School Writing Programs October 7, 2009 Presented by Carol Franks, Writing Consultant, KDE 502-564-2106, ext. 4513.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Advertisements

Session Objectives Begin to understand the goals, purpose and rationale for Program Reviews Learn about the components of implementing Program Reviews.
Session Learning Target You will gain a better understanding of identifying quality evidence to justify a performance rating for each standard and each.
FRANKLIN PUBLIC SCHOOLS SCHOOL COMMITTEE MAY 27, 2014 Massachusetts Kindergarten Entry Assessment (MKEA)
1 Literacy PERKS Standard 1: Aligned Curriculum. 2 PERKS Essential Elements Academic Performance 1. Aligned Curriculum 2. Multiple Assessments 3. Instruction.
1 704 KAR 19:002 Revised October KRS (1)(a) - ”Alternative Education” a program that exists to meet the needs of students that cannot be.
Improvement Plan Training NCLB. No Child Left Behind Program Series: Improvement Plans.
System Safeguards and Campus Improvement
Campus Improvement Plans
Carol Franks, KDE Literacy Consultant
Gathering Evidence Educator Evaluation. Intended Outcomes At the end of this session, participants will be able to: Explain the three types of evidence.
Getting Organized for the Transition to the Common Core What You Need to Know.
Please Mute Your Cell Phones & Place them at a distance that prevents feedback Place your Office Phones on Mute unless indicating that you have a question.
August 15, 2012 Fontana Unified School District Superintendent, Cali Olsen-Binks Associate Superintendent, Oscar Dueñas Director, Human Resources, Mark.
Evaluating School Literacy Programs October 22, 2009 Presented by Pamela Wininger, Reading Consultant Carol Franks, Writing.
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals II
1 Program Improvement Update Foundations for writing the LEA Addendum.
The Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems April Regionals Multiple Measures: Gathering Evidence 1.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 5: Gathering Evidence August
Teacher: Decide what to teach Decide what to assign Decide how to assess Decide how to grade In the end, convey how the kids did compared to each.
On-Site School Review All-Staff Meeting An asset-building model of school improvement... Presenters: ___________________________ The High-Performing School.
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Susan Smuskiewicz, NBCT North Bullitt High School.
Teacher Development and Evaluation Model October 22, 2012.
Student Assessment Inventory for School Districts Context setting, assessment scenarios, and communications.
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
School Governance for Parents: Advisory Committees How ELAC and SAC Can Help Your School Develop a Better Balanced Scorecard.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Goals of This Session Provide background for program review development Describe document make-up.
Writing Policy Review Process Rebecca Woosley Carol Franks Renee Boss KDE Literacy Consultants 1.
Professional Performance Process Principal Level Meetings October 19 & 22, 2009.
Interim Joint Committee on Education June 11, 2012.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
CHANGING ASSESSMENT AND COMMUNICATION. Belief Statement Grades should be an effective means of communicating academic and social progress The language.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
On-Site School Review Leadership Meeting An asset-building model of school improvement... Presenters: ___________________________ The High-Performing School.
Title I Schoolwide Planning Comprehensive Needs Assessment Wednesday, October 24, 2012.
Introduction to Coaching School-Wide PBS:RtIB. 2 Agenda PBS:RtIB Brief Overview Coaching Tier 1 Coaching Skills and Activities Resources and Barriers.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
Professional Learning Communities “The most promising strategy for sustained, substantial school improvement is developing the ability of school personnel.
PERSONNEL EVALUATION SYSTEMS How We Help Our Staff Become More Effective Margie Simineo – June, 2010.
School Writing Programs Kentucky Department of Education October 2009.
Campus Improvement Plans Northwest ISD Presentation to the Board of Trustees October 14, 2013.
Introduction to School-based Decision Making A 6-hour training for new SBDM Council members.
Fall, 2011 Get ready, Get set………..It’s Here. PROGRAM REVIEW Wide Lens View Senate Bill 1-March 2009 Arts & Humanities, Writing, and Practical Living Career.
“A Truthful Evaluation Of Yourself Gives Feedback For Growth and Success” Brenda Johnson Padgett Brenda Johnson Padgett.
This presentation:  is “ready-to-use” for presentations to school division administrators, board members, library personnel, teachers, etc.  incorporates.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Program Review A systematic method of analyzing components of an instructional program, including instructional practices, aligned and enacted curriculum,
What you need to know about changes in state requirements for Teval plans.
TEACHER EVALUATION After S.B. 290 The Hungerford Law Firm June, 2012.
Writing Policy for SBDM Councils. Goals of this Session provide an overview of Senate Bill 1 requirements related to writing provide guidance in reviewing.
The Individual Education Plan (IEP) Toronto District School Board January 20, 2015.
The Comprehensive Literacy Plan Pennsylvania KeystonestoOpportunity Tom Corbett Governor Ron Tomalis Secretary.
WELCOME Next Generation Councils. Jan Stone, Director of Data, Assessment and Research Bullitt County Schools Amy Ramage, District Assessment Coordinator.
Moving Title IA School Plans into Indistar ESEA Odyssey Summer 2015 Presented by Melinda Bessner Oregon Department of Education.
SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT A process – not an event. Summative assessment “Information is used by the teacher to summarize learning at a given point in time.
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
Kentucky Core Academic Standards Pike County Schools.
Liz Roper Diane Perhac Family and Community Engagement Statistical Research Specialist College and Career Readiness LEA Support and Improvement Debbie.
Nevada Department of Education Office of Educational Opportunity Nevada Comprehensive Curriculum Audit Tool for Schools NCCAT-S August
October 17, What is the primary purpose(s) and responsibility of our committee?
District Literacy Program A Summary of the.  The Henderson County School District Literacy Program includes elements mandated in Senate Bill 1.  The.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction CISC General Membership Meeting March (Excerpted version.
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Curriculum Selection Process
Presentation transcript:

School Writing Programs October 7, 2009 Presented by Carol Franks, Writing Consultant, KDE , ext. 4513

Goals of today’s Session Understand Senate Bill 1 implications related to writing (development of writing program, program reviews, portfolio expectations, interim) Learn what you can do now to support your schools Understand resources available for support

Norms/Agenda Parking Lot Restroom as needed Break about 10:30 for the PP Time for questions provided Silent cell phones

SB 1 states, “Each school-based decision making council or if there is no school council, a committee appointed by the principal, shall adopt policies that determine the writing program for its school.” Each school will submit the policy to KDE for review and comment. SBDM Requirements Related to Writing

Writing, as defined by SB1 “Writing means a purposeful act of thinking and expression that uses language to explore ideas and communicate meaning to others. Writing is a complex, multifaceted act of communication.”

Writing Programs Writing program Writing policy Writing plan Each SBDM council shall determine the writing program for its school. Components of a program: Instructional practices Aligned & enacted curriculum Formative & summative assessments Professional development & support services Administrative support & monitoring

Writing Policy Writing program Writing Policy Writing plan Each SBDM council shall adopt policies that determine the writing program for its school.

School-wide Literacy: Beyond the Writing Program Literacy Program Writing program Writing Policy plan Writing plan A school’s writing program fits within the larger realm of a school’s literacy program. A school’s literacy program includes reading, writing, speaking, listening, and observing.

Writing Program Review Process Literacy program Writing program Writing Policy plan Writing plan The writing program review is the process for analyzing components of a school’s writing program: the “instructional practices, aligned and enacted curriculum, student work samples, formative and summative assessments, professional development and support services, and administrative support and monitoring.”

Writing Program Review—schools may develop interim plan for transition period Writing Program Review Pilot— schools have access to pilot program review process Writing Program Review—results included in accountability for each school Timeline

Best Practice recommendation: SBDM appoints a committee to develop the school’s writing program & policies Suggested Committee Representation Literacy lead Teacher council member Parent council member Assistant Principal of curriculum/instruction Additional teachers Additional parents Classified staff Community members Students (at secondary level)

“Writing portfolios, consisting of samples of individual student work that represent the interests and growth of the student over time, shall be a required part of any writing program in primary through grade twelve.” Portfolios, Per SB1

Portfolios are part of the required criteria for the program review and audit process. A writing portfolio shall be maintained for each student and follow each student from grade to grade and to any school. Portfolios, Per SB1

A school’s policies for the writing program shall address the use of the portfolio: for determining student’s performance in communication grading procedures and feedback to students regarding their writing & communication skills the responsibility for review of the portfolios and feedback to students other policies to improve the quality of an individual student’s writing & communication skills

Individual Learning Plans (6-12) and Writing Students can collect documents in their ILP Students can now journal in their IL P 15

What can you do now to support the school’s in your district? Take advantage of the luxury of time you have before accountability

Take a Snapshot of your school’s writing program as it is NOW

Create Future Snapshots What does the snapshot of your school’s writing program look like – next year? – in 3 years? – in 5 years? Your planning should be long-range

A School’s Writing Plan Literacy Program Writing program Writing Policy plan Writing plan A school’s writing plan an policy may not encompass all the components of a school’s writing program. Therefore the program review process may certainly reach further than what is included in a school’s writing plan.

Multiple opportunities for students to develop complex communication skills for a variety of purposes Access to and use of technology tools Access to and use of language resources Procedures for developing and monitoring portfolios Feedback to students regarding writing and communication skills Requirements of a Writing Plan

A closer look at this document Task: Read from the perspective assigned to your team. Decide the implications for the assigned perspective: What might need to happen for you to do your part in implementation and/or development of your school’s writing plan?

Another Resource: Taking a Look at your School-wide Literacy Program Literacy Program Writing program Writing Policy plan Writing plan Literacy PERKS model

PERKS Essential Elements Academic Performance 1.Aligned Curriculum 2.Multiple Assessments 3. Instruction and Targeted Intervention Learning Environment 4. Literate Environment 5. School/Family/Community Partnerships 6. Professional Development Efficiency 7. Literacy Team 8. Valuable Resources 9. Literacy Plan

Literacy Program Effectiveness Review for KY Schools (PERKS) Structure of PERKS Literacy Team 9 standards with indicators Review model and support School-leveling planning based on review nal+Resources/Literacy/Literacy+PERKS/

Cindy Parker—Language Arts Branch Manager Writing Consultants KDE Contacts

Developing a Schoolwide Writing Plan acy/Kentucky+Writing+Program/Writing+Planning+Guidance+ -+Developing+a+Schoolwide+Writing+Plan.htm Literacy PERKS acy/Literacy+PERKS/ KDE Resources

Questions? Suggestions? What else do you need?