Missouri State Online Academic Integrity Week October 6, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Providing Evidence of Academic Integrity and Student Authentication in Online Courses and Programs Matthew Prineas, UMUC Elizabeth Mulherrin, UMUC.
Advertisements

Service to Leadership Freshmen Orientation Assessment Service to Leadership Professional Development Training August 14, 2012 Agriculture Research Complex.
1 Distance Learning College Action Project UPDATE – September 22, 2011 Presented by: Eric Kunnen, M.A. Director, Distance Learning and Instructional Technologies.
Distance Learning Environments Definition Motivating Factors Grades vs. Learning Expectations of Institutions and Faculty.
Why do students cheat? How do they cheat? How has cheating changed since distance education came into being? Academic integrity is of particular interest.
On Line Comparability Panel Williamsburg, VA May 16-19, 2011.
Chaos and Disruption: Breaking the Mold of Online Learning Indian River State College Quality Matters Degree Initiative.
Introduction to Psychology: Northern Arizona University Fully implemented, 2009  2000/year foundational, survey-style class  Traditionally, 8-11 uncoordinated.
College of Education Graduate Programs Portfolio Workshop.
Dallas Baptist University College of Education Graduate Programs
Assessment in Online Courses: Practical Examples Ms. Darla Runyon Dr. Roger Von Holzen Northwest Missouri State University.
Pace/NACTEL Online Testing FIPSE Learning Anytime Anywhere Partnership (LAAP) Grantee David Sachs – Co-Director of NACTEL Program Nancy Hale.
DIXIE STATE UNIVERSITY FACULTY IMPACT ON RETENTION David Roos, Ed.D. Executive Director, Enrollment Management *
Summer Online Courses A Distance Learning Alternative for Traditional Campuses North East Regional Computing Program Annual Conference (NERCOMP) Boston.
Cumberland County: May 28 Oak Ridge: June 2 Roane County: June 4 Scott: June 4 Campbell: June 9 Knox: June 10 Loudon: June 11.
Establishing a Distance Learning Framework for the Institution (Part II) Sali Kaceli Director, Educational Technology and Distance Learning Cairn University.
The Effectiveness of Student Authentication and Student Authenticity in Online Learning at Community Colleges Mitra Hoshiar Los Angeles Pierce College.
METHODS Study Population Study Population: 224 students enrolled in a 3-credit hour, undergraduate, clinical pharmacology course in Fall 2005 and Spring.
Presented by: Dr. Kip Kristine Leland Online Learning: Overcoming Challenges; Exploring Possibilities.
Pre-Advanced Placement Tricia Renner, Director of State and Legislative Outreach, Midwest Region Deana Rainey, Teacher Monroe Middle School Omaha, Nebraska.
Evidence Based Teaching Strategy: Applied to Student Orientation
Instructional Design F LORIDA A TLANTIC U NIVERSITY.
Authenticating Online Students: Practically Speaking Patricia James October 15, 2013 For audio call Toll Free and use PIN/code
An Online Learning Case Study Board of Governors Distance Learning Workshop March 23, 2011 Dr. Joel L. Hartman, Vice Provost & CIO University of Central.
Engineering Education Conference - Spring 2009 Increasing Assessment Effectiveness in a Time of Decreasing Budgets Increasing Assessment Effectiveness.
UNC ONLINE OVERVIEW Faculty Assembly – 3/25/2011.
Where Innovation Is Tradition Students as Scholars : QEP Update Fall 2010 Kimberly K. Eby Bethany M. Usher QEP Planning Committee.
ELearning Update March 12, National Trends Approximately 1.9 million students were studying online in the fall of 2003 In 2009, 11.9 million students.
Learners’ Attitudes and Perceptions of Online Instruction Presented by: Dr. Karen S. Ivers Dr. JoAnn Carter-Wells Dr. Joyce Lee California State University.
QUALITY MANAGEMENT AS A TOOL FOR QUALITY CULTURE EMBEDMENT: VILNIUS UNIVERSITY APPROACH Inga Milisiunaite, Roma Adomaitiene, Juozas Galginatis Vilnius.
Understanding Student Expectations & Effective Teaching Presented by: Dr. Laura Marler Associate Professor of Management College of Business Mississippi.
Orientation to the Engineering Education System.  Organization of engineering education  Community college role in engineering education  The engineering.
Student success is the first priority. Increasing Student Response Rates Presenters  Magaly Tymms, Associate Director, Academic Effectiveness and Assessment.
The Redesigned Elements of Statistics Course University of West Florida March 2008.
Academic Integrity at Brandeis Erika Lamarre Director of Academic Integrity The policies Education and Prevention Reporting an incident.
Dealing with Cheating and Plagiarism in Online Classes Ms. Darla Runyon Dr. Roger Von Holzen Northwest Missouri State University
Review of University Policies and Procedures Academic Regulations.
STARTALK: Our mission, accomplishments and direction ILR November 12, 2010.
ELearning Committee Strategic Plan, A Brief History of the ELC Committee Developed and Charged (2004) CMS Evaluation and RFP Process (2004)
Assessment of Student Performance in Online Courses: Paradigm and Praxis NEMAH N. HERMOSA University of the Philippines 30 July.
College of Education Graduate Programs
LAS Online: Reinventing the Academic Enterprise Jim Witte Applied Technologies for Learning in the Arts & Sciences, College of Liberal Arts & Sciences,
Testing Engine Saint Leo University Center for Online Learning Dr. Deborah Pendarvis Saint Leo University.
Knowing Our Students, and Helping Them Succeed. 54.8% Latino Students (38.8% college-wide) 67.6% Female v. 32.4% Male (61.4% v. 38.6% college-wide) Average.
T EXAS A & M U NIVERSITY Mechanical Engineering Master of Mechanical Engineering.
Assessing Distance Learners at Texas Tech University West Texas Assessment Conference Jennifer Hughes, M.S. Director, Office of Planning and Assessment.
PRESENTER: Deb Sullivan Ford. AVC2CSU is a proposed comprehensive cohort pathway program intended to allow students pursuing select AS-T and AA-T degrees.
Developing, Funding, and Managing University Centers Presentation by Doug Day Deputy Director for Policy Studies Illinois Board of Higher Education SHEEO.
Academic Honor Policy Survey Results Amy Guerette, Jennifer Buchanan and Ann DelRossi On behalf of the Academic Honor Policy Committee.
Presentation to Adjunct Faculty (AF) Members By Academic Affairs August 16 th, 2012 Dr. Braha Dr. Kehe MEET AND CONFER POLICY MEETING 1.
Inside Online Service-Learning: Students’ Perspectives Nicole Peterson, M.S. Student, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Megan DuFrane, M.S. Student, University.
From the Mountains to the Prairies: A National Online Model for Training Field Instructors Diane Casey Crowley, MSW, LCSW Kristina Whiton-O’Brien, MSW,
Academic Honor Policy and Grade Appeals System Ann DelRossi, Academic Affairs Administrator Office of the Vice President for Faculty Development and Advancement.
Chapter 1 Assessment in Elementary and Secondary Classrooms
What Is This Intentional Learning Thing?
Academic Honor Policy and Grade Appeals System
Perceptions of Online Education
Market Development and Academic Quality in Online Higher Education
IST World Campus Update 2/4 IST WC
Taia L.C. Reid, Assistant Director of the Peer Educator Program
ACADEMIC INTEGRITY TASK FORCE
University of St. Francis
MGT 3823: Responsible leadership
Academic Integrity in Online Assessment
Cheating in Online Classes: How Concerned Should We Be?
Student Accessibility Services Getting You Started
Online Instruction Implementation and pedagogical dimensions of online instruction within the context of purpose William C. Rivenbark Professor and MPA.
Orientation to the Engineering Education System
Adjunct, newbies, and non-tenure track faculty – oh my!
Orientation to the Engineering Education System
Presentation transcript:

Missouri State Online Academic Integrity Week October 6, 2009

Missouri State Online 2 Academic Integrity Week Missouri State Online and Instructional Technologies Presents: “Changing the Culture from Online Cheating to Online Learning.”

Missouri State Online 3 Panelist Introductions  Dr. Gary Rader, Director for MS Online  Dr. Scott Wegner, Ed.D.  Dr. Julie Anderson-Ituarte, M.S.  Michael Frizell, Director, Writing Center  Shellie Jones, CASL, MSAS Student  Andy Lear, BKD, MSAS Student

Missouri State Online 4 Considerations for Online Academic Integrity Growth in Academic Dishonesty Growth of online courses and enrollments Concern about academic integrity in the online classroom + =

Missouri State Online 5 MSU – online enrollment stats Spring semesters show impressive growth of students taking online classes.

Missouri State Online 6 What Research Shows  Perception: Academic Dishonesty is more prevalent online than face-to-face.  Research: Shows online students are less inclined to cheat  Assessment: Motivated students cheat less  Friends University (2009)

Missouri State Online 7 Forms of Online Academic Dishonesty  Cheating on Tests  Plagiarism  Aiding and Abetting  Friends University Study (2009)

Missouri State Online 8 Detection and Deterrence: The Faculty Perspective Scott Wegner Julie Anderson-Ituarte

Missouri State Online 9 The Student Integrity Profile  Younger rather than older are more inclined to cheat  Early cheating continues through graduate school  Lack of awareness produces cheating  Cultural differences  Friends University Study (2009)

Missouri State Online 10 The Student Perspective Shellie Jones Andy Lear

Missouri State Online 11 Changing the Culture  Proactive faculty from the start  Establish Honor Code – increase student awareness  Inform faculty how academic dishonesty applies to online education  Provide procedures to detect it  Policies to support faculty who detect and pursue instances of academic dishonesty.

Missouri State Online 12 Unintentional Online Plagiarism? Michael Frizell, The Writing Center

Missouri State Online 13 Design Online Exams to Deter Cheating  Open book exams  Timed exams  Scramble the order of questions  Pop quizzes  Non-exam assessments  Proctored exams

Missouri State Online 14 The Non-Exam Option Reduce cheating by changing the “culture” Are there alternative non-exam options for all subjects?  Motivating student learning through alternative pedagogies (the discussion forum)  Assessing student learning through critical thinking  Stimulating student motivation to learn and assess learning outcomes  Providing autonomy with structure, relatedness and competency  Empowering students to engage in the learning process

Missouri State Online 15 The Proctored Option  University of Connecticut (2008) study reveals online, un-proctored multiple choice exams suffer more from cheating than supervised multiple choice exams.  Various technologies to reduce cheating are expensive and less than satisfactory.  Higher Education Opportunity Act (2008) addresses authentication concerns.  Test Proctoring provides another good alternative for supervising traditional test-taking and authenticating student identities.

Missouri State Online 16 P ILOT P ROJECT

Missouri State Online 17 MS Online Test Proctoring Pilot Project - Summer 2009 Purpose of the pilot is to provide:  F2F supervised alternative to online testing without sacrificing distance convenience and modality.  Additional means for “authentication.”  Instrument to prevent cheating online.  Student/faculty support infrastructure for HLC approval to offer online degrees.

Missouri State Online 18 MS Online Test Proctoring Narrative  Selection of Pilot Subjects SPE 506/507  Number of students  Initial costs in time and resources  Policies and Procedures  Dealing with off campus testing  Administration of exams and reporting of results Julie Anderson-Ituarte Aundrayah Shermer

Missouri State Online 19 Test Proctoring Schedule Proctor Acknowledgement

Missouri State Online 20 Proctor Verification

Missouri State Online 21 Outcomes  Summary and Conclusion  Student satisfaction  Faculty satisfaction  Pilot did not measure reduction of cheating  Pilot set up to address concerns for potential cheating

Missouri State Online 22 Future Steps  Repeat the process in the fall of  Employ feedback from summer results.  Utilize assessment tools to measure learning outcomes in online courses with proctored and un-proctored objective exams.  Design courses with alternatives to traditional concepts of test taking.  Provide proctored testing for subject areas where objective exams are necessary to discourage cheating.

Missouri State Online 23 A&Q

Missouri State Online 24 Contact Information Missouri State Online Kenneth E. Meyer Alumni Center 300 S. Jefferson (417)