Response rateFirst-year Senior GGC Southeast Public Carnegie ClassNSSE 2013 GGC Southeast Public Carnegie ClassNSSE 2013 9%15%23%21% 22%21%29%26% Representativeness.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Student Engagement Task Force Cindy Horn and John Thorp, Co-Chairs December 15, 2005.
Advertisements

Gary Whisenand Director, Institutional Research August 26, 2011.
Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: Annual Campus Climate Survey: 2010 Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty Senate.
Prepared by: Fawn Skarsten Director Institutional Analysis.
National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Comparisons of the survey results for UPRM Office of Institutional Research and Planning University of Puerto.
You will be familiar with the five NSSE benchmarks and the survey items that make up each benchmark. You will be familiar with the comparison groups.
DATA UPDATES FACULTY PRESENTATION September 2009.
Gallaudet University Results on National Survey of Student Engagement Office of Institutional Research August, 2007.
Student Engagement In Good Educational Practices Findings From the 2004 and 2007 National Surveys of Student Engagement Cathy Sanders Director of Assessment.
First Year & Senior Student Experiences The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) 2011 Office of Institutional Research and Policy Studies.
Student and Faculty Perceptions on Student Engagement: ISU’s NSSE and FSSE Results 2013 Ruth Cain, Assessment Coordinator Dan Clark, Department of History.
NSSE and MSU Retention Chris Fastnow Office of Planning and Analysis December 4, 2008.
NSSE 2014: Accolades and Action Items Faculty Senate Nov. 20, 2014 Patrick Barlow, Ph.D., Assessment Coordinator.
GGC and Student Engagement.  NSSE  Overall: 32%  First Year: 30%  Seniors: 33%  GGC  Overall: 28%  First Year: 26% (381)  Seniors: 38% (120)
Presentation to Student Affairs Directors November, 2010 Marcia Belcheir, Ph.D. Institutional Analysis, Assessment, & Reporting.
Mind the Gap: Overview of FSSE and BCSSE Jillian Kinzie NSSE.
Benchmarking Effective Educational Practice Community Colleges of the State University of New York April, 2005.
2008 – 2014 Results Chris Willis East Stroudsburg University Office of Assessment and Accreditation Spring 2015
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services.
St. Petersburg College CCSSE 2011 Findings Board of Trustees Meeting.
Results of AUC’s NSSE Administration in 2011 Office of Institutional Research February 9, 2012.
Community College Survey of Student Engagement CCSSE 2014.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2006 Marcia Belcheir Institutional Analysis, Assessment & Reporting.
An Introduction: NSSE and the Concept of Student Engagement.
CCSSE 2013 Findings for Cuesta College San Luis Obispo County Community College District.
 Assessing Student Engagement.  1. Amount of time/effort students put into their studies and other educationally purposeful activities  2. How institutional.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
NSSE 2005: Student Perceptions of Enriching Educational Experiences Kathryn Doherty, Ed.D. January 18, 2006.
National Survey of Student Engagement, 2008 Results for UBC-Vancouver.
Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: National Survey of Student Engagement Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty.
APSU 2009 National Survey of Student Engagement Patricia Mulkeen Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
NC State Office of Institutional Research & Planning September, 2014.
Academic Staff Senate Presentation March 17, 2014.
ESU’s NSSE 2013 Overview Joann Stryker Office of Institutional Research and Assessment University Senate, March 2014.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2009 Missouri Valley College January 6, 2010.
CCSSE 2010: SVC Benchmark Data Note: Benchmark survey items are listed in the Appendix (slides 9-14)
NSSE 2013 How to Use Results (or “Why you should care about NSSE”) 8/26/
1 This CCFSSE Drop-In Overview Presentation Template can be customized using your college’s CCFSSE/CCSSE results. Please review the “Notes” section accompanying.
Drake Curriculum Assessment Wabash Memo NSSE 2013 Results + Senior Focus Groups Report to Faculty Senate February 19, 2014 Kevin Saunders Stephanie Majeran.
NSSE 2005 CSUMB Report California State University at Monterey Bay Office of Institutional Effectiveness Office of Assessment and Research.
Looking Inside The “Oakland Experience” Another way to look at NSSE Data April 20, 2009.
Student Engagement as Policy Direction: Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Skagit Valley College Board of Trustees Policy GP-4 – Education.
De Anza College 2009 Community College Survey of Student Engagement Presented to the Academic Senate February 28, 2011 Prepared by Mallory Newell Institutional.
National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Comparison on the survey results at UPRM with peers Office of Institutional Research and Planning University.
Jennifer Ballard George Kuh September 19, Overview  NSSE and the Concept of Student Engagement  Select Linfield results:  NSSE 2011  Brief explanation.
NSSE Working Student Study Assessment Day Presentation Office of Assessment Fitchburg State College.
NSSE 2013 Results Report to Faculty Senate February 19, 2014.
1 NSSE Results Fort Lewis College (2010) Richard A. Miller Exec. Dir – OIRPA.
Diversity at Stetson: Perspectives of Students and Faculty John Tichenor Associate Professor of Decision and Information Science.
1 Results From UNCG’s Spring 1998 Sophomore Survey Office of Institutional Research September 1998 The University of North Carolina at Greensboro.
GGC and Student Engagement.  NSSE  Overall: 27% (down 5%)  First Year: 25% (down 5%)  Seniors: 28% (down 5%)  GGC  Overall: 35% (up 7%)  First.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Results & Recommendations Presented by: November, 2005 S. J. Sethi, Ph.D.
Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness 1 The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006.
The University of Texas-Pan American Susan Griffith, Ph.D. Executive Director National Survey of Student Engagement 2003 Results & Recommendations Presented.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2013 Presented by: November 2013 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.
Learning Communities at Ventura College. What are learning communities? Interdisciplinary learning Importance of sense of community for learning Student.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2014 Presented by: October 2014 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.
Director of Institutional Accreditation and Assessment
The University of Texas-Pan American
NSSE Data Conversations
Irish Survey of Student Engagement (ISSE) Results 2016
UTRGV 2016 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
The University of Texas-Pan American
2017 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services
Your Institutional Report Step by Step
UTRGV 2018 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
UTRGV 2017 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
2013 NSSE Results.
Presentation transcript:

Response rateFirst-year Senior GGC Southeast Public Carnegie ClassNSSE 2013 GGC Southeast Public Carnegie ClassNSSE %15%23%21% 22%21%29%26% Representativeness First-year Senior Respondent %Population % Respondent %Population % Female Full-time First-time, first-year4446 N/A Race/ethnicity a Am. Indian or Alaska Native10 00 Asian Black or African American Hispanic or Latino Native Hawaiian/Other Pac. Isl White Other00 00 Foreign or nonresident alien11 11 Two or more races/ethicities44 33 Unknown01 33

2012 and Prior2013 BenchmarksThemeEngagement Indicator Level of Academic Challenge Academic Challenge Higher-Order Learning Reflective and Integrative Learning Learning Strategies Quantitative Reasoning Active & Collaborative Learning Learning with Peers Collaborative Learning Discussions with Diverse Others Student Faculty Interaction Experiences with Faculty Student-Faculty Interaction Effective Teaching Practices Enriching Educational Experiences Campus Environment Quality of Interactions Supportive Environment Supportive Campus Environment

GGC Southeast Public Carnegie ClassNSSETop 50% Top 10% Academic Challenge Higher-Order Learning Reflective and Integrative Learning Learning Strategies ✓ 44.3 Quantitative Reasoning ✓ 30.5 Learning with Peers Collaborative Learning Discussions with Diverse Others Experiences with Faculty Student-Faculty Interaction Effective Teaching Practices ✓ 44.7 Campus Environment Quality of Interactions Supportive Environment

GGC Southeast Public Carnegie ClassNSSETop 50% Top 10% Academic Challenge Higher-Order Learning Reflective and Integrative Learning Learning Strategies ✓ 45.4 Quantitative Reasoning ✓ 32.5 ✓ Learning with Peers Collaborative Learning Discussions with Diverse Others ✓ 45.8 ✓ Experiences with Faculty Student-Faculty Interaction Effective Teaching Practices ✓ 45.3 Campus Environment Quality of Interactions Supportive Environment ✓ 39.1

GGC Southeast Public Carnegie ClassNSSE First Year Learning community Service-learning Research with faculty8665 Participated in at least one Participated in two or more Seniors Learning community2224 Service-learning Research with faculty Internship or field exp Study abroad Culminating senior exp Participated in at least one Participated in two or more

GGC First-year students compared with Southeast PublicCarnegie ClassNSSE 2013 Engagement IndicatorMean Effect sizeMean Effect sizeMean Effect size Higher-Order Learning Reflective & Integrative Learning Learning Strategies * *.12 Quantitative Reasoning GGC Senior students compared with Southeast PublicCarnegie ClassNSSE 2013 Engagement IndicatorMean Effect sizeMean Effect sizeMean Effect size Higher-Order Learning Reflective & Integrative Learning Learning Strategies *.14 Quantitative Reasoning ** *.14

Percentage responding "Very much" or "Quite a bit" about how much coursework emphasized…GGC Southeast Public Carnegie ClassNSSEGGC Southeast Public Carnegie ClassNSSE 4b. Applying facts, theories, or methods to practical problems or new situations c. Analyzing an idea, experience, or line of reasoning in depth by examining its parts d. Evaluating a point of view, decision, or information source e. Forming a new idea or understanding from various pieces of information First YearSenior

Percentage of students who responded that they "Very often" or "Often"…GGC Southeast Public Carnegie ClassNSSEGGC Southeast Public Carnegie ClassNSSE 2a. Combined ideas from different courses when completing assignments b. Connected your learning to societal problems or issues c. Included diverse perspectives (political, religious, racial/ethnic, gender, etc.) in course discussions or assignments d. Examined the strengths and weaknesses of your own views on a topic or issue e. Tried to better understand someone else's views by imagining how an issue looks from his or her perspective f. Learned something that changed the way you understand an issue or concept g. Connected ideas from your courses to your prior experiences and knowledge First YearSenior

Percentage of students who responded that they "Very often" or "Often"…GGC Southeast Public Carnegie ClassNSSEGGC Southeast Public Carnegie ClassNSSE 9a. Identified key information from reading assignments b.Reviewed your notes after class c. Summarized what you learned in class or from course materials First YearSenior

Percentage of students who responded that they "Very often" or "Often"…GGC Southeast Public Carnegie ClassNSSEGGC Southeast Public Carnegie ClassNSSE 6a. Reached conclusions based on your own analysis of numerical information (numbers, graphs, statistics, etc.) b. Used numerical information to examine a real-world problem or issue (unemployment, climate change, public health, etc.) c. Evaluated what others have concluded from numerical information First YearSenior

GGC First-year students compared with Southeast PublicCarnegie ClassNSSE 2013 Engagement IndicatorMean Effect sizeMean Effect sizeMean Effect size Collaborative Learning ** * -.11 Discussions with Diverse Others GGC Seniors compared with Southeast PublicCarnegie ClassNSSE 2013 Engagement IndicatorMean Effect sizeMean Effect sizeMean Effect size Collaborative Learning Discussions with Diverse Others *** *** ***.36

Percentage of students who responded that they "Very often" or "Often"… GGC Southeast Public Carnegie ClassNSSEGGC Southeast Public Carnegie ClassNSSE 1e.Asked another student to help you understand course material f.Explained course material to one or more students g.Prepared for exams by discussing or working through course material with other students h.Worked with other students on course projects or assignments

Percentage of students who responded that they "Very often" or "Often" had discussions with… GGC Southeast Public Carnegie ClassNSSEGGC Southeast Public Carnegie ClassNSSE 8a.People from a race or ethnicity other than your own b.People from an economic background other than your own c.People with religious beliefs other than your own d.People with political views other than your own

GGC First-year students compared with Southeast PublicCarnegie ClassNSSE 2013 Engagement Indicator Mean Effect sizeMean Effect sizeMean Effect size Student-Faculty Interaction * Effective Teaching Practices ** * *.13 GGC Seniors compared with Southeast PublicCarnegie ClassNSSE 2013 Engagement Indicator Mean Effect sizeMean Effect sizeMean Effect size Student-Faculty Interaction Effective Teaching Practices *.14

Percentage of students who responded that they "Very often" or "Often"… GGC Southeast Public Carnegie ClassNSSEGGC Southeas t Public Carnegie ClassNSSE 3a.Talked about career plans with a faculty member b.Worked w/faculty on activities other than coursework (committees, student groups, etc.) c.Discussed course topics, ideas, or concepts with a faculty member outside of class d.Discussed your academic performance with a faculty member First YearSenior

Percentage responding "Very much" or "Quite a bit" about how much instructors have…GGC Southeast Public Carnegie ClassNSSEGGC Southeast Public Carnegie ClassNSSE 5a.Clearly explained course goals and requirements b.Taught course sessions in an organized way c.Used examples or illustrations to explain difficult points d.Provided feedback on a draft or work in progress e.Provided prompt and detailed feedback on tests or completed assignments First YearSenior

GGC First-year students compared with Southeast PublicCarnegie ClassNSSE 2013 Engagement Indicator Mean Effect sizeMean Effect sizeMean Effect size Quality of Interactions * ** ** -.20 Supportive Environment * GGC Seniors compared with Southeast PublicCarnegie ClassNSSE 2013 Engagement Indicator Mean Effect sizeMean Effect sizeMean Effect size Quality of Interactions ** * -.17 Supportive Environment

Percentage rating a 6 or 7 on a scale from 1="Poor" to 7="Excellent" their interactions with… GGC Southeast Public Carnegie ClassNSSEGGC Southeast Public Carnegie ClassNSSE 13a.Students b.Academic advisors c.Faculty d.Student services staff (career services, student activities, housing, etc.) e.Other administrative staff and offices (registrar, financial aid, etc.) First YearSenior

Percentage responding "Very much" or "Quite a bit" about how much the institution emphasized… GGC Southeast Public Carnegie ClassNSSEGGC Southeast Public Carnegie ClassNSSE 14b.Providing support to help students succeed academically c.Using learning support services (tutoring services, writing center, etc.) d.Encouraging contact among students from diff. backgrounds (soc., racial/eth., relig., etc.) e.Providing opportunities to be involved socially f.Providing support for your overall well-being (recreation, health care, counseling, etc.) g.Helping you manage your non- academic responsibilities (work, family, etc.) h.Attending campus activities and events (performing arts, athletic events, etc.) i.Attending events that address important social, economic, or political issues First YearSenior

Participate in a learning community or some other formal program where groups of students take two or more classes together First YearSenior

About how many of your courses at this institution have included a community-based project (service learning)? First YearSenior

Work with a faculty member on a research project First YearSenior

Participate in an internship, co-op, field experience, student teaching, or clinical placement.

Participate in a study abroad program

Complete a culminating senior experience (capstone course, senior project or thesis, comprehensive exam, portfolio, etc.)