1 www.nasa.gov National Aeronautics and Space Administration John H. Glenn Research Center at Lewis Field Dave Taylor Deputy Director, Plum Brook Station.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Atom Chip Technology (ACT) A New Program to Focus a New Quantum Technology for Emerging National Needs CQI Please See Nick Bigelow With Questions.
Advertisements

1 Precursor In-situ Lunar Oxygen Testbed - PILOT PISCES 2008 PILOT Hydrogen Reduction Field Demonstration and Commercialization Implications D. Larry Clark.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Presentation to the NASA Goddard Academy 2. Constellation Overview Ken Davidian Lead, Commercial.
Lunar Base Challenge Space Academy for Educators 2012.
1 Partnering Presented at JUSTSAP/PISCES 2008 Collaboration with Colorado School of Mines.
1 Architecture and Planning Strategies for Addressing Radiation, Space Weather, and Space Climatology Impact on NASA Missions Study Sponsor - NASA Office.
GSFC/Wallops Flight Facility 1 Small Satellite Opportunities at Wallops Flight Facility Dr. John Campbell Director, Wallops Flight Facility.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Ground Test Project Aeronautics Test Program Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate
Watch the following video and answer the questions on your question sheet. Importance of Testing.
Larry Bell, Sasakawa International Center for Space Architecture (SICSA) Gerald D. Hines College of Architecture, University of Houston, Houston TX RUTGERS.
Effects of the Venus Atmosphere on Thermal Insulating Material Performance Michael Pauken, Linda Del Castillo, Jay Polk, Dannah Almasco Jet Propulsion.
2013 NASA Safety and OH Directors’ Meeting Kennedy Space Center, FL 2013 NASA Safety and OH Directors’ Meeting Kennedy Space Center, FL “Moving Forward.
Lunar Advanced Science and Exploration Research: Partnership in Science and Exploration Michael J. Wargo, Sc.D. Chief Lunar Scientist for Exploration Systems.
1 Configuration Development for HIF Final Focus Superconducting Quadrupole Array HIF Final Focus Meeting July 2, 2002 Tom Brown Chang Jun Phil Heitzenroeder.
Feb 2005 P. 1 Adaptive Control of Robotic Landers: Simulation Requirements Nilesh Kulkarni Perot Systems, Inc., Adaptive Control & Evolvable Systems Group.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration The Future of Space Exploration Orion, Ares and Beyond.... AIAA / NSC / JPL Town Hall Meeting 26 April 2007.
Flags Courtesy of 3dflags.com Robotic Precursor Missions to the Moon and Mars Douglas. A. Craig Tetsuji Yoshida NASA- HQ Shimizu Corp. November 2008.
SPACECRAFT ACCIDENTS: EXAMINING THE PAST, IMPROVING THE FUTURE Overview and Challenger Case Study Bryan Palaszewski working with the Digital Learning Network.
Joel Yudai.  Mission is to pioneer the future in:  Space exploration.  Scientific discovery.  Aeronautics research.
9/2/2010Innovative and Successful Partnerships SummitPage 1 Johnson Space Center Johnson Space Center Capabilities and Partnerships Ellen Ochoa Deputy.
PMSS Final SOW May 22 nd, Statement of Work 2 GLENN RESEARCH CENTER PROJECT MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES (PMSS) The Contractor shall provide expert.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration 1 NASA GLENN RESEARCH CENTER Tomorrow Begins Here!
Systems Engineering for Space Vehicles Bryan Palaszewski with the Digital Learning Network NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH.
Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology National Aeronautics and Space Administration National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Introduction to Lunar Excavator Senior Design Project Mission Objective: Design a excavator to dig lunar.
Nuclear Power Fission and Radioisotope Presented to: Propulsion and Power Panel Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board National Research Council by Joseph.
The Pursuit for Efficient S/C Design The Stanford Small Sat Challenge: –Learn system engineering processes –Design, build, test, and fly a CubeSat project.
NASA and The Moon. What Does NASA Do? NASA's mission is to pioneer the future in space exploration, scientific discovery and aeronautics research. To.
Propulsion Systems Laboratory
1 NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center 2005/4/14 LRO/CRaTER Technical Interchange Meeting LRO Mechanical Systems Giulio Rosanova / /
Space Power Facility (SPF) CEV Environmental Qualification Testing DISCLAIMER: This Initial Government Concept does not represent a preferred Government.
5-1 Constellation Space Suit System Government Capabilities and Facilities Crew and Thermal Systems Division.
Oh, Thank Heaven for 7-Eleven: Fueling Up in Space with In-Situ Resource Utilization ASTE-527 Final Presentation Riley Garrett.
EFFECTS OF THE VENUS GROUND AMBIENT ENVIRONMENT ON MATERIALS Principal Investigator: Linda Del Castillo Co-Investigators: James Polk, Michael Pauken, Elizabeth.
Space-Based Network Centric Operations Research. Secure Autonomous Integrated Controller for Distributed Sensor Webs Objective Develop architectures and.
ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCE DATA CENTER ‘Best’ Practices for Aggregating Subset Results from Archived Datasets Walter E. Baskin 1, Jennifer Perez 2 (1) Science.
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS & SPACE ADMINISTRATION (NASA)
Hubzone Industry Day June 19, Facilities Division Construction Projects John A. Selby National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Corporate Management of Facilities Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate (ARMD) Blair Gloss May 3, 2005.
Doris Hamill UAV Business Development Lead NASA Langley Research Center and Hampton Roads First Responders.
1 NASA In Transition Presented to the Aerospace Control and Guidance Systems Committee Meeting No. 96 Harbour Town Resort Hilton Head, SC October 19, 2005.
May 17NSF Small Satellite Workshop 1 Student Space Experiment Access - A National Imperative David Yoel & Gil Moore Vanguard.
Construction of an International Space Vehicle Using the Space Station Dan Roukos ASTE 527 December 15, 2009.
NASA/Air Force Cost Model presented by Keith Smith Science Applications International Corporation 2002 SCEA National Conference June
29 May 2008 Exploration Technology Development Program’s Radiation Hardened Electronics for Space Environments (RHESE) Andrew S. Keys, James H. Adams,
Dr. Richard R. Vondrak Director, Robotic Lunar Exploration Program Science Mission Directorate NASA Headquarters September 2004 NASA Robotic Lunar Exploration.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) A History.
Human Exploration of Mars Design Reference Architecture 5
NASA’s Organization National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Marshall Space Flight Center Launching the Future of Exploration and Science Robert Lightfoot.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration February 27, 2013 Defining Potential HEOMD Instruments for Mars 2020 A Work in Progress... NOTE ADDED BY.
October, 2005 NASA’s Exploration Architecture. 2 A Bold Vision for Space Exploration  Complete the International Space Station  Safely fly the Space.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration July 28, 2009.
SENSOR SELECTION CALIBRATION OVERVIEWOVERVIEW DESIGN ROADMAP ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The project would not have been possible without the extensive.
Rationale for Selected MIL-STD-1540E Thermal Test Requirement
Workshop on Science Associated with the Lunar Exploration Architecture - Earth Science Subcommittee Theme: A Lunar-Based Earth Observatory Science Observations.
Range Operations Craig Griffith Chief, Range Operations Branch WATR Operations Branch Dryden Flight Research Center February 21, 2001.
The Year in Review 2016 Humans to Mars Report. Mars Science Paving the Way Notable Discoveries – The Past 5 Years Mars was once a habitable environment.
Integrated Thermal Analysis of the Iodine Satellite (iSAT) from Preliminary to Critical Design Review October 20th 2016 Stephanie Mauro NASA Marshall Space.
Kentucky Space Facilities for satellite development, testing and operation Twyman Clements1, David Jones1 ,Jason Bratcher1, Jessamyn Delgado2, Daniel Erb1,
© The Aerospace Corporation 2008 Rationale for Selected MIL-STD-1540E Thermal Test Requirement John W. Welch The Aerospace Corporation TFAWS
NASA Hypersonic Research
Return to The Moon: An International Perspective
Mars Sustainability Workshop Kennedy Space Center February 8, 2018
Adam Koelling Jake Charnock Matthew Nesselrodt Kyle Raney
Autonomous Operations in Space
IlliniSat-3 Power Board
Deep Space Exploration Requires the best from all of us
THERMAL CONTROL SYSTEM
Presentation transcript:

1 National Aeronautics and Space Administration John H. Glenn Research Center at Lewis Field Dave Taylor Deputy Director, Plum Brook Station NASA Glenn Research Center

2 National Aeronautics and Space Administration John H. Glenn Research Center at Lewis Field Cutting Corners on Environmental Testing Altair Project <10% of spacecraft fully complying with the MIL- STD suffered failures More than 60% failed when only half the recommended environmental tests were performed 2001 Aerospace Corporation study of 454 U.S. satellites found an exponential relationship between percentage of satellite failures and Environmental Test Thoroughness Index (ETTI), the degree to which a spacecraft’s acceptance and qualification test program complies with MIL-STD 1540B

3 National Aeronautics and Space Administration John H. Glenn Research Center at Lewis Field Ground Testing in Relevant Environments BASIC PREMISE: Large (full) scale ground testing in relevant lunar/planetary surface environments is important Development/demonstration of technologies Mission risk reduction WHY? Experience has shown that lunar and martian environments are very challenging Lunar/planetary surface missions generally: Are expensive Take a long time to implement Are highly visible Technology development / demonstration Success in the lab does not necessarily mean success in the field Mission developers are looking for technologies with a “track record” Technology down-selects better supported if based on performance in a relevant environment Low Tolerance for Mission Risk

4 National Aeronautics and Space Administration John H. Glenn Research Center at Lewis Field NEW FACILITY Ground Testing in Relevant Environments So, ideally, we’d like to test as close to flight configuration as we can in an environment that is as close to the lunar surface as we can get Oh, and resources are extremely limited so the testing needs to be as inexpensive as possible!

5 National Aeronautics and Space Administration John H. Glenn Research Center at Lewis Field Major Test Facilities at PBS Cryogenic Component Lab (CCL) Space Power Facility (SPF) Spacecraft Propulsion Research Facility (B-2) Hypersonic Tunnel Facility (HTF) Combined Effects Chamber (CEC) (Future)

6 National Aeronautics and Space Administration John H. Glenn Research Center at Lewis Field KEY FEATURES –Large size (25’ dia. Spherical chamber) –Pressure and Vacuum capability (1800 to Torr) –Liquid hydrogen cold wall (40K temps) –Able to accommodate regolith simulant in the chamber, including stratification for drilling & excavation demonstrations –Built-in shaker system that can be used for settling and stratification –Simple design makes chamber inexpensive to maintain and operate –Existing support systems at B-2 Complex! Combined Effects Chamber (CEC) Plum Brook Station’s Combined Effects Chamber, recently relocated to the B-2 Complex, may be a good candidate for a large scale Surface Test Facility SYSTEMS AND COMPONENT TESTING FOR: –Landers (robotic and human) –Rovers (robotic and human) –In-situ Resource Utilization (ISRU) systems –Surface power systems –Heat radiators and deployment systems –Surface habitats –And much more

7 National Aeronautics and Space Administration John H. Glenn Research Center at Lewis Field Interested? Is there interest in the lunar surface systems community in the ground test capabilities that CEC might be able to offer? Interest? Thank you for your time. See next slide for possible next steps. Y N

8 National Aeronautics and Space Administration John H. Glenn Research Center at Lewis Field Suggested Approach Customer Driven Incremental Test Capability Development 1.Identify & assemble interested parties (that’s why I’m here!) 2.Define LSA test capability requirements What does the community need and when? What are the priorities? 3.Incorporate LSA testing requirements into short and long range facility plans at Plum Brook Station 4.Build Advocacy Make sure that NASA understands that this capability is important to the LSA community (see next chart) 5.Implement incremental capabilities as resources become available 6.Make test capabilities available to all interested parties Leverage existing resources at Plum Brook Station to operate and maintain capabilities at the lowest possible cost HELP!