31 October 2002.
0 Blending competition and regulation New Dehli, December 5, 2006 Benoit Loutrel, Director, Regulation of fixed and mobile markets Department AUTORITE.
Market Analysis under the New EU Regulatory Framework for Electronic Communications CLA European Conference 2005 Stockholm, October 27-28, 2005 Hogan &
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REGULATION AND POLICY-MAKING FOR AFRICA Module 5 Energy Regulation Module 5: STRUCTURE, COMPOSITION AND ROLE OF AN ENERGY REGULATOR.
Review of Legislative Framework for Electronic Communications A Mobile Perspective Rob Borthwick 4 February 2000.
DG Information Society 1 Liberalisation and regulation in Electronic Communications in the EU 2nd ICT Summit Istanbul, 3-6 September 2002 Hans-Peter Gebhardt.
Implementation of EU Electronic Communication Directives.
The New EU Directives Oftel Forum 25/04/02 Heather Clayton.
31 January 2005 Claes Rosvall – 1 of 9 FURTHER LIBERALISATION OF THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY IN BOTSWANA Claes Rosvall
Research Needs and Outputs Telecommunications Policy and Regulation Presented by: Michelle Grell The Telecommunications Authority of Trinidad and Tobago.
TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY IN A RAPIDLY EVOLVING MARKET CTO conference on implementing the WSIS Action Plan, NAIROBI, th March,2004. Presented by.
The Notification Procedure of national telecoms markets Pál Belényesi 27 October 2006.
Internet Policy Day 3 - Workshop Session No. 5 The impact of telecomms regulation Prepared for CTO by Link Centre, Witwatersrand University, South Africa.
Regulatory Transparency and Efficiency in the Communications Industry in Australia Jennifer Bryant Office of Regulation Review Australia.
Future of the UK mail market: regulatory perspective CWU Forum 9 February 2006 RICHARD MORIARTY POSTCOMM.
Division of Technology, Industry, and Economics Economics and Trade Branch SESSION 7 - How to do Integrated Assessment Stage D: Issuing policy recommendations.
1 Independent Communications Authority of South Africa Presentation to the Portfolio Committee of Communication on ICASA Strategic Plan and Budget 13 March.
3 rd Athens Process Forum /24, Sofia CEER WG SEEER – Regulatory Benchmarking Standards for SEE.
DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION FRAMEWORK Presentation by Ministry of Finance 10 December 2013.
Erkki Liikanen - Date The Challenges for the Mobile Sector The European Commission’s perspective Pearse O’Donohue European Commission DG INFSO.
1 Competition Policy and Sectoral Regulation B y Dr. Cezley Sampson Head of Legal & Regulatory Practice CPCS Transcom CUTS 7UP4 Project Accra, Ghana June.
Empowerment and Protection of Consumers in ICT Market PRESENTED AT THE STAKEHOLDERS FORUM ON QUALITY OF SERVICE AND CONSUMER EXPERIENCE 23 RD – 25 TH NOVEMBER,
PRESENTED AT THE STAKEHOLDERS FORUM ON QUALITY OF SERVICE AND CONSUMER EXPERIENCE LAICO REGENCY HOTEL Creating Space for Consumer Rights in.
1 MTN PRESENTATION TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON COMMUNICATIONS Hearings on Telecoms Policy Directions 3 April 2001 Irene Charnley – Chairperson, M-Cell.
1 TINF 2010 Tuesday 30 November 2010 Present and Future Regulation of Electronic Communications Vesa Terävä European Commission Information Society & Media.
BTA Seminar The benefits and costs of liberalisation : how to go about liberalisation in Africa Bill Wigglesworth Gaborone, 31 January 2005.
Florence Forum, November 2008 Regulation (EC) 1228/ ERGEG Compliance Monitoring.
Harmonisation in progress: the telecom regulation example Andrzej Chrzanowski Office of Telecommunications and Post Regulation URTiP, Poland November 2004.
PROTECTING THE INTERESTS OF CONSUMERS OF FINANCIAL SERVICES Role of Supervisory Authorities Keynote Address to the FinCoNet Open Meeting 22 April 2016.
 ROAD SAFETY: the European Union Policy European Commission, Directorate General for Mobility & Transport «Road Safety.
©Ofcom EU Communications package : State of Implementation Kip Meek, Senior Partner, Content & Competition Brussels, 30 May 2005.
Liberalisation and regulation in the telecommunication sector: Theory and empirical evidence Week 3 The European Regulatory Framework for the Telecommunication.
N Melville.
Independent Communications Authority of South Africa
Portfolio Committee on Communications
The new European regulatory framework for electronic communications and perspectives 27th january.
Business sector engagement and Consumer Awareness October 3rd, 2017
Regulatory Transparency and Efficiency in the Communications Industry in Australia Jennifer Bryant Office of Regulation Review Australia.
COMPETITION ASSESSMENT of Laws and Regulations
The competition enforcement in regulated sectors
Sustainable Gaming – Saving the sector from itself
XIIIth Madrid Forum (16th/17th October 2007)
Effectiveness Working Group
Collaborative regulation in the digital economy
Presentation transcript:

© Copyright Ovum The role of the BTA and competition law A presentation to the Stakeholders’ Forum on further liberalisation David Lewin 2nd February 2005

© Copyright Ovum Challenges for the BTA Challenges of full liberalisation  ensure profit maximising industry co- operates in Government’s ICT policy  resolve disputes between a growing number of players  distinguish in a transparent way between markets which are competitive and those which require regulation  issue more licences  continue to empower and protect consumers Challenges of full liberalisation  ensure profit maximising industry co- operates in Government’s ICT policy  resolve disputes between a growing number of players  distinguish in a transparent way between markets which are competitive and those which require regulation  issue more licences  continue to empower and protect consumers A changing role for the BTA. So important to:  articulate the guiding principles which the BTA will follow  focus efforts on the key functions required for effective competition

© Copyright Ovum Three possible principles to follow  Continue to provide independent and predictable regulation:  needed to attract the new investment required for further liberalisation to be successful  ensure the amendment to the Telecommunications Act is interpreted in a way which does not deter outside investors  transparent consultation and decision making processes are central to implementing this principle  Implement proportionate measures:  benefits of any regulation should outweigh the costs  especially important in a small market like Botswana given:  costs of regulation are largely fixed  benefits often proportionate to the market size  Forbear from regulation wherever possible:  market mechanisms should determine supply conditions where possible  focus regulation on correcting market failure rather than managing the market for particular outcomes  follow infrastructure based competition policy in first three years of full liberalisation

© Copyright Ovum Key roles for the BTA - consumers and licensing  Consumer protection and empowerment:  continue to check service providers before licensing  focus on informing consumers rather than restricting service providers  do not regulate QoS for consumers but let them make an informed choice  develop measures for VoIP - but keep them to a minimum  Licensing:  continue to check service providers before licensing  move to a standard licence for service providers and individual licences for the three main incumbents  rationalise the licence fee structure to avoid distorting competition

© Copyright Ovum Key roles for the BTA - price control  Refrain from retail price controls where possible and let service providers experiment with prices and price structures to grow the market  Develop an explicit and transparent process to decide where price control is needed  At retail level impose price controls in markets which are not effectively competitive:  on BTC’s basic national and local services  on leased lines on most routes outside the Gaborone to Francistown corridor  monitor retail prices in the mobile markets but no price control  At the wholesale level regulate prices of non replicable bottleneck facilities and services:  all call termination services  BTC's wholesale leased line prices on low volume routes  BTC’s (or Botswana International’s) international wholesale services in medium term

© Copyright Ovum Key roles for the BTA - other  Effective and flexible spectrum management is of central importance to success of full liberalisation:  microwave links, FWA, PMR, 3rd mobile  beyond study terms of reference to make recommendations in this area  Important for BTA to ensure that spectrum pricing study has right terms of reference  Review infrastructure based competition policy:  give it three years  review progress and, if necessary, consider imposing service based measures on BTC eg carrier selection  Collect, collate and publish more information on telecoms markets of Botswana to enable potential investors to evaluate decisions with confidence

Level 3The role of competition law © Copyright Ovum

© Copyright Ovum Sector specific regulation and competition law Sector specific regulation  Telecoms sector specific applied by the BTA  Ex ante regulation  Put in place to stop the possibility of a dominant operator acting in an anti competitive manner Competition law  Applies to all industries  Ex post regulation - remedies applied after anti competitive conduct has taken place  Punitive fines act to deter anti competitive behaviour  Applies only to dominant operators  The two sets of regulations function in parallel  So it is important to produce consistent outcomes  The two sets of regulations function in parallel  So it is important to produce consistent outcomes

© Copyright Ovum Use of competition law in telecoms - 1  Ex-ante regulation: BTA sets rule in advance to ensure effective competition in the industry  Ex-post regulation: the competent authority rules on complaints that an operator with a dominant position in a market has engaged in anti-competitive behaviour  Ex-ante regulation: BTA sets rule in advance to ensure effective competition in the industry  Ex-post regulation: the competent authority rules on complaints that an operator with a dominant position in a market has engaged in anti-competitive behaviour  Ministry of Trade and Industry is in process of enacting a competition law to:  apply ex post competition regulation across all industries  establish a national competition authority (NCA)  So competition law and ex ante sector specific regulation will operate in parallel  Who should resolve competition law disputes in the telecoms sector?  How do the authorities concerned ensure consistent outcomes from the two processes?

© Copyright Ovum Use of competition law in telecoms - 2  Who should resolve competition law disputes in the telecoms sector - the BTA or the NCA?  BTA would help ensure consistency of outcome between ex ante and ex post rulings and expert analysis of problems  NCA would help ensure consistency of outcome across all industries and reduce danger of “cross contamination” of the two processes  How do the authorities concerned ensure consistent outcomes from the two processes?  need for common approach to definition of markets and assessment of dominance  need for regular informal contacts between the two organisations  We recommend that the NCA resolves competition law disputes with expert advice of the BTA:  works in South Africa and Sweden  support of BTC and Mascom  We recommend that the BTA and NCA should develop a joint approach on working together  We recommend that the NCA resolves competition law disputes with expert advice of the BTA:  works in South Africa and Sweden  support of BTC and Mascom  We recommend that the BTA and NCA should develop a joint approach on working together

Level 3Thank you © Copyright Ovum