Standardizing Arguments Premise 1: New Mexico offers many outdoor activities. Premise 2: New Mexico has rich history of Native Americans and of Spanish.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Argumentation.
Advertisements

16 Methods of Persuasion Slide No. Title Title Slide
17 C h a p t e r Methods of Persuasion.
Faulty Reasoning.
Understanding Logical Fallacies
Copyright © 2008, Terry Hudson Session 3. Copyright © 2008, Terry Hudson Chapter 2 – Argument Coordination Relationship between arguer and recipient as.
Fallacies What are they?. Definition There are over 100 fallacies They are illogical statements that demonstrate erroneous reasoning (sometimes intended-manipulation/
Logic and Reasoning Panther Prep North Central High School.
©2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 16 Thinking and Speaking Critically.
Preparing to Persuade: Reasoning and Logic. Aristotle’s “Proofs” “logos” to describe logical evidence “ethos” to describe speaker credibility “pathos”
Stephen E. Lucas C H A P T E R McGraw-Hill© 2004 Stephen E. Lucas. All rights reserved. Methods of Persuasion 16.
 Read the following argument. Examine it closely. Do you think it is logically sound? Why?  [T]he acceptance of abortion does not end with the killing.
How We’re Persuaded ETHOS = LOGOS = PATHOS =
Fallacies Information taken from Purdue OWL, Nancy Wood’s Perspectives on Argument and Annette Rottenberg’s Elements of Argument.
Flawed Arguments COMMON LOGICAL FALLACIES.  Flaws in an argument  Often subtle  Learning to recognize these will:  Strengthen your own arguments 
What Are Essays? The Application of Reason. Define Rhetoric “Rhetoric is the art of persuasion. Its goal is to change people’s opinions and influence.
Basics of Argumentation Victoria Nelson, Ph.D.. What is an argument? An interpersonal dispute.
Persuasion Principles of Speech Chapter What is Persuasion? How have you been persuaded today? Used in all aspects of life Both verbal and non-verbal.
Logical Fallacies. Syllogism (not a fallacy) A logical argument presented in terms of two statements and a conclusion which must be true if the two statements.
Grading Criteria for Assigment 1 Structure – –sense of time, present and past –conflict with two distinct sides –description of cause of conflict –shared.
Eng 111 Dana Frierson Fall Types of Reasoning (Logic) n Deductive u Inferring particular “fact” from general assumptions u General to specific n.
AP English Language and Composition
Credibility and Reasoning. Describing Credibility Credibility is the audience’s attitude toward or perception of the speaker. Components of Credibility.
PERSUASION. “Everybody Hates Chris”
Copyright  2010 Pearson Education Canada / J A McLachlan Chapter Five Principles of Discussion and Debate.
McGraw-Hill©Stephen E. Lucas 2001 All rights reserved. CHAPTER SIXTEEN Methods of Persuasion.
PERSUASION.
1 Reasoning Chapter 8. 2 Forms of Proof Logos = Logical evidence Logos = Logical evidence Ethos = Ethics/Credibility Ethos = Ethics/Credibility Pathos.
Introduction to Public Speaking Chapters 15 and 16.
Methods of persuasion Chapter 17 Recap.
INFORMAL FALLACIES The aim of this tutorial is to help you learn to recognize and resist fallacious arguments.
Logic Fallacies Debate Class Production Spain Park High School
Logical Fallacies Guided Notes
{ Methods of Persuasion Speech class.  The audience perceives the speaker as having high credibility  The audience is won over by the speaker’s evidence.
Logical Fallacy-false or erroneous statement or an invalid or deceptive line of reasoning- these harm quality of speeches.
Chapter Two: Good Reasoning Review Applying Ethics: A Text with Readings (10 th ed.) Julie C. Van Camp, Jeffrey Olen, Vincent Barry Cengage Learning/Wadsworth.
Look for these in the arguments of others and avoid them in your own arguments.
Look for these in the arguments of others and avoid them in your own arguments.
Fallacies The quickest ways to lose arguments. Introduction to Logic O Argument: The assertion of a conclusion based on logical premises O Premise: Proposition.
Errors in Reasoning. Fallacies A Fallacy is “any error in reasoning that makes an argument fail to establish its conclusion.” There are two kinds of fallacies.
Argumentum Ad Hominem Attacking the person’s character or personal traits rather than the argument at hand Rejecting a claim based on the person defending.
Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2004 Chapter 17 The Structure of Persuasion This multimedia product and its contents are protected under copyright law. The following.
Chapter Two: Good Reasoning Applying Ethics: A Text with Readings (10 th ed.) Julie C. Van Camp, Jeffrey Olen, Vincent Barry Cengage Learning/Wadsworth.
Be Reasonable! Recognize and Avoid Logical Fallacies.
Common Logical Fallacies Flawed Arguments. Logical Fallacies… Flaws in an argument Often subtle Learning to recognize these will: – Strengthen your own.
Logical Fallacies. Inductive vs. Deductive Reasoning.
Additional Fallacy – Appeal to Misplaced Authority Use of testimony or an expert in a given field to endorse an idea or product for which the expert does.
Common Logical Fallacies Flawed Arguments. Logical Fallacies… Flaws in an argument Often subtle Learning to recognize these will: – Strengthen your own.
Common Logical Fallacies FLAWED ARGUMENTS SUBTLE ERRORS IN JUDGEMENT AND CONSTRUCTION.
Fallacies are errors in argument and they fall into two groups: 1.Evasions 2.Oversimplifications Source: The Little Brown Handbook, 11th ed.
Chapter 24: Persuasive Speaking
METHODS OF PERSUASION Chapter 16. Credibility Ethos – the word that Aristotle used to describe what we now think of as a speaker’s credibility Credibility.
The McGraw-Hill Companies ∙ The Art of Public Speaking, 11th Edition © 2012 Stephen E. Lucas. All rights reserved.
1 WRITING THE ACADEMIC PAPER ——Logic and Argument Tao Yang
McGraw-Hill Education ∙ The Art of Public Speaking, 12th Edition © 2015 Stephen E. Lucas. All rights reserved. The Art of Public Speaking Chapter 17.
Developing your arguments
A POCKET GUIDE TO PUBLIC SPEAKING 5TH EDITION Chapter 24
A POCKET GUIDE TO PUBLIC SPEAKING 5TH EDITION Chapter 24
Logical fallicies By: Zeke Sloan.
Chapter 16 and 17 Review December 8, 2008.
Common Logical Fallacies
More on Argument.
Logical Fallacies, Ch 6, RRW
Logical Fallacy Study Guide
Argumentation Strategies
More on Argument.
Fallacies of Reasoning
Fallacies.
Methods of Persuasion Chapter 17.
A POCKET GUIDE TO PUBLIC SPEAKING 5TH EDITION Chapter 24
Presentation transcript:

Standardizing Arguments Premise 1: New Mexico offers many outdoor activities. Premise 2: New Mexico has rich history of Native Americans and of Spanish conquest Premise 3: New Mexico is inexpensive. _______________________________ Conclusion: New Mexico is an excellent vacation choice.

Standardizing Arguments Claim: New Mexico is an excellent vacation choice. ______________________________________ Support/Evidence 1: New Mexico offers many outdoor activities. Support/Evidence 2: New Mexico has rich history of Native Americans and Spanish conquest Support/Evidence 3: New Mexico is inexpensive.

Standardizing Arguments with the Toulmin Model Premises(Grounds)→→→Conclusion (Claim) REASONING (WARRANT) G → So C ; Since W Harry was born in the U.S. (Grounds) → So: Harry is a U.S. citizen (Claim) Since A person born in the U.S. is legally a U.S. citizen (Warrant)

Toulmin Model, cont. (G) Harry was born in the U.S. →So: (Q) presumably, (C) Harry is a U.S. citizen (R) unless he did not claim the U.S. citizenship Since (W) A person born in the U.S. is legally a U.S. citizen On account of (B) U.S. immigration law

Main Types of Reasoning INDUCTIVE: forming generalizations from specific instances DEDUCTIVE: reasoning from principles (known facts) CAUSAL reasoning PARALLEL CASE

Inductive Reasoning Reasoning that moves from particular facts to a general conclusion.

Guidelines for Inductive Reasoning Are there enough specific instances? Are the specific instances typical? Are the instances recent / relevant?

Deductive Reasoning Reasoning that moves from a general principle to a specific conclusion. The conclusion of deductive reasoning is certain rather than probable.

Syllogisms Major Premise: All humans are mortal Minor Premise: Socrates is a human Therefore: Conclusion: Socrates is mortal

Guidelines for Deductive Reasoning Make sure listeners will accept your general principle (major premise) Provide evidence to support your minor premise

Causal Reasoning Reasoning that seeks to establish causal relationship between two phenomena / events. A causes B

Guidelines for Causal Reasoning Avoid the fallacy of false cause Do not assume that events have only a single cause

Parallel cases Reasoning Reasoning in which a speaker compares two similar cases and infers that what is true for the first case is also true for the second.

Guidelines for Parallel Cases Reasoning Above all, make sure the two cases being compared are essentially alike

Fallacy An error in reasoning.

Fallacies Hasty generalization Causal Fallacies (False cause) Bandwagon Fallacy Ad Hominem Either / Or Fallacy Invalid analogy Appeals to Misplaced Authority, Ignorance, Emotion, Tradition

Hasty Generalization A fallacy in which a speaker jumps to a general conclusion on the basis of insufficient evidence.

False Cause A fallacy in which a speaker mistakenly assumes that because one event follows another, the first event is the cause of the second.

Invalid Analogy An analogy in which the two cases being compared are not essentially alike.

Red Herring A fallacy that introduces an irrelevant issue to divert attention from the subject under discussion.

Red Herring “Why should we worry about the amount of violence on television when thousands of people are killed in automobile accidents each year?”

Ad Hominem A fallacy that attacks the person rather than dealing with the real issue in dispute.

Ad Hominem “The governor has a number of interesting economic proposals, but let’s not forget that she comes from a very wealthy family.”

Either-Or A fallacy that forces listeners to choose between two alternatives when more than two alternatives exist.

Either-Or “The government must either raise taxes or reduce services for the poor.”

Bandwagon A fallacy that assumes that because something is popular, it is therefore good, correct, or desirable.

Bandwagon “The President must be correct in his approach to domestic policy; after all, polls show that 60 percent of the people support him.”

Slippery Slope A fallacy that assumes that taking a first step will lead to subsequent steps that cannot be prevented.

Slippery Slope “Passing federal laws to control the amount of violence on television is the first step in a process that will result in absolute government control of the media and total censorship over all forms of artistic expression.”