Upper Darby School District Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) 2010 Performance.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
South Dakota Accountability System – Year 2 School Performance Index Guyla Ness September 10, 2013.
Advertisements

Title I School Improvement in North Carolina. Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) determines if a Title I school goes into Title I School Improvement.
Massachusetts School and District Accountability System 2003 Mid-Cycle AYP Determinations State Report December 4, 2003.
Title I/AYP Presentation Prepared by NHCS Title I Department for NHCS PTA September 22, 2010.
School Accountability Ratings What Are Our District’s Accountability Ratings? What do they mean?
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
Upper Darby School District Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) 2010 Performance.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) & CAHSEE Results Update Prepared for the September 21, 2010 Board of Education.
2013 Accountability Report Jurupa Unified School District Board of Education Meeting.
Data 101 Presented by Janet Downey After School Program Specialist Riverside Unified School District.
1 Utah Performance Assessment System for Students U-PASS Accountability Plan Judy W. Park Assessment & Accountability Director Utah State Office of Education.
1 Cold Water Elementary English Language Arts Standard Status: Approaching (2010) MAP Performance Index Status Targets (2011)
2010 California Standards Test (CST) Results Lodi Unified School District Prepared by the Assessment, Research, and Evaluation August 17, 2010 Board Study.
Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.
Grade 3-8 English Language Arts and Mathematics Results August 8, 2011.
Supporting Successful School Experiences for Students in Foster Care Through Collaboration November 3, 2011.
Cambrian School District Academic Performance Index (API) Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Program Improvement (PI) Report.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress Fresno Unified School District 2005 Data Review.
San Leandro Unified School Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel.
ESEA ACCOUNTABILITY JAMESVILLE-DEWITT
District Assessment & Accountability Data Board of Education Report September 6, 2011 Marsha A. Brown, Director III – Student Services State Testing and.
SCHOOL ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT ALBUQUERQUE PUBLIC SCHOOLS RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY DEPARTMENT.
2011 – 12 AYP & PSSA. AYP = Adequate Yearly Progress Requirement of NCLB (No Child Left Behind) Federal Legislation that will require 100% of students.
School Performance Profile and PVAAS.  Federal accountability and PA law dictate that school effectiveness must be measured looking at multiple.
Baldwin-Whitehall School District 2009 AYP Presentation.
Academic Achievement Highlights San Francisco Unified School District August 2010.
Acquiring English Proficiency in the Torrington Public Schools Programs, Process, and Student Progress Cheryl F. Kloczko.
Grade 3-8 English Language Arts English Language Arts Grades 3, 4, and 5 Total Public.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 10, 2007.
No Child Left Behind Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Know the Rules Division of Performance Accountability Dr. Marc Baron, Chief Nancy E. Brito, Instructional.
School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
CAHSEE Results Board Report 1 Lodi Unified School District 2009 California High School Exit Examination Results September 15, 2009.
District Improvement….. Outcomes  Why we are in District Improvement.  What is DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT?  How we got this rating.  What does this mean.
This year’s PSSA results show that Pennsylvania is on track to move all students to proficiency by 2014 as required by the federal No Child Left Behind.
Capacity Development and School Reform Accountability The School District Of Palm Beach County Adequate Yearly Progress, Differentiated Accountability.
NCLB / Education YES! What’s New for Students With Disabilities? Michigan Department of Education.
Parkway District Improvement…. 10/16/ Outcomes  Why we are in District Improvement.  What is DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT?  How we got this rating. 
Daniel Melendez. School Demographics  Language  English Learners  7% (55 students)  Socio-Economic  35% qualify for free or reduced lunch (276) 
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) /22/2010.
On the horizon: State Accountability Systems U.S. Department of Education Office of Elementary and Secondary Education October 2002 Archived Information.
No Child Left Behind Impact on Gwinnett County Public Schools’ Students and Schools.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez January 2010.
Baldwin-Whitehall School District 2012 AYP Presentation.
GEORGIA’S CRITERION-REFERENCED COMPETENCY TESTS (CRCT) Questions and Answers for Parents of Georgia Students February 11, 2009 Presented by: MCES.
TACOMA PUBLIC SCHOOLS- RESEACH AND EVALUATION Webinar for Tacoma Principals May 7, 2014 (Thank you to the State Board of Education for some of the slides.
- 0 - OUSD Results MSDF Impact Assessment State Accountability Academic Performance Index (API) The API is a single number, ranging from a low.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.
Updates on Oklahoma’s Accountability System Jennifer Stegman, Assistant Superintendent Karen Robertson, API Director Office of Accountability and Assessments.
Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction November 2004 No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 Implementation of the.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). What is Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)? As a condition of receiving federal funds under No Child Left Behind (NCLB), all.
2012 Accountability Progress Report (APR) Office of Accountability October 23, 2012.
Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]
Supporting Successful School Experiences for Students in Foster Care Through Collaboration November 3, 2011.
NYS School Report Card & Spring 2014 NYS Assessment Results Orchard Park Central School District Board of Education Presentation August 26, 2014.
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
Accountability in California Before and After NCLB
A Brief History Data-Based School & District Improvement
76% African American 14% Latino 9% Asian 1% White 51% Low-Income
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
Pennsylvania Department of Education
Online Data Workshop SIP Office of Curriculum and Instruction Office of School Improvement.
Broken Arrow Public Schools District Assessment/Accountability Report
2009 California Standards Test (CST) Results
Every Student Succeeds Act
Presentation transcript:

Upper Darby School District Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) 2010 Performance

No Child Left Behind No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 –All students must be Proficient or higher in mathematics and reading/language arts by –To ensure that districts/schools are on track to achieve this goal, states determine if districts/schools are making sufficient progress each year; i.e. Adequate Yearly Progress

AYP Targets Participation in the state math assessment Participation in the state reading assessment Performance on the state math assessment Performance on the state reading assessment Other academic indicators

Performance Targets Mathematics % % % % % % % Reading % % % % % % %

Subgroups (N≥40) American Indian or Alaskan Native Asian or Pacific Islander Black/African American non-Hispanic Latino/Hispanic White non-Hispanic Multi-Racial/Ethnic IEP (Special Education) ELL (English Language Learner) Economically Disadvantaged

AYP Summary BuildingAttempted SubgroupsSubgroups MadeMade AYP Aronimink99Yes Bywood2524No Garrettford21 Yes Highland Park2625No Hillcrest13 Yes Kelly1715No Primos15 Yes Senkow17 Yes Stonehurst2120No Westbrook Park13 Yes Beverly Hills3332No Drexel Hill25 Yes High School2824No District66Yes Total %

PSSA Math Proficiency - District Grades Target = 56 % 2011 Target = 67 %

PSSA Math Proficiency - District Grades Target = 56 % 2011 Target = 67 %

PSSA Math Proficiency - District Grades Target = 56 % 2011 Target = 67 %

PSSA Math Proficiency – All Students 2010 Target = 56 % 2011 Target = 67 %

PSSA Math Proficiency – White Students 2010 Target = 56 % 2011 Target = 67 %

PSSA Math Proficiency – Black Students 2010 Target = 56 % 2011 Target = 67 %

PSSA Math Proficiency – Latino Students 2010 Target = 56 % 2011 Target = 67 %

PSSA Math Proficiency – Asian Students 2010 Target = 56 % 2011 Target = 67 %

PSSA Math Proficiency – IEP Students 2010 Target = 56 % 2011 Target = 67 %

PSSA Math Proficiency – English Language Learner Students 2010 Target = 56 % 2011 Target = 67 %

PSSA Math Proficiency – Economically Disadvantaged Students 2010 Target = 56 % 2011 Target = 67 %

PSSA Reading Proficiency – District Grades Target = 63 % 2011 Target = 72 %

PSSA Reading Proficiency – District Grades Target = 63 % 2011 Target = 72 %

PSSA Reading Proficiency – District Grades Target = 63 % 2011 Target = 72 %

PSSA Reading Proficiency – All Students 2010 Target = 63 % 2011 Target = 72 %

PSSA Reading Proficiency – White Students 2010 Target = 63 % 2011 Target = 72 %

PSSA Reading Proficiency – Black Students 2010 Target = 63 % 2011 Target = 72 %

PSSA Reading Proficiency – Latino Students 2010 Target = 63 % 2011 Target = 72 %

PSSA Reading Proficiency – Asian Students 2010 Target = 63 % 2011 Target = 72 %

PSSA Reading Proficiency – IEP Students 2010 Target = 63 % 2011 Target = 72 %

PSSA Reading Proficiency – English Language Learner Students 2010 Target = 63 % 2011 Target = 72 %

PSSA Reading Proficiency – Economically Disadvantaged Students 2010 Target = 63 % 2011 Target = 72 %

Upper Darby School District Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) 2010 Performance