1 Risk-based Evaluations and Trends of Railway Casualty Accidents on the National Railway of South Korea International Railway Safety Conference 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Action 1: Mission/task analysis Action 2: List Hazards Action 3: List Causes STEP 1 IDENTIFY THE HAZARD STEP 2 ASSESS THE RISK Action 1: Assess hazard.
Advertisements

Arab Mashreq Road Safety Partnership Workshop
Vancouver, October 08th 2013 DB Systemtechnik GmbH Marc Geisler The challenge of transforming a rule-based system into a risk-based culture on an example.
Risk Assessment and Management Katie Matthews GEOG 350 November 8, 2007.
1 Development and Application of Hazard Analysis & Risk Assessment Models for the Korea Railway International Railway Safety Conference 2008 Denver, Colorado.
Railway Safety Plan and Its Status in Korea
Vectus Ltd Copyright Page 1 Safety Process in Vectus ’ PRT Project Inge Alme: Safety Manager Jörgen Gustafsson: CTO.
1 Risk evaluation Risk treatment. 2 Risk Management Process Risk Management Process.
Title slide PIPELINE QRA SEMINAR. PIPELINE RISK ASSESSMENT INTRODUCTION TO GENERAL RISK MANAGEMENT 2.
Rail Safety Committee Mid Year Meeting December 2011
Japan’s Efforts to Ensure Safety of Railways October 12th, 2010 Railway Bureau MLIT.
Dinesh Mohan Transportation Research & Injury Prevention Programme Indian Institute of technology Delhi Emerging Dimensions of Railway Safety.
Railtrack PLC Safety & Standards Directorate Railway Safety: Analysing Risks and Causes Sally Brearley Railtrack Safety and Standards Directorate 8 December.
Human factor, road-rail safety policies, available technologies at level crossing. Towards a model to evaluate LCs risk. Emilio Cosciotti Massimo Costa.
Title: Railway Safety Plan in Korea Name: Sanglog Kwak, Sungbae Yoon, Kwanghag Choi Organisation: MLTM, KRRI Economy: Republic of Korea Thirty Fourth APEC.
Pipeline Qra Seminar Title slide Title slide.
Frequency analysis and scenario development
SMS Operation.  Internal safety (SMS) audits are used to ensure that the structure of an SMS is sound.  It is also a formal process to ensure continuous.
International Rail Safety Conference Goa 1 October 2007 – 3 October 2007 GB Experience 10 years after privatisation Anson Jack Deputy Chief Executive Director.
Title: Rail Safety Survey Presenter’s Name: DAISY P. JACOBO Economy: Philippines 33rd APEC Transportation Working Group Tokyo, Japan October
Mark Piekarz, Ian Jenkins and Peter Mills
Health & Safety in Construction An Introduction. Objectives 1 recognise that accidents are ‘serious stuff’ recognise that accidents are ‘serious stuff’
WHAT IS SYSTEM SAFETY? The field of safety analysis in which systems are evaluated using a number of different techniques to improve safety. There are.
1 Problem Areas in Construction Safety CH 4: Problem Areas in Construction Safety Faculty of Applied Engineering and Urban Planning Civil Engineering Department.
Introduction to Risk Management C7 Slide 1. The Concept of Safety  ‘Safety’ refers to the reduction of risk to a tolerable level  Risk = Likelihood.
DESIGNING FOR SAFETY CHAPTER 9. IMPORTANCE OF DESIGNING FOR SAFETY  In the near future, the level of safety that companies and industries achieve will.
This Project is funded by the European Union Project implemented by Human Dynamics Consortium This project is funded by the European Union Projekat finansira.
ASSTAR User Forum #1 Rome 4th April 2006 ASAS-TN2 Second Workshop ASSTAR Safety Approach and Preliminary Issues Dr Giuseppe GRANIERO, SICTA
Supporting European Rail Accident Investigation Inter national Rail Safety Conference Sweden 29th September 2009 Dr Jane Rajan Head of sector : safety.
SAFETY OF TRAFFIC COMPARED TO OTHER HUMAN ACTIVITIES IN FINLAND Otto Kärki and Kirsi Pajunen Technical Research Centre of Finland (VTT)
Westminster Kingsway College Professional Chef Diploma Unit 703 S.Greubel.
INTERGO bvI PO Box 19218E 3501 DE UTRECHTT Countdown on a platform Higher punctuality and increased level.
Risk Management 3-1 Chapter 3. Learning Objectives Define risk. Define risk management. Discuss the meaning of and the process for risk identification.
Railway Safety Commission An Coimisiún Sábháilteachta Iarnróid The Management of Third Party Generated Risk in Ireland International Railway Safety Conference.
INTRODUCTION TO STATISTICAL STUDY OF BUS ACCIDENT ARE THE BUSES SAFE OR NOT? GRSG, 109 th session Sept. – 2. Oct Presented by Dr. MATOLCSY Mátyás.
Designing tools for enhanced monitoring of railway safety performance of the European Union and its Member States Vojtech EKSLER & Cecilia LIND Safety.
1 Review and Assessment of the Korea Rail ’ s Safety Performance using Risk Assessment Models International Railway Safety Conference 2009, Sweden Chan-Woo.
Annex I: Methods & Tools prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 1 ICH Q9 QUALITY.
International Railway Safety Conference October 7 th, 2013 Rob Smith, National Legislative Director - Teamsters Canada Rail Conference Marc Beaulieu, Regional.
Objectives Students will be able to:
Transport Rail Safety & the Railway Safety Directive Frank Jost Single European Rail Area EU Commission 1.
1 Federal Office of Transport, Hannes Meuli, Roman Slovák Workshop on Rail Safety: Trends and Challenges, UNECE, Geneva, Schweizerische Eidgenossenschaft.
International Railway Safety Conference 2008 A regulator’s challenge – inspecting the right things Allan Spence HM Deputy Chief Inspector (Operations)
A sustainable safety performance for railways Angelo Pira Project Officer at the European Railway Agency (ERA)
SAFETY OF TRAM TRAFFIC IN THE CITY OF ZAGREB Goran Radosović.
HIGH SPEED RAIL ASSESSMENT NORGE
השוואת תנאי עבודת עתקים ודרישות בטיחות נעשתה בהתאם לדו"ח מבקר 3/13. ISRAEL RAIL COMPANY General Overview Udi Kaplansky (MSc. Safety Engineering) VP Safety,
ON “SOFTWARE ENGINEERING” SUBJECT TOPIC “RISK ANALYSIS AND MANAGEMENT” MASTER OF COMPUTER APPLICATION (5th Semester) Presented by: ANOOP GANGWAR SRMSCET,
Process Safety Management Soft Skills Programme Nexus Alliance Ltd.
1 Address: UIC Safety Database (SDB) System and Results.
Collision, Injury and Severity Report Fiscal Year End 2014 OPERATIONS, PLANNING, and SAFETY COMMITTEE.
DETECTION AND ASSESSMENT OF SAFETY PROBLEMS WITHIN ROAD TRANSPORT DECISION MAKING Prof. Dr. Nikolay Georgiev eng. Violina Velyova ‘Todor Kableshkov’ University.
Level Crossing Safety Management Information System
Yokohama National University
Guide for the application of the CSM design targets (CSM-DT)
Guide for the application of the CSM design targets (CSM-DT)
23rd International Railway Safety Conference
Guide for the application of CSM design targets (CSM DT)
Ranjan kumar Assistant Manager CCL,Ranchi
SYSTEM SAFETY AND THE TECHNICAL AUTHOR
ALARP: when is enough, enough?
Safety Update First Quarter FY 2017
Air Carrier Continuing Analysis and Surveillance System (CASS)
QRA Guideline - update Marcello Oliverio February 6, 2018
Quantitative Risk Assessment
U.S. Railroad Safety Statistics & Trends
BHOPAL Industrial Disaster Management Cycle: OECD 2004.
ISO and TR Update for FDA Regulated Industries
Predicting Crashes with Safe Systems Surrogates Obtained from Video Analytics – Implications for Evaluation of Vision Zero Safety Treatments Alireza Jafari.
Project Risk Management Jiwei Ma
Presentation transcript:

1 Risk-based Evaluations and Trends of Railway Casualty Accidents on the National Railway of South Korea International Railway Safety Conference 2007 Goa, India 30 th September - 6 th October Chanwoo Park, Jongbae Wang, Yunok Cho, Hyukjin Yoon, Joonam Park

2 IIntroduction Contents II Development of Risk Assessment Model III Risk Assessment Results IVConclusion

3 Railway Accident Classification in South Korea 1. Introduction Railway Traffic Accident Train Accident Train collision accident, Train derailment accident, Train fire accident, Other train accidents Level Crossing Accident Collision or contact between a train and a road vehicle on the railway level crossing (excluding collision between a train and people) Railway Traffic Casualty Accident Passenger casualty accident, Worker casualty accident, MOP casualty accident (including collision between a train and people in level crossings) Train Operation Delay Accident Rolling stock derailment, Rolling stock damages, Rolling stock fire, Rolling stock separation, Rolling stock rolling, Regulation violation such as SPAD, Railway track failure, Electric supply system failure, Signal system failure, Rolling stock failure, etc Railway Safety Accident Railway safety casualty accident, Fire accident, Infrastructure/equipment accident, Construction accident Disaster “The Railway Safety Act was established in 2004 The railway accident report regulation has been set up in 2006” Railway Accident Classification by the R Railway Accident Classification by the Railway Accident Report Regulation

4 Railway Casualty Accident 1. Introduction l l Excluding train derailment, train collision, train fires/explosion l l Excluding collision between a train and a road vehicle on the railway level crossing l l Including suspected suicide l l Including collision between a train and people in level crossings l l Excluding train derailment, train collision, train fires/explosion l l Excluding collision between a train and a road vehicle on the railway level crossing l l Including suspected suicide l l Including collision between a train and people in level crossings Casualty accidents in both railway traffic accidents and safety accidents All kinds of accidents that cause Injuries of people on railway premises The railway casualty accident refers to …..

5 Railway Casualty Accident Situation on the Main Line 1. Introduction Accident Frequency per YearFatalities and Weighted Injuries (FWI/Year) “the number of casualty accidents occupies more than 50% of railway accidents and 90% of the total risk of railway in South Korea.” 0.1 of a fatality for major injury of a fatality for minor injury.

6 1. Introduction Research Objectives Quantitative Risk Evaluation of Casualty Accidents for Passengers, Railway Staffs and MOP (Member of public) Hazard Identification / Preliminary Hazard Analysis (PHA) Frequency Analysis Consequence Analysis Risk Analysis Interaction analysis between hazardous events and hazardous condition WWW Safety regulations, Published sources Accident related reports Accident Analysis

7 2. Development of Risk Assessment Model Risk Analysis Process Hazard Identification Causal Analysis Consequence Analysis Loss Analysis Options Analysis Impact Analysis Demonstration Of ALARP and Compliance - Railtrack, Yellow Book 3: Fundamentals and Guidance,

8 2. Development of Risk Assessment Model Overall Procedures Railway Accident Appearance Scenarios Railway Accident Appearance Scenarios FTA Model Railway Accident Progress Scenarios Railway Accident Progress Scenarios ETA Model Casual Analysis Consequence Analysis Hazard Identification Defining the Initiating Hazardous Events Development of Accident Scenarios Risk Assessment (Loss Analysis) HazardousEvents

9 2. Development of Risk Assessment Model Initiating Hazardous Events Railway CategoryInitiating Hazardous Events Railway Traffic Casualty Accident People struck/crushed Striking with train, Striking with objects Trip/Slip Trip/slip during train boarding/alighting, Trip/slip by train emergency braking/emergency start FallingFalling from train, Falling from platform during train boarding/alighting Caught/DraggedCaught in a train door, Caught between platform and train OthersElectric Shock, Burn, Suffocation Railway safety accident People struck/crushed Striking with rolling stock, Striking with objects Trip/Slip Trip/slip inside station premises, Trip/slip on track/level crossing, Trip/slip inside rolling stock, Trip/slip at workplace Falling Falling from rolling stock, Falling from rolling stock roof, Falling during elevated work, Falling from railway structure, Falling from platform Caught/Dragged Caught in installations inside rolling stock, Caught in railway structure of station, Caught in work equipment/objects Electric ShockElectric shock in rolling stock and railway structure BurnBurn in rolling stock and railway structure SuffocationSuffocation in rolling stock and railway structure OthersPatient occurrence, Assault/threat, Discovery for casualties

10 2. Development of Risk Assessment Model Accident Appearance Scenario Structure HazardousEvent Hazardous Factor 1 HumanFactorsTechnicalFactorsThirdPartyHazard Hazardous Factor X HumanFactorsTechnicalFactorsThirdPartyHazard The number of …… l. l Hazardous events is 28. l l Appearance scenarios including hazardous factors is 282. l l Detailed hazardous factors is 47. l. l Accident appearance scenarios is 13,254. l. l Hazardous events is 28. l l Appearance scenarios including hazardous factors is 282. l l Detailed hazardous factors is 47. l. l Accident appearance scenarios is 13,254. Detailed Hazardous Factors

11 2. Development of Risk Assessment Model Accident Appearance Scenario Example

12 2. Development of Risk Assessment Model Accident Progress Scenario Structure Critical factors influencing accident severity were identified in the accident progress scenarios” Example of the Accident Progress Scenarios

13 2. Development of Risk Assessment Model Accident Analysis Information System 1) railway operation data processing part; 2) accident/incident data processing part; 3) hazard list management part; 4) hazardous event management part; 5) environment condition management part; 6) safety measure management part; 7) statistical analysis part of accident/incident data; 8) accident scenario creation/management part Railway Accident Analysis Information System Railway Accident Analysis Information System Accident/Incident Analysis Statistical Analysis of Accident/Incident Data Accident Scenario Creation/Management

14 3. Risk Assessment Results Railway Casualty Accident Data Analysis Railway accident data for two years (2004 – 2005) on the main line of South Korea were analyzed. In the case of rare events not available from accident data, each risk were assessed using engineering judgments. Total risk per year: Average Frequency per year: Injured People Fatalities and Weighted Injuries (FWI)/Year ValuesPercentages Passenger % Member of public (MOP) % Staff % Total %

15 3. Risk Assessment Results Total Risk for Railway Casualty Accidents

16 3. Risk Assessment Results Average Frequency/yr for Hazardous Events

17 3. Risk Assessment Results Risk for Hazardous Events

18 3. Risk Assessment Results Risk for Train Striking Events

19 3. Risk Assessment Results Risk Profile

20 4. Conclusion l Risk model based on the accident scenarios. l Totally 28 initiating hazardous events l Accident frequency assessment model using the FTA technique l Consequence estimation model using the FTA technique l Risk model based on the accident scenarios. l Totally 28 initiating hazardous events l Accident frequency assessment model using the FTA technique l Consequence estimation model using the FTA technique Development of risk assessment model for the railway casualty accidents l Total overall risk per year: l Risk per year for passenger, MOP, and staff: 53, 115.3, 14.5 l Risk of “people striking with train” event: 86.7% l Risk of “trespassers on the open tracks between stations” event: 49.2% l Total overall risk per year: l Risk per year for passenger, MOP, and staff: 53, 115.3, 14.5 l Risk of “people striking with train” event: 86.7% l Risk of “trespassers on the open tracks between stations” event: 49.2% Risk assessment for railway casualty accidents “First step in the risk assessment of railway casualty accidents in Korea Application to the definition of the risk reduction measures”

21 Thank you!