AFM Probing Opiod Signa losome Comp lex. AFM schematic deflection (nm) = [sensitivity (nm/V)] × [deflection(V)] force = (cantilever spring constant) ×

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Instrumental Analysis
Advertisements

Psychology: A Modular Approach to Mind and Behavior, Tenth Edition, Dennis Coon Appendix Appendix: Behavioral Statistics.
Table of Contents Exit Appendix Behavioral Statistics.
Fuzzy Expert Systems. Lecture Outline What is fuzzy thinking? What is fuzzy thinking? Fuzzy sets Fuzzy sets Linguistic variables and hedges Linguistic.
Some Ideas Behind Finite Element Analysis
Fuzzy Medical Image Segmentation
Control Charts for Variables
CHAPTER 6 Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data
Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 4e © 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 6-1 Chapter 6 The Normal Distribution and Other Continuous Distributions.
Control Charts for Attributes
Atomic Force Microscop (AFM) 3 History and Definitions in Scanning Probe Microscopy (SPM) History Scanning Tunneling Microscope (STM) Developed.
Slide # 1 SPM Probe tips CNT attached to a Si probe tip.
Chapter 3: Central Tendency. Central Tendency In general terms, central tendency is a statistical measure that determines a single value that accurately.
2.002 Tutorial Presentation Problem 1-Atomic Force Microscopy Justin Lai.
Exercise I: Calculate DS in [nm/V] questions: DS =
Elastic potential energy
LECTURER PROF.Dr. DEMIR BAYKA AUTOMOTIVE ENGINEERING LABORATORY I.
DATA MINING WITH CLUSTERING AND CLASSIFICATION Spring 2007, SJSU Benjamin Lam.
Chapter 3: Central Tendency. Central Tendency In general terms, central tendency is a statistical measure that determines a single value that accurately.
Cover of Scientific American, October Source: Actuator driven by thermal expansion of water and air.
Sample Scanner Laser Position Sensitive Photodiode Tip Cantilever AFM working in IFJ atomic force microscopy FNFN FLFL.
Atomic Force Microscope Nanoindentation/Scratching
AFM Images Bacteria Mosquito eye DNA molecules t&view=article&id=51&Itemid=57.
Multiple Receptors Involved in Human Rhinovirus Attachment to Live Cells Christian Rankl, Ferry Kienberger, Linda Wildling, Jürgen Wruss, Hermann J. Gruber,
Sample Problem 9.8 For the uniform beam and loading shown, determine the reaction at each support and the slope at end A. SOLUTION: Release the “redundant”
Modelling of Atomic Force Microscope(AFM)
Volume 105, Issue 8, Pages (October 2013)
Tapping mode AFM: simulation and experiment
5 Pharmacodynamics.
Volume 89, Issue 4, Pages (October 2005)
Atomic Force Microscopy Samrat Dutta, Ph.D.
Effect of Microvillus Deformability on Leukocyte Adhesion Explored Using Adhesive Dynamics Simulations  Kelly E. Caputo, Daniel A. Hammer  Biophysical.
Volume 106, Issue 6, Pages (March 2014)
Surface ultrastructure and mechanical property of human chondrocyte revealed by atomic force microscopy  C.-H. Hsieh, Ph.D., Y.-H. Lin, Ph.D., S. Lin,
Guillaume T. Charras, Mike A. Horton  Biophysical Journal 
F. Benedetti, C. Micheletti, G. Bussi, S.K. Sekatskii, G. Dietler 
Volume 102, Issue 11, Pages (June 2012)
Volume 74, Issue 3, Pages (March 1998)
Local Viscoelastic Properties of Live Cells Investigated Using Dynamic and Quasi-Static Atomic Force Microscopy Methods  Alexander Cartagena, Arvind Raman 
Intensity Correlation-Based Calibration of FRET
Volume 107, Issue 5, Pages (September 2014)
Instabilities in the Transient Response of Muscle
Volume 102, Issue 11, Pages (June 2012)
Lateral Mechanical Coupling of Stereocilia in Cochlear Hair Bundles
Anne Marie W. Bartosch, Rick Mathews, John M. Tarbell 
Volume 105, Issue 3, Pages (August 2013)
Stiffness Tomography by Atomic Force Microscopy
Volume 100, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Atomic Force Microscope
Low Spring Constant Regulates P-Selectin-PSGL-1 Bond Rupture
Tom E. Williams, Shanmugam Nagarajan, Periasamy Selvaraj, Cheng Zhu 
Shamik Sen, Shyamsundar Subramanian, Dennis E. Discher 
B-S Transition in Short Oligonucleotides
Volume 86, Issue 5, Pages (May 2004)
Jamie L. Maciaszek, Biree Andemariam, Greg Huber, George Lykotrafitis 
Volume 101, Issue 8, Pages (October 2011)
Quantitative Analysis of the Viscoelastic Properties of Thin Regions of Fibroblasts Using Atomic Force Microscopy  R.E. Mahaffy, S. Park, E. Gerde, J.
Volume 101, Issue 7, Pages (October 2011)
Simultaneous Topography and Recognition Imaging Using Force Microscopy
Volume 95, Issue 2, Pages (July 2008)
R. Gueta, D. Barlam, R.Z. Shneck, I. Rousso  Biophysical Journal 
Drug-Receptor Interactions
Prisca Schär-Zammaretti, Job Ubbink  Biophysical Journal 
Change in Rigidity in the Activated Form of the Glucose/Galactose Receptor from Escherichia coli: A Phenomenon that Will Be Key to the Development of.
Structural biology with carbon nanotube AFM probes
Volume 96, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
Volume 107, Issue 9, Pages (November 2014)
Single-Molecule Measurement of the Stiffness of the Rigor Myosin Head
Volume 74, Issue 3, Pages (March 1998)
Volume 101, Issue 7, Pages (October 2011)
Presentation transcript:

AFM Probing Opiod Signa losome Comp lex

AFM schematic deflection (nm) = [sensitivity (nm/V)] × [deflection(V)] force = (cantilever spring constant) × (deflection)

Functionalization of AFM tips NHS/EDC Antibody solution SH CH 3 Thiols+ + OH SH O C CT(PEG 12 ) MT(PEG 4 ) Au S O C OH S O C S CH 3 S Au S O C O O N O S CH 3 S S O C O O N O Au S CH 3 S NH S O C S O C Au antibody

Detection of antibody-receptor recognition - SHSY5Y cell line stably expresses the MOPR tagged with T7. SHSY5Y neuroblastoma cell line T7 Anti-T7 - The T7-tagged receptor can be identified by AFM probe modified with T7-antibody

approach contact retract Force measurements by AFM Forces between the tip and receptor were monitored by continuously indenting and retracting the tip at constant lateral positions. Force curve

Three typical force curves demonstrating the interaction events between the tip and the receptor specific unbinding interaction nonspecific unbinding interaction no interaction deflection (nm) = [sensitivity (nm/V)] × [deflection(V)] force = (cantilever spring constant) × (deflection)

Fuzzy logic Fuzzy logic is an approach to computing based on "degrees of truth" rather than the usual "true or false" (1 or 0) Boolean logic. Fuzzy logic includes 0 and 1 as extreme cases of truth but also includes the various states of truth in between so that, for example, someone whose age is 60 might be assigned a membership of 0.25 in the fuzzy set of old people.

Reading the Force volume file and calibrating the force curves Loading a new force curve Detection of all the vertical segments on force curve Analysis of each force curve Higher than the threshold? Fuzz logic analysis of the corresponding FC segment Attribution of a grading to the event Building the histogram YES Has the whole FC been analyzed? NO YES Flow chart of detecting events algorithm

Convolution The integral of two functions f and g. The resulting amount overlap that occurs when g is shifted over f is the convolution of f and g. f * g ≡ ∫ f (τ ) g (t − τ )dτ

Convolution between force curves and the filter (difference)

Convolution with different filters The convolution of the FC with three different filters gives three new curves that present peaks at locations where steep vertical segments, right angles, or v shapes exist on the original FC curve.

Characteristic Retract curve

(-0.03,-0.03, 0.5, 0)

Unbinding force distribution histograms Peak= pN, Aver age= pN

Determining elastic modulus Elastic modulus is the measure of a substance's tendency to be deformed elastically when a force is applied to it. E=stress/strain

The Hertz Model Indentation = z-x The data obtained by indentation experiments are usually plots of force against piezo displacement rather than tip sample separation. In applying the Hertz model, curves should eb converted to Force indentaion curve

Elastic Modulus wave E Average

Results Poisson statistical method: The number of receptor-antibody pairs (n) is finite and follows a Poisson distribution. µ n = σ n 2 F= measured force for n pairs, F = nF s, F s = single pair force µ F = µ n F s, σ F 2 = σ n 2 F s 2, F s = σ F 2 / µ F If there are nonspecific interactions (F n ), µ F = µ n F s + F n, σ F 2 = σ n 2 F s 2 = (µ F - F n ) F s = µ F F s - F n F s n1n1 n2n2 F = F 1 + F 2 F1F1 F2F2

Variance versus mean of the unbinding forces Mean Forc e (pN) Force varian ce (pN 2 ) N F s = 123 pN F n = 93 pN Computed forces based on Poisson Statistical method

Conclusion Based on the Poisson statistical method, the force required to unbind a single ligand and its pair is 123 pN and the nonspecific unbinding force is 93 pN. The unbinding force calculated is consistent with those obtained for antigen-antibody pairs by others. The potential of the sensor for localizing individual receptor sites can be used in future simultaneous studies on the effect of agonist stimulation on the receptor distribution and its association to changes in biophysical properties.

Appendix

µ Opiod receptor (MOPR) major target of pain treatment RECEPTORS interact with specific ligands to produce changes in the function of the system. Opiod signalo some permits the encounter of the receptors, ligands, membrane proteins and effectors initiating events leading to any of ligand’s effect. LIGANDS are Chemicals that bind to receptors. EFFECTORS translate the drug- receptor interaction into a change in cellular activity. AGONISTS is a drug capable of fully activating the effector system when it binds to the receptor. A Few Concepts