Contemporary Questions in Project Monitoring and Evaluation By Maiwada Zubairu Snr. M & E Specialist NMEMS II BROWN BAG FORUM (BBF)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Il Project Cycle Management :A Technical Guide The Logical Framework Approach 1 1.
Advertisements

The Aged Care Standards and Accreditation Agency Ltd Continuous Improvement in Residential Aged Care.
Donald T. Simeon Caribbean Health Research Council
OECD/INFE High-level Principles for the evaluation of financial education programmes Adele Atkinson, PhD OECD With the support of the Russian/World Bank/OECD.
Prepared by BSP/PMR Results-Based Programming, Management and Monitoring Presentation to Geneva Group - Paris Hans d’Orville Director, Bureau of Strategic.
SMART: Developing Effective Goals and Objectives Presented by Barry Nagle Evaluation and Action Research Associates (EARA) Fairfax, VA March 2009.
Lesson 2: Project: Evaluation, Monitoring, Auditing Macerata, 22 nd October Alessandro Valenza, Director, t33 srl.
Results-Based Management: Logical Framework Approach
Module 1: Key concepts in data demand & use
Challenge Questions How good is our operational management?
Project Management Tools
Progress report from work of GECES Sub-group on Social Impact Measurement – 6 June 2013 Rapporteur: Lisa Hehenberger Research Director, European Venture.
Submission Writing Fundamentals – Part Webinar Series Leonie Bryen.
CASE STUDIES IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Dr. G. Johnson, Program Evaluation and the Logic Model Research Methods for Public Administrators Dr. Gail Johnson.
Monitoring Evaluation Impact Assessment Objectives Be able to n explain basic monitoring and evaluation theory in relation to accountability n Identify.
SESSION ONE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT & APPRAISALS.
CONCEPT PAPER RESULT BASED PLANNING. RESULT-ORIENTED PLANNING Overall Objective/ Goal Specific Objective/ Purposes Expected Result/ Output Activities.
This project is funded by the EUAnd implemented by a consortium led by MWH Logical Framework and Indicators.
Engineering, Operations & Technology | Information TechnologyAPEX | 1 Copyright © 2009 Boeing. All rights reserved. Architecture Concept UG D- DOC UG D-
Sociology 3322a. “…the systematic assessment of the operation and/or outcomes of a program or policy, compared to a set of explicit or implicit standards.
Project “Ex-ante evaluation of programming documents and strengthening evaluation capacity for EU funds post-accession” (EUROPAID/130401/D/SER/HR) Project.
1 Introduction to Evaluating the Minnesota Demonstration Program Paint Product Stewardship Initiative September 19, 2007 Seattle, WA Matt Keene, Evaluation.
Managing staff development Chris Schiller Thursday 31 July 2014.
KEYWORDS REFRESHMENT. Activities: in the context of the Logframe Matrix, these are the actions (tasks) that have to be taken to produce results Analysis.
Comp 20 - Training & Instructional Design Unit 6 - Assessment This material was developed by Columbia University, funded by the Department of Health and.
IAOD Evaluation Section, the Development Agenda (DA) and Development Oriented Activities Julia Flores Marfetan, Senior Evaluator.
Software Engineering Saeed Akhtar The University of Lahore Lecture 8 Originally shared for: mashhoood.webs.com.
What is a Process? A logically related set of tasks performed to achieve a defined business outcome. A structured, measured set of activities designed.
Promising Ideas and Issues to Consider in Reaching Reading and Literacy Goals Logistics of supervision, training, support to teachers Sakil Malik Director.
Monitoring & Evaluation: The concepts and meaning Day 9 Session 1.
The Development of BPR Pertemuan 6 Matakuliah: M0734-Business Process Reenginering Tahun: 2010.
D1.HRD.CL9.06 D1.HHR.CL8.07 D2.TRD.CL8.09 Slide 1.
EVALUATION OF HRD PROGRAMS Jayendra Rimal. The Purpose of HRD Evaluation HRD Evaluation – the systematic collection of descriptive and judgmental information.
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Participatory Planning Project Cycle Management (PCM)
Project Management Learning Program 7-18 May 2012, Mekong Institute, Khon Kaen, Thailand Writing Project Report Multi-Purpose Reporting.
THIS PRESENTATION IS INTENDED AS ONE COMPLETE PRESENTATION. HOWEVER, IT IS DIVIDED INTO 3 PARTS IN ORDER TO FACILITATE EASIER DOWNLOADING AND VIEWING,
Project Management Learning Program 23 Mar – 3 Aprl 2009, Mekong Institute, Khon Kaen, Thailand Managing for Development Results Results-Oriented Monitoring.
Tracking national portfolios and assessing results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in West and Central Africa June 2008, Douala, Cameroon.
Project management Topic 1 Project management principles.
Evaluation and Designing
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
Strategic Planning Crossing the ICT Bridge Project Trainers: Lynne Gibb Sally Dusting-Laird.
Changing the way the New Zealand Aid Programme monitors and evaluates its Aid Ingrid van Aalst Principal Evaluation Manager Development Strategy & Effectiveness.
IT Leading the Way to Institutional Effectiveness Presenter: Kendell Rice, Ph.D. July 11, 2007.
IDEV 624 – Monitoring and Evaluation Evaluating Program Outcomes Elke de Buhr, PhD Payson Center for International Development Tulane University.
CHAPTER 16 Preparing Effective Proposals. PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATIONS  Conducting a Preliminary Assessment  Prior to Writing the Proposal  How Fundable.
Logical Framework Approach An Evaluation Toolbox Presentation
CAPA in Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services An independent evaluation by the Mental Health Foundation 2009 National CAMHS Support Service.
SUMMARY Macerata, 8 th April Andrea Gramillano, t33 srl.
P3 Business Analysis. 2 Section F: Project Management F1.The nature of projects F2. Building the Business Case F4. Planning,monitoring and controlling.
Assessment/Evaluation Make evaluation a central part of planning – not an afterthought 1) Determine Needs 2) Determine Desired Outcomes 3) Determine Activities.
Identifying Monitoring Questions from your Program Logic.
Developing a Monitoring & Evaluation Plan MEASURE Evaluation.
The International Society for Quality in Health Care (ISQua) – Guidelines.
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS organizations in Papua New Guinea Day 4. Session 10. Evaluation.
Benefits Map Using this Template
Gender-Sensitive Monitoring and Evaluation
Gender-Sensitive Monitoring and Evaluation
Strategic Planning for Learning Organizations
Prepared by BSP/PMR Results-Based Programming, Management and Monitoring Presentation to Geneva Group - Paris Hans d’Orville Director, Bureau of Strategic.
Chapter 6 Project Management and Project Cycle Management.
مديريت كارورزي پزشكي اجتماعي.
ALINGMENT OF PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT 2014 – 2020 FUNDS WITH MACRO-REGIONAL STRATEGIES IOANNIS FIRBAS General Director National Coordination Authority – PA.
Project Management Tools
Introduction to CPD Quality Assurance
Resources Program Activities Outputs Outcomes Impact Assessment +
OGB Partner Advocacy Workshop 18th & 19th March 2010
Presentation transcript:

Contemporary Questions in Project Monitoring and Evaluation By Maiwada Zubairu Snr. M & E Specialist NMEMS II BROWN BAG FORUM (BBF)

2

Defining a Project

Program Vs Project: What is the difference? A program is a group of related projects managed in a coordinated way to obtain benefits not available from managing projects individually. A Project is a temporary undertaking to create a unique product or service.

The Project Cycle

Defining a Project….. What is the concern? It is what leads us to believe that ‘something needs to be done’ What is the task? We need to have clarity as to the boundaries of what will be done in terms of time, money and people.

What is the purpose of the project? The benefit of addressing the concern Who is the end user? This identifies who will make use of the project outcomes.

What will be the end result? This is the ‘when’ and the ‘what’; the tangible things that the successful project will deliver. We need to specify the end result and judge whether it’s congruent with the concern, task and purpose.

What are the success criteria? These are the things which are measurable and enable us to demonstrate that the project has achieved its intended outcomes and been conducted within the resources intended. The quality/quantity of the outputs and to whether we kept to time and budget, and to the outcomes achieved and the longer-term impact

TESTING the Concern, Task and Purpose Is the TASK capable of delivering the PURPOSE? If the PURPOSE is achieved will it solve (or largely solve) the CONCERN? If NO to either question then logically (in terms of the project’s own internal validity) the project will FAIL !

Defining M & E ARE WE DOING THE THINGS RIGHT? (MONITORING) ARE WE DOING THE RIGHT THINGS? (EVALUATION)

THREE SIMPLE QUESTIONS to ask BEFORE you start to plan a monitoring or evaluation activity… WHO: are we doing this for? (Funders, Managers, beneficiaries and other key stakeholders? WHAT: is going to be monitored or evaluated? HOW: is the monitoring and evaluation activity to be done?

Three Universal Evaluation Questions Are we doing what we said we would do? [ Internal validity] Are we making any difference? [ Impact Assessment] Are these the right things to do? [Strategic relevance and learning]

Being Clever or Being Wise?

AS PROJECT MANAGERS, AND M & E PROFESSIONALS WE NEED TO BE BOTH WISE AND CLEVER

Concluding Remarks

“In the end, the measure of our success will not be predicated on the number of evaluations done, or stored within a database, or even solely upon the quality of the findings. We’ll be successful if and when the evaluation work of USAID contributes to greater development effectiveness” -USAID Administrator, Rajiv Shah

HOW IS THE PROJECT DOING?

References