Manpower and space requirements for ILD 2015/1/13 Y. meeting at SLAC 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ILD Resource Survey 2014/9/9 Y. Sugimoto 1. Committee under MEXT ILC Task Force in MEXT Academic experts committee Particle-Nuclear physics WG Members.
Advertisements

SiD Surface assembly Marco Oriunno (SLAC) MDI-CFS Meeting Sep. 4-6, 2014, Ichinoseki (Japan)
Report from the ILD Meeting Ties Behnke ILC project meeting
Fermilab E906 Schedule Paul E. Reimer 20 June 2008.
Assembly Hall in Hybrid-A’ and ILD 2014/9/6 Yasuhiro Sugimoto 1.
LCC status Lyn Evans 1April 18, 2015PAC Orsay. ILC in Linear Collider Collaboration 2 ICFA Chair: J Mnich Program Adv. Committee PAC – Chair: N. Holtkamp.
Software Performance Engineering - SPE HW - Answers Steve Chenoweth CSSE 375, Rose-Hulman Tues, Oct 23, 2007.
DH in Hybrid-A and ILD 2014/9/5 Yasuhiro Sugimoto 1.
Experimental hall in Japanese mountain site Y. Sugimoto ILD MDI/Integration 1.
HPS Budget and Schedule Marco Oriunno, June 4-6, 2013 HPS Collaboration Meeting, JLAB.
1 FD Support and Pacman for GLDc 27 Aug Yasuhiro Sugimoto KEK.
ILD meeting Welcome/Introduction 2015/4/23 Y. 1.
3 March 2009M. Breidenbach1 SiD LoI Costs M. Breidenbach.
Discussion/ Planning Session -ILD organisation: status and plans -Concrete plans -Report from the R&D group: Jan Strube -Report from the parameter group:
Tracking Integration Challenges Y. meeting 2013/9/25.
LCB/ICFA meeting at Newport News with full snow, February This is only for TB meeting Presentation and not for Distribution. ( )
MEXT Review Process in Japan 2014/7/16 Y. Sugimoto 1.
Experimental hall in Japanese mountain site Y. Sugimoto 1.
LCC Physics&Detector Report Hitoshi Yamamoto SiD Meeting Jan,
Status of Linear Collider Activities Rika Takahashi on behalf of the LC Communicators 104 November, 2013 Interactions US.
Our mandate has been completed The physics and detector perspective of the ILC-TDR Sakue Yamada May 27, /05/271Sakue Yamada ECFA.
R&D status of FPCCD VTX and its cooling system Yasuhiro Sugimoto for FPCCD VTX group 1.
Computing for ILC experiments Akiya Miyamoto KEK 14 May 2014 AWLC14 Any comments are welcomed.
27-March-10 LCWS10 - Beijing Global Design Effort 1 Barry Barish LCWS10 - Beijing 27-March-10 “Cost Containment” for the TDR.
LINEAR COLLIDER COLLABORATION Designing the world’s next great particle accelerator Detector Hall Configuration Overview New baseline (Hybrid A’) proposed.
Atsuto Suzuki. 1. Toward ILC Construction : Japanese Activities 1. Toward ILC Construction : Japanese Activities.
ILD workshop 119 participants (including last minute registrations which are not on the WEB) 2 days of contributions lively discussions, which had to be.
ILC in Japan A 10 minute introduction H.Weerts Argonne National Lab March 24, 2014 University of Chicago.
RD’s Report on Detector Activity General Overview Project Advisory Sakue Yamada December 14, 2012 Sakue Yamada.
Status of renewal of Buildings 115 & 507 Borge & Erwin Siesling.
DESY_ILCW07 Global Design Effort-CF&S 1 Beam Delivery System & Interaction Region Fred Asiri CF&S Point of Contact.
HEPResearchers Set-up JLCB and JLCC ~6 Cite Decision Design ILC Lab. Japan Policy Council Positive Reference from New Prime Minister.
1 BDS and Detector schedules for discussion at MDI meeting August 15, 2006 Andrei Seryi with input from Martin Gastal, Yasuhiro Sugimoto et al.
Cost Issues Y.Sugimoto, A.Maki Estimation Procedure Get unit cost from the cost estimation for GLD(DOD) Estimate (relative) amount of return-yoke.
1 SPAFOA Capitol Hill Briefing December 2013 Harry Weerts International Linear Collider - progress & status SPAFOA meeting, Dec 11, 2013, H.Weerts.
Status Report on ILC Project in Japan Seiichi SHIMASAKI Director, Office for Particle and Nuclear Research Promotion June 19, 2015.
CMS Experiment at the LHC, CERN Date Recorded: :21 CET Run/Event: / Candidate Collision Event Report from Belgium Michael Tytgat.
ILD requirement for assembly space and time 2015/11/3 Yasuhiro 1.
ILC Detector R&D in Japan Hitoshi Yamamoto Tohoku University.
Strategy of detector solenoid construction Yasuhiro Sugimoto KEK 1.
SiD collab. Mtg., 30 jan 2008 H.Weerts Stimulate the discussion & Closing Remarks to SiD collaboration meeting 30 January 2008 H.Weerts Argonne National.
1 ILD meeting LAL M. Joré – Integration status Matthieu Joré – 25 th of May ILD integration status and open issues.
ILD SiD CALI CE LC- TPC FCAL R&D group (ILC) group (ILC) “collab” (CLIC)  host lab “collab” (LC) “collab” (LC) “collab” (LC) R&D groups involved in “world-wide.
Computing Resources for ILD Akiya Miyamoto, KEK with a help by Vincent, Mark, Junping, Frank 9 September 2014 ILD Oshu City a report on work.
Budget Outlook Glen Crawford P5 Meeting Sep
Detector Cooperation with CLIC PAC Pohang meeting November 3, 2009 F. Richard LAL/Orsay 11/03/20091.
Assembly scenario of ILD Si trackers 2015/4/21 Yasuhiro 1.
The Situation in Japan Yasuhiro Okada, Executive Director, KEK ILD meeting 2014 September 7, 2014, Oshu-city, Iwate, Japan 1.
SPHENIX MECHANICAL D. Lynch August 21, /15/2014sPHENIX Mechanical Design.
ILC Physics and Detector - Status and Goals for LCWS14 – Hitoshi Yamamoto LCWS14, Belgrade October 6,
1 CF lab review ; September 16-19, 2013, H.Weerts Budget and Activity Summary Slides with budget numbers and FTE summaries/activity for FY14 through FY16.
An idea of ILD general assembly plan 2015/10/8 Yasuhiro Integration Meeting 1.
LCC Physics and Detector Report
2016/9/30 Yasuhiro Infra/CFS mini-ws
Completion and Pre-Exploitation Costs for the Initial ATLAS Detector
Detector Utility/Service Cavern
Mike PAC Charge & Agenda ALCW15 Plenaries CERN SPC – September 2014
Update of experimental hall in Japanese mountain site
Detector Service Cavern for ILC
SiD LoI Costs M. Breidenbach 29 July 2010 M. Breidenbach.
Introduction to the Workshop
ILD subdetectors ILD session, ALCPG07 26-Oct-07 Hitoshi Yamamoto.
Sub-Detector Assembly Area Summary of discussion at ALCW2015
ILC Detector R&D in Japan
The DBD: Outline and Scope
Preparations for a Lehman Review
Snowmass on the Mississippi
Paul Colas, CEA Saclay, Akira Sugiyama, Saga U.
Yasuhiro Okada, Executive Director, KEK
Detector Proto-Technical board Sep 30, 2010
Presentation transcript:

Manpower and space requirements for ILD 2015/1/13 Y. meeting at SLAC 1

MANPOWER REQUIREMENT (+MEXT REVIEW) 2

Survey in ILD In ILD, we have been surveying resource requirements –In each phase : preparation (4 years), construction, operation –In each sub-system –In each area (for human resource) : home institutes, main campus, IP campus This survey has two-fold purposes –Input to a LCB subcommittee on governance and management (Chair: B.Foster) through ILC Infrastructure and Planning WG (Chair: S.Yamada) Number of people on-site Requirements on campus / facilities –Input to the MEXT TDR validation WG Budget and human resource needed for preparation (R&D), construction, and operation These numbers for detectors will not be shown in 5 min presentation in the next WG meeting on Jan 26 th (these numbers for Acc and CFS will be reported), but we might be asked to show these numbers at any time 3

WG under LCB 4 LCB Chirr: S.Komamiya LCC Director: L.Evance Accelerator Dep.Director: M.Harison CLIC Dep.Director: S.Stapnes Physics/Detector Dep.Director: H.Yamamoto Infra/Planning WG Chair: S.Yamada Gov./manage. WG Chair: B.Foster

Committee under MEXT ILC Task Force in MEXT Academic experts committee Particle-Nuclear physics WG Members are physicists from; HEP(6), Nuclear physics, Cosmic-ray, Astronomy, Accelerator(2), Particle theory, Nuclear theory, Cosmology, Science communication TDR validation WG Members are accelerator physicists from; KEK(3), JAERI, Riken(2), NIRS, HiSOR, JASRI/Spring8, CROSS-Tokai u/shingi/chousa/shinkou/038/i ndex.htm We need information from detector groups 5

What MEXT wants to know Investment Profit Accelerator cost Detector cost Physics Running cost Physics WGTDR validation WG Upgrade cost Academic Experts Committee

Status of the survey in ILD Each sub-system group (including physics analysis) has been asked to show their estimate on budget and human resource requirements in each phase / area In the construction period, timeline of the human resource requirement was made according to an assumption of the construction schedule (next slide) Still temporary numbers are given for several sub-systems –Magnet (Yoke and coil) –Common engineering –SET/ETD –FCAL –Resource requirements in preparation (R&D) phase Not estimated yet –Global DAQ –Running cost (Y10) 7

Assumption of ILD construction Timeline –A tentative time line was drawn based on the schedule in TDR (Figure in Vol.3-II) and recent CFS study –Assembly hall is assumed to be built in 2 years from ground breaking 8

FTE from external institutes 9 (Students are not included)

FTE from ILC Lab. 10

FTE in each area on site Assumption –There are main campus near Shinkansen station and satellite campus near (above) IP (IP campus) –In IP campus, there is a main building which includes office rooms, laboratories, and clean rooms –ILD construction scenario: VTX, SIT, and FTD are installed into the inner support tube (L~8m) in a clean room, and installed into ILD as a “Inner Si tracker” in the detector hall TPC MPGD modules are installed into the end-plate in a clean room, and whole TPC is installed into ILD in the detector hall Calorimeter/Muon-detector modules are tested in a laboratory at IP campus, and installed into ILD in the assembly hall 11

FTE of scientists on site 12

FTE in each area on site 13

FTE in each area on site including “Labor” except for magnet 14

Some issues Conversion of manpower to cost –In TDR, only “Labor” is converted to cost, and in-house employees such as professors are not converted to cost –In accelerator, all scientists in-house is converted to cost –If we (physics/detector) do the similar way, the cost becomes enormous –At present, we do not try to convert in-house manpower into cost 15 ILD constructionPerson*YearMILCU M&S387 Labor (Temporary employee) In-house scientists

TDR validation WG meeting In next TDR validation WG meeting on Jan.26 th, detector issues will be discussed But the allocated time is only 5 min. We have prepared 3 page presentation (+ back-up slides), and sent it to MEXT on Jan. 6 th –Resource issues are not discussed in the slides except for the number of signatories in LOI –But we should be ready to answer on these issues when asked 16

SPACE REQUIREMENT 17

Space requirements of ILD We have not made this kind of survey in ILD yet My tentative guess is as follows –IP Campus building Laboratory and clean room –Sub-detector assembly & test before installation / maintenance –Control room –~1/2 floor of 25mx60m building Office –Rooms for 70~140 persons –3.5mx5.8m x35 rooms (2~4/room)  ~1 floor –Main Campus Office: –Rooms at least for 120 persons –3.5mx5.8mx60 rooms (>2/room) –The site should have extra space (land) to build additional office building later if necessary 18

Laboratory space Because of difference in installation schedule, the same space can be used by different sub-detectors; –HCAL  TPC –ECAL  Si trackers –MUON  FCAL, ETD 19 Electronics /DAQ HCAL  TPC MUON  FCAL /ETD Control room ECAL VTXSITFTD Si Trackers 5m 25m 60m

Office space It seems ~34 office rooms can be put in a floor with meeting rooms, rest rooms, elevators in common space 20 25m 60m Common space

SUMMARY 21

Summary Our guess on the human resource requirement of ILD is; –20 – 25 FTE from ILC labo. –~500 FTE from external labo./university –Among them, 70 (running period) – 140 (construction period) FTE are working at IP campus, and >120 FTE are working at Main campus –If students are taken into account, these numbers would increase Space requirement of ILD in IP campus building (25x60m 2 ) would be; –~35 office rooms and several meeting rooms (~1 floor) –~0.5 floor for a control room and laboratory (clean room) space Each sub-detector group should study the process of construction and maintenance in detail to get more reliable number (by when?) 22

BACK-UP SLIDES 23

Resource need in R&D phase Assumption in TDR validation WG –After approval of the ILC project, 4 years are necessary for the preparation to get ready for construction We can expect larger amount of budget in this preparation period We are requested to clarify budget and human resource needed in this period –A rule of thumb; 10 – 20% of construction cost/manpower –But we should try to estimate by ourselves –Estimate of each sub-detector will not be disclosed: ILD R&D cost as a whole What happens on detectors in this period –R&D –Proposal –Technology choice –Detailed (construction ready) design –Industrialization –TDR of sub-detectors 24