Launch Propulsion: SMC/LR Perspectives Presented to

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EXTROVERTSpace Propulsion 08 Bi-propellant Liquid Rocket Engines.
Advertisements

Larry Phillips MAY 13th-17th, 2002 Micro Arcsecond Xray Imaging Mission: Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF) Launch Vehicle Information Final Version.
FEDERAL SPACE AGENCY International conference “Europe space policy: ambitions 2015” Session 1. “General view on propulsion systems: LV of the future”
Liquid Rocket Engine Cycles
© The Aerospace Corporation 2011 NRC Workshop on NASA Technology Roadmaps TA01 - Launch Propulsion Systems Randy Kendall General Manager Launch Systems.
Robert J. Collier Trophy Nominee: X-51A WaveRider
Blue Origin AIAA Civil Space Symposium Huntsville, Alabama
V/FLF 117/ /06/ P. 1 ESA SPACE EXPLORATION AND INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION Workshop – Washington D.C. June 21-22, 2004.
1 Review of US Human Space Flight Plans Committee Evaluation Measures and Criteria for Humans Spaceflight Options 12 August 2009.
GSFC/Wallops Flight Facility 1 Small Satellite Opportunities at Wallops Flight Facility Dr. John Campbell Director, Wallops Flight Facility.
Introduction Over the past 20 years there have been numerous attempts to develop a new RLV All failed or prematurely canceled All share a common issue:
Launch Vehicles. LAUNCH SYSTEM CONCEPTS SHROUD PROTECTS THE SPACECRAFT SHROUD PROTECTS THE SPACECRAFT MAIN VEHICLE PRIMARY LIQUID OR SOLID ROCKET PROPELLANT.
Architecture Team Industry Day Briefing 17 January, 2002.
Heavy Launchers by Alain Souchier president Association Planète Mars France EMC11 Neuchâtel, 1 Octobre 2011.
Copyright © 2013 United Launch Alliance, LLC. Unpublished Work. All Rights Reserved. Civil Space 2013 Critical Challenges: Safety, Mission Assurance, and.
Office of the Secretary of Defense Defense Microelectronics Activity (DMEA) Defense Microelectronics Activity (DMEA) Doug Casanova Defense Microelectronics.
MAE 4262: ROCKETS AND MISSION ANALYSIS Single and Multi-Stage Rockets September 9, 2014 Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department Florida Institute.
MAE 5495: Launch Vehicle Analysis LECTURE 1 Dr. Andrew Ketsdever Spring 2008.
Rocket Power Introduction to Rockets and Missiles Scott Schoneman.
Rocket Power – Part 2 Introduction to Rockets and Missiles Scott Schoneman 4 Nov 03.
Propulsion Engineering Research Center NASA Technology Roadmap: Launch Propulsion Systems Robert J. Santoro The Propulsion Engineering Research Center.
0 Financial and Market Risks for Space Launch Providers Presented by: Charlie Precourt ATK Aerospace Systems Space Transportation Policy and.
Illinois Space Society Tech Team USLI FRR Presentation.
Reducing the cost of sustained operations through technology infusion April 2004 Darin Skelly NASA Kennedy Space Center Transformational Spaceport & Range.
Launch System Launch Vehicle Launch Complex Orbit Insertion Orbit Maneuvers.
Liquid & Solid Propulsion Overview
Rocket Engine Physics and Design
Rockets Tuesday: Rocketry Wednesday: Meet in my room 601: hydrogen demo and Quiz over rocketry. Thursday: Satellites and Orbital Mechanics Friday: Satellites,
Copyright © 2010 United Launch Alliance, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
International Civil Aviation Organization Colloquium on Environmental Aspects of Aviation Aircraft Noise - The Way Forward Willard Dodds, Chairman ICCAIA.
A3 Altitude Test Facility
1 Directorate of Industry Relations, Analysis and Policy (DIRAP) Paul Herring, Director “CASE FOR CANADIAN DEFENCE INDUSTRIAL POLICY” 27 February 2012.
Space and Missile Systems Center Innovation Strategies: Maximizing Payoff of Industry Research and Development (IRAD) Investments for National Security.
1 SpaceX proprietary data constituting “Confidential Information” under applicable agreements. Tim Hughes Vice President & Chief Counsel.
Welcome to the Symposium on Space Transportation Policy and Market Risks November 16, 2011 Space Policy Institute Elliott School of International Affairs.
Corporate Perspective on Russia Future High Tech R&D and Manufacturing Ambassador Thomas Pickering Senior Vice-President, International Relations The Boeing.
Spaceport Florida Authority Presentation to Advanced Spaceport Technology Working Group (ASTWG) May 15, 2001 Keith Witt Director of Spaceport Development.
AFRL Nuclear S&T Investment Strategy Dr. David Hardy SES Associate Director for Space Technology Air Force Research Laboratory 27 August 2010.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Presentation to the NASA Goddard Academy National Aeronautics and Space Administration 3. Commerce Space.
Copyright © 2008 United Launch Alliance, LLC. All rights reserved. Images Courtesy of Lockheed Martin and The Boeing Company O22P1-478 SPACE Transportation.
Copyright © 2010 United Launch Alliance, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
LAUNCH VEHICLE DOWNSELECT A Wide Variety of Launch Systems Are Available Today Initial Downselect Constraint Based Upon UMRM Requirements Primary Payload.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Transitioning Toward the Future of Commercial Human Spaceflight COMMERCIAL CREW PROGRAM AIAA Spring Dinner.
LRO/LCROSS Launch Preview How Where When Presentation for NASA Solar System Ambassadors and Museum Alliance March 20, 2009 Brooke Hsu, LRO E/PO Lead Brian.
Bill Anderson Purdue University 23 March 2011 Perspectives on Launch Propulsion System Roadmap.
Space Florida NASA Presentation on Shiloh Commercial Launch Site Project Volusia County Council 4April13.
Project Ares University of Central Florida NASA Student Launch 1/28/2015.
ST5 PDR June 19-20, 2001 NMP 2-1 EW M ILLENNIUM P ROGRA NNMM Program Overview Dr. Christopher Stevens Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of.
11 Space Transportation Policy and Market Risks Panel 5 – International Customers, Competitors and Partners The George Washington University Elliot School.
1 Stan Graves Vice President, Science & Engineering ATK Propulsion Systems March 23 – 24, 2011 NASA Technology Roadmaps.
CRICOS No J a university for the world real R ENB443: Launcher Systems Image Credit: ESA Caption: The generic Ariane-5 (Ariane Flight 162) lifting.
Office of Space Flight Spaceport and Range Technology Development Initiative Al Sofge NASA Headquarters May 15, 2001.
AIAA Responsive Space April 22, 2004 Highly Operable Propulsion System Approaches and Propulsion Technologies for Operationally Responsive Space.
Approved For Public Release © The Aerospace Corporation 2009 June 17, 2009 Initial Summary of Human Rated Delta IV Heavy Study Briefing to the Review of.
Flight Hardware. Flight Profile - STS Flight Profile - SLS Earth Mars 34,600,000 mi International Space Station 220 mi Near-Earth Asteroid ~3,100,000.
Marshall National Aeronautics and Space Administration Industry 4.0 : How the New Interaction Between Man and Machine in Smart Factories Will.
액체로켓엔진의 이론과 실제 한국항공우주연구원 발사체추진제어팀 임 하 영.
Propulsion Economic Considerations for Next Generation Space Launch by Chris Y. Taylor 40th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit.
NASA Hypersonic Research
Propellant Depot Bernard Kutter United Launch Alliance
ROCKETS AND MISSION ANALYSIS
Development and Principles of Rocketry
NASA Technology Roadmaps ATK Commentary
DESIGN OF THE ARIES IV TRIBRID LIQUID PROPELLANT ROCKET ENGINE
Video ULA.
Team A Propulsion 1/16/01.
Section 5: Lecture 3 The Optimum Rocket Nozzle
DDR&E AC: Aligned to the National Defense Strategy
Presentation transcript:

Launch Propulsion: SMC/LR Perspectives Presented to Launch Propulsion Workshop Caltech Pasadena, CA Presented by Lt Col Toby Cavallari Chief Engineer Launch and Range Systems Directorate Space and Missile Systems Center 23 March 2011

ELV History (1958 – Present) In past 50 years, propulsion enabled ballistic and spacelift capabilities Powered first US ICBMs Evolved into launch vehicle systems, opening the door to space Continued with improvements in performance, reliability, and operability However, more than 40% of all historical launch vehicle failures caused by propulsion subsystem malfunctions (#1 contributor) Drawing courtesy of Boeing

Historical USAF Development & Industrial Base More than 50 years, USAF has been a key player in rocket development Today, only several U.S. companies are active

EELV Families Two families of launch vehicles (Atlas V and Delta IV) (401) (5XX Series) Delta IV (Med) Atlas V Family GTO Capability (lbs) 8/02 7/03 (4XX Series) Delta IV (Med+ 4 series) (Med+ 5 series) (Heavy) 3/03 11/02 12/04 Delta IV Family 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 IOC Atlas V (Heavy) PWR RS-68 Engine Russian RD-180 Engine RL10-A-2 Engine RL10B-2 GEM-60 SRB

Current EELV Propulsion Environment Escalating engine cost growth Must ensure engine availability for EELV until 2030 Supplier obsolescence Reliance on foreign suppliers for EELV mission assurance and sustainment Payload mass-to-orbit expected to continue on an upward trend Declining U.S. industry capability in engine development and production Some specific concerns: EELV Upper Stage Engines: 50-year-old craftsman-based manufacturing Currently flying at reduced confidence margins Running at twice original engine chamber pressure Requiring highly selective screening per USG standards Increased mission assurance costs No further growth opportunity without major redesign Kerosene Booster Engine: DoD reliance on Russian designed and built engine Limiting opportunity for technology transfer to new U.S. engine effort Also, ITAR restricts U.S. technology transfer into RD-180 program

Chamber Pressure (psia) RL10 Engines LOX/LH2 engine built by Pratt-Whitney Rocketdyne Expander cycle 1st RL10 flight in 1963 (RL10A-3 on Centaur) RL10A-4-2 and RL10B-2 first flown in 2002 Atlas V and Delta IV 2nd stage engines More than 40% component commonality between Delta and Atlas RL10 variants RL10A-4-2 (Atlas V) RL10A-4-2 (Atlas V) RL10B-2 (Delta IV) Thrust, vac (lbf) 22,300 24,750 Chamber Pressure (psia) 610 640 Isp, vac (sec) 450.5 464 MR 5.5 6.0 Expansion Ratio 84 285 RL10B-2 (Delta IV)

Upper Stage Engine History & Future Paths Qual. Year RL10A-1 15k lbf Pc=300 psia Isp = 422 s 1961 1963 1967 1991 1998 1999 2000 RL10A-3 Isp = 427 s 1966 1985 1994 A-1 A-3 A-3-1 A-3-3A A-4 A-4-1 B-2 A-4-2 A-3-3 A-4-1A RL10A-3-3A 16.5k lbf Pc=475 psia Isp = 444.4 s RL10B-2 24.7k lbf Pc=640 psia Isp = 464 s RL10A-4-2 22.3k lbf Pc=610 psia Isp = 451 s (Delta IV) (Atlas V) Model Possible Upper Stage Engine Paths Converting existing RL10B-2 inventory No further growth opportunity without major redesign Fly RL10C on Atlas V RL10C RL10A & RL10B-2 Next Generation Engine (NGE) True common, new upper stage engine Greater designed-in reliability/performance margins Fly on both Atlas V and Delta IV

Upper Stage Next Generation Engine (NGE) Objectives Modern manufacturing techniques Greater designed-in reliability and performance margins More sustainable Lower life cycle cost Achieve a truly common LOX/Hydrogen upper stage engine Incorporates National Security Space & NASA requirements Interagency partnership opportunity Captures emerging commercial needs Creates open competition Bolster U.S. liquid propulsion industrial base capability Leverage advanced design tools matured by AFRL/NASA technology investment e.g. AFRL Upper Stage Engine Technology (USET) SMC/Aerospace and NASA currently assessing benefits of using the NGE for Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle (EELV) missions NASA’s Cryogenic Propulsion Stage for space exploration

Potential Partnership Areas Opportunities for joint propulsion development programs Overcome emerging National Security Space challenges and declining budgets Lay groundwork for interagency cooperation and commercial partnerships Take advantage of NASA’s commitment to advanced tech development and emerging commercial needs National Propulsion Strategy for upper stage engine (e.g. NGE) and high- thrust kerosene booster engine Common engine - not common vehicle architectures Improved funding stability Accelerated development schedule Shared testing and ground certification costs Optimal use of national test facilities Revitalize declining industrial base capability New engine has many cross-cutting mission benefits & capabilities Military, civil, and commercial

Backup Charts

Chamber Pressure (psia) RD-180 Engine Atlas V Common Core Booster (first stage) engine LOX/kerosene engine built by NPO Energomash, Russia Oxygen-Rich Staged Combustion (ORSC) cycle First flown in 2002 Full Power Level (100% PL) Min. Power Level (47% PL) Thrust, vac (lbf) 933,400 438,700 Thrust, sea level (lbf) 860,200 365,500 Chamber Pressure (psia) 3722 1755 Isp, vac (sec) 339.3 335.5 Isp, sea level (sec) 312.7 279.5 MR 2.72 (+/- 7%) Expansion Ratio 36.87

Chamber Pressure (psia) RS-68 Engine Delta IV Common Booster Core (CBC) engine LOX/LH2 engine built by Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne Largest LOX/LH2 engine Used existing technologies to minimize cost and risk Gas Generator (GG) cycle First flown in 2002 RS-68A upgrade certification underway Full Power Level (102% PL) Min. Power Level (57% PL) Thrust, vac (lbf) 751,000 432,000 Thrust, sea level (lbf) 656,000 337,000 Chamber Pressure (psia) 1420 815 Isp, vac (sec) 409 Isp, sea level (sec) 357 MR 6.0 Expansion Ratio 21.6

Atlas V Solid Rocket Booster (SRB) Strap-On Solid Motors Atlas V Solid Rocket Booster (SRB) Delta IV GEM-60 Atlas V (500 Series) (0-5 SRBs) (400 Series) (0-3 SRBs) SRB GEM-60 SRB Characteristics Diameter (in) 62 Length (ft) 67 Gross Weight (lb) 102,396 Burn Time (sec) 88 Total Impulse, Vacuum (lbf-sec) 26,190,000 Isp, Vacuum (sec) 279.3 Average Thrust, Vacuum (lbf) 270,420 Max Thrust, Vacuum (lbf) 380,000 MEOP (psi) 1600 GEM-60 Characteristics Diameter (in) 60 Length (ft) 53 Gross Weight (lb) 74,700 Burn Time (sec) 90.8 Total Impulse, Vacuum (lbf-sec) 17,950,000 Isp, Vacuum (sec) 274 Average Thrust, Vacuum (lbf) 197,540 Max Thrust, Vacuum (lbf) 300,000 MEOP (psi) 1294