PRESENTATION TO THE STANDARDS AND INTEROPERABILITY FRAMEWORK WORKGROUP MAY 21, 2014 3 PM Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs and the PMIX Architecture.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DC Responses Received WA OR ID MT WY CA NV UT CO AZ NM AK HI TX ND SD NE KS OK MN IA MO AR LA WI IL MI IN OH KY TN MS AL GA FL SC NC VA WV PA NY VT NH.
Advertisements

Naloxone: Cost, Logistics, and Supply Issues Community Pharmacy Perspective Krystalyn Weaver, PharmD National Alliance of State Pharmacy Associations.
NICS Index State Participation As of 12/31/2007 DC NE NY WI IN NH MD CA NV IL OR TN PA CT ID MT WY ND SD NM KS TX AR OK MN OH WV MSAL KY SC MO ME MA DE.
Agencies’ Participation in PBMS January 20, 2015 PA IL TX AZ CA Trained, Partial Data Entry (17) Required Characteristics & 75% of Key Indicators (8) OH.
National Journal Presentation Credits Producers: Katharine Conlon Director: Afzal Bari House Committee Maps Updated: March 19, 2015.
MD VT MA NH DC CT NJ RI DE WA
Medicaid Enrollment of New Eligibles in Expansion States, by Party Affiliation of Governor New Eligibles as a Percent of Total Medicaid Enrollment, FY.
Essential Health Benefits Benchmark Plan Selection, as of October 2012
Uninsured Non-Elderly Adult Rate Increased from 17. 8% to 20
Medicaid Eligibility for Working Parents by Income, January 2013
Medicaid Enrollment of New Eligibles in Expansion States, by Party Affiliation of Governor New Eligibles as a Percent of Total Medicaid Enrollment, as.
House price index for AK
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
Children's Eligibility for Medicaid/CHIP by Income, January 2013
The State of the States Cindy Mann Center for Children and Families
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
States with Section 1115 ACA Expansion Waivers, December 2015
Expansion states with Republican governors outnumber expansion states with Democratic governors, May 2018 WY WI WV◊ WA VA^ VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK.
Expansion states with Republican governors outnumber expansion states with Democratic governors, January WY WI WV◊ WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA.
Share of Births Covered by Medicaid, 2006
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Non-Citizen Population, by State, 2011
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Share of Women Ages 18 – 64 Who Are Uninsured, by State,
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN1 SD SC RI PA1 OR OK OH ND NC NY NM NJ NH2
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN1 SD SC RI PA OR OK OH1 ND NC NY NM NJ NH NV
WY WI WV WA VA* VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
Mobility Update and Discussion as of March 25, 2008
Current Status of the Medicaid Expansion Decision, as of May 30, 2013
IAH CONVERSION: ELIGIBLE BENEFICIARIES BY STATE
WAHBE Brokers / QHPs across the country as of
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2015
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2018
HHGM CASE WEIGHTS Early/Late Mix (Weighted Average)
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Status of State Participation in Medicaid Expansion, as of March 2014
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
10% of nonelderly uninsured 26% of nonelderly uninsured
22% of nonelderly uninsured 10% of nonelderly uninsured
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2017
S Co-Sponsors by State – May 23, 2014
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT* TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
Seventeen States Had Higher Uninsured Rates Than the National Average in 2013; Of Those, 11 Have Yet to Expand Eligibility for Medicaid AK NH WA VT ME.
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Average annual growth rate
Percent of Children Ages 0–17 Uninsured by State
Executive Activity on the Medicaid Expansion Decision, May 9, 2013
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
How State Policies Limiting Abortion Coverage Changed Over Time
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Percent of Adults Ages 18–64 Uninsured by State
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 401 sessions with 11,639 participants
States including quality standards in their SSIP improvement strategies for Part C FFY 2013 ( ) States including quality standards in their SSIP.
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
10% of nonelderly uninsured 26% of nonelderly uninsured
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT* TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT* TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
Current Status of State Individual Marketplace and Medicaid Expansion Decisions, as of September 30, 2013 WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK.
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Income Eligibility Levels for Children in Medicaid/CHIP, January 2017
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK OH ND NC NY NM NJ NH NV
22% of nonelderly uninsured 10% of nonelderly uninsured
Presentation transcript:

PRESENTATION TO THE STANDARDS AND INTEROPERABILITY FRAMEWORK WORKGROUP MAY 21, PM Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs and the PMIX Architecture

What is a Prescription Drug Monitoring Program? A prescription drug monitoring program (PDMP) is a state program that collects controlled substance prescription records from dispensers and then provides prescription histories and other compiled and/or analyzed data to authorized end-users for use in clinical care, law enforcement, regulation of professional practice, research and evaluation.

PDMP Models States with internally developed solutions *  Data storage – 16  Report generation – 15  Data collection – 8  Web hosting - 8 States with third party solutions (Six different vendors)*  Data collection – 41  Web hosting – 38  Report generation – 34  Data storage – 33 Staffing - Average staff size 2.96**  13 PDMPs have 1 employee  16 PDMPs have 2 employees  7 PDMPs have 3 employees  5 PDMPs have 5 or more employees Mandated participation vs voluntary participation * - responses are from a March 2014 survey of PDMPs by the PDMP Training and Technical Assistance Center at Brandies University. 47 PDMPs responded to this portion of the survey. **41 PDMPs responded

Status of Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs (PDMPs) AK AL AR CA CO ID ILIN IA MN MO MT NE 1 NV ND OH OK OR TN UT WA AZ SD NM VA WY MI GA KS HI TX ME MS WI NY PA LA KY NC SC FL VT WV Operational PDMPs Enacted PDMP legislation, but program not yet operational Legislation Pending NH MA RI CT NJ DE MD DC 2 1 The operation of Nebraska’s PMP is currently being facilitated through the state’s Health Information Initiative. Participation by patients, physicians, and other health care providers is voluntary. 2 The Mayor of D.C. has approved the legislation but it is pending a 30-day review process by Congress. © 2014 The National Alliance for Model State Drug Laws (NAMSDL)..

Prescription Information Collected by PDMPs Patient identification:  Name & Address  DOB & Gender  Pt Identifier Prescriber Information Dispensing Pharmacy Information Drug Information, e.g.  NDC # = name, type, strength, manufacturer  Quantity & date dispensed  Source of payment (some states)

Data Collected from Pharmacies PDMPs Collect Dispensed Controlled Substances Rx:  30 collect Schedules II – V  18 collect Schedules II – IV  1 collects Schedule II & III  1 collects Schedules II only  Some Collect Non-Controlled Medications  8 collect tramadol (Ultram®)  1 each – Butorphanol, butalbitol w/acetamenophen Some states collect “Drugs of Concern” e.g. Tramadol Reporting Frequency varies – POS, 24 hours, 7-30 days

PDMP Data Data is Provided to:  Doctors and other prescribers  Pharmacists  Health Professional Licensing Boards  Law Enforcement  Medical Examiners  Medicaid State Agencies  Other:  Drug Courts  Worker’s Compensation  Third Party Payers  Certified Drug Counselors These vary depending on individual state regulations regarding data sharing.

Impact of Prescription Monitoring in Virginia

Impact of Prescription Monitoring in Kentucky PDMP Use is Mandatory in KY HB1 made use mandatory as of 7/20/2012 Mandated use of the PDMP (KASPER) by Prescribers for Schedule II or Schedule III with hydrocodone Data provided by Kentucky All Schedule Prescription Electronic Reporting system

Impact of Prescription Monitoring in Kentucky Prescribers must: Query KASPER before initially prescribing Query once every 3 mos. for ongoing treatment Query before issuing new prescriptions or refills Data provided by Kentucky All Schedule Prescription Electronic Reporting system

Prescription Monitoring Information Exchange (PMIX) As electronic monitoring of prescription drugs advanced, the need to share data between PDMPs grew. The states realized that a standard for the exchange was needed. The initiative that established PMIX grew out of the Bureau of Justice Assistance/IJIS Institute PMP Committee.

The Four Pillars of the PMIX Architecture End to End Security Standards Based Exchange (GRA) Common Exchange Data and Metadata (NIEM) Hub Connections (Hub to Hub)

PMIX Architecture A information exchange standard designed by PDMP Administrators and based on:  National Information Exchange Model (NIEM) data & metadata  Global Reference Architecture (GRA) Profile  Open Standards Contains:  Information Exchange Package Documentation (IEPD)  State to State Service Specification  Hub to Hub Service Specification  Execution Context Document

PMIX Architecture Specifically designed for:  Flexibility in its use  Hub to Hub  State to State  Direct Connections by various third parties  PMP to PMP security and privacy using Public Key Infrastructure (PKI)  Cost Effective Use (no fees for using PMIX)  Compliance with Grant Requirements Supported by NABP and BJA/IJIS

Choice and Flexibility Hub State Routing Service (SRS) SRS Potential In-state Partners PMP System PMP System PMP System PMP System Hub PMP System PMP System

Ohio Automated Rx Reporting System (OARRS) HIT to PDMP Data Sharing utilizing the PMIX Architecture Coming Soon!

HIT to OARRS Connectivity Utilized Web Service (PMIX Architecture) A web-based application intended for software consumption Typical credential is digital certificate The connecting software/customer organization authenticates – not the end user

PMIX Work Group Representatives from AL, CA, FL, KY, ME, NM, OH, OK, VA, WA, Bureau of Justice Assistance and the PDMP Training and Technical Assistance Center. Recommend, review and approve enhancements to PMIX

Summary of PDMP Data Sharing Resources limited in many PDMPs State Regulations guide sharing Data available to share varies from state to state PMIX standard built on the common elements between states

Expanded Data Sharing Have a strong desire to data sharing with HIE, HIT and other parties Broad consensus that ease of access for providers will increase timely access and utilization of data

For More Information Chad Garner, Director, Ohio Automated Rx Reporting System (OARRS) – Ralph Orr, Director, Virginia Prescription Monitoring Program – Don Vogt, PMP Program Manager, Oklahoma Bureau of Narcotics Prescription Monitoring Program – Jean Hall, Integration Project Manager, Kentucky All Schedule Prescription Electronic Reporting –