Neutrino Flavor ratio on Earth and at Astrophysical sources K.-C. Lai, G.-L. Lin, and T. C. Liu, National Chiao Tung university Taiwan INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Probing CP violation in neutrino oscillations with neutrino telescopes Kfir Blum, Yosef Nir, Eli Waxman arXiv: [hep-ph]
Advertisements

Resonant Leptogenesis In S4 Model Nguyen Thanh Phong Cantho University In cooperation with Prof. CSKim, SKKang and Dr. YHAhn (work in progress)
FSI Phases using CP Asymmetries from B Meson Decay Based on the work arXiv:1402:2978 Jihn E. Kim, Doh Young Mo, Soonkeon Nam Busan Particle Physics Workshop.
Recent Results from Super-Kamiokande on Atmospheric Neutrino Measurements Choji Saji ICRR,Univ. of Tokyo for the Super-Kamiokande collaboration ICHEP 2004,
Morimitsu TANIMOTO Niigata University, Japan Prediction of U e3 and cosθ 23 from Discrete symmetry XXXXth RENCONTRES DE MORIOND March 6, La Thuile,
1 3+2 Neutrino Phenomenology and Studies at MiniBooNE PHENO 2007 Symposium May 7-9, 2007 U. Wisconsin, Madison Georgia Karagiorgi, Columbia University.
MINOS+ Starts April 2013 for three years April
Sergio Palomares-Ruiz June 22, 2005 Super-NO A Based on O. Mena, SPR and S. Pascoli hep-ph/ a long-baseline neutrino experiment with two off-axis.
Neutrino oscillations/mixing
Probing neutrino flavor transition mechanism with ultrahigh energy astrophysical neutrinos 賴光昶長庚大學通識中心賴光昶長庚大學通識中心 2014 海峡两岸粒子物理与宇宙学研讨会 黃山,安徽, May 9th,
Higgs Quadruplet for Type III Seesaw and Implications for → e and −e Conversion Ren Bo Coauther : Koji Tsumura, Xiao - Gang He arXiv:
The GSI oscillation mystery Alexander Merle Max-Planck-Institute for Nuclear Physics Heidelberg, Germany Based on: AM: Why a splitting in the final state.
Searching for the footprint of prompt atmospheric neutrino flux and beyond Guey-Lin Lin National Chiao-Tung U. Taiwan With N. Tung and F.-F. Lee KEKPH.
Neutrino oscillations and non- standard neutrino-matter interactions (NSI) Cecilia Lunardini INT & UW department of Physics, Seattle A.Friedland, C.L.
Doubly charged Higgs bosons at Hadron Colliders and neutrino mass hierarchy Mayumi Aoki (KEK) A.G.Akeroyd and M.A. PRD72, (2005) (hep-ph/ )
CP-phase dependence of neutrino oscillation probability in matter 梅 (ume) 田 (da) 義 (yoshi) 章 (aki) with Lin Guey-Lin ( 林 貴林 ) National Chiao-Tung University.
November 19, 2005 Sergio Palomares-Ruiz Physics of Atmospheric Neutrinos: Perspectives for the Future Topical Workshop on Physics at Henderson DUSEL Fort.
Determining the Dirac CP Violation Phase in the PMNS Matrix from Sum Rules Arsenii Titov in collaboration with I. Girardi and S.T. Petcov SISSA and INFN,
1 Super-Kamiokande atmospheric neutrinos Results from SK-I atmospheric neutrino analysis including treatment of systematic errors Sensitivity study based.
Probing the Octant of  23 with very long baseline neutrino oscillation experiments G.-L. Lin National Chiao-Tung U. Taiwan CYCU Oct Work done.
Presented at 24 th Rencontres de Blois, Chateaux, France, 27 May – 1 June 2012.
5/1/20110 SciBooNE and MiniBooNE Kendall Mahn TRIUMF For the SciBooNE and MiniBooNE collaborations A search for   disappearance with:
Neutrino oscillation physics II Alberto Gago PUCP CTEQ-FERMILAB School 2012 Lima, Perú - PUCP.
Leptonic CP Violation & Wolfenstein Parametrization For Lepton Mixing in Gauge Family Model Yue-Liang Wu Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics China.
0 Physics of Neutrinos From Boris Kayser, Fermilab.
Resolving neutrino parameter degeneracy 3rd International Workshop on a Far Detector in Korea for the J-PARC Neutrino Beam Sep. 30 and Oct , Univ.
Shaving Type-I Seesaw Mechanism with Occam's Razor
Test Z’ Model in Annihilation Type Radiative B Decays Ying Li Yonsei University, Korea Yantai University, China Based on J. Hua, C.S Kim, Y. Li, arxiv:
Molecular Charmonium. A new Spectroscopy? II Russian-Spanish Congress Particle and Nuclear Physics at all Scales and Cosmology F. Fernandez D.R. Entem,
Sensitivity to New Physics using Atmospheric Neutrinos and AMANDA-II John Kelley UW-Madison Penn State Collaboration Meeting State College, PA June 2006.
The NOvA Experiment Ji Liu On behalf of the NOvA collaboration College of William and Mary APS April Meeting April 1, 2012.
(some) Future CMB Constraints on fundamental physics Alessandro Melchiorri Universita’ di Roma, “La Sapienza” MIAMI2010, Fort Lauderdale December 15th.
Latest Results from the MINOS Experiment Justin Evans, University College London for the MINOS Collaboration NOW th September 2008.
CP violation in the neutrino sector Lecture 3: Matter effects in neutrino oscillations, extrinsic CP violation Walter Winter Nikhef, Amsterdam,
Extrapolation Neutrino Flux measured at Near Detector to the Far Detector Near Detector Workshop, CERN, 30 July 2011 Paul Soler, Andrew Laing.
Neutron enrichment of the neck-originated intermediate mass fragments in predictions of the QMD model I. Skwira-Chalot, T. Cap, K. Siwek-Wilczyńska, J.
Matter Effect on Neutrino Oscillation from Universality Violation in Neutral Current Interactions Naotoshi Okamura (YITP) and Minako Honda (Ochanomizu.
New Results from the Salt Phase of SNO Kathryn Miknaitis Center for Experimental Nuclear Physics and Astrophysics, Univ. of Washington For the Sudbury.
Search for Electron Neutrino Appearance in MINOS Mhair Orchanian California Institute of Technology On behalf of the MINOS Collaboration DPF 2011 Meeting.
1 Neutrino Phenomenology Boris Kayser Scottish Summer School August 10,
Neutrino mass and DM direct detection Daijiro Suematsu (Kanazawa Univ.) Erice Sept., 2013 Based on the collaboration with S.Kashiwase PRD86 (2012)
Michel Gonin – Ecole Polytechnique – France : SUPER NOVA SN1987A Super-Kamiokande Introduction neutrino oscillations mixing matrices Introduction.
Shih-Hao Wang 王士豪 Graduate Institute of Astrophysics & Leung Center for Cosmology and Particle Astrophysics (LeCosPA), National Taiwan University 1 This.
Aart Heijboer ● ORCA * catania workshop sep statistical power of mass hierarchy measurement (with ORCA) Aart Heijboer, Nikhef.
To Determine the Initial Flavor Composition of UHE Neutrino Fluxes with Neutrino Telescopes Shun Zhou ( IHEP, Beijing ) April 23-26, 2006 International.
Quark-Lepton Complementarity in light of recent T2K & MINOS experiments November 18, 2011 Yonsei University Sin Kyu Kang ( 서울과학기술대학교 )
Recent Results from Super-K Kate Scholberg, Duke University June 7, 2005 Delphi, Greece.
Atmospheric Neutrinos Phenomenology and Detection p 00 ++  e+e+ e-e- ++  Michelangelo D’Agostino Physics C228 October 18, 2004.
Tests of Lorentz Invariance using Atmospheric Neutrinos and AMANDA-II John Kelley for the IceCube Collaboration University of Wisconsin, Madison Workshop.
Shun Zhou, IHEP, Beijing, China TeVPA, September, 2008 Probing Neutrino Mixing and Unitarity Violation at Neutrino Telescopes Shun Zhou IHEP, CAS,
On the Prospect of Tau Neutrino Astronomy in GeV Energies and Beyond G.-L. Lin National Chiao-Tung U. Taiwan Moriond 2005.
Sensitivity to New Physics using Atmospheric Neutrinos and AMANDA-II John Kelley UW-Madison IceCube Collaboration Meeting Baton Rouge, LA April 10, 2006.
Shih-Hao Wang 王士豪 Graduate Institute of Astrophysics & Leung Center for Cosmology and Particle Astrophysics (LeCosPA), National Taiwan University 1 This.
Constraint on  13 from the Super- Kamiokande atmospheric neutrino data Kimihiro Okumura (ICRR) for the Super-Kamiokande collaboration December 9, 2004.
T2K Experiment Results & Prospects Alfons Weber University of Oxford & STFC/RAL For the T2K Collaboration.
Double beta decay and Leptogenesis International workshop on double beta decay searches Oct SNU Sin Kyu Kang (Seoul National University of.
1-2 Mass Degeneration in the Leptonic Sector Hiroyuki ISHIDA (Tohoku University) Collaboration with : Takeshi ARAKI (MISC) Ref ; T. Araki and H.I. arXiv.
A model for large non-standard interactions of neutrinos leading to the LMA-dark solution Yasaman Farzan IPM, Tehran.
New Results from MINOS Matthew Strait University of Minnesota for the MINOS collaboration Phenomenology 2010 Symposium 11 May 2010.
Neutrino Oscillations and T2K
Determining the neutrino flavor ratio at the astrophysical source
Non-unitary deviation from the tri-bimaximal mixing and neutrino oscillations Shu Luo The Summer Topical Seminar on Frontier of Particle Physics.
SOLAR ATMOSPHERE NEUTRINOS
Gamma Ray Constraints on New Physics Interpretations of IceCube Data
Flavor Distribution of UHE -Oscillations at -Telescopes
SOLAR ATMOSPHERE NEUTRINOS
Neutrino telescopes and possible solutions to ambiguities in neutrinos
T2KK Sensitivity of Resolving q23 Octant Degeneracy
Double beta decay and Leptogenesis
Rome Samanta, University of Southampton
Presentation transcript:

Neutrino Flavor ratio on Earth and at Astrophysical sources K.-C. Lai, G.-L. Lin, and T. C. Liu, National Chiao Tung university Taiwan INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL OF NUCLEAR PHYSICS 31st Course Neutrinos in Cosmology, in Astro-, Particle- and Nuclear Physics Erice-Sicily: September 2009

Neutrino flavor ratio at sources (0, 0, 1)  Source (1, 0, 0) Muon damped source (0, 1, 0) ● (1/3,2/3,0) Pion source ●

Basic measured parameter definition – R : The ratio of track to shower events. – S: The ratio of two flavor shower. Experimental results are limited by number of detected events,  fluctuation  R and  S Assumed K. Blum, Y. Nir and E. Waxman, arXiv: [hep-ph].

Basic idea I: What is the real source we observed. From measured data to original source: P True flavor ratio at source Measured flavor ratio at Earth  R i,th and S i,th R i,exp and S i,exp  22 1  region  2 < 2.3  2 <  region. 00  ’0’0 ’0’0 + Choubey et al., PHYSICAL REVIEW D 77, (2008)

# 1: Only 10% R For E < 0.3PeV, difficult to distinguish e from .  Only R Even at  R/R ~ 10%, could not resolve muon damp source from pion source. muon damp source Pion source R only is unable to determine the original source. Measuring S is necessary. M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia and M. Maltoni, Phys. Rep. 460, 1 (2008); M. Maltoni, T. Schwetz, M. A. Tortola, and J. W. F. Valle, New J. Phys. 6, 122 (2004); S. Choubey, Phys. At. Nucl. 69, 1930 (2006); S. Goswami, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 21, 1901 (2006); A. Bandyopadhyay, S. Choubey, S. Goswami, S. T. Petcov, and D. P. Roy, Phys. Lett. B 608, 115 (2005); G. L. Fogli et al., Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 57, 742 (2006).

# 2-1: sin 2  13 =0 for   Can rule-out pion source from muon-damped source under  R/R ~ 10%,  S  /S  ~ (11~14)% Astrophysical hidden source (1/2, a, (2/3 –a)) can be rule-out too. 2015/5/126 sin 2  23 =0.45 sin 2  23 =0.55 muon damp source Pion source Astrophysical Hidden source O. Mena, et al., PRD, 2007

# 2-2: sin 2  13 = 0 for   Can't rule-out muon-damped source from pion source under  R/R ~ 10%,  S  /S  ~ (11~12)%, sin 2  23 =0.45sin 2  23 =0.55 muon damp source Pion source

# 3-1: CP phase ,   Under  R/R ~ 10%,  S  /S  ~ 13% 2015/5/128 muon damp source sin 2  13 = 0 sin 2  13 =  0.01 (non zero) Gray:  =0 Blue:  =  /2 Red:  =  Pion source No dependence on CP phase  when (sin 2  13 ) best-fit = 0

# 3-2: CP phase  for   muon damp source sin 2  13 = 0 sin 2  13 =  0.01 Gray:  =0 Blue:  =  /2 Red:  =  Pion source Under  R/R ~ 10%,  S  /S  ~ 13%

# 4-1: Critical uncertainty  R  /R  = 13%  S  /S  = 16%  R  /R  = 5%  S  /S  = 6% Need several hundreds of neutrino events to confirm the source.

Basic idea II: From Oscillation mechanism to new physics flavor ratio measured on Earth oscillation Possible source flavor ratio oo  ij,  Decay  ij,  Other mechanism

Normal hierarchy: sin 2 θ 13 < 0.14 and 0.37 < sin 2 θ 23 <0.65 Inverted hierarchy: sin 2 θ 13 < 0.27 and 0.37 < sin 2 θ 23 <0.69 Possible measured region with different strategy Pion source with normal hierarchy Muon source with normal hierarchy Pion source with inverted hierarchy Muon source with inverted hierarchy * * Inverted hierarchy is only possible # # Allow both hierarchy Super-Kamiokande Collaboration Phys. Rev. D 74, (2006)

All possible measured ratio for neutrino oscillation mechanism Neutrino oscillation # # New physics Beyond osciallation normal hierarchy inverted hierarchy measured ratio All possible source

One example: Decay with normal mixing angle # # #: Only decay in this region is available. Michele Maltoni et al JHEP07(2008)064

Another example: Decay with inverted hierarchy mixing angle # # # #: Only decay in this region is available.

Conclusion Part I Measuring the R ratio only is not sufficient to determine the source type. The Critical uncertainties required to distinguish between pion and muon damped source: for pion source:  R  /R  = 5%  S  /S  = 6% for muon source:  R  /R  = 13%  S  /S  = 16% Part II New method to probe new physics.

Reference:

The exact form of oscillation probability matrix K.-C. Lai, G.-L. Lin, and T. C. Liu, arXiv: [hep-ph] ω ≡ sin 2 2θ 12, Δ ≡ cos 2 θ 23, D ≡ sinθ 13, δ the CP phase.