Module 7 Slide 1 NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION REGULATORY PRACTICES WORKSHOP - 2006 MODULE: 7 Enforcement.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 independent external review by Lord Hunt of Wirral UK Financial Ombudsman Service David Thomas corporate director and principal ombudsman.
Advertisements

Transparency and Domestic Regulation Mina Mashayekhi Division on International Trade UNCTAD.
1 ELİG Attorneys at Law ICN Plenary V: Case resolution methods and factors for effectively choosing them Gönenç Gürkaynak, LL.M., Esq.
1 ITU Interconnection Workshop 17 August 2001 Role of the Regulator K S Wong Office of the Telecommunications Authority Hong Kong, China.
Purdue University is an Equal Opportunity/Equal Access institution. Getting To Compliance The goal is compliance, not punishment.
BIE SPECIAL EDUCATION ACADEMY PRESENTERS: JUDY WILEY AND NARCY KAWON I ntroduction to Procedural Safeguards Bureau of Indian Education.
Dispute Resolution Under the Congressional Accountability Act
Alabama Real Estate License Law & The REALTORS Code of Ethics
The 10 Golden Rules in Managing Complaints & Discipline.
Civil Administrative Enforcement of Environmental Laws.
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Dispute Settlement and Effective Enforcement of IP.
NARUC/NIGERIA REGULATORY PARTNERSHIP Peer Review Presented by Elijah Abinah Assistant Director Public Utilities Division Arizona Corporation Commission.
F L O R I D A D E P A R T M E N T O F B U S I N E S S A N D P R O F E S S I O N A L R E G U L A T I O N Division of Regulation Complaint Process Division.
Project on Competition Law Enforcement and Governance: Comparative Institutions: SOUTH AFRICA Dennis Davis and Lara Granville.
The Adjudication Process Virginia Department of Health Professions New Board Member Training October 2008.
Litigation and Alternatives for Settling Civil Disputes CHAPTER FIVE.
Professor Vicki Waye Law School Division of Business UniSA
Business and Its Legal Environment (Mgmt 246) Alternative Dispute Resolution (Chapter 3) Professor Charles H. Smith Fall 2010.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 17 Administrativ e Law.
DISPUTE RESOLUTION METHODS
Dispute Resolution Methods
Simple, Effective, Transparent Regulation: Best Practices in OECD countries Cesar Cordova-Novion Deputy Head of Programme Regulatory Reform, OECD.
Per Anders Eriksson
© 2004 West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning 1 Chapter 43 Administrative Law Chapter 43 Administrative Law.
Water Users’ Workshop – Session March 2007 Dixie Center – St. George, Utah Water Users’ Workshop – Session March 2007 Dixie Center – St.
WTO FORUM: ARTICLE 25 OF THE DSU Christian Albanesi Managing Counsel ICC International Court of Arbitration.
Enforcement at the Israel Securities Authority: from Criminal to Administrative Dr. Zvi Gabbay, Adv.
Module 7 Slide 1 NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION REGULATORY PRACTICES WORKSHOP MODULE: 3 Compliance Promotion & Monitoring.
 Administrative law is created by administrative agencies which regulate many areas of our government, community, and businesses.  A significant cost.
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license.
NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION REGULATORY PRACTICES WORKSHOP MODULE: 4 INVESTIGATION.
Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc. Business Law in Canada, 7/e, Chapter 2 Business Law in Canada, 7/e Chapter 2 The Resolution of Disputes.
Foundations of Effective Board Operation Nicole L. Mace Vermont School Boards Association.
ASSESSMENT TASK 5 PRESENTATION ON : THE LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. THE LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. THE LEVEL OF THE STAKEHOLDER. THE LEVEL OF THE STAKEHOLDER.
EPA’s ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUDICATION SYSTEM Environmental Appeals Board U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Kathie A. Stein, Judge.
Neutral Confidentiality DON ADR Program Office NOTE: These slides are just an overview and not intended as legal advice. People seeking legal advice on.
Third Party Alternative Dispute Resolution. Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)?  It involves the application of theories, procedures, and skills designed.
Module 2 Slide 1 NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION REGULATORY PRACTICES WORKSHOP MODULE: 2 A The Independent Regulator.
Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman Provides free, independent, just, informal and speedy resolution of complaints about telephone and Internet access.
CReCER Meeting Managua 2012 Bruce Overton, Assistant Director Office of International Affairs.
Chapter 3 Judicial, Alternative, and E-Dispute Resolution
Avoid Disputes, Not Complaints Presented by: Stuart Ayres and Derek Pullen Stuart Ayres, Scheme Manager Derek Pullen, Scheme Adjudicator.
Chapter #07 Labor or work Discipline. Article 90 : Procedures for application of labor discipline Employees shall be obliged to follow the labor discipline.
1 Resolving Special Education Disputes Understanding When and How to Use the New Procedural Safeguard System Education Law Center November 28,
VCE Legal Studies: Evaluating the role of the court as a law-maker
Resolution of Conflicts, Options under Mexican and Chinese Laws
Mediation with the Information Commissioner’s Office Cory Martinson Appeals and Policy Analyst 25 November 2009.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
Transport Canada Marine Safety’s Compliance and Enforcement Program.
1 Eleventh National HIPAA Summit The New HIPAA Enforcement Rule Gerald “Jud” E. DeLoss, Esq. General Counsel Fairmont Orthopedics & Sports Medicine, P.A.
An Scoil Dli, UCDUCD School of Law Decision Making in the Context of the Administrative Sanctions Procedure A programme for Inquiry Members of the Financial.
1 Consumer Protection & Anti- competitive conduct in Telecommunications Part V & Part XIB of the Trade Practices Act 1974 Australian Communications and.
Washington State Collection Agency Board: Regulatory Process Grace Hamilton, Investigator Department of Licensing – Collection Agency Board Complaint Process.
Fall  Alternative Enforcement : The City of Mankato has established an Administrative Enforcement and Hearing Program as an enforcement option.
Bylaw Enforcement: Best Practices Guide for Local Governments Presentation to Southern Interior Local Government Association Conference, Kelowna, BC April.
AN OVERVIEW OF ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR) MECHANISMS BY MUENI MUTUNGA.
Many slides Copyright © 2008 by Delmar Learning
Presentation to the National Council of Provinces on Financial Sector Regulation Bill “Impact on Voluntary Ombuds” 14 February 2017.
BAR Independent Alternative Dispute Resolution
Chapter 6 Administrative Law
Introduction to law Business & Commercial Law 2014
Principles of Administrative Law <Instructor Name>
Whistleblower Program
SIMAD UNIVERSITY Keyd abdirahman salaad.
Essentials of the legal environment today, 5e
Neutral Confidentiality
Regulation and Procedures of Interconnection
Chapter 3 Judicial, Alternative, and E-Dispute Resolution
What are a parent’s options when they and the school disagree?
Presentation transcript:

Module 7 Slide 1 NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION REGULATORY PRACTICES WORKSHOP MODULE: 7 Enforcement

Module 7 Slide 2 NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION REGULATORY PRACTICES WORKSHOP Topic 1 - Principles and Procedures Critical Questions 1. What is enforcement in the context of a deregulated telecommunications regime? 2. Why is an enforcement regime needed? 3. What are the features of an effective enforcement regime? Module 7 – Pages 7-8

Module 7 Slide 3 NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION REGULATORY PRACTICES WORKSHOP Enforcement Principles Fair A system that is perceived as fair would abide the regulators decisions. A system that is perceived as unfair creates uncertainty leading to reduced investment. Transparency creates certainty with known procedures. Commercial confidentiality is essential. Module 7 – Page 9

Module 7 Slide 4 NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION REGULATORY PRACTICES WORKSHOP Enforcement Principles Fast Prompt decisions allow companies to continue with their business plans. Swift decisions and timely penalties deter future violations. Pre- established deadlines keep the process moving. Module 7 – Page 10

Module 7 Slide 5 NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION REGULATORY PRACTICES WORKSHOP Enforcement Principles Firm Regulator needs adequate sanction authority to give companies incentives to follow the rules. Penalties must be severe enough to deter violations. Module 7 – Page 10

Module 7 Slide 6 NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION REGULATORY PRACTICES WORKSHOP Enforcement Principles Flexible Regulator needs a range of tools with more than just formal litigation to resolve enforcement. Compliance not punishment Module 7 – Page 10

Module 7 Slide 7 NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION REGULATORY PRACTICES WORKSHOP Enforcement Principles Purpose of Enforcement is to ensure Compliance NOT punishment

Module 7 Slide 8 NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION REGULATORY PRACTICES WORKSHOP Independent Regulator Requires: The power to investigate the actions and records of all telecommunications providers. The authority to impose sanctions and penalties for violation of regulations with authority based in law. Module 7 – Page 11

Module 7 Slide 9 NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION REGULATORY PRACTICES WORKSHOP Enforcement Procedures Procedures should take account of: The principles of fast, fair, firm and flexible Fit the economy’s legal system to make the process familiar and to facilitate the appeals process Ensure procedures are clear and well defined That each step in the process has a clear timeline Module 7 – Page 11

Module 7 Slide 10 NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION REGULATORY PRACTICES WORKSHOP Enforcement Procedures The enforcement regime must provide for: 1. Regulator-initiated investigation 2. Consumer’s complaints 3. Carrier complaints against other carriers 4. A mechanism for the outcome to be appealed. 5. Alternative dispute resolution options Module 7 – Page 11

Module 7 Slide 11 NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION REGULATORY PRACTICES WORKSHOP Enforcement Procedures Discussion points Are these enforcement features in use in your country? Which are not? List three features that are working well and three that need improvement How could improvements be made? Module 7 – Page 12

Module 7 Slide 12 NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION REGULATORY PRACTICES WORKSHOP Topic 2 – Applying Procedures Three types of complaint Regulator Initiated Investigations Consumer Complaints Carrier to carrier Complaints Module 7 – Page 14

Module 7 Slide 13 NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION REGULATORY PRACTICES WORKSHOP Tools for Gathering Information Letter of Inquiry Inspections Legal Order Module 7 – Pages 15-16

Module 7 Slide 14 NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION REGULATORY PRACTICES WORKSHOP Penalties Module 7 – Page 17

Module 7 Slide 15 NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION REGULATORY PRACTICES WORKSHOP Penalties Warnings Violation Notice Order to cease non-compliance Fines Seizure Licence revocation Criminal Proceedings Module 7 – Pages 17-20

Module 7 Slide 16 NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION REGULATORY PRACTICES WORKSHOP Case Study Regulator Initiated Investigation How effective the ACCC was in applying the principles of fast, firmness, fairness and flexibility in its enforcement approach? Did the actions taken matched the violation? List 2 suggestions to improve the ACCC approach

Module 7 Slide 17 NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION REGULATORY PRACTICES WORKSHOP Features of a Complaints Process Resolved quickly Simple and inexpensive Do not require an attorney The regulator keeps statistics of informal complaints A pattern of complaints can initiate an investigation Ombudsman - another option

Module 7 Slide 18 NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION REGULATORY PRACTICES WORKSHOP Managing Customer Complaints Consumer letter initiates complaint The regulator sends letter to the carrier Voluntary “satisfaction” by the carrier is most common resolution. The complainant can file a formal complaint. Carriers don’t ignore a consumer complaint, because the regulator can pursue it on its own motion. Module 7 – Page 20

Module 7 Slide 19 NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION REGULATORY PRACTICES WORKSHOP Features of a Complaints Process Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman (TIO) – Australia Set up under the Telecommunications Act & totally independent from government, regulator and operators Funded by industry, had 1043 members in 2003/2004, fixed line & mobile operators and internet service providers Budget of $A 6.6 for 2003/2004 with 65 staff. Received 76,000 customer complaints in same year from a base of 32 million customers

Module 7 Slide 20 NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION REGULATORY PRACTICES WORKSHOP Customer Complaint - Case Study Discussion points The adequacy of the response? Was the outcome reasonable for the customer in this instance?

Module 7 Slide 21 NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION REGULATORY PRACTICES WORKSHOP Managing Carrier to Carrier Complaints Upon receipt of complaint, the regulator determines if it complies with the lodgment rules. If the complaint complies it is forwarded to the carrier, who must file an answer. The defendant is permitted to file an answer responding to the allegations in the complaint. Module 7 – Page 30

Module 7 Slide 22 NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION REGULATORY PRACTICES WORKSHOP Carrier to Carrier Complaints Process Features Detailed rules and timelines Complainant fully informs the regulator of the law or rules allegedly violated Complainant needs to establish violation with evidence The regulator does not gather information; it is an adjudicator Decisions serve as precedent Module 7 – Page 31

Module 7 Slide 23 NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION REGULATORY PRACTICES WORKSHOP Carrier to Carrier Complaints Process Discussion points List the features of the Carrier to Carrier complaints process that works well? Also list those you believe are not working so well Describe the possible difficulties for a regulator to be independent from an incumbent operator in these kind of complaints Module 7 – Page 32

Module 7 Slide 24 NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION REGULATORY PRACTICES WORKSHOP Topic 3 – Appeals Features Decisions by regulator’s staff - appealed to the head regulator Decisions by head regulator - appellant requests regulator to reconsider Parties not be able to raise new arguments Next step appeals to next in the hierarchy – court system or Ministry. Appeals consistent with court system: no multiply avenues for appeal Module 7 – Pages 33-34

Module 7 Slide 25 NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION REGULATORY PRACTICES WORKSHOP Customer Complaint - Case Study Discussion points What are the appeals processes that operate in an economy you know? How well are these working? What could be improved

Module 7 Slide 26 NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION REGULATORY PRACTICES WORKSHOP Appeals - Case Study In small groups consider and comment on : The adequacy of the appeals provisions in Hong Kong China

Module 7 Slide 27 NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION REGULATORY PRACTICES WORKSHOP Alternative Dispute Resolution Mediation Private settlements

Module 7 Slide 28 NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION REGULATORY PRACTICES WORKSHOP Mediation Process Features Carriers exchange letters Regulator’s staff meets with both sides Regulator would find areas of agreement Disputes resolved quickly It narrows the issues in dispute Some cases reflect the unequal power of the parties

Module 7 Slide 29 NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION REGULATORY PRACTICES WORKSHOP Aggravating and Mitigating Factors Aggravating Penalties or judgments could be harsher Violation resulted in injury to persons, property, business Previous history of violations Mitigating Discovered the violation before it was reported and acted Voluntarily disclosed the contravention to the regulator

Module 7 Slide 30 NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION REGULATORY PRACTICES WORKSHOP Appeals practices in APEC economies Discussion Point In the Case Studies from Japan, United States, Korea and Singapore Identify the escalation processes, and any Alternative dispute resolution processes