Caution: Investigational Device. Limited by Federal (USA) Law to investigational use. AMEthyst The AMEthyst Trial A prospective randomized controlled study.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ENDEAVOR IV Acronym: ENDEAVOR IV. Lead investigator: Dr Martin Leon from Columbia University, New York Source: Transcatheter cardiovascular Therapeutics,
Advertisements

“Real World”: SVG, De Novo or Restenotic Coronary Artery Lesions Chronic Stable Angina, Silent Ischemia, Acute Coronary Syndromes Vessel Diameters:
Introduction Recent guidelines considered PCI to be a potential alternative to CABG for ULMCA stenosis, based on several large registries and randomized.
Distal Protection: PRIDE, CAPTIVE Symbiot III, AiMI Dr James Cotton MD MRCP Heart and Lung Centre Wolverhampton.
FFR vs Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation
J. Mehilli, MD, G. Richard, F-J. Neumann, S. Massberg, K-L. Laugwitz, J. Pache, J. Hausleiter, I. Ott, M. Fusaro, T. Ibrahim, A. Schömig, A. Kastrati Deutsches.
Randomized Comparison of FFR-guided and Angiography-guided Provisional Stenting for True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: The DKCRUSH-VI trial Shao-Liang.
2 Year Clinical Outcomes from the Pivotal RESOLUTE US Study Laura Mauri MD, MSc on behalf of the RESOLUTE US Investigators Brigham and Women’s Hospital.
Seung-Jung Park, MD, PhD On behalf of the PRECOMBAT Investigators Professor of Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Heart Institute, Asan.
DIABETES trial P Jiménez-Quevedo, M Sabaté, DJ Angiolillo, JA Gómez-Hospital, R Hernández-Antolín, J Goicolea, F Alfonso, C Bañuelos, J Escaned, R Moreno,
Francesco Liistro Cardiovascular Department, Arezzo, Italy Impact of Thrombus Aspiration on Myocardial Tissue Reperfusion and Left Ventricular Functional.
Proximal Protection during Saphenous Vein Graft Intervention using the Proxis™ Embolic Protection System The PROXIMAL Trial Laura Mauri, MD, MSc, FACC,
TITAX AMI Trial Y. Giraud-Sauveur on behalf of P.Karjalainen, MD, PhD : Principal Investigator BCIS 2009 London, UK A Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing.
CPORT- E Trial Randomized trial comparing outcomes of non-primary PCI at hospitals with and without on-site cardiac surgery.
SPIDER Saphenous Vein Graft Protection In a Distal Embolic Protection Randomized Trial Simon R. Dixon MBChB, William W. O’Neill MD William Beaumont Hospital,
ARMYDA-5 (Antiplatelet therapy for Reduction of MYocardial Damage during Angioplasty) Study Prospective, multicenter, randomized trial investigating influence.
As presented by Keith D Dawkins MD FRCP FACC Southampton University Hospital United Kingdom EuroSTAR The European Cobalt Stent with Antiproliferative for.
SIROLIMUS-ELUTING STENTS EFFECTIVELY INHIBIT NEOINTIMAL PROLIFERATION AS COMPARED TO BARE METAL STENTS IN DISEASED SAPHENOUS VEIN GRAFTS: 6-month IVUS.
A Randomized Comparison of Everolimus-­ Eluting Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds vs. Everolimus-Eluting Metallic Stents: One-Year Angiographic and.
TAXUS Landmark Analysis Impact of Long-Term Clopidogrel Usage on Death, Myocardial Infarction and Stent Thrombosis Gregg W. Stone, MD Stephen G. Ellis,
Endeavor Safety: Pooled Analysis of Early and Late Safety of a Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent Laura Mauri, MD, MSc Brigham and Women’s Hospital Harvard Clinical.
Trial Design Issues Associated with Evaluation of Distal Protection Devices in Diseased Saphenous Vein Grafts Bram D. Zuckerman, MD, FACC Medical Officer,
FRONTIER Registry The Guidant MULTI-LINK FRONTIER ™ Coronary Stent System for the Treatment of Pts with Native De Novo or Restenotic Bifurcation Coronary.
Name of the speaker: Germano DiSciascio I have the following potential conflicts of interest to report:  Consulting  Employment in industry  Stockholder.
A Prospective, Randomized Trial Evaluating a Paclitaxel-Eluting Balloon in Patients TReated with Endothelial Progenitor Cell CapTuring Stents for De Novo.
LONG-TERM EVENTS IN SIROLIMUS-ELUTING STENTS: a specific focus on diseased saphenous vein grafts from the randomized DELAYED-RRISC trial Pierfrancesco.
ADMIRALADMIRAL Abciximab before Direct Angioplasty and Stenting in Myocardial Infarction Regarding Acute and Long term follow-up ADMIRAL Study ADMIRAL.
Clinical Experience with the Bio Active Stent (BAS) in FINLAND 9 e CFCI Hotel Meridien Etoile Paris, France 10 Octobre 2007 Pasi Karjalainen, MD, PhD.
Endeavor 4: A Randomized Comparison of a Zotarolimus- Eluting Stent and a Paclitaxel- Eluting Stent in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease Martin B.
Effect of Intravascular Ultrasound- Guided vs. Angiography-Guided Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation: the IVUS-XPL Randomized Clinical Trial Myeong-Ki.
ISAR-CABG Objective To compare the efficacy of DES with BMS in a randomized trial powered for clinical events Sample 610 patients with de novo SVG lesions.
Compare Trial 2 year follow-up Peter Smits Maasstad Ziekenhuis Rotterdam The Netherlands.
For OMA distribution only. © 2014 Medtronic, Inc. All rights reserved DOC_1A 03/14 Four-Year Outcomes Following Resolute Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent.
The SAFER Trial Evaluation of the Clinical Safety and Efficacy of the PercuSurge GuardWire in Saphenous Vein Graft Intervention As presented at TCT 2000.
Ten Year Outcome of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Versus Medical Therapy in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy Results of the Surgical Treatment.
A Prospective, Randomized Trial of a Paclitaxel coated Balloon vs. uncoated Balloon Angioplasty in Patients with Drug- Eluting Stent Restenosis PEPCAD-DES.
Philippe Généreux, MD for the Tryton Bifurcation Trial Investigators Columbia University Medical Center Cardiovascular Research Foundation New York City.
End points in PTCA trials. A successful angioplasty is defined as the reduction of a minimum stenosis diameter to
Final 5 year results from the all-comer COMPARE trial: a prospective randomized comparison between Xience-V and Taxus Liberté TCT 2013 San Francisco Pieter.
Prof. Dr. Sigmund Silber, FESC, FACC On behalf of the RESOLUTE
Background & Study Design
David E. Kandzari, MD on behalf of the BIONICS investigators
Disrupt CAD Study Design
Everolimus-eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: ABSORB III Trial 2-Year Results Stephen G. Ellis, MD,
Disclosures Runlin Gao has received a research grant
Runlin Gao, M.D. On behalf of ABSORB China Investigators
New Generation Resolute Integrity Drug-Eluting Stent Superior to Benchmark Xience Drug-Eluting Stent: Primary Endpoint Results from the PROPEL Study –
on behalf of the ABSORB II Investigators
Final Five-Year Follow-up of the SYNTAX Trial: Optimal Revascularization Strategy in Patients With Three-Vessel Disease and/or Left Main Disease Patrick.
BRANCH Bare Metal BifuRcAtion SteNt Clinical Trial in Humans Early Clinical Experience by Raoul Bonan, MD On behalf of the BRANCH study investigators.
The Tryton Bifurcation Trial:
on behalf of the ABSORB II Investigators
MACE Trial Rationale, Study Design, and Current Status
On behalf of J. Belardi, M. Leon, L. Mauri,
on behalf of the ABSORB II Investigators
Long-term follow-up of the DIABETES I (DIABETes and sirolimus Eluting Stent) trial: P Jiménez-Quevedo, M Sabaté, DJ Angiolillo, JA Gómez-Hospital, R Hernández-Antolín,
3-Year Clinical Outcomes From the RESOLUTE US Study
ENDEAVOR IV: 5 Year Final Outcomes
Incidence and management of restenosis after treatment of unprotected left main disease with drug-eluting stents: 70 restenotic cases from a cohort of.
FOR DISTRIBUTION BY MEDTRONIC OFFICE OF MEDICAL AFFAIRS ONLY.
12-month clinical and 13-month angiographic outcomes from a randomized trial evaluating the Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold vs. metallic drug-eluting.
ENDEAVOR III Multicenter Randomized Trial Clinical/MACE Angio/IVUS
Presented at TCT 2006.
Martin B. Leon, David R. Holmes, Dean J. Kereiakes, Jeffrey J
Maintenance of Long-Term Clinical Benefit with
ISAR-LEFT MAIN: A Randomized Clinical Trial on Drug-Eluting Stents for Unprotected Left Main Lesions J. Mehilli, MD Deutsches Herzzentrum Technische.
ISAR-LEFT MAIN: A Randomized Clinical Trial on Drug-Eluting Stents for Unprotected Left Main Lesions J. Mehilli, MD Deutsches Herzzentrum Technische.
Angioplasty Balloon-associated Coronary Debris and the EZ FilterWire
Comparison of Everolimus-Eluting and Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents: First Report of the Five-Year Clinical Outcomes from.
Atlantic Cardiovascular Patient Outcomes Research Team
Presentation transcript:

Caution: Investigational Device. Limited by Federal (USA) Law to investigational use. AMEthyst The AMEthyst Trial A prospective randomized controlled study of the Medtronic Interceptor® PLUS Coronary Filter System for PCI of Degenerative SVG Dean Kereiakes M. Turco, B, McLaurin, R. Feldman, N. Farhat, J. Breall and M.Foster on behalf of the study investigators Late Breaking Clinical Trial Presentation TCT 2007

Caution: Investigational Device. Limited by Federal (USA) Law to investigational use. AMEthyst Dean J. Kereiakes, M.D., FACC Disclosure: SCIENTIFIC ADVISORY BOARD: Cordis/Johnson & Johnson Boston Scientific Corporation, Inc. Abbott Vascular Core Valve RESEARCH GRANT SUPPORT: Boston Scientific Corporation Inc. Abbott Vascular Medtronic Daiichi Sankyo CONSULTING: Eli Lilly Co. Daiichi Sankyo Medtronic

Caution: Investigational Device. Limited by Federal (USA) Law to investigational use. AMEthyst AMEthyst Medtronic Interceptor PLUS Filter Catheter Study Device Nitinol Filter Basket 71% Open pore area Low profile 2.7 Fr ” wire Actuator handle 100 µ distal pores µ proximal openings

Caution: Investigational Device. Limited by Federal (USA) Law to investigational use. AMEthyst AMEthyst InvestigatorHospital # Patients B. McLaurin Anderson Area Med. Ctr. 65 R. Feldman Munroe Regional Med. Ctr. 63 N.Farhat EMH Regional Hospital 62 D. Kereiakes* Christ Hospital 44 J. Breall Indiana University Med. Ctr. 44 M. Foster Providence Hospital 32 A. Rabinowitz Texsan/SW Texas 25 J. Patterson Forsyth Med. Ctr. 24 A. Szyniszewski St. Joseph Mercy 23 K. Smith University of Florida 20 * Principal Investigator Enrollment : 73 U.S. Centers - “Top 10”

Caution: Investigational Device. Limited by Federal (USA) Law to investigational use. AMEthyst Randomized, Open Label, Multicenter Trial AMEthyst: Study Design Primary Endpoint: MACE (death, MI, repeat revascularization) at 30 days MACE (death, MI, repeat revascularization) at 30 days Secondary Endpoints: Elevated CK, CK-MB during index hospitalization, in hospital MACE, device and clinical success Elevated CK, CK-MB during index hospitalization, in hospital MACE, device and clinical success Primary Endpoint: MACE (death, MI, repeat revascularization) at 30 days MACE (death, MI, repeat revascularization) at 30 days Secondary Endpoints: Elevated CK, CK-MB during index hospitalization, in hospital MACE, device and clinical success Elevated CK, CK-MB during index hospitalization, in hospital MACE, device and clinical success 30 days De Novo or restenotic lesions of Saphenous Vein Grafts Vessel Diameter: mm De Novo or restenotic lesions of Saphenous Vein Grafts Vessel Diameter: mm Control DEP* n = 200 Control DEP* n = 200 Interceptor® PLUS n= 600 Interceptor® PLUS n= 600 2:1 randomization Clinical Procedure *GuardWire® or FilterWire TM EZ at physician’s discretion

Caution: Investigational Device. Limited by Federal (USA) Law to investigational use. AMEthyst AMEthyst Includes multivessel PCI with following restrictions: Total of 2 lesions in up to 2 native vessels (non-target lesions [NTL]) NTLs successfully treated before enrollment to study Unlimited target lesions (TL) in up to 2 SVG’s Key Inclusion Criteria: Subjective or Objective evidence of ischemia TL in a SVG >50 and 50 and <100% stenosed Target Vessel has TIMI 1 flow or greater Key Exclusion Criteria: Recent Myocardial Infarction (MI) >24 hrs, with + CK-MB, or Acute MI Surgery within 30 days LVEF <25% TL has been previously stented TL within 5mm of graft ostium or <35mm from graft-native anastomosis Subject Selection Criteria

Caution: Investigational Device. Limited by Federal (USA) Law to investigational use. AMEthyst AMEthyst Core Labs QCA Core Lab –Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA –Jeffrey J. Popma, MD Data Coordinating Center –Harvard Clinical Research Institute, Boston, MA, USA –Laura Mauri, MD ECG Core Lab –Harvard Clinical Research Institute, Boston, MA, USA –Peter Zimetbaum, MD Clinical Events Committee/DSMB –Harvard Clinical Research Institute, Boston, MA, USA –Donald Cutlip, MD

Caution: Investigational Device. Limited by Federal (USA) Law to investigational use. AMEthyst 2:1 Randomization Ratio AMEthyst Sample Size Calculation INITIAL ASSUMPTIONS: D30 MACE rate for Interceptor and Control group <10% Power 80% 1-sided alpha error 5% Delta for equivalence 5.5% Interceptor PLUS 400 patients Control Device 200 Patients 600 Patients SAFER Trial Borrow additional patients using Bayesian methods

Caution: Investigational Device. Limited by Federal (USA) Law to investigational use. AMEthyst Revised Sample Size Calculations DSMB Safety Review 04/18/05 (first 300 patients) No Safety Issues However: Observed control 30D MACE <<10% ? Pooling with SAFER patients ? Study Adequately Powered Continue Study Add 200 patients AMEthyst Revised Assumptions 30D MACE rate for control and Interceptor assumed < 6% Power 80% 1-sided alpha error 5% Delta for equivalence 4.5%

Caution: Investigational Device. Limited by Federal (USA) Law to investigational use. AMEthyst AMEthyst Final Patient Distribution and Follow-up Patients Enrolled n=800 Randomized 2:1 Interceptor n = 533 Control DEP n = 267 Clinical F/U 30 days 258/ % Clinical F/U 30 days 522/ % GuardWire n= 194 FilterWire* n=73 *Additional optional control device added per Amendment Feb 2006

Caution: Investigational Device. Limited by Federal (USA) Law to investigational use. AMEthyst AMEthyst Patient Demographics Interceptor PLUS n=533ControlDEP n=267 n=267 p value Male (%) Age (yrs+SD) Diabetes (%) Hypertension (%) Dyslipidemia (%) Unstable Angina (%) Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (%+SD) Prior PCI to target lesion (%)

Caution: Investigational Device. Limited by Federal (USA) Law to investigational use. AMEthyst AMEthyst Interceptor n = 533 Control n = 267 p value Age of SVG (yrs) B2/C lesions (%) RVD (mm) Lesion Length (mm) Pre-procedure MLD (mm) Post- procedure In-Stent MLD (mm) In-Stent MLD (mm) In-stent % stenosis In-stent % stenosis Procedural and Lesion Characteristics

Caution: Investigational Device. Limited by Federal (USA) Law to investigational use. AMEthyst SVG Degenerative Score (% lumen irregularities ) Am J Cardiol 2005; 95(2) (0-25%) 1 (26-50%) 2 (51-75%) 3 (76-100%)

Caution: Investigational Device. Limited by Federal (USA) Law to investigational use. AMEthyst Interceptor n = 533 Control n = 267 p value % % % % AMEthyst Extent of SVG Degeneration

Caution: Investigational Device. Limited by Federal (USA) Law to investigational use. AMEthyst Interceptor n = 533 Control n = 267 p value Number of Stents/Pt 1.28± ± Total Stent Length (mm) 25.8 ± ± Stent:Lesion Length 1.58 ± ± Stent diameter 3.0 mm (%) 3.0 mm (%) mm (%) 3.5 mm (%) 4.0 mm (%) 4.0 mm (%) Max Deployment (ATM) 16.1 ± ± Max Inflation (ATM) 16.4 ± ± GP IIb/IIIa Inhibitor (%) AMEthyst Procedural Characteristics

Caution: Investigational Device. Limited by Federal (USA) Law to investigational use. AMEthyst Interceptorn=533Controln=267 p Value Death % (#) (2) 0.11 MI % (#) 7.3 (39) 5.2 (14) 0.30 Q Wave Q Wave Non-Q wave Non-Q wave 6.9 (37) 4.5 (12) 0.21 Stent Thrombosis % (#) 00 MACE % (#) 7.3 (39) 5.6 (15) 0.46 AMEthyst Outcomes – in hospital

Caution: Investigational Device. Limited by Federal (USA) Law to investigational use. AMEthyst Device success defined as delivery, deployment and retrieval of the assigned device Clinical success defined as delivery, deployment and retrieval of the assigned device with no in hospital MACE Interceptorn=533Controln=267 p value Device Success (%) Clinical Success (%) Final TIMI Flow (%) AMEthyst Device Effectiveness (ITT population)

Caution: Investigational Device. Limited by Federal (USA) Law to investigational use. AMEthyst Interceptorn=501Controln=250 p Value p Value Death % (#) (2) 0.11 MI % (#) 8.0 (40) 6.0 (15) 0.37 Q Wave Q Wave 0.4 (2) 0.8 (2) 0.60 Non Q wave Non Q wave 7.6 (38) 5.2 (13) 0.28 Stent Thrombosis % (#) 0.4 (2) 0.8 (2) 0.60 TLR % (#) 0.2 (1) 0.4 (1) 1.00 TVR (non-TL) % (#) (3) 0.04 MACE % (#) 8.0 (40) 7.2 (18) 0.77 AMEthyst Outcomes to 30 days

Caution: Investigational Device. Limited by Federal (USA) Law to investigational use. AMEthyst Control (n=18/250) Interceptor (n=40/501) 7.2% 8.0% 30 day MACE P for Non-Inferiority (for delta=4.5%) P for difference 0.77 AMEthyst Primary Endpoint

Caution: Investigational Device. Limited by Federal (USA) Law to investigational use. AMEthyst Conclusions The Interceptor® PLUS filter is not inferior in safety and efficacy to 30 days when compared with currently approved DEP device standards (GuardWire, FilterWire EZ). A trend toward less frequent TVR (non-TL) to 30 days observed following Interceptor (vs. Control DEP) Overall MACE to 30 days in DEP device-treated patients appears to be less frequent in contemporary PCI practice and deserves further study. AMEthyst