The necessity of New Regulations for New Technologies regarding R79 Japan September / 2012 Informal document GRRF-73-16 (73rd GRRF, 18-20 September 2012,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Informal document No.GRB-47-4 (47th GRB, February 2008 Agenda item 3 (a) CLEPA presentations supporting justifications of informal documents GRB-47-2.
Advertisements

HERO UNIT Training Module Work Zone Traffic Control And Incident Management Operations.
Hazard and Incident Warning « Majority of events occurring on the road represent a danger for road users » By transmitting road events and road status.
Comparison between TOR of IG-ITS/AD and SAE Levels*1
Proposal of Automated Driving from Ad- hoc group on LKAS/RCP Submitted by the Chair of the Special Interest Group on Lane Keeping Assist Systems (LKAS)
Automatically Commanded Steering Function
GRRF Request: Include a cross reference to R10 in R78 Purpose: Ensure Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) does not affect electronic brake modules in a.
8th RESS IG IMMA contribution RESS-8-9. IMMA L6/L7 contribution IMMA has decided to provide the global expertise on L6/L7-vehicles at WP29 to address.
ACSF Informal Group Industry proposals 1 st Meeting of ACSF informal group April 29 and 30, 2015 in Bonn 1 Informal Document ACSF
The Promotion of Active Safety Measures in Japan - collision damage mitigation brake - September 2007 Road Transport Bureau Road Transport Bureau MLIT.
Submitted by the experts from Sweden and Japan Presentation in conjunction with GRRF Amendment proposals to UN R79 to introduce the requirements.
10 November 2009 Masahiko NAITO MLIT, JAPAN Future direction for harmonization of vehicle regulations ~ Japanese contribution to WP29 ~ Informal Document.
General Safety Regulation ACEA discussion paper Renzo Cicilloni Director Safety Paris, June 2009 AEBS/LDWS
1 Survey on the Effectiveness of Safety Belt Reminder System Japan December 2006 Informal Document No. GRSP th GRSP 12th- 15th December 2006 Agenda.
Outline of Definition of Automated Driving Technology Document No. ITS/AD (5th ITS/AD, 24 June 2015, agenda item 3-2) Submitted by Japan.
Presentation for Document ACSF-03-03_rev1 Oliver Kloeckner September rd meeting of the IG ASCF Munich, Airport Informal Document.
Damage Mitigation Braking System
ECE Regulation No.79 Informal Document No. GRRF (61 st GRRF, 5-9 February 2007 agenda item 5.) Proposal for Amendments Presented by the Expert from.
The Promotion of Active Safety Measures in Japan - collision damage mitigation brake - February 2007 Road Transport Bureau Road Transport Bureau MLIT Japan.
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism Possible Example of Split of Regulation ~ Split of R79 and The New Regulation of Driving Assistance.
Difference for "Automatically commanded steering function", "Corrective steering function" and " Autonomous Steering System " Informal Document: ACSF
Traffic Accidents caused by Lane Departure in Japan  Data of Traffic Accidents around Japan Transmitted by the expert from Japan Informal document GRRF
Vehicle Safety - (R)Evolution of Driving Assist Systems Jochen Schäfer Heiner Hunold Submitted by the experts from Informal document GRRF th GRRF,
Regulation 13 Transitional Provisions Presentation in conjunction with GRRF which has been updated to ECE/TRANS/WP29/GRRF/2014/7 Prepared by the.
IHRA-ITS UN-ECE WP.29 ITS Informal Group Geneva, March, 2011 Design Principles for Advanced Driver Assistance Systems: Keeping Drivers In-the-Loop Transmitted.
Remote Control Parking (RCP)
Protective Braking for ACSF Informal Document: ACSF
Brief Review up to Now 1 March 11, 2011, Geneva UNECE/WP29/ITS Informal Group 19th Meeting T. Onoda & K. Hiramatsu, Japan Transmitted by expert from JAPANInformal.
Results of the Study on ACSF Transition Time Informal Document: ACSF National Traffic Safety and Environment Laboratory, Japan 4th Meeting of ACSF.
Regulation 13-H Transitional Provisions Presentation in conjunction with ECE/TRANS/WP29/GRRF/2014/16 Prepared by the ad hoc group on Transitional Provisions.
5 th ACSF meeting French views Bonn January 2016 Informal Document - ACSF Submitted by the expert of France.
CLEPA Position Special GRRF Session on Automatic Emergency Braking and Lane Departure Warning Systems Brainstorming Meeting 9 Dec UN Palais des.
Common Understanding on Major Horizontal Issues and Legal Obstacles Excerpts from the relevant sections of the ToR: II. Working items to be covered (details.
GRRF Ad-Hoc Working Group
Table 3 – Value of Dimension D
Hand-off Warning Time of LKA
Informal document GRRF-84-32
Informal Document: ACSF-06-16
7th ACSF meeting London, June 28-30, 2016
PRESENTED BY:BHABESH RANJAN MAHAKUD
Common Understanding on Major Horizontal Issues and Legal Obstacles
Informal Working Group on ACSF
Submitted by the expert form Japan Document No. ITS/AD-09-12
Informal Document: ACSF Rev.1
ACSF-C2 2-actions system
Timing to be activated the hazard lights
ACSF-C2 2-actions system
AEBS/LDW Proposed changes with regard to the implementation of technical specifications for Lane Departure Warning Systems (LDWS) GRRF st.
Statement of Principles on the Design of High-Priority Warning Signals
Industry Homework from AEB 02
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
Traffic Accidents caused by Lane Departure in Japan
Proposals from the Informal Working Group on AEBS
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
Chair: Jin Seop Park, Republic of Korea Secretary: Thomas Kinsky, OICA
Quintessences Proposal for Category C of Germany and Japan
HERO UNIT Training Module
Proposals from the Informal Working Group on AEBS
Safety concept for automated driving systems
Behaviour of M2 & M3 general construction in case of Fire Event
Interpretation of 06 series of amendments to Regulation No. 48
Informal Document: ACSF-10-08
Maximum allowable Override Force
Emergency Steering Function
Informal document GRRF-78-41
ACSF B2 SAE Level 2 and/or Level 3
6th ACSF meeting Tokyo, April 2016
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
Regulation ECE R79-03 ACSF C 2-Step HMI
Automated Lane Keeping Systems
Presentation transcript:

The necessity of New Regulations for New Technologies regarding R79 Japan September / 2012 Informal document GRRF (73rd GRRF, September 2012, Agenda item 8(c))

How the ADASS Is Defined in R79  In the Introduction section of R79, the ADASS ( Advanced Driver Assistance Steering Systems ) is defined as follows: Systems whereby the driver remains in primary control of the vehicle but may be helped by the steering system being influenced by signals initiated on-board the vehicle are defined as "Advanced Driver Assistance Steering Systems”.  Based on the above definition, the requirements on “Automatically commanded steering function” and “Corrective steering function” are given in paragraphs , , and Appendix in last page

Japanese approach for the Technical Guideline of New Technologies regarding R79  On the other hand, Japanese government has already placed a few Technical Guidelines about the follows devices, LKAS (Lane Keeping Assist System) Lane Keeping Assist System can reduce driver’s workload during keeping a vehicle within a lane, and it can contributes to reduction of traffic accidents by lane departure and so on. PAS (Parking Assist System) Parking Assist System can reduce driver’s workload during backward parking, and it can contributes to reduction of traffic accidents during parking. These new devices, which meet the Technical Guidelines, are expanding on the market.

Necessity of New Regulations for New Technologies regarding R79 Since the devices for new technologies are going to expand on the market, we need technical standards for ensuring safety of these systems. The current R79 has no technical requirements for concrete devices like LKAS and PAS. Therefore, technical standards for LKAS and PAS should be established as new regulations. R79 should also be amended if necessary.

Proposal for New Regulations for New Technologies regarding R79 at the next session  At the next session of GRRF (Mar. 2013), Japan is considering the proposing establishment of new regulations for LKAS and PAS.  In this case, the control principles discussed at ITS Informal Meeting will also be taken into account. In other words, the regulation for ADASS should be established based on “Design Principles for Control Systems” to guarantee prevention of any accidents caused by the system and also prevention of confusion for users. (Currently being developed by ITS Informal Group)

Number of units shipped globally by Japanese car manufacturers and other countries Changes in PAS Shipment Volumes

Number of units shipped in Japan by Japanese car manufacturers 0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12, Year Shipment volume (units/year) Changes in LKAS Shipment Volumes

The abstract of Lane Keeping Assistance System The system controls a steering with sensing lines on a road by a camera, and it assists a driver keeping a vehicle within a lane. It is expected that traffic accidents such as departure from a road side are reduced by the system because of reduction of driver’s workload.

Fig.2 Fig.1 The abstract of Parking Assistance System The system controls a steering to assists a driver parking a vehicle into a backward parking space. Two types of parking are considered (Fig.1 and/or Fig.2). It is expected that traffic accidents during backward parking are reduced by the system because of reduction of driver’s workload.

 Vehicle speed range for the system operation  Functional limitation for the system  Prevention of driving without holding a steering wheel  System status of ON or OFF  Driver’s override  Necessary information shown to a driver by display  Methods for notifying necessary information to a driver  Failsafe functions  Methods and contents to make users know necessary items  Test procedure Confirmation method regarding technical requirement The Major Contents of the Japanese Technical Guideline for Lane Keeping Assistance System

 System status of ON or OFF by driver’s intention  Conditions for start of the system (target parking position)  Assistance of a departure from the parking spot  Vehicle speed limitation for the system operation  Driver’s override  Prevention of harming a driver by rotation of steering wheel  Necessary information shown to a driver by display  Methods for notifying necessary information to a driver  Failsafe functions  Methods and contents to make users know necessary items  Test procedure Confirmation method regarding technical requirement The Major Contents of the Japanese Technical Guideline for Parking Assistance System

Appendix (Definition of R79) "Advanced Driver Assistance Steering System“ means a system, additional to the main steering system, that provides assistance to the driver in steering the vehicle but in which the driver remains at all times in primary control of the vehicle. It comprises one or both of the following functions: (paragraph of the current R79) "Automatically commanded steering function“ means the function within a complex electronic control system where actuation of the steering system can result from automatic evaluation of signals initiated on-board the vehicle, possibly in conjunction with passive infrastructure features, to generate continuous control action in order to assist the driver in following a particular path, in low speed manoeuvring or parking operations. (paragraph of the current R79) "Corrective steering function“ means the discontinuous control function within a complex electronic control system whereby, for a limited duration, changes to the steering angle of one or more wheels may result from the automatic evaluation of signals initiated on-board the vehicle, in order to maintain the basic desired path of the vehicle or to influence the vehicle's dynamic behaviour. Systems that do not themselves positively actuate the steering system but that, possibly in conjunction with passive infrastructure features, simply warn the driver of a deviation from the ideal path of the vehicle, or of an unseen hazard, by means of a tactile warning transmitted through the steering control, are also considered to be corrective steering. (paragraph of the current R79)

Appendix (Requirement of R79) The direction of operation of the steering control shall correspond to the intended change of direction of the vehicle and there shall be a continuous relationship between the steering control deflection and the steering angle. These requirements do not apply to systems that incorporate an automatically commanded or corrective steering function, or to auxiliary steering equipment. These requirements may also not necessarily apply in the case of full power steering when the vehicle is stationary and when the system is not energised Advanced driver assistance steering systems shall only be approved in accordance with this Regulation where the function does not cause any deterioration in the performance of the basic steering system. In addition they shall be designed such that the driver may, at any time and by deliberate action, override the function." Whenever the Automatically Commanded Steering function becomes operational, this shall be indicated to the driver and the control action shall be automatically disabled if the vehicle speed exceeds the set limit of 10 km/h by more than 20 per cent or the signals to be evaluated are no longer being received. Any termination of control shall produce a short but distinctive driver warning by a visual signal and either an acoustic signal or by imposing a tactile warning signal on the steering control.