Establishing a Life Sciences R&D Centre in the Scottish Central Belt A cost/quality comparison (Based on information from the Financial Times fDi Benchmark.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Capacity Planning & Facility Location
Advertisements

Establishing a Marine R&D Facility in the Scottish Central Belt A cost/quality comparison (Based on information from the Financial Times fDi Benchmark.
Aviel Tenenbaum Executive Vice President, GS&M ECI Telecom in Brazil Brazil: Technological Innovation & investment Opportunities December 15, 2008 Tel.
Scottish Development International Phil Stirling Senior International Executive, Oil & Gas.
UK TRADE & INVESTMENT (UKTI). Anthony Arkle Energy & Infrastructure Inward Investment Projects 4 th December 2009.
Wouter Schuitemaker Investment Director businessbirmingham.com.
Global Dynamism Index (GDI) 2013 summary report Model developed by the Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU)
A Review of International Shared Service Centre/BPO Locations (Based on information from the Financial Times fDi Benchmark tool, April 2012)
Globalization of Technology Dr Henry Loewendahl VP North America, fDi Intelligence, Financial Times Ltd Managing Director, WAVTEQ Ltd INSME Annual Meeting.
1 The Global Competitiveness Report and Evaluation of Mongolia’s Position Kerry Jaggi and Emma Loades World Economic Forum 13 October 2005 Copyright 2004.
The importance of property in marketing FDI Farannan Tannam.
1 FDI Confidence Index ® 2003 FDI Confidence Index ® The Global Business Policy Council Press Slides September 2003.
1 “European R&D Benchmarking (2002) “European R&D Benchmarking (2002)” Science, Technology and Innovation Policy Student Presentations Students: Miguel.
Who is FCm? FCm Global Network (Equity & Partner Countries) Total 75+ Countries Network - $4.67b EMEA - $2.51b APAC - $1.25b Americas - $914m Offices.
© economiesuisse,, Challenges for Switzerland‘s Foreign Trade Policy Gerold Bührer, Chairman 36th Annual General Meeting 2010 ARAB-SWISS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE.
Establishing a Medical Devices Manufacturing Plant in Scotland A cost/quality comparison (Based on information from the Financial Times fDi Benchmark tool.
1 Confidential Skilled, English speaking talent pool Annual supply of fresh talent for English language BPO 2013E; ‘000s 410,000 BPO industry addressable.
Establishing a Customer Support Centre A cost/quality comparison (Based on information from the Financial Times fDi Benchmark tool – April 2012)
Chapter Eight Global Market Participation. Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.Chapter 8 | Slide 2 Evaluating National Markets Where.
PROJECT PARTNERS Catholic Community Services of York Region, COSTI, Job Skills, Ministry of Training, Colleges and Universities, Seneca College, Toronto.
Bio Pharma Manufacturing in the Scottish Central Belt A cost/quality comparison (Based on information from the Financial Times fDi Benchmark tool – June.
1 From E-Government to Connected Governance: Harnessing Information & Communication Technologies for Knowledge Acquisition and Sharing Michael G. Mimicopoulos.
Facilitating FDI into Europe and Central Asia Working through consulting firms.
Business Model for an Industrial development agency
Implementing the Lisbon Strategy The Role of Regions Kirsty Macdonald Head of Office Scotland Europa.
WHY Hungary? WHAT in Hungary? Gergely Mikola Chairman, British Chamber of Commerce in Hungary Director of Corporate and Regulatory Affairs in CEE, BAT.
THE SIGNIFICANCE OF RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY IN MALAYSIAN PROPERTY SECTOR Muhammad Najib Mohamed Razali Hishamuddin Mohd Ali Department of Property Management.
The Canadian Trade Commissioner Service Indian investment in Canada An Overview October 2011.
NS4053 Winter Term 2014 Country/Region Indices. Country Indices/Rankings I There are a number of organizations that provide rankings of countries based.
Wireless Technology Centre 2010 A cost/quality comparison (Based on information from the Financial Times fDi Benchmark tool)
Multimedia Design Report 2012 A cost/quality comparison (Based on information from the Financial Times fDi Benchmark tool.)
Economic Mission of Israel in Singapore מדינת ישראל The State of Israel Israel Life Science Seminar April 2005 Why Israel? Anat Katz Commercial Attaché.
Textiles Manufacturing Plant (Based on information from the Financial Times fDi Benchmark tool, May 2012)
Breakfast Briefing Barry O’Leary CEO IDA Ireland.
Establishing a Software Development Centre in Scotland A cost-quality comparison (Based on information from the Financial Times fDi Benchmark tool – June.
Fund Administration Centre A cost/quality comparison (Based on information from the Financial Times fDi Benchmark tool – April 2012)
Data Centre Global Benchmarking 2011 City Level (Simplified) Profile.
Establishing an Electronics R&D Centre A cost/quality comparison (Based on information from the Financial Times fDi Benchmark tool – May 2012)
State of the Scottish Economy Richard Murray Office of the Chief Economic Adviser 26 th March 2010.
Who we are… October Aircraft Leasing Industry Aircraft leasing is the renting of commercial aircraft to airlines Approx. 40% of all aircraft are.
Food and Beverages Manufacturing Plant A cost/quality comparison (Based on information from the Financial Times fDi Benchmark tool – May 2012)
Enterprise & Environment Directorate TRANSPORT FOR REGIONAL GROWTH 5 NOVEMBER 2015 Keith Winter, Executive Director, Enterprise and Environment, Fife Council.
Tazeem Pasha SelectUSA U.S. Department of Commerce Washington, DC Foreign Direct Investment in the United States 1SelectUSA.gov.
NS4540 Winter Term 2015 Country Indices. Country Indices/Rankings I There are a number of organizations that provide rankings of countries based on factors.
Renewable Energy Technology Centre (Offshore Marine) A cost/quality comparison (Based on information from the Financial Times fDi Benchmark tool – April.
Establishing a Plastics Manufacturing Plant in Scotland A cost/quality comparison (Based on information from the Financial Times fDi Benchmark tool – May.
Foreign Direct Investments – A Key Prerequisite for Economic Growth – Case of the Czech Republic VLADIMÍR BARTOVIC EUROPEUM INSTITUTE FOR EUROPEAN POLICY,
Skills Context – North East LEP 22 th March 2016 Michelle Duggan Fiona Thom.
Growth Excellence Matrix Diagnostic Improving Future Growth Potential.
Wind Turbine Manufacturing A cost-quality comparison (Based on information from the Financial Times fDi Benchmark tool – April 2012)
April Competitiveness of Scottish Central Belt Value for Money Overall Attractiveness Quality of the Location Annual Operating Costs Quality Competitiveness.
Scottish Enterprise Denmark’s economy and comparisons with Scotland SE Board performance Committee November 2006.
The Biopharmaceutical Industry – Protecting Investment through Sustainable policy Barry O’Leary February 23 rd 2012.
Who we are: InvestBulgaria Agency is a government investment promotion arm, part of the Ministry of Economy IBA services: Macroeconomic data on Bulgaria.
Assessment of a Country as a Market or Production Location
Insider Connectivity Review & Savings Analysis
R&D Department National Qualifications Authority, UAE October 2016
Software Development Center California Scotland Benchmark Report 2016
RSA Insight Report: Supporting Slides
RSA Insight Report: Supporting Slides
RSA Insight Report: Supporting Slides
RSA Insight Report: Supporting Slides
RSA Insight Report: Supporting Slides
RSA Insight Report: Supporting Slides
RSA Insight Report: Supporting Slides
RSA Insight Report: Supporting Slides
RSA Insight Report: Supporting Slides
RSA Insight Report: Supporting Slides
RSA Insight Report: Supporting Slides
RSA Insight Report: Supporting Slides
Presentation transcript:

Establishing a Life Sciences R&D Centre in the Scottish Central Belt A cost/quality comparison (Based on information from the Financial Times fDi Benchmark tool – June 2011)

Competitiveness of Scottish Central Belt Value for Money Overall Attractiveness Quality of the Location Annual Operating Costs Life Science R&D in Scottish Central Belt? Large Size of Industry in Life Science Strong Track Record in Life Sciences Availability of Highly Skilled Staff High Quality Business Environment Flexible Labour Market Highly Competitive Labour Costs Contents

The following analysis is based on fDi Benchmark, an online location benchmarking tool provided by the Financial Times (FT) fDi Benchmark compared the Scottish Central Belt with the leading locations globally for Life Science R&D Centres based on an analysis of over 55 quality factors and 10 cost factors A key emphasis was placed on: - Presence of industrial cluster – the size of BioPharma industry, track record and R&D capabilities; and - General business environment – regulatory environment, operating risk, taxation and economic growth and stability - Costs to employ laboratory specialists and scientists Other factors including labour availability and quality, accessibility and the living environment were also assessed Benchmarking Study

The fDi Benchmark Matrix shows the trade off between cost and quality across the 5 selected locations for the Life Science R&D Centre profile. The average cost and quality score is 100 for the selected locations. Source: fDi Intelligence, from the Financial Times Ltd fDi Benchmark Matrix The ‘ideal’ quadrant is the top left (high quality/lower operating costs)

Cost FactorUsage Amount Property Total Occupancy cost (in town office rent)3,000 m² Weighting Model OverviewWeight Presence of an Industrial Cluster50 Labour Availability and Quality20 General Business Environment15 Living Environment10 Infrastructure and Accessibility5 Employee Type Profile Head count R&D / Engineering Head of Research and Development1 Laboratory Specialist17 Laboratory Technician15 R&D Team Leader4 Scientist10 Administration Facilities/Office Services Specialist3 5 Project Profile Overview

The matrix is based on the weighting and cost model for the Life Science R&D Centre profile. The weighting model identifies the key location criteria for the project and the cost model shows the primary cost inputs for the operation. The cost and quality scores are calculated using real data on all the location requirements and cost inputs. The results indicate the different location solutions for the investor as follows:  the Scottish Central Belt offers higher quality at lower cost than the average of all the selected locations  Boston and Munich offer higher quality but at higher cost  Copenhagen and Rotterdam offer lower cost, but at lower quality The Operating Cost value is in GBP - United Kingdom Pound Location Qualitative Score Operating Cost Index Operating Cost Value Boston (MA) ,608,589 Copenhagen ,158,947 Munich ,937,999 Rotterdam ,737,827 Scottish Central Belt ,886,411 Source: fDi Intelligence, from the Financial Times Ltd fDi Benchmark Matrix

The location attractiveness index shows the overall attractiveness of the 5 selected locations for the Life Science R&D Centre profile. The ratio of quality to cost is 50:50 Source: fDi Intelligence, from the Financial Times Ltd Location Attractiveness Index

The cost quality competitiveness uses the results of the fDi Benchmark Matrix to show the value for money of each location option. The graph shows that:  The top location offering the highest quality for a given level of cost is the Scottish Central Belt  the Scottish Central Belt also offers an above average level of quality and good value for money as its relative quality is higher than its relative cost Source: fDi Intelligence, from the Financial Times Ltd Cost Quality Competitiveness

The annual operating cost calculation for Life Science R&D centre is based on the following primary input costs: Labour Cost - The average cost across the selected locations for Life Science R&D centre is GBP 3,465,954 - The greatest cost saving between the selected locations is GBP 1,870,762 per annum - The location with the lowest operating costs is Rotterdam In terms of the individual cost factors, the location with the lowest costs is: - Labour Cost: the Scottish Central Belt - Property: Rotterdam The values in the chart below are in GBP United Kingdom Pound Source: fDi Intelligence, from the Financial Times Ltd LocationLabour CostProperty Boston (MA)3,658,046950,542 Copenhagen2,446,628712,319 Munich2,876,3951,061,603 Rotterdam2,197,275540,551 Scottish Central Belt1,648,3931,238,017 Cost Competitiveness

The quality competitiveness assessment is based on the weight model for the Life Science R&D Centre profile which assesses each location across the following location factors: - General Business Environment - Labour Availability and Quality - Presence of an Industrial Cluster Infrastructure - Accessibility and Living Environment The average score for the selected locations is 100. The location with the highest quality score is Boston In terms of the individual quality factors, the location with the highest score is: - General Business Environment: Copenhagen - Labour Availability and Quality: Boston - Presence of an Industrial Cluster: Boston - Infrastructure and Accessibility: Munich - Living Environment: the Scottish Central Belt Source: fDi Intelligence, from the Financial Times Ltd Location General Business Environment Labour Availability and Quality Presence of an Industrial Cluster Infrastructure and Accessibility Living Environment Boston (MA) Copenhagen Munich Rotterdam Scottish Central Belt Quality Competitiveness

The quality competitiveness breakdown for General Business Environment for the Life Science R&D Centre profile is shown below The location with the highest overall score for General Business Environment is Copenhagen In terms of the individual quality criteria within General Business Environment, the location with the highest score is: - Economic growth and stability: Boston - Operating risk: the Scottish Central Belt - Taxation and incentives: Copenhagen - Access to finance: Boston - Regulatory environment: Copenhagen Source: fDi Intelligence, from the Financial Times Ltd Location Economic growth and stability Operating risk Taxation and incentives Access to finance Regulatory environment Boston (MA) Copenhagen Munich Rotterdam Scottish Central Belt General Business Environment

The quality competitiveness breakdown for Labour Availability and Quality for the Life Science R&D Centre profile is shown below The location with the highest overall score for Labour Availability and Quality is Boston In terms of the individual quality criteria within Labour Availability and Quality, the location with the highest score is: - Overall size of labour market: Boston -Tightness and competition for labour: the Scottish Central Belt - Experienced industry-specific staff: the Scottish Central Belt - Flexibility of labour regulations: Copenhagen Source: fDi Intelligence, from the Financial Times Ltd Location Overall size of labour market Tightness and competition for labour Experienced industry- specific staff Flexibility of labour regulations Boston (MA) Copenhagen Munich Rotterdam Scottish Central Belt Labour Availability and Quality

The quality competitiveness breakdown for Presence of an Industrial Cluster for the Life Science R&D Centre profile is shown below The location with the highest overall score for Presence of an Industrial Cluster is Boston In terms of the individual quality criteria within Presence of an Industrial Cluster, the location with the highest score is: - Size of industry: Munich - Track record: the Scottish Central Belt - Research and Development Capabilities: Boston Source: fDi Intelligence, from the Financial Times Ltd Location Size of industry Track record Research and Development Capabilities Boston (MA) Copenhagen Munich Rotterdam Scottish Central Belt Presence of an Industrial Cluster

The quality competitiveness breakdown for Infrastructure and Accessibility for the Life Science R&D Centre profile is shown below The location with the highest overall score for Infrastructure and Accessibility is Munich In terms of the individual quality criteria within Infrastructure and Accessibility, the location with the highest score is: - Access to major overseas markets: Munich - Quality of utilities: Rotterdam - Quality of ICT infrastructure: Copenhagen Source: fDi Intelligence, from the Financial Times Ltd Location Access to major overseas markets Quality of utilities Quality of ICT infrastructure Boston (MA) Copenhagen Munich Rotterdam Scottish Central Belt Infrastructure and Accessibility

The quality competitiveness breakdown for Living Environment for the Life Science R&D Centre profile is shown below The location with the highest overall score for Living Environment is the Scottish Central Belt In terms of the individual quality criteria within Living Environment, the location with the highest score is: - Cost of living: the Scottish Central Belt - Attractiveness for international staff: Boston Source: fDi Intelligence, from the Financial Times Ltd Location Cost of living Attractiveness for international staff Boston (MA) Copenhagen Munich Rotterdam Scottish Central Belt Living Environment

To realise the potential, please contact: Scottish Development International 150 Broomielaw, Atlantic Quay Glasgow G2 8LU Scotland, UK T F Worldwide offices in: Americas, Europe, Middle East, Africa and Asia Pacific