Current status of numerical relativity Gravitational waves from coalescing compact binaries Masaru Shibata (Yukawa Institute, Kyoto University)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Inspiraling Compact Objects: Detection Expectations
Advertisements

Numerical Relativity & Gravitational waves I.Introduction II.Status III.Latest results IV.Summary M. Shibata (U. Tokyo)
Gamma-Ray bursts from binary neutron star mergers Roland Oechslin MPA Garching, SFB/TR 7 SFB/TR7 Albert Einstein‘s Century, Paris,
07 Nov 2003Gravitational Wave Phenomenology Workshop1 Numerical Relativity Deirdre ShoemakerCornell University  The role of numerical relativity in gravitational-wave.
Recent results with Goddard AMR codes Dae-Il (Dale) Choi NASA/Goddard, USRA Collaborators J. Centrella, J. Baker, J. van Meter, D. Fiske, B. Imbiriba (NASA/Goddard)
Coalescenza quadrupolo  Coalescing binary systems: main target of ground based interferometers quadrupole approach: point masses on a circular orbit +
Black holes: Introduction. 2 Main general surveys astro-ph/ Neven Bilic BH phenomenology astro-ph/ Thomas W. Baumgarte BHs: from speculations.
Testing GR with Ground-Based GW Detectors B.S. Sathyaprakash, Cardiff University, UK (based on a Living Reviews article with Schutz) at University of Birmingham,
Black hole binary mergers: recent developments in numerical relativity First-term presentation By Nikos Fanidakis Supervisors: Carlton Baugh, Shaun Cole,
1 Discussion of bursts implications for GRB We consider an inspiral/merger scenario... Possible bursts (CC with 25ms or 100ms integration) applications:
1 Binary Black Holes, Gravitational Waves, & Numerical Relativity Joan Centrella NASA/GSFC Bernard’s Cosmic Stories June 2006 Valencia, Spain.
LIGO-G Z Gravitational wave observations as a probe for strong gravity Peter R. Saulson Syracuse University Spokesperson, LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
1 Observing the Most Violent Events in the Universe Virgo Barry Barish Director, LIGO Virgo Inauguration 23-July-03 Cascina 2003.
The Strongly Relativistic Double Pulsar and LISA Vicky Kalogera Physics & Astronomy Dept with Chunglee Kim (NU) Duncan Lorimer (Manchester)
(SPH) Simulations of Binary Neutron Star Coalescence Examining the Mass Ratio Dependence of Post-Newtonian Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics Jonathon Meyers,
The Astrophysics of Gravitational Wave Sources Conference Summary: Ground-Based Detectors ( Hz) Kimberly New, LANL.
1 Yasushi Mino Theoretical AstroPhysics Including Relativity (TAPIR), CalTech Index 1: Introduction: LISA project 2: MiSaTaQuWa.
Testing GR with Inspirals B.S. Sathyaprakash, Cardiff University, UK based on work with Arun, Iyer, Qusailah, Jones, Turner, Broeck, Sengupta.
Gabriel Török* Relating high-frequency QPOs and neutron-star EOS *Institute of Physics, Faculty of Philosophy and Science, Silesian University in Opava,
Objective of numerical relativity is to develop simulation code and relating computing tools to solve problems of general relativity and relativistic astrophysics.
Einstein’s elusive waves
Gravitational waves and neutrino emission from the merger of binary neutron stars Kenta Kiuchi Collaboration with Y. Sekiguchi, K. Kyutoku, M. Shibata.
Detection rates for a new waveform background design adopted from The Persistence of Memory, Salvador Dali, 1931 Bence Kocsis, Merse E. Gáspár (Eötvös.
LIGO- G D Status of LIGO Stan Whitcomb ACIGA Workshop 21 April 2004.
1 Massive Black Hole Mergers: As Sources and Simulations John Baker Gravitational Astrophysics Laboratory NASA/GSFC CGWP Sources & Simulations February.
Jacksonville, 15 April 2007 Carlos Palenzuela (1), I.Olabarrieta (1),L. Lehner (1),S. Liebling (2) with contributions from M. Anderson (1), D. Neilsen.
Precession during merger R. O’Shaughnessy (UWM) J. Healy, L. London, D. Shoemaker (Georgia Tech) Midwest Relativity Meeting, Chicago arXiv:
Merger of binary neutron stars in general relativity M. Shibata (U. Tokyo) Jan 19, 2007 at U. Tokyo.
Binary Pulsar Coalescence Rates and Detection Rates for Gravitational Wave Detectors Chunglee Kim, Vassiliki Kalogera (Northwestern U.), and Duncan R.
The Analysis of Binary Inspiral Signals in LIGO Data Jun-Qi Guo Sept.25, 2007 Department of Physics and Astronomy The University of Mississippi LIGO Scientific.
1 Calculating Gravitational Wave Signatures from Black Hole Binary Coalescence Joan Centrella Laboratory for High Energy Astrophysics NASA/GSFC The Astrophysics.
1 GWDAW11 Dec 19, 2006 John Baker LISA source modeling and data analysis at Goddard John Baker – NASA-GSFC K. Arnaud, J. Centrella, R. Fahey, B. Kelly,
Sources of Gravitational Waves: an Overview
Double Compact Objects: Detection Expectations Vicky Kalogera Physics & Astronomy Dept Northwestern University with Chunglee Kim (NU) Duncan Lorimer (Manchester)
Gravitational Wave and Pulsar Timing Xiaopeng You, Jinlin Han, Dick Manchester National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
1 Building Bridges: CGWA Inauguration 15 December 2003 Lazarus Approach to Binary Black Hole Modeling John Baker Laboratory for High Energy Astrophysics.
Initial Data for Magnetized Stars in General Relativity Eric Hirschmann, BYU MG12, Paris, July 2009.
Searching for Gravitational Waves with LIGO: A New Window on The Universe Duncan Brown Syracuse University RIT Physics Colloquium November 19, 2007 LIGO-G Z.
Phase transition induced collapse of Neutron stars Kim, Hee Il Astronomy Program, SNU 13th Haengdang Symposium, 11/30/2007.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California CC & M. Vallisneri, PRD.
S.Klimenko, December 16, 2007, GWDAW12, Boston, LIGO-G Z Coherent burst searches for gravitational waves from compact binary objects S.Klimenko,
Manuela Campanelli, LSC Worshop 3/20/2002 The Lazarus Project: Modeling gravitational radiation from coalescing binary black holes MANUELA CAMPANELLI Department.
Intermediate mass black hole and numerical relativity Zhoujian Cao Institute of Applied Mathematics, AMSS
Applying Numerical Relativity and EOB to Black Hole Binary Observation Sean McWilliams NASA Goddard Space Flight Center University of Maryland Collaborators:
Motions of Self-Gravitating bodies to the Second Post- Newtonian Order of General Relativity.
Cosmological Heavy Ion Collisions: Colliding Neutron Stars and Black Holes Chang-Hwan Lee
Rates from binaries: current status Tomasz Bulik Warsaw University.
A New Relativistic Binary Pulsar: Gravitational Wave Detection and Neutron Star Formation Vicky Kalogera Physics & Astronomy Dept with Chunglee Kim (NU)
Precessing Binaries: Astrophysical Expectations Vicky Kalogera Physics & Astronomy Dept Northwestern University with Philippe Grandclement Mia Ihm.
Isola d’Elba 28/05/2006 Non linear effects in pulsations of compact stars Andrea Passamonti Andrea Passamonti Aristotle University of Thessaloniki VESF.
Binary Compact Object Inspiral: Rate Expectations Vicky Kalogera with Chunglee Kim Richard O’Shaughnessy Tassos Fragkos Physics & Astronomy Dept.
Einstein 2005 July 21, 2005 Relativistic Dynamical Calculations of Merging Black Hole-Neutron Star Binaries Joshua Faber (NSF AAPF Fellow, UIUC) Stu Shapiro.
Soichiro Isoyama Collaborators : Norichika Sago, Ryuichi Fujita, and Takahiro Tanaka The gravitational wave from an EMRI binary Influence of the beyond.
1 Merging Black Holes and Gravitational Waves Joan Centrella Chief, Gravitational Astrophysics Laboratory NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Observational.
Gravitational waves. A status report Michele Maggiore Département de physique théorique.
GW – the first GW detection ! Is it a start of GW astronomy ? If “yes” then which ? «Счастлив, кто посетил сей мир в его минуты роковые !...» Ф.Тютчев.
Statements of the interest in LCGT data analysis Ping Xi Shanghai United Center for Astrophysics (SUCA), Shanghai Normal University.
LIGO-G09xxxxx-v1 Form F v1 Numerical Simulations of Superkick Binary Black Holes Lydia Nevin Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute LIGO SURF 2014 Mentor:
APS Meeting April 2003 LIGO-G Z 1 Sources and Science with LIGO Data Jolien Creighton University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee On Behalf of the LIGO.
Gravitational Wave Astronomy --The Dawn has Arrived!-- 1 Misao Sasaki Yukawa Institute for Theoretical Physics Kyoto University APCTP 25 March, 2016.
Gravitational Waves What are they? How can they be detected?
Detection of gravitational waves from binary black hole mergers
Inspiral of comparable mass binaries Facilitators: Bala Iyer, Thomas Baumgarte, Jolien Creighton and NS-NS/NS-BH binary merger Facilitators: Fred Rasio,
On Behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration and VIRGO
Generalized quasi-Keplerian parametrization for compact binaries in hyperbolic orbits Gihyuk Cho (SNU) Collaborate with H.M. Lee (SNU), Achamveedu Gopakumar.
Search for gravitational waves from binary black hole mergers:
Center for Gravitational Wave Physics Penn State University
Fred Rasio Northwestern University
Apply discontinous Galerkin method to Einstein equations
The latest result of BNS merger simulations.
Presentation transcript:

Current status of numerical relativity Gravitational waves from coalescing compact binaries Masaru Shibata (Yukawa Institute, Kyoto University)

Initial LIGO Adv LIGO, LCGT… Prediction only by Num. Rela h=h(f)f Merge Frequency f (Hz) GW spectrum from compact binaries Assume BH=10M sun NS=1.4M sun Chirp

We need to solve Einstein equation Equation of motion (Usually, hydro eqs.) Maxwell equation, Radiation hydro, Elementary physics, … Non linear equations: NR is the unique method

Needed implementations 1. Einstein’s evolution equations solver 2. GR Hydrodynamic equations solver 3. Gauge conditions (coordinate conditions) 4. Realistic initial conditions 5. Gravitational wave extraction techniques 6. Apparent horizon (Event horizon) finder 7. Special techniques for handling BHs 8. Micro physics (EOS, neutrino processes, B-field, radiation transfer …) 9. Powerful supercomputers or AMR

Present status 1. Einstein’s evolution equations solver 2. GR Hydrodynamic equations solver 3. Gauge conditions (coordinate conditions) 4. Realistic initial conditions 5. Gravitational wave extraction techniques 6. Apparent horizon (Event horizon) finder 7. Special techniques for handling BHs 8. Micro physics (EOS, neutrino processes, B-field, radiation transfer …) 9. Powerful supercomputers or AMR ○○○○○○○△○○○○○○○○△○ Not yet

Before Einstein’s evolution equations solver 2. GR Hydrodynamic equations solver 3. Gauge conditions (coordinate conditions) 4. Realistic initial conditions 5. Gravitational wave extraction techniques 6. Apparent horizon (Event horizon) finder 7. Special techniques for handling BHs 8. Micro physics (EOS, neutrino processes, B-field, radiation transfer …) 9. Powerful supercomputers or AMR ○○○○○○××△○○○○○○××△

Summary of current status Simulation for BH spacetime (BH-BH, BH- NS, collapse to BH) is now feasible. Simulation for NS-NS with a variety of equations of state is in progress. Adaptive mesh refinement (AMR) enables to perform a longterm simulation for inspiral. MHD effects, finite temperature EOS, neutrino cooling, etc, start being incorporated ⇒ Application to relativistic astrophysics (but still in a primitive manner)

§ BH-BH: Status Simulation from late inspiral through merger phases is feasible: Evolve ~10 orbits accurately by several groups For nonspining BHs, an excellent analytical modeling (i.e. Taylor-T4 formula) has been found for orbital evolution and gravitational waveforms For the spinning BH-BH, several works exist, but still a large parameter space is left; good modeling has not been done yet.

Gravitational waves from BBH merger By F. Pretorius QNM BH ringing Inspiral waveform

Universal Fourier spectrum f  7/6 inspiral f  2/3 merger Buonanno, Cook, & Pretorius, PRD75 (2007) e  ringdown h(f)h(f) (15+15M sun )

advLIGO, LCGT 1st LIGO Frequency (Hz) Current level Assume BH=10 M sun h=h(f)f Larger mass Detection is possible now

High-precision computation by Cornell-Caltech group Nonspining Equal-mass 15 orbits

Excellent agreement with Taylor T4 formula

§ NS-NS: Status Late inspiral phase by AMR: It is possible to follow >~5 orbits before merger with nuclear-theory based EOS  Will clarify the dependence of GWs on EOSs at the onset of merger Merger phase: It is feasible to follow evolution to a stationary state of BH/NS. BUT, still, with simple EOS/microphysics  More detailed modeling is left for the future work

1.5M sun Merger to BH Akmal-Pandharipande-Ravenhall EOS Kiuchi et al. (2009) 1.4M sun Merger to NS

1.5M sun Merger to BH Akmal-Pandharipande-Ravenhall EOS Kiuchi et al.

Merger to BH+disk 1.3M sun 1.6M sun

Merger to NS 1.4M sun

Gravitational waveform for black-hole formation case Inspiral Merger Ring down

Universal spectrum for BH formation Inspiral h eff ~ f n n~-1/6 Damp BH QNM Merger Different from BBH Bump Damp

Gravitational waveform for hyper- massive NS formation case Inspiral Merger QPO

Spectrum for two EOSs advLIGO EOS-dependence of f cut

Assume BH : 10M sun 、 NS: 1.4M sun Frequency f (Hz) f  Spectrum BH form Initial LIGO advLIGO h HMNS form ~ 3kHz ~ 6 kHz

§ Status of BH-NS It is possible to follow several orbits. Significant difference between tidal- disruption and no-disruption waveforms  Merger waveforms depend significantly on the neutron star radius Still in an early stage; simulations have been performed with simple EOSs  Next task: Survey for waveforms using a wide variety of EOSs (on going)

Inspiral: (M/R) NS =0.145,  =2 polytrope M BH /M NS =2 M BH /M NS =5 ~5 orbits ~7.5 orbits

(M/R) NS =0.145, M BH /M NS =2

(M/R) NS =0.145, M BH /M NS =4 (& >4) No disk

Gravitational waveforms (M/R) NS =0.145, M BH /M NS =2 Dotted curve = 3 PN fit inspiral disruption Quick shutdown

Gravitational waveforms (M/R) NS =0.145, M BH /M NS =5 Dotted curve = 3 PN fit ringdown

(M/R) NS =0.178 M BH /M NS =3 (M/R) NS =0.145 Clear ringdown Not very clear No disruption Mass shedding

Typical spectrum (M/R) NS =0.145, M BH /M NS =3 Inspiral Damp ∝ exp[-(f/f cut ) n ] BH-QNM Hz

Spectrum (M/R) NS =0.145, 0.160, 0.178, M BH /M NS =3 No-disruption  Spectrum extends to high-frequency Ringdown frequency Inspiral Damp

Relation between Compactness (C) and mass ratio (Q) C For small mass ratio, strong dependence of f cut on NS compactness QNM frequency

Summary Accurate GR simulation can be performed. Many simulations are ongoing for many groups not only for BH-BH, but also for NS-NS and BH-NS. In 3—5 years, a variety of theoretical waveforms will be derived.  These may be used for deciding design for next-generation detectors

With spin: Q=2, C=0.145, 0.160, S>0 shifts lower f Cyan = with spin a=0.5

Relation between Compactness (C) and mass ratio (Q) C spin

Spectrum (M/R) NS =0.145, M BH /M NS =2–5 No-disruption  Spectrum extends to high-frequency ∝ exp[-(f/f cut ) n ] Ringdown