Ion Accelerator Complex for MEIC January 28, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview of MEIC Ion Complex and Ion Collider Ring
Advertisements

Simulation Study For MEIC Electron Cooling He Zhang, Yuhong Zhang Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Abstract Electron cooling of the ion beams.
Proton / Muon Bunch Numbers, Repetition Rate, RF and Kicker Systems and Inductive Wall Fields for the Rings of a Neutrino Factory G H Rees, RAL.
Charge Exchange injection in BNL AGS 1972: First suggested for AGS ( by A. Maschke ) 1982: Brought into operation in AGS. D.S. Barton, L. Alhrens, E. Gill,
Thomas Roser Snowmass 2001 June 30 - July 21, MW AGS proton driver (M.J. Brennan, I. Marneris, T. Roser, A.G. Ruggiero, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas,
ERHIC Main Linac Design E. Pozdeyev + eRHIC team BNL.
(ISS) Topics Studied at RAL G H Rees, RAL, UK. ISS Work Areas 1. Bunch train patterns for the acceleration and storage of μ ± beams. 2. A 50Hz, 1.2 MW,
Thomas Roser RHIC Open Planning Meeting December 3-4, 2003 RHIC II machine plans Electron cooling at RHIC Luminosity upgrade parameters.
Kevin Jordan Beam Diagnostics Collaboration Meeting 3/18/15 MEIC Design Overview.
Expectations and Directions of MEIC Ion Injector Design Optimization Yuhong Zhang MEIC Collaboration Meeting Spring 2015 March 30 and 31, 2015.
Toward a Test Facility for an ERL Circulator Ring Based e-Cooler MEIC Electron Cooler Test Facility Planning Retreat January 31, 2012.
MEIC Electron Cooling Simulation He Zhang 03/18/2014, EIC 14 Newport News, VA.
Page 1 Workshop 01/2011 The Accumulator/Pre-Booster Bela Erdelyi Department of Physics, Northern Illinois University, and Physics Division, Argonne National.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy AGS Upgrade and Super Neutrino Beam DOE Annual HEP Program Review April 27-28, 2005 Derek I. Lowenstein.
Cooler Injector Synchrotron (CIS) at IUCF V.S. Morozov MEIC Collaboration Meeting March 30-31, 2015.
Page 1 Review 09/2010 MEIC Ion Linac and Pre-Booster Design Bela Erdelyi Department of Physics, Northern Illinois University, and Physics Division, Argonne.
Proton Driver at Fermilab Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermilab IDS-NF 7 th Plenary Meeting Oct 17-19,2011.
EDM2001 Workshop May 14-15, 2001 AGS Intensity Upgrade (J.M. Brennan, I. Marneris, T. Roser, A.G. Ruggiero, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas, S.Y. Zhang) Proton.
MEIC Staged Cooling Scheme and Simulation Studies He Zhang MEIC Collaboration Meeting, 10/06/2015.
Synchronization Andrew Hutton Slava Derbenev Yuhong Zhang.
Electron Model for a 3-10 GeV, NFFAG Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
PROTON LINAC FOR INDIAN SNS Vinod Bharadwaj, SLAC (reporting for the Indian SNS Design Team)
ERHIC design status V.Ptitsyn for the eRHIC design team.
Design Optimization of MEIC Ion Linac & Pre-Booster B. Mustapha, Z. Conway, B. Erdelyi and P. Ostroumov ANL & NIU MEIC Collaboration Meeting JLab, October.
The SPS as a Damping Ring Test Facility for CLIC March 6 th, 2013 Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU CERN CLIC Collaboration Working meeting.
Fermilab and Muons Proton Driver (for ν-Factory, μ + -μ - Collider, …) David Neuffer Fermilab.
DTL Option for MEIC Ion Injection Jiquan Guo, Haipeng Wang Jlab 3/30/
Preliminary MEIC Ion Beam Formation Scheme Jiquan Guo for the MEIC design study team Oct. 5,
Undulator based polarized positron source for Circular electron-positron colliders Wei Gai Tsinghua University/ANL a seminar for IHEP, 4/8/2015.
THE DESIGN OF THE AGS-BASED PROTON DRIVER FOR NEUTRINO FACTORY W.T. WENG, BNL FFAG WORKSHOP JULY 7-11, 2003 KEK, JAPAN.
Warm and Cold Ion Linac: Comparison and Optimization March 30, 2015.
Synchronization Issues in MEIC Andrew Hutton, Slava Derbenev and Yuhong Zhang MEIC Ion Complex Design Mini-Workshop Jan. 27 & 28, 2011.
Presenter : Yang Wu McMaster University Work conducted at IHEP.
Progress in the Multi-Ion Injector Linac Design
Large Booster and Collider Ring
A. Plastun¹, B. Mustapha, Z. Conway and P. Ostroumov
Injector Chain General and more about p-RCS
Space Charge Effect Simulation Using DA Based FMM and Electron Cooling Simulation for JLab’s MEIC Project.
MEIC Electron-Ion Collider - Space-Charge Issues
Injector Chain General and more about p-RCS/i-RCS
CEPC Injector Damping Ring
Pulsed Ion Linac for EIC
Collider Ring Optics & Related Issues
LEIR Presented by M. CHANEL PSDAYS: EVIAN 2001.
Low Energy Electron-Ion Collision
Status of the JLEIC Injector Linac Design
DTL for MEIC Ion Injection
JLEIC ion fullsize booster (2256m) space charge limit (Δν=0
MEIC New Baseline: Part 9
Update on ERL Cooler Design Studies
Ion bunch formation options for 400GeV JLEIC
JLEIC 200 GeV Ion Injector Chain and Bunch Formation
Update on MEIC Activities at ANL
MEIC New Baseline: Luminosity Performance and Upgrade Path
JLEIC 200 GeV ion beam formation options
Multi-Ion Injector Linac Design – Progress Summary
MEIC New Baseline: Part 7
Jiquan Guo, Haipeng Wang
MEIC New Baseline: Performance and Accelerator R&D
MEIC Alternative Design Part V
HE-JLEIC: Do We Have a Baseline?
Cooling of C6+ ion beam with pulsed electron beam
Some Thoughts on the JLEIC Ion Injector
RF Parameters for New 2.2 km MEIC Design
RF system for MEIC Ion Linac: SRF and Warm Options
Optimization of JLEIC Integrated Luminosity Without On-Energy Cooling*
Updated MEIC Ion Beam Formation Scheme
An Alternative Ion Complex Agenda /some preliminary estimations/
JLEIC Ion Beam Formation options for 200 GeV
Choice of harmonic number with the consideration of ion beam formation
Presentation transcript:

Ion Accelerator Complex for MEIC January 28, 2010

2 Ion Sources  Main parameters –Emittance –Pulse current –Pulse length –Repetition rate  Polarized H¯ and D¯ –Improve degree of polarization  Light ion polarized sources – –Demonstrate peak pulse current  Heavy Ion Sources (ECR) –Demonstrate ~2 mA over 250  sec –New generation of ECR sources (56 GHz) in afterglow mode  Heavy Ion Sources (EBIS) –Charge per pulse is low – longer accumulation time in the pre-booster

3 Multi-beam Ion Linac  Linac layout  200 MeV for protons and 70 MeV/u for heavy ions seems close to optimal for accumulation of required current with specified beam quality in the pre-booster  SRF technology for ion beam acceleration is well established  Further cost reduction is expected due to many new projects  However, it is unlikely that the cost of the linac drops below $100M Normal conducting Superconducting MEBT Stripper RFQ IH QWR QWR HWR DSR Ion Sources

4 Pre-Booster  Current pre-conceptual design satisfies all specifications required for the collider –Low emittance –High current –Excellent properties of the polarized beams  Demonstrated technology –Multi-turn injection of heavy-ion beams –Electron cooling with DC beams –2-harmonic acceleration at low frequency  Further R&D due to more challenging beam parameters (low emittance, high current, higher energy,…) –3D simulation of the injection –3D simulation of acceleartion

5 Large Booster  Longer circumference (factor of 4 longer then pre-booster)  Conceptually similar to the pre-booster  Protons from 3 to 12 GeV  Lead Ions from 1.18 GeV/u to ~4.5 GeV/u –Fully stripped before the injection into the L-Booster  Acceleration –Use low frequencies harmonics 4 or 5 –Higher harmonics may not be necessary (to suppress space charge)  Lattice – no issues  Maintain polarization – no significant issues  Emittance, space charge can be controlled well

6 Forming High Frequency (750 MHz) ion bunches  Concept: –Accelerate ions to high energies with low frequency RF –Create coasting beam – L-Booster or Main Ring –Adiabatically bunch and accelerate – efficiency ~99% is required –Minimize losses –Momentum collimation  Develop 750 MHz cavities with variable frequency in the range of ~10 MHz. –Normal conducting –Can be a mechanical tuner to vary frequency in timescale of a second  Main ring –Protons from 12 to 60 GeV –  f ~2MHz for 750 MHz –Lead ions ~4.5 GeV/u to 23 GeV/u -  f ~10MHz for 750 MHz

7 Issues with forming of 750 MHz bunches  Acceleration time – defined by the tuner system in the RF cavities –Mechanical – seconds –Ferrites ? The frequency is high  Acceleration time can be reduced if two RF systems are used: low frequency (~10 MHz) and high frequency with very low  f  Main Ring is crowded, is there enough space in the MR for collimation?

8 Main Ring  Transition energy must be lower ~4 GeV/u  IBS