Fine-scale 3-D Dynamics of Critical Plasma Regions: Necessity of Multipoint Measurements R. Lundin 1, I. Sandahl 1, M. Yamauchi 1, U. Brändström 1, and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Progress and Plans on Magnetic Reconnection for CMSO For NSF Site-Visit for CMSO May1-2, Experimental progress [M. Yamada] -Findings on two-fluid.
Advertisements

1 Kuafu A mission to start a mission William Liu Canadian Space Agency & Chinese Academy of Sciences August 29, 2011, 3rd ILWS Science Symposium, Beijing.
General Findings Concerning the Magnetospheric Realm ILWS - 11 Science Workshop, Beijing, China, Aug-Sep 2011.
ESS 7 Lecture 14 October 31, 2008 Magnetic Storms
Anti-parallel versus Component Reconnection at the Magnetopause K.J. Trattner Lockheed Martin Advanced Technology Center Palo Alto, CA, USA and the Polar/TIMAS,
000509EISPDR_SciInvGIs.1 EIS Science Goals: The First Three Months…. Louise Harra Mullard Space Science Laboratory University College London.
Comparing the solar wind-magnetosphere interaction at Mercury and Saturn A. Masters Institute of Space and Astronautical Science, Japan Aerospace Exploration.
Budget and Roles of Heavy Ions in the Solar System M. Yamauchi, I. Sandahl, H. Nilsson, R. Lundin, and L. Eliasson Swedish Institute of Space Physics (IRF)
Five Spacecraft Observations of Oppositely Directed Exhaust Jets from a Magnetic Reconnection X-line Extending > 4.3 x 10 6 km in the Solar Wind Gosling.
Auroral dynamics EISCAT Svalbard Radar: field-aligned beam  complicated spatial structure (
PLASMA TRANSPORT ALONG DISCRETE AURORAL ARCS A.Kullen 1, T. Johansson 2, S. Buchert 1, and S. Figueiredo 2 1 Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Uppsala.
The Structure of the Parallel Electric Field and Particle Acceleration During Magnetic Reconnection J. F. Drake M.Swisdak M. Shay M. Hesse C. Cattell University.
Sept. 12, 2006 Relationship Between Particle Acceleration and Magnetic Reconnection.
The Sources of Solar Hazards in Interplanetary Space Leonard Strachan & Jun Lin (Harvard – Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics) Paper [72.05] “Contributions.
Solar Flare Particle Heating via low-beta Reconnection Dietmar Krauss-Varban & Brian T. Welsch Space Sciences Laboratory UC Berkeley Reconnection Workshop.
Meeting 5 April 5, 2006 Comparative Aspects of Particle Acceleration and Reconnection.
O. M. Shalabiea Department of Physics, Northern Borders University, KSA.
New England Space Science Meeting 3 Feb 1, 2006 Implications of Reconnection Nathan Schwadron Feb 1, 2006.
Magnetic Reconnection in the Solar Wind Gosling, Phan, et al.
Oct. 10, 2006 Energy Partitioning from Magnetic Reconnection.
Solar system science using X-Rays Magnetosheath dynamics Shock – shock interactions Auroral X-ray emissions Solar X-rays Comets Other planets Not discussed.
Swedish National Graduate School of Space Technology Cluster multi-spacecraft measurements: applications on transition layer development and location of.
Tuija I. Pulkkinen Finnish Meteorological Institute Helsinki, Finland
Cusp O+ H+ e- "SPI" event #1 event #2 MLT energy ratio = 15~20 O+ H+ 68°CGLat66°CGLat 63°CGLat #1) Mono-energetic ion injection with O+ faster.
Transition Region And Coronal Explorer Observes three-dimensional magnetic structures in the Photosphere Defines the geometry and dynamics of the Transition.
CROSS-SCALE and SCOPE: The future in Space Plasma Physics Matt Taylor on behalf of Steve Schwartz, Masaki Fujimoto and the Cross-Scale and SCOPE Teams.
In-situ observations of magnetic reconnection in solar system plasma What can we export to other astrophysical environments? Alessandro Retinò, R. Nakamura.
Structure and Detection of Rolled-up Kelvin-Helmholtz Vortices in the Tail Flank of the Magnetosphere H. Hasegawa, M. Fujimoto, T. K. M. Nakamura, K. Takagi.
Multiscale issues in modeling magnetic reconnection J. F. Drake University of Maryland IPAM Meeting on Multiscale Problems in Fusion Plasmas January 10,
1 Barry Mauk, Nicola Fox, David Sibeck, Shrikanth Kanekal, Joseph Grebowsky, Ramona Kessel RBSP Project Science Team This document has been reviewed for.
A. Kullen (1), L. Rosenqvist (1), and G. Marklund (2) (1) Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Uppsala, Sweden (2) Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm,
29 August, 2011 Beijing, China Space science missions related to ILWS in China
1 Mars Micro-satellite Mission Japanese micro-satellite mission to Mars to study the plasma environment and the solar wind interaction with a weakly-magnetized.
Space Science MO&DA Programs - September Page 1 SS It is known that the aurora is created by intense electron beams which impact the upper atmosphere.
Reconnection rates in Hall MHD and Collisionless plasmas
MAGNETOSPHERIC RESPONSE TO COMPLEX INTERPLANETARY DRIVING DURING SOLAR MINIMUM: MULTI-POINT INVESTIGATION R. Koleva, A. Bochev Space and Solar Terrestrial.
Oxygen Injection Events observed by Freja Satellite M. Yamauchi 1, L. Eliasson 1, H. Nilsson 1, R. Lundin 1, and O. Norberg 2 1.Swedish Institute of Space.
A generic description of planetary aurora J. De Keyser, R. Maggiolo, and L. Maes Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy, Brussels, Belgium
1 THEMIS Inner Magnetosphere Review, Dec 20, 2008 Summary of THEMIS results in the inner magnetosphere Future mission operations discussion: –Science targets.
XVII CLUSTER Workshop, Uppsala, 14 May 2009 Fan and horseshoe instabilities -relation to the low frequency waves registered by Cluster in the polar cusp.
Collisionless Magnetic Reconnection J. F. Drake University of Maryland presented in honor of Professor Eric Priest September 8, 2003.
ESS 7 Lecture 13 October 29, 2008 Substorms. Time Series of Images of the Auroral Substorm This set of images in the ultra-violet from the Polar satellite.
Simulation Study of Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetotail and Solar Corona Zhi-Wei Ma Zhejiang University & Institute of Plasma Physics Beijing,
A. Vaivads, M. André, S. Buchert, N. Cornilleau-Wehrlin, A. Eriksson, A. Fazakerley, Y. Khotyaintsev, B. Lavraud, C. Mouikis, T. Phan, B. N. Rogers, J.-E.
EGU General Assembly 2006, 2-7 April, 2006, Wien ST6 Multi-point measurements of solar-terrestrial plasma: results and future perspectives Scientific objectives.
Guan Le NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Challenges in Measuring External Current Systems Driven by Solar Wind-Magnetosphere Interaction.
MHD and Kinetics Workshop February 2008 Magnetic reconnection in solar theory: MHD vs Kinetics Philippa Browning, Jodrell Bank Centre for Astrophysics,
H. Hasegawa(1), A. Retinò(2), A. Vaivads(3), Y. Khotyaintsev(3), M
CRRES observations indicate an abrupt increase in radiation belt fluxes corresponding to the arrival of a solar wind shock. The processes(s) which accelerate.
Van Allen Probes Extended Mission Science Themes (1 of 3) 1.Spatial and temporal structures of injections and other transient phenomena and their effects.
M. Yamauchi 1, H. Lammer 2, J.-E. Wahlund 3 1. Swedish Institute of Space Physics (IRF), Kiruna, Sweden 2. Space Research Institute (IWF), Graz, Austria.
24 January, 20011st NOZOMI_MEX Science Workshop, Jan, 2001 R. Lundin, M. Yamauchi, and H. Borg, Swedish Institute of Space Physics H. Hayakawa, M.
SS Special Section of JGR Space Physics Marks Polar’s 5th Anniversary September 4, 1996 This April special section is first of two Polar special sections.
Magnetic reconnection present and future of in situ observations Andris Vaivads Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Uppsala Workshop, Magnetic reconnection.
Cluster observation of electron acceleration by ULF Alfvén waves
Plasma Wave Excitation Regions in the Earth’s Global Magnetosphere
Data-Model Comparisons
NASA’s MMS Uncovers Dance of Electrons in Space
The Ionosphere and Thermosphere GEM 2013 Student Tutorial
Mass-loading effect in the exterior cusp and plasma mantle
ARTEMIS – solar wind/ shocks
The Wakes and Magnetotails of Venus and Mars
Ionosphere, Magnetosphere and Thermosphere Anthea Coster
Solar and Heliospheric Physics
Magnetosphere: Bow Shock Substorm and Storm
Space activities at Charles University
Satellite mission ideas using EISCAT_3D
Transition Region and Coronal Explorer (TRACE)
Richard B. Horne British Antarctic Survey Cambridge UK
Past cusp researches: (potentially) missing facts
Presentation transcript:

Fine-scale 3-D Dynamics of Critical Plasma Regions: Necessity of Multipoint Measurements R. Lundin 1, I. Sandahl 1, M. Yamauchi 1, U. Brändström 1, and A. Vaivads 2 1. Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Kiruna 2. Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Uppsala

Abstract Both Cluster and SOHO revealed that the key plasma processes that are critical to large-scale energy conversion and dynamics (e.g, current disruption, acceleration/radiation processes, shock formation, initiating reconnection, non-reconnection plasma entry) lie in a small-scale physics with scale size comparable to the electron scale and electron-ion hybrid scales, which is beyond what Cluster has aimed for. To reveal these processes, we need a new generation of multi-spacecraft missions and continued solar and solar wind observations: * An Earth-orbiting multi-spacecraft system with at least 8 spacecraft, 4 of them placed within typical electron scale lengths (e.g. gyroradii) in critical regions, the other with typical meso-scale separation (several ion gyroradii). * Continued solar and solar wind monitoring upstream of the Earth.

Introduction: Post-Cluster science Energy conversion and transport in plasma, i.e., laboratory, space, and inside stars, are of common interest to fundamental physics, space physics, and astrophysics. While energy flow in the MHD has been rather well conceived and most predictions were confirmed in both laboratory and space-bone observation, those related to kinetic effects (ion and electron effects) need further investigation. The Cluster project, with its power of multipoint techniques, has reached the resolution of ion inertia scale, revealing for the first time the ion scale dynamics of key regions such as magnetopause, cusp, magnetotail, and auroral acceleration region. At the same time Cluster has revealed that the key plasma processes that are critical to the entire magnetospheric plasma dynamics lies in small-scale physics with scale size comparable to the electron scale and electron-ion hybrid scales. Similarly, the SOHO satellite also revealed that key regions with large energy release such as the coronal mass ejections (CME) and the solar flares are located in very confined regions, requiring us to focus more on the particle behaviour in these key phenomena.

What are the critical issues? Reconnection (diffusion region) Plasma Vortices (site and condition) Plasma filamentation (site and condition) Current sheet dynamics and instability (boundary and substorms) Acceleration and radiation (auroral and shock) Energy transfer (meso & micro scale) All the other non-MHD (E ≠ - v x B) phenomena Determination of curl B, curl E, dB/dt, and dE/dt in small scale All involve inertia & gyroradii scale physics

Critical issue: Acceleration & Radiation j up j down Auroral arc and dual (up & down) field-aligned current and electric field. We now see fine structure. However, What causes these structures and waves? How to separate temporal development from spatial structures? Electrons Ions FAST orbit 1626 / Altitude ~ 4100 km

Critical issue: Filamentation & current sheets Field-aligned current sheets (thickness, strength…) Striations Dynamics, temporal, spatial Data from ALIS Photo: Y. Ebihara

Critical issue: Reconnection Cluster resolved the ion inertia length during its crossing through the diffusion region. But this is not enough to understand the mechanism because the electron Hall effect E n ~JxB/en seems to play an important role.

Critical issue: Impulsive plasma injection s/c1 s/c3 s/c1 s/c3 Pressure-pulse induced injection

Critical issue: Vortices Past missions up to Cluster revealed that vortices exist everywhere. Implications of a vortex? Connection to the ionosphere? Cluster observation of vortices at the magnetopause (Hasegawa et al. 2004)

Critical issue: Non-MHD behavior (induction => e/m energy created from particle energy) (e/m forcing)

Technological challenge (From Schwartz et al., 1998) The next generation missions must cover different spatial scales (electron, electron-ion, and ion). This requires one step higher technology from Cluster in both the instrumentation and the spacecraft operation, i.e., multi-spacecraft systems using autonomy, and on-board/swarm intelligence. It is a good technological challenge as well as scientific challenge.

Conclusions We need a next generation mission after Cluster and SOHO which will resolve the 4-D (space and time) structure of the electron and electron-ion scales in key region of important space plasma phenomena. To achieve this we suggest the following strategy for ESA : 1. Launch an Earth-orbiting multi-spacecraft system with at least 8 spacecraft, 4 of them placed within typical electron scale lengths (e.g. gyro-radii), the other with meso-scale separation (several ion gyro radii). 2. Provide continued solar and solar wind monitoring upstream of the Earth. (Can be done in collaboration with other agencies.)

Why magnetospheric physics? The space and the solar atmosphere are the only place where these scales can be directly measured within next few decades. Furthermore, the magnetospheric physics is: required for understanding the solar-terrestrial coupling - on long term and short term basis only partially understood - a complex system crucial for understanding the evolution of the solar system (comparative planetology) crucial for understanding the acceleration of matter up to high velocities (plasma acceleration) crucial for understanding the evolution of stars and galaxies (plasma escape, mass loss)

Energization

summary Microphysics of the electron scale, electron-ion scale, and ion-scale (from electron Debye/inertia length up to ion inertia length and ion gyroradius) are important in the largest energy conversion and transport such as CME formation in solar physics, substorm onset in space physics, active galactic nuclea in astrophysics, and in dense plasma physics such as fusion and internal stars.