1 Paradoxes of determinism. 2 Freedom … 3 Leucippus, Democritus World – physical system, mathematization of world, negation of divine providence, finality,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FATE v. FREE WILL. Fatalism The idea of fatalism coincides with destiny. This means that everything in our lives is predestined by fate. In other words,
Advertisements

What is it like to be me? Trying to understand consciousness.
The ontological argument. I had the persuasion that there was absolutely nothing in the world, that there was no sky and no earth, neither minds nor.
Michael Lacewing Is the mind the brain? Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
Metaphysics Part II. Thought Experiment: Physical & Mental Properties A1. 2 more objects: quarters, books, grass… A2. 2 more physical descriptors: green,
Today’s Outline Hume’s Problem of Induction Two Kinds of Skepticism
Discovering HOPE in the midst of evil SUFFERING AND THE HIDDENNESS OF GOD.
Meditations on First Philosophy
1 Hypothesis Testing Chapter 8 of Howell How do we know when we can generalize our research findings? External validity must be good must have statistical.
“… if (the best philosophy) doesn ’ t seem peculiar you haven ’ t understood it ” Edward Craig.
The Existence of God and the Problem of Evil
Nondual Quantum Duality To Show How The “Duality Versus Nonduality” Conflict Is Resolved Within Orthodox Quantum Theory To Show How The “Human Freedom.
Aristotle: - Cause - Cosmology - Prime or Unmoved Mover.
The Rationalists: Descartes Certainty: Self and God
Substance dualism: do Descartes’ arguments work? Michael Lacewing
1 The Rationalists: Leibniz Freedom, Responsibility, Evil Soazig Le Bihan - University of Montana.
René Descartes The father of modern Western philosophy and the epistemological turn Methodological doubt, his dreaming argument and the evil.
Metaphysics Philosophy 1 Spring, 2002 G. J. Mattey.
The Problem of Knowledge. What new information would cause you to be less certain? So when we say “I’m certain that…” what are we saying? 3 things you.
Metaphysics Philosophy 21 Fall, 2004 G. J. Mattey.
© Michael Lacewing Dualism and the Mind-Body Identity Theory Michael Lacewing
Is There Any Evidence? Science involves the study of things that can be observed and repeated. – God cannot be observed (John 4:24) – Creation cannot.
Ross Arnold, Winter 2015 Lakeside institute of Theology The Existence of God II February 20, 2015.
Jean Paul Sartre: Existentialism Questions to answer for yourself: What are the key elements of Existentialism? What would an "existential ethic" look.
Kevin Vandergriff. Prior Probability in Terms of Simplicity Christian Theism Specified Naturalism (Hypothesis of Indifference) 1 - A maximally powerful.
Philosophy of Mind Week 2: Descartes and Dualism
Aquinas’ Proofs The five ways.
EXISTENTIALISM.
Acts 17:16-34 Pastor Keone. Acts 17: While Paul was waiting for them in Athens, he was greatly distressed to see that the city was full of idols.
 Doubt- to be uncertain about something, to hesitate to believe  Dualism- the belief that the mind and body are separate (but interact). Mind is a kind.
EXISTENCE OF GOD. Does God Exist?  Philosophical Question: whether God exists or not (reason alone)  The answer is not self-evident, that is, not known.
Descartes and Buddies “To be or not to be, that is the question”
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 12 Minds and bodies #1 (Descartes) By David Kelsey.
Exercise # 1 A short summary of a Greek tragedy by Aeschylus, Sophocles, or Euripides.
Creed 6 Creator Divine Providence, Divine Keeping of Creation & Divine Economy.
Puzzles and Paradoxes of Time Travel
Owen Flanagan James B. Duke Professor of Philosophy Professor of Psychology and Neuroscience Co-Director Center for Comparative Philosophy Duke University.
What is the Meaning of living?.  Thales asked, “What is Basic Stuff of the Universe?”  What is the “ARCHE?”  Three Assumptions  Fundamental explanation.
© Michael Lacewing Substance and Property Dualism Michael Lacewing
L ECTURE 6: D ESCARTES. L ECTURE O UTLINE In today’s lecture we will: 1.Become introduced to Rene Descartes 2.Begin our investigation into Descartes’
The Turn to the Science The problem with substance dualism is that, given what we know about how the world works, it is hard to take it seriously as a.
Substance dualism Michael Lacewing co.uk.
The causally undetermined choice
Varieties of Scepticism. Academic Scepticism Arcesilaus, 6 th scolarch of the Academy Arcesilaus, 6 th scolarch of the Academy A return to the Socratic.
Revolution in “ natural philosophy” The success of Newton’s physics had immediate effect on: 1. metaphysics i. concepts of body, force and motion ii.
Descates Meditations II A starting point for reconstructing the world.
OR WHY DOES IT MATTER? Existentialism and Absurdism.
Anselm’s “1st” ontological argument Something than which nothing greater can be thought of cannot exist only as an idea in the mind because, in addition.
René Descartes (1596–1650) Cartesian Substance Dualism.
© Michael Lacewing Determinism: varieties Michael Lacewing
On the Nature of Things. Motion of Atoms Weight of atoms causes them to naturally move downward (II, 190). All atoms have equal speed in void (II, 239).
The Mind And Body Problem Mr. DeZilva.  Humans are characterised by the body (physical) and the mind (consciousness) These are the fundamental properties.
René Descartes Brandon Lee Block D.
Lauren Dobbs “Cogito ergo sum”. Bio  Descartes was a French born philosopher from the 1600’s.  He’s most famous for his “Meditations on First Philosophy”
He says, “This is the message we have heard from him,” that is, the Lord Jesus, “and proclaim to you, God is light.” He begins with God. Why is that so.
An Outline of Descartes's Meditations on First Philosophy
EPISTEMOLOGY: BRANCH OF PHILOSOPHY CONCERNED WITH THE SCOPE OF KNOWLEDGE.
Substance and Property Dualism Quick task: Fill in the gaps activity Quick task: Fill in the gaps activity ?v=sT41wRA67PA.
METAPHYSICS The study of the nature of reality. POPEYE STUDIES DESCARTES.
Rene Descartes: March – February Father of Modern Philosophy Attempts to reconcile the new scientific method with traditional metaphysics.
The philosophy of Ayn Rand…. Objectivism Ayn Rand is quoted as saying, “I had to originate a philosophical framework of my own, because my basic view.
1 Top Down Perception And What it’s Like to Be Ancient Look at the old woman Or is it a young woman? Is perception shaped by prior belief? –Compare persistent.
Seeing the Father John 14:5-11.
Divine Economy The Nicene Creed.
Substance and Property Dualism
What it’s Like to Be Ancient
What it’s Like to Be Ancient
The study of the nature of reality
Three kinds of dependence
Is There a God? This presentation is intended to give a visual description of my viewpoint on God’s existence. This presentation presents historical philosophers.
Presentation transcript:

1 Paradoxes of determinism

2 Freedom …

3 Leucippus, Democritus World – physical system, mathematization of world, negation of divine providence, finality, supernatural acts, randomness and freedom … Nothing happens by vain but always from certain reason ( LOGOS ) and necessity (ANANKE). Leucippus Order of necessity - ANANKE and its impact

4 Ignorance... The cause of destruction of scull of bald man was eagle, that dropped down tortoise to destroy its shell. A 68 from Simplicius People created image of chance to hidden their own ignorance. B 119 from Stobaius Higher origin of chance: It seems to somebody that chance is some kind of cause not apparent to human thinking. It seems to be something divine and in higher degree superhuman. Aristotle, Physics, II, 196,7 Chance is just, fair … 1. Absence of chance

5 2. nonexistence of freedom („free will“) No responsibility Fatalism fate cause the force of necessity In the tale The Last Judgment by Karel Čapek people are judged by man – the judge. God is only witness, he cannot judge because he knows all. …“But I still don’t understand why you aren’t the judge,” Kugler said thoughtfully. “But why are they judging… the same people who were judges on earth?” “Because man belongs to man. As you see, I’m only the witness. But the verdict is determined by man, even in heaven. Believe me, Kugler, this is the way it should be. Man isn’t worthy of divine judgment. He deserves to be judged only by other men.”

6 Epicurus Parenclisis Randomness = freedom ? (casualizm) At the end Epicurus realised, that the aim of his way of explanation is serenity, self-realization, and not understanding of nature itself. Marx K., Thesis: „On the Differences between the Natural Philosophy of Democritus and of Epicurus“, 1841, p. 37 Eddington, Jeans: Parenclisis (swerving) in quantum mechanics – tychism (Pierce)

7 Stoics Freedom – mistaken concept – voluntarity comming from psychophysical dualism Omipotent LOGOS (however: causal consistency – epistemological instrument in GTR) Roots of dualism: Pýthagorean conception of soul Butterfly, girl, whole person, principle of motion, principle of life, principle of thinking, feeling, personality … Forms: I x world Selfperception x perception of outer world Pýthagoreans dualism Soul x physical body Platonism Body prison for soul … Descartes res cogitans x res extensa

8 We are free, as we can do everything we want to do, however we are also determined, as we must want what we want. Plótinos, Enneady III,2(47),10 Is determinism on contradiction with freedom? How can be people free if God in advance knows all they will do? … Knowledge of future do not část any necessity on what will hapen. It is the same like with knowledge of present things. Boёthius, Consolidation of philosophy, 5th book

9 Free will – misconception Will is not force, but feeling I control my behaviour Libet experiments – our brain decides what I will do some period of time (till 7 seconds!) before I will do my decision… Time of latence

10 Is determinism valid? Absolute determinism x “non absolute” Retrogradal determinism – determination of the past Ontological definition Is the future (of system, world) determined? What means „determined“? Epistemological definition Is it possible to know the future? “Informatic” definition of problem Are data concerning the future presend here now? Is is possible to get them? Gracus theorem?

11 Unpossibility of Laplace daemon: Butterfly effect Feetback phenomenon Relativistic limitations Quantum mechanics (?) Conclussion Ontological definition indefensible Only epistemological (meta)theory(property of epistemological systém All ya can do is do what you must. Bob Dylan