Kentucky Travel Demand Model Users Group Overview for the TNMUG Organizational Meeting on January 26, 2004 in Nashville by Rob Bostrom, P.E. Division of.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Forecasting Traffic and Toll Revenue for Public-Private Partnerships (P3) vs. Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO): A comparison 14 th TRB National.

Advertisements

Madison County Travel Demand Model Challenges and Innovations Diane B. Zimmerman, PE.

July 22, Model Objectives Forecast ADT on the Rural State Highway System Autos & Trucks Autos & Trucks Arterial System Arterial System Complement,

Determining the Free-Flow Speeds in a Regional Travel Demand Model based on the Highway Capacity Manual Chao Wang Joseph Huegy Institute for Transportation.

Transportation’s Relation to Growth Management `.

December 13, 2010 Developing Bicycle Performance Measures for Integrated Multi-Modal Corridor Management.

KYTC Freight Planning for the OPPM Meeting on September 8, 2004 by Rob Bostrom, P.E. Division of Multimodal Programs.

Simpson County Travel Demand Model July 22, 2003.

Lawrence-Douglas County Regional ITS Architecture Update.

Intercity Person, Passenger Car and Truck Travel Patterns Daily Highway Volumes on State Highways and Interstates Ability to Evaluate Major Changes in.

PLATFORM ASSIGNMENT AND SIMULATION MODELS Henk Taale AVV Transport Research Centre.

Norman W. Garrick Transportation Forecasting What is it? Transportation Forecasting is used to estimate the number of travelers or vehicles that will use.

A National County-Level Long Distance Travel Model Mike Chaney, AICP Tian Huang, PE, AICP, PTOE Binbin Chen, AICP 15 th TRB National Transportation Planning.

Endeavors in Transportation Health Impact Assessment LCDR Joseph Ralph, MPH, CHES Healthy Community Design Initiative June 2015 National Center for Environmental.

Milton-Madison Bi-State Travel Demand Model Rob Bostrom Planning Application Conference Houston, Texas May 19, 2009.

1 Using Transit Market Analysis Tools to Evaluate Transit Service Improvements for a Regional Transportation Plan TRB Transportation Applications May 20,

Getting More Value from All Highway Data FHWA’s Current Initiatives and Future Plans Presented at Data System Requirements and Gaps to Support Restructuring.

Texas Freight Forecasting Rob Bostrom Monisha Khurana Liza Amar Planning Applications Conference 2015.

Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Evaluating and Communicating Model Results: Guidebook for.

FHWA Next Generation Simulation (NGSIM) Program 2007 TRB Planning Applications Conference Daytona, FL May 7, 2007 James Colyar, P.E. Highway Research Engineer.

Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Transportation Planning Applications Committee (ADB50) presented by Sarah Sun Federal Highway Administration.

Old Policy – which no one ever seem to have heard of.

Statewide ITS Strategic Plan and Architecture Illinois Public Transportation Association Board Meeting Scott Lee IDOT ITS Technical Coordinator.

Crash Data: How Kentucky Improved Their System Eric Green, MSCE, PE, GISP University of Kentucky Kentucky Transportation Center.

Assessment of Urban Transportation Networks by integrating Transportation Planning and Operational Methods /Tools Presentation by: Sabbir Saiyed, P.Eng.

National Household Travel Survey Statewide Applications Heather Contrino Travel Surveys Team Lead Federal Highway Administration Office of Highway Policy.

Simpson County Travel Demand Model Mobility Analysis November 7, 2003.

A Case Study in the Deployment of a Web-based Service as a Stakeholder Involvement Tool to Support the Development of a Travel Demand Model 14 th Annual.

Transportation Planning 599 Cooltoolsfor successful transportation projects Troy Hearn Division of Planning.

How to Put “Best Practice” into Traffic Assignment Practice Ken Cervenka Federal Transit Administration TRB National Transportation.

INDOT Access Management Study _________________________ Long Range Transportation Planning Section Division of Environment, Planning and Engineering INDIANA.

Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to FHWA “Talking Freight” Seminar Series presented by Lance Neumann Cambridge Systematics, Inc. August.

December 2006 Study Update We’ve been busy since our last round of advisory committee and task force meetings were held in the summer and fall. Our next.

Traffic Parameters for use with MOBILE6 in Ky. - Update by Jesse Mayes, P.E. Division of Multimodal Programs July 22, 2003.

Current State of FSUTMS Practice Presented to Model Task Force November 9, 2009 Terry Corkery FDOT Systems Planning Office.

David B. Roden, Senior Consulting Manager Analysis of Transportation Projects in Northern Virginia TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference.

US DOT Planning for Operations Initiative – An Update AASHTO SCOH Annual Meeting June 14-17, 2009 Manchester, NH Rick Backlund – FHWA Office of Operations.

Major Transportation Corridor Studies Using an EMME/2 Travel Demand Forecasting Model: The Trans-Lake Washington Study Carlos Espindola, Youssef Dehghani.

Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) in Kentucky ITS Mid- America Fall 2005.

S. Erdogan 1, K. Patnam 2, X. Zhou 3, F.D. Ducca 4, S. Mahapatra 5, Z. Deng 6, J. Liu 7 1, 4, 6 University of Maryland, National Center for Smart Growth.

The Iowa Travel Analysis Model Civil Engineering 451/551 Fall Semester 2009 Presented by: Phil Mescher, AICP Office of Systems Planning, Iowa Department.

1 Operations Academy Senior Management Program Next Offering September 16-26, 2008.

Douglas Townes FHWA Resource Center 3D Engineered Models for Construction - Implementation March 14, 2013 | Washington, DC TRB Committee on Intelligent.

Integrated Travel Demand Model Challenges and Successes Tim Padgett, P.E., Kimley-Horn Scott Thomson, P.E., KYTC Saleem Salameh, Ph.D., P.E., KYOVA IPC.

Iowa Peer Review for Travel Demand Model Calibration/Validation and Reasonableness Checking Ames, Iowa March 30 – April 1, 2004.

Project Level Traffic Forecasting Summary of Practices from other States TNMUG March 6, 2008.

Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Safety Data Analysis Tools Workshop presented by Krista Jeannotte Cambridge Systematics, Inc. March.

Wisconsin Statewide Model July 26,2006. Travel Forecasting & Analysis Section  Forecasts for Project Development & Design Major Projects and Statewide.

Presented to Model Task Force Model Advancement Committee presented by Thomas Rossi Krishnan Viswanathan Cambridge Systematics Inc. Date November 24, 2008.

Bharath Paladugu TRPC Clyde Scott Independent Consultant

Creating a Statewide Modeling System in Virginia Presentation for the 11th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 7, 2007.

Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lecture 17 Transportation Planning Overview.

11 th National Planning Applications Conference Topic: Statewide Modeling Validation Measures and Issues Authors: Dave Powers, Anne Reyner, Tom Williams,

Using GPS To Locate Collisions Lessons Learned Division of Traffic Accident Surveillance Section.

Integrated Corridor Management Initiative ITS JPO Lead: Mike Freitas Technical Lead: John Harding, Office of Transportation Management.

STATE OF TEXAS BORDER PARTNERSHIP WORKING GROUP Kirk D. Fauver Statewide Planning Engineer FHWA TX Division (HPP-TX) June 30, 2004.

Tianjia Tang, Ph.D., PE Chief, Travel Monitoring and Surveys Division Office of Highway Policy Information, Federal Highway Administration Washington,

Integrated Corridor Management Initiative Dale Thompson Transportation Specialist Office of Operations R&D May 4, 2005.

January 26, 2001 Self Assesmsnts of Operations and Management 1 Self-Assessment Process for Roadway Operations Prepared for TexITE Meeting San Antonio,

Semi-Automated Approach to Develop Focus Area Forecasts from a Statewide Model 12th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 17-21,

Archived Data Management System Study Advisory Committee Meeting September 25, 2003.

Status Update on Developing Guidance for Travel Demand Modeling Office of Transportation Data and Analysis August 11, 2009 Mark Flinner, Traffic Forecast.

Mobile Metropolitan Planning Organization Federal Certification Process “Public Involvement Component” April 13, 2011 Federal Highway Administration Federal.

SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE MEASURES, RANKING AND PRIORITIZATION CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT PLANS INCORPORATION INTO STIP & TIP STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION MONITOR.

NCHRP 7-22 Planning & Preliminary Engineering Applications Guide for the HCM Kittelson & Associates 01/12/15 1 Status Report.

Office of Freight Management and Operations 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE Washington, D.C FHWA Freight Intermodal.

Transportation Planning Applications Conference Sheldon Harrison

United States Census Bureau Data in various forms has been used as part of the current update to the Kentucky Statewide Traffic Model (KYSTM). The goal.

Johnson City MPO Travel Demand Model

A STATE-WIDE ACTIVITY-BASED

Presentation transcript:

Kentucky Travel Demand Model Users Group Overview for the TNMUG Organizational Meeting on January 26, 2004 in Nashville by Rob Bostrom, P.E. Division of Multimodal Programs

Presentation Overview Overview of Travel Demand Modeling in KY Overview of Travel Demand Modeling in KY PurposePurpose PlayersPlayers Model TypesModel Types Model UsesModel Uses Model SoftwareModel Software KY MUG Overview KY MUG Overview Meeting topicsMeeting topics Web siteWeb site Running the MUGRunning the MUG ChangesChanges

Travel Demand Models/Uses Forecasting - especially new facilities Forecasting - especially new facilities Air Quality - VMT, speed forecasting, Mobile 5.0b/6.0 inputs Air Quality - VMT, speed forecasting, Mobile 5.0b/6.0 inputs Transportation Plans - used for MPO and small urban area needs analysis Transportation Plans - used for MPO and small urban area needs analysis Corridor studies - I-66, I-69, I-74, and other major routes Corridor studies - I-66, I-69, I-74, and other major routes Special - CVM (Commercial Vehicle Monitoring) station optimization, User Cost Analysis, Detour Analysis Special - CVM (Commercial Vehicle Monitoring) station optimization, User Cost Analysis, Detour Analysis

Modeling Players In-House In-House MultimodalMultimodal MPOsMPOs KIPDA, KIPDA, OKI OKI Lexington Lexington Ashland, Clarksville, Owensboro, E-town, Bowling Green, Henderson/Evansville Ashland, Clarksville, Owensboro, E-town, Bowling Green, Henderson/Evansville Consultants Consultants Four Statewide On-Demand ContractsFour Statewide On-Demand Contracts Others on individual projectsOthers on individual projects

Modeling Software MinUTP MinUTP Old modelsOld models Hybrid Models (Owensboro)Hybrid Models (Owensboro) Current KYSTMCurrent KYSTM TransCAD TransCAD New modelsNew models

Travel Demand Models/Types KYSTM KYSTM MPO MPO County-level County-level Small urban Small urban Subarea Subarea Sketch Sketch

Travel Demand Models/Statewide Travel Demand Models/Statewide

Travel Demand Models/Statewide

Travel Demand Models/MPO Travel Demand Models/MPO

Travel Demand Models/MPO

Travel Demand Models County-Level

Travel Demand Models/Small Urban Area

Travel Demand Models/Subarea

MUG Background Going since 1995 Going since 1995 Formed because of need to evaluate new software Formed because of need to evaluate new software Meet about 3 times/year Meet about 3 times/year Workshops Workshops Morning meetings Morning meetings Participants: State, local, consultants, MPO, academic, FHWA Participants: State, local, consultants, MPO, academic, FHWA

MUG Topics Travel Demand Models Travel Demand Models SoftwareSoftware TRANSIMSTRANSIMS Statewide ModelStatewide Model MPO ModelsMPO Models Urbanized modelsUrbanized models

MUG Topics Travel Demand Model Interfaces Travel Demand Model Interfaces Forecasting/projectsForecasting/projects DataData TMS TMS Surveys Surveys SE data SE data OD OD Air quality/Mobile6.0Air quality/Mobile6.0 Other tools Other tools Traffic simulation modelsTraffic simulation models Freight/ReebieFreight/Reebie GISGIS

MUG Web Site Web: Web: Members Members ~114~114 Put in Access data basePut in Access data base Share w/ whoeverShare w/ whoever Presentations Presentations Links Links TMIPTMIP TRB statewide model committeeTRB statewide model committee Other MUGsOther MUGs

Running the MUG Steering Committee Steering Committee 3-man planning team3-man planning team Everybody helpsEverybody helps Meetings Meetings Topic selectionTopic selection Securing speakersSecuring speakers Meeting prep.Meeting prep. Day of meetingDay of meeting HonorariumsHonorariums Meeting follow-upMeeting follow-up Training creditTraining credit Publicity Publicity Distribution List Distribution List Member listMember list

MUG Meeting Details Workshops Workshops 4-6 hours4-6 hours 6-10 sessions6-10 sessions National experts & local expertsNational experts & local experts TopicsTopics Speed Estimation Speed Estimation Traffic Simulation Traffic Simulation Travel Surveys Travel Surveys Statewide Model Stakeholders Statewide Model Stakeholders Travel Demand Model Data Travel Demand Model Data Innovative Modeling Technologies Innovative Modeling Technologies

MUG Meeting Details Morning meetings Morning meetings 2-3 hours2-3 hours 4-5 presentations4-5 presentations Sponsorship of FHWA/other training Sponsorship of FHWA/other training HERS/ST (FHWA)HERS/ST (FHWA) REMIREMI TransCAD (Caliper)TransCAD (Caliper) Statewide Traffic Forecasting (FHWA)Statewide Traffic Forecasting (FHWA)

MUG Meeting Details AttendanceAttendance Morning meetings ~ Morning meetings ~ Workshops ~ Workshops ~ different states including presenters from CA, FL, DC, TX and others different states including presenters from CA, FL, DC, TX and others Usually have KY, IN, OH, and WV. Usually have KY, IN, OH, and WV.

Conclusion KY MUG has served KYTC well. KY MUG has served KYTC well. InterdisciplinaryInterdisciplinary TrainingTraining SynergySynergy Win-winWin-win InnovativeInnovative KY MUG prototype for other data/analysis partnerships KY MUG prototype for other data/analysis partnerships FreightFreight Congestion PMsCongestion PMs

Contacts KYTC: KYTC: Rob Bostrom, Bostrom, Lynn Soporowski Soporowski Thank you for your attention! Thank you for your attention!