BACKGROUND Members of the University of Maine’s Cooperative Forestry Research Unit (CFRU) have identified a better understanding about how forest stands.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Thinning intensity studies and growth modeling of Montana mixed conifer forests at the University of Montana’s Lubrecht Experimental Forest Thomas Perry.
Advertisements

Evaluating Approaches to “Ecosystem Management” Using FVS Steve McConnell NWIFC August 29, 2002.
Predicting Sapling Recruitment Following Partial Cutting in the Acadian Forest: Using Long-Term Data to Assess the Performance of FVS-NE David Ray 1, Chad.
Modeling Tree Growth Under Varying Silvicultural Prescriptions Leah Rathbun University of British Columbia Presented at Western Mensurationists 2010.
Harold S.J. Zald and Andrew N. Gray USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station 3200 SW Jefferson Way, Corvallis, OR Tree Regeneration.
Managing Timberlands Owned by a REIT. 2 Key Components of a REIT  REIT Background: Form of C-corporation Created in 1960 Vehicle for the multitudes Pass-through.
Lecture 7 Forestry 3218 Forest Mensuration II Lecture 7 Forest Inventories Avery and Burkhart Chapter 9.
CROP TREE GROWTH AND QUALITY TWENTY- FIVE YEARS AFTER PRECOMMERCIAL THINNING IN A NORTHERN CONIFER STAND Leah M. Phillips 1, Robert S. Seymour 1, and Laura.
“The conservation objective in the Mississippi Alluvial Valley is to provide forested habitat capable of supporting sustainable populations of all forest.
NASP IMDS Stand Density THE BIG THREE: Absolute stand density Quadratic Mean Diameter Basal Area.
Growth and yield Harvesting Regeneration Thinning Fire and fuels.
Forestry Measurements
Fall River Long-term Productivity Study : Predictions of Pre-harvest Biomass and Nutrient Pools K. Petersen, B. Strahm, C. Licata, B. Flaming, E. Sucre,
Forestry Measurements Ms. Dombroski September 2005.
Cooperative Forestry Research Unit: Success Stories Spencer R. Meyer Associate Director Cooperative Forestry Research Unit University of Maine.
What Do You See? Message of the Day: The management objective determines whether a site is over, under, or fully stocked.
Materials and Methods Stand Management Cooperative (SMC) Type 1 Installations Research Plots Six 1 acre Douglas-fir plots per installation were examined.
 Discuss silvicultural principles related to restoration/fuels treatments  Compare conditions from the 1900 Cheesman Lake reconstruction to current.
Western Hardwood Association Symposium III October 7, 2003 The Future of Hardwood Tree Farming.
West Virginia University Division of Forestry 3 rd Forest Vegetation Simulator Conference February 13-15, 2007 Fort Collins, Colorado.
1 Density and Stocking. 2 Potential of the land to produce wood is determined mainly by its site quality. The actual production or growth of wood fiber.
Stem form responses to differing areas of weed control around planted Douglas-fir trees Robin Rose, Douglas A. Maguire, and Scott Ketchum Department of.
The Potential of the Alder Resource: Challenges and Opportunities David Hibbs and Andrew Bluhm Hardwood Silviculture Cooperative Department of Forest Science.
Five Rivers Silviculture Workshop, April 23, 2003 Purposes of the workshop: Further refine the prescription for the pulsed pathway; Identify uncertainties.
Community dynamics in old growth and second growth hemlock forests.
Potential for Biomass Energy Development in South Carolina Tim Adams Resource Development Director South Carolina Forestry Commission.
Development and Implementation of a Red Alder Tree Farm Program Western Hardwood Association Annual Meeting June, 2005.
Using the Gingrich (1967) Stocking Chart for Upland Hardwood forests in the Central States Gingrich, S. F Measuring and evaluating stocking and.
Forest Productivity Will it be the Holy Grail? Wayne Brandt Executive Vice President.
Dead/Dying Douglas-fir Granite Creek area Dead/Dying Douglas-fir Harvest up to 95% of dead/dying trees
Treatments and methods to manipulate stand structure suitable for fuel reduction.
Thinning mixed-species stands of Douglas-fir and western hemlock in the presence of Swiss needle cast Junhui Zhao, Douglas A. Maguire, Douglas B. Mainwaring,
Kalum TSA Mid-Term Timber Supply Issue. Land classification Reduction area (ha) Result (ha) Gross TSA area 2,300,464 Large parks 460,845 Tree Farm Licences.
Comparisons of DFSIM, ORGANOIN and FVS David Marshall Olympia Forestry Sciences Laboratory PNW Research Station USDA Forest Service Growth Model Users.
By Klaus Puettmann & Mike Saunders Department of Forest Resources, University of Minnesota A New Tool for White Spruce Management: Density Management Guides.
1 Lessons Learned On the Second Entry in a Cariboo Mule Deer Winter Range Alex Fraser Research Forest Ken Day, Manager SISCO Winter Workshop, February.
Looking for the Plateau in Douglas-fir Annual Volume Increment
Harold S.J. Zald and Andrew N. Gray USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station 3200 SW Jefferson Way, Corvallis, OR Tree Regeneration.
RAP-ORGANON A Red Alder Plantation Growth Model David Hibbs, David Hann, Andrew Bluhm, Oregon State University.
SILVICULTURAL PRACTICES. SILVICULTURE The application of various treatments such as; tree planting, pruning, intermediate cuttings and harvest cuts.
Stand Development. Site Capability The ability of a forest to grow is related directly to physical site factors. Favourable physical factors create better.
Annualized diameter and height growth equations for plantation grown Douglas- fir, western hemlock, and red alder Aaron Weiskittel 1, Sean Garber 1, Greg.
Silvicultural Prescription Rob Lusk. B All Species PlotTPATPA SD Basal Area BA SD Average Stand Diameter Average Stand Diameter SD Mean Quadratic Diameter.
The Effect of Fuel Treatments on the Invasion of Nonnative Plants Kyle E. Merriam 1, Jon E. Keeley 1, and Jan L. Beyers 2. [1] USGS Western Ecological.
Aggregated National Forest Inventory Data Hungary State Forest Service of Hungary Contact: Zoltán Kovács
Potential Biomass Volumes From Forest Treatments in the West Bryce Stokes National Program Leader Washington, DC ______ USDA Forest Service R&D.
David R. Jackson Penn State Cooperative Extension February 10, 2009 “I Have Timber to Sell” Timber Sales and Marketing.
GROWTH AND YIELD How will my forest grow? Dr. Glenn Glover School of Forestry & Wildlife Sciences Auburn University.
CFI NPT Forestry & Fire Management Division.
Leah Rathbun PhD Candidate, University of British Columbia
SILVICULTURAL PRACTICES
Results as of 10/18/2016 Presented By Allison Kanoti
Everything You Ever Wanted to Know About TPO and Biomass
Forest Growing and Processing in Otago - Southland
Forest Mensuration And Statistics.
One-year Oak Regeneration (Quercus spp
Temporal and spatial variability in stand structure and individual-tree growth for 10 years following commercial thinning in spruce-fir forests of northern.
Vermont Department of Forests, Parks & Recreation
Developing Edition 3.0 of CIPSANON
LONGYEAR A MICHIGAN-BASED ASSET MANAGER FOR OVER 145 YEARS.
List of Treatments in 2015 Injection Study
Jing Hu University of Queensland
Then… ….and Now.
FFA Forestry CDE – Elba High School – Mr. Davis
The Swedish National Forest Inventory
Shortleaf Pine Demonstration Areas Assist Promoting Restoration
Kirk Hanson (360)
By: Philip W. Williams Bachelor of Science in Forestry Student
Forest Resources Monday, April 4.
Forestry Clipboard Tables
Presentation transcript:

BACKGROUND Members of the University of Maine’s Cooperative Forestry Research Unit (CFRU) have identified a better understanding about how forest stands respond to commercial thinning as a top research priority for As a result, the CFRU Commercial Thinning Research Network was established in A primary objective of this network is to establish a set of long-term commercial thinning study sites across the state of Maine. Initial efforts are directed at the spruce-fir forest type. Research installations in mature spruce-fir stands that have been previously pre-commercially thinned are answering two key questions: What is the influence of: (1) timing of commercial thinning? (2) residual density on subsequent stand response? EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN 1.Randomized complete block design with 6 sites or replications 2.Seven 0.92 A (200 x 200 ft) treatment plots containing 0.20 A (100 x 87.2 ft) measurement plot installed per site (see diagram) 3.Pre-treatment tree measurements include tree species, DBH, height, and location in plot (summer 2000) 4.Pre-treatment data were used to develop treatment specifications for each plot 5.Plots were thinned using a single-grip processor with forwarder and ghost trails (see diagram) in Merchantable volume removed was measured 7.Residual trees are numbered with aluminum tag, location within plot recorded, and DBH, height, and live crown monitored over long-term 8.Data collected from this site are being combined with data from other sites across state to determine tree- and stand-level responses to commercial thinning treatments STUDY PLOT DESIGN 200 ft 30 ft 100’ 87.2’ 200 ft 30 ft 100 ft 87.2 ft Ghost trails Forwarder trails - approx. 12 ft wide and 100 ft apart 12 ft Wood zone – logs stacked here STAND HISTORY ~1966—Overstory removal, naturally regenerated ~1982—Herbicide treatment ~1985—Pre-commercially thinned to a target density of 850 trees/acre February 2002—Plots 7 and 3 were commercially thinned to remove 33 and 50 percent respectively of the relative density TREATMENT PRESCRIPTIONS THEORETICAL AND ACTUAL TREATMENT EFFECTS AS SHOWN ON STAND DENSITY MANAGEMENT DIAGRAM Actual treatment effect following first thinning at 33% and 50% at this site Log tree density (TPA) Log tree volume (ft 3 ) Average stand trajectory line Max. self- thinning line 33% 50% Control Theoretical effect of thinning intensity on residual relative density Control Maximum self-thinning line (RD=1.0) Log tree density Log tree volume Start RD reduction 33%50% Time of entry Robert G. Wagner, Robert S. Seymour, and Daniel J. McConville Maine's Commercial Thinning Research Network Irving Woodlands, LLC, Weeks Brook Installation

For more information about this study site contact: Cooperative Forestry Research Unit Bob Wagner, Director and Professor of Forest Ecosystem Science University of Maine, Orono, Maine ; Phone: (207) ; Irving Woodlands, LLC Hugh Crammond: (207) CFRU COOPERATORS Major Cooperators Baskahegan Corporation Clayton Lake Woodlands Nexfor Fraser Papers, Inc. Hancock Timber Resource Group Huber Resources Corporation International Paper Company Irving Woodlands, LLC Maine Bureau of Parks and Lands Maine Timberlands Company MeadWestvaco Corporation Plum Creek Timber Company, Inc. Prentiss & Carlisle Company, Inc. Ste. Aurelie Timberlands Company Seven Islands Land Company The Nature Conservancy Other Cooperators Bethel Furniture Stock, Inc. H.O. Bouchard, Inc. Field Timberlands Finestkind Tree Farms Hancock Lumber Company, Inc. Huber Wood Products Landvest F. A. Madden, Inc. Peavey Manufacturing Company Pride Manufacturing Company Robbins Lumber Company Western Maine Nurseries The following organizations have supported this research through the Cooperative Forestry Research Unit at the University of Maine PLOT CONDITIONS BEFORE AND AFTER THINNING Total stand volume (VOL/A) in cords/acre, stand density (TPA) in trees per acre, mean volume per tree (VOL/TREE) in ft 3 per tree, and relative density (RD), before thinning and immediately after thinning for plots that had received a thinning. THINNING EQUIPMENT USED 12’ WIDE FORWARDER TRAILS WERE CUT ON 100’ INTERVALS Valmet single-grip processor used in the thinning operation PLOTTREATMENT VOL/ATPAVOL/TREERD BeforeAfterBeforeAfterBeforeAfterBeforeAfter % % % % % % CONTROL STUDY SITES PEF Comp. 23A IP Macwahoc Irving Weeks Brook Rd. Plum Creek Ronco Cove Plum Creek Lazy Tom IP Alder Stream