Defending Complaints at the Lancaster County/ Pennsylvania HRC Presented by: David R. Keller Barley Snyder LLC 126 East King Street Lancaster, PA 17602.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dispute Resolution Under the Congressional Accountability Act
Advertisements

Prince William County Human Rights Commission Table of Contents 2 1. Introduction2. Civil Rights Act Title VII3. Bases of Discrimination4. How to File.
The Ontario Human Rights Commission.
DIFFERENCES BETWEEN Old and New A & P Grievance Procedures.
Human Rights Ordinance Training. Purpose 1)Overview of Human Relations Ordinance 2)Intent of the Ordinance 3)Protected Classes 4)Stages of the Claims.
The Process of Litigation. What is the first stage in a civil lawsuit ?  Service of Process (the summons)
© 2007 Prentice Hall, Business Law, sixth edition, Henry R. Cheeseman Chapter 3 Litigation and Alternative Dispute Resolution Chapter 3 Litigation and.
Alternative, Judicial, and E-Dispute Resolution
The Legal Series: Employment Law I. Objectives Upon the completion of training, you will be able to: Understand the implications of Title VI Know what.
Litigation and Alternatives for Settling Civil Disputes CHAPTER FIVE.
16.1 Civil Cases.
Chapter 16 Lesson 1 Civil and Criminal Law.
Top 10 Mistakes Employers Make and How to Keep from Making Them Ashley Scheer Jackson Walker L.L.P. 901 Main Street, Suite 6000 Dallas, Texas (214)
Oh No! … It’s an EEOC Charge! How to Respond Effectively. HR Women’s Breakfast Briefing June 11, 2008 Washington, DC Kara M. Maciel, Esq.
Understanding Discipline in the Workplace
The Ontario Human Rights Commission.
Chapter Implementing Equal Employment Opportunity 3.
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMAT IVE ACTION All materials provided in this training, including the contents of linked pages, are provided for general.
Legal Issues in HR OS352 HRM Fisher Jan 19, 2005.
3-1 Copyright ©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Understanding Equal Opportunity and The Legal Environment Chapter 3.
Minimizing Employment Liability Risk Staff Affirmative Action Office (SAAO) May 2009.
Civil Rights Training. Why? Civil Rights Regulations are intended to assure that benefits of Child Nutrition Programs are made available to all eligible.
A More Effective Approach for Employers and Addressing Charges
HUMAN RIGHTS Administering Human Rights Legislation.
Human Rights in Ontario. Human Rights Activity- let’s do a Human Rights Quiz… Individuals should be treated fairly as human beings regardless of the age.
Liability Protection Best Practices. ©SHRM 2008 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission – EEOC Created by Title VII of the 1964 Civil Right Act. Charged.
CAMPUT 2015 Energy Regulation Course Donald Gordon Conference Centre Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario Role of Tribunal Staff, Interveners and Independent.
Terry J. Harmon, Esq. Sniffen & Spellman, P.A. 123 North Monroe Street Tallahassee, Florida
Example - Human Rights Case. Case Citation Formats Criminal Law:R v. Jones prosecution v. defense Civil Law:Smith v. Jones plaintiff v. defendant Human.
Human Rights Complaints and Discrimination Prevention Canadian Human Rights Commission January 2005.
DEALING WITH HARASSMENT AND ABUSE COMPLAINTS Lt (NL) James Smith VANCOUVER ISLAND DIVISION.
The Martha’s Vineyard Public Schools Civil Rights Policy {Adoption Date}
Part I Sources of Corrections Law. Chapter 4 - Going to Court Introduction – Chapter provides information on appearing in court, either as a witness or.
April 2, 2007 Ontario Human Rights Commission Introduction to the Enhanced Complaints Process (ECP) – Pilot.
COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS AND OPPORTUNITIES EXPEDITED CASE PROCESSING PURSUANT TO PUBLIC ACT
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Sexual Harassment for Managers. Definition: According to the EEOC, sexual harassment is defined as: Any unwelcome sexual advances, Requests for sexual.
Chapter 4 Alternative, Judicial, and E- Dispute Resolution.
1 Farm Service Agency FY2010 Annual Civil Rights Training “FSA No Fear Act Training Required Every Two Years” and“Understanding/Navigating FSA EEO Complaint/ADR/Mediation.
EDSE 539 Special Education Leadership in Schools Parent Rights and Relationships Dispute Resolution Remedies.
FILING AND DECIDING A HUMAN RIGHTS CASE PART A: DEFINITIONS PART A: DEFINITIONS PART B: FILING A CASE/DISMISSAL PROCESS PART B: FILING A CASE/DISMISSAL.
Iowa Civil Rights Commission Disclaimer The information contained in this presentation is a brief overview and should not be construed as legal advice.
Chapter 3 Judicial, Alternative, and E-Dispute Resolution
DEALING WITH THE PROBLEM EMPLOYEE John Ashby
EEO and the Legal Environment of HR. Chapter 3 What is Equal Employment Oppy? EEO is legal protection against discrimination. Race Religion Age Sex National.
Chapter 16.1 Civil Cases. Types of Civil Lawsuits In civil cases the plaintiff – the party bringing the lawsuit – claims to have suffered a loss and usually.
Introduction Michelle Neels Investigative Paralegal for 25 years investigative - 15 years with Legal services and 10 years civil rights investigations.
Uniform Complaint Procedure Memorandum # MEM-560 October 10, 2003 By: Jaime Morales.
Mediation with the Information Commissioner’s Office Cory Martinson Appeals and Policy Analyst 25 November 2009.
Ontario Human Rights Commission.  The Ontario Human Rights Commission is the agency directly responsible for administering and enforcing the Human Rights.
Copyright© 2011 WeComply, Inc. All rights reserved. 12/12/2015 Avoiding Retaliation.
+ Human Rights Complaints. + Filing a Complaint A lawyer is not needed to file a complaint. Complaints can be withdrawn at any point. Complainant – person.
HANDLING DISCIPLINARY AND GRIEVANCE CASES – INCLUDING INVESTIGATIONS BY GAIL ESCOLME EMPLOYMENT LAW SOLICITOR.
Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Division of Immigration Health Services FY 2010.
Slide 1 1.What are the most common discrimination charges filed with the EEOC? The least common? Source: The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
Moot Court Supreme Court Summer Institute for Teachers.
PANELISTS ROB FISHER BRIAN MACDONOUGH MIKE BIRCH, MODERATOR Representing Clients Before the MCAD in Employment Discrimination Cases.
Legal Literacy for Supervisors Risk Research Bulletin, January 2008.
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
The Ontario Human Rights Commission Complaints Process CLN4U.
Ontario Human Rights Commission
Chapter 3 Alternative, Judicial, and Online Dispute Resolution
Administering Human Rights Legislation
Internal Complaint Process
PROTEÇÃO DAS MÃOS: LIÇÕES PARA TODA A VIDA
EEO MODULE 3: DISCRIMINATION COMPLAINT PROCESSING
Administering Human Rights Legislation
Chapter 3 Judicial, Alternative, and E-Dispute Resolution
Chapter 16.1 Civil Cases.
Labor and Employment Law Update
Presentation transcript:

Defending Complaints at the Lancaster County/ Pennsylvania HRC Presented by: David R. Keller Barley Snyder LLC 126 East King Street Lancaster, PA Direct: Fax:

Initial Review of Complaint

Read thoroughly

Initial Review of Complaint Check for timeliness Check to see if the Complainant signed the Complaint (if not, raise it as an affirmative defense)

Initial Review of Complaint Check for jurisdiction Size Geographic location Allegation of a category protected by the statute

Initial Review of Complaint If any defects discovered Complete the Answer, but deny jurisdiction; or Complete the Answer, but include affirmative defenses such as timeliness

Initial Review of Complaint Be careful before asserting that the Employer is beneath the four employee threshold Independent contractors Part time/casual employees Under the table payments

TAKE IT SERIOUSLY

A complaint is not “no big deal”

TAKE IT SERIOUSLY The Complaint is very important to the Complainant, who will push hard for a positive resolution and will challenge most of your facts

TAKE IT SERIOUSLY The HRC, while neutral, is charged with responsibility to remedy discrimination Investigator will ask tough questions It does not pay to be cavalier about the Complaint

DO A THOROUGH INVESTIGATION

Take the necessary time Extension of time of 20 days at Lancaster HRC is nearly automatic Same with a 30 day extension at Pennsylvania HRC

DO A THOROUGH INVESTIGATION Make certain that your organization knows all of the facts One person in charge Talk to all witnesses Review all documents Compile and review relevant policies and procedures

DO A THOROUGH INVESTIGATION It creates serious problems to respond to the HRC and later find it necessary to say that you were wrong Get it right the first time

What if individual Management Employees are named in the Complaint?

Get the facts first

What if individual Management Employees are named in the Complaint? What reassurances do you give to the Employee? If facts were correct and Employee was acting in good faith, Company can support and represent its Management Employee If, at any time, it appears that the Company and Management Employee have different interests, we will tell you

What if individual Management Employees are named in the Complaint? Separate counsel? Who pays?

How to Respond to a Complaint? A formal Answer to the Complaint is required Must be served on the Complainant and his/her attorney, if any Can, and ordinarily should be, a short statement of response to each allegation of the Complaint

How to Respond to a Complaint? It can be more expansive, which should be considered in unusual circumstances Include affirmative defenses (failure to use internal complaint procedures, failure to request reasonable accommodations, late filing, etc.)

How to Respond to a Complaint? Include verification

How to Respond to a Complaint? These matters may eventually go to court, and without a proper Answer the Employer could lose on a technicality.

How to Respond to a Complaint? Position Letter or Position Statement Not served on the Complainant unless you choose to do so Your opportunity to tell the story Must be factually correct with relevant documents as exhibits Should be persuasive If your attorney writes it, have it carefully reviewed for even small inaccuracies

How to Respond to a Complaint? Response to document requests Lancaster HRC and Pennsylvania HRC have slightly different procedures

How to Respond to a Complaint? A document request is the opening negotiation as to what you ultimately give to either HRC Until investigators understand the case, they really don’t know what they need Most investigators will narrow their requests for good reason – some will not

Fact Findings – To Attend or Not to Attend? What is a Fact Finding? Internal meeting at which both sides attend The Investigator (Fact Finder) asks all of the questions Tape recorded in Lancaster, not at Pennsylvania HRC

Fact Findings – To Attend or Not to Attend? You can listen to and respond to the Complainant The Complainant can listen to and respond to you

Fact Findings – To Attend or Not to Attend? Factors to consider in deciding whether to attend a Fact Finding – it is not mandatory Can it be accomplished in a reasonable period of time

Fact Findings – To Attend or Not to Attend? Is a settlement offer being considered? Are there witnesses who will be especially uncomfortable or will not be good witnesses? Does Complainant have an attorney?

Fact Findings – To Attend or Not to Attend? Are there disputed facts worth discussing? Is the Complaint so frivolous as to be a waste of time? Is the Fact Finder reasonable, well organized, and under control?

Fact Findings – To Attend or Not to Attend? If you attend Tell it like it is Answer only the questions The Employer can send information to the Fact Finder at any later time before a decision is made

Fact Findings – To Attend or Not to Attend? Have one person take good notes while the others pay attention to the questions and respond to them You can call a time out Be prepared to be asked to settle and have a response ready

What May Occur During the Remaining Investigation?

Expect additional questions and document requests from the HRC

What May Occur During the Remaining Investigation? Expect requests for witness interviews or sworn statements from the HRC Management/supervisory employees may have Company attorney present Non-Management/Supervisory may not

What May Occur During the Remaining Investigation? Sworn statements are routinely requested by the Pennsylvania HRC and EEOC, sometimes by the Lancaster County HRC Again, the request is an open negotiation Evaluate the request and normally agree – sworn statements are better than witness interviews

The Human Relations Commission Decision

The Complaint may be dismissed. But the Complainant still has rights.

The Human Relations Commission Decision You may receive a letter summarizing the results of the investigation and indicating that the HRC is concluding that you have violated the statute

The Human Relations Commission Decision You will be given the opportunity to respond to a letter finding merit Prepare a strong response attacking the factual assertions particularly; or Engage in settlement discussions

The Human Relations Commission Decision If there is no settlement, and the HRC does not respond positively to a rebuttal Hearing Court appeals The Complainant has the right to take the case to court

IMPORTANT

Do not lie or ask witnesses to lie Do not falsify documents Do not destroy documents Preserve electronic information

Discrimination in... Lancaster County Human Relations Commission Employment Public Accommodation Education Housing

“Protected Classes” Lancaster County Human Relations Commission age (40+) categories under which someone can file sex handicap / disability race color family status ancestry religion pregnancy national origin GED sexual harassment

Complaint Process Lancaster County Human Relations Commission Complaint Filed Fact Finding Conference Investigation Finding No Probable CauseProbable Cause Possible Appeal Conciliation Attempt Public Hearing Finding Charge Not Established Discrimination Found Possible Court Review Remedy Issued Compliance Possible Court Review