Overview of Risk: The Need for New Requirements Module 3 Soil Fumigant RED Requirements.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hazardous Materials Are... Substances that because of their chemical nature, pose a potential risk to life, health, or property if they are released or.
Advertisements

P RIVATE A PPLICATOR R ECERTIFICATION North Carolina Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services Structural Pest Control & Pesticides Division,
Principles of Decontamination. Objectives Define contamination and decontamination Differentiate between the concepts of exposure and contamination Identify.
1 Overview of Soil Fumigant Uses Module 2 Soil Fumigant RED Requirements.
Keep the product where you want it! Patrol Your Pesticides! Dean Herzfeld, U of MN Kay Sargent, MDA.
Buffer Zones Distances, Credits & Posting (2011) Module 7 Soil Fumigant RED Requirements.
Soil Fumigation In Idaho
TRP Chapter Chapter 2.3 Environmental impacts and health risks.
Using Pesticides Safely.  RST.11 ‐ 12.1 Cite specific textual evidence to support analysis of science and technical texts, attending to important distinctions.
WNV Pesticide Regulations Brian Rowe Pesticide Section Manager Michigan Department of Agriculture.
Module Three Chapters 7, 8, & 9. Chapter 7 Site Assessment and Weather.
New Requirements For Soil Fumigant Pesticide Products EPA and UGA Grower Trainings Nov 2010 Culpepper and Sumner.
Instructions for using this template. Remember this is Jeopardy, so where I have written “Answer” this is the prompt the students will see, and where.
Site Specific Fumigant Management Plan And Post Application Summary Joel Kangiser WSDA.
John Leahy, EPA Pesticide Re-evaluation Division
Western Regions Pesticide Meeting May 2010 Inspection Checklist.
2010 Fumigant Handler and Worker Protection Measures Western Regions Pesticide Meeting May 2010.
Norton, 2010 E. Randall Norton, Ph.D. The University of Arizona Safford Agricultural Center.
Buffer Zones and Credits
Slide 1 Copyright © 2007, 2004, by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Disasters and Hazardous Materials Chapter 33.
Worker Protection Measures Tarp Perforation and Removal and Entry Restrictions John Leahy, EPA Pesticide Re-evaluation Division.
Overview and Implementation Schedules Richard Keigwin, Director EPA Pesticide Re-evaluation Division.
Western Regions Pesticide Meeting May 2010 Buffer Overlap Limitations & Exceptions.
RADON The Health Risks and Solutions. What is Radon? A naturally occurring radioactive gas. Colorless, odorless and tasteless. Found all over the U.S.
Pesticide Labeling Reeves Petroff
Registrant Requirements; EPA, Registrant, and Partner Roles in Training Richard Keigwin, Director Pesticide Re-evaluation Division.
Safety Training Presentation
EPA Resource Development And Outreach Activities John Leahy, EPA Pesticide Re-evaluation Division.
Ohio Pesticide Applicator Training
Fumigant Management Plans and Post Application Summary Reports Module 6 Soil Fumigant RED Requirements.
Good Agricultural Practices (GAPs) Module 4 Soil Fumigant RED Requirements.
THE WORKER PROTECTION STANDARD Pesticide Emphasis Program Oregon OSHA.
Principles of Decontamination
Campus Safety Training
BLR’s Safety Training Presentations
School Safety Training
Module 1 Chapter 1, 2, and 3. Chapter 1 Overview of Soil Fumigants and Soil Fumigation.
Protecting Yourself, Workers and Family from Pesticide Poisonings.
Transportation-related Air Pollutants Health Effects and Risk Linda Tombras Smith, PhD Chief, Health and Exposure Assessment Branch Research Division October.
HVACR416 – Design Effects of IAQ Problems. The effects of IAQ problems are often non-specific symptoms rather than a clearly defined illness. Symptoms.
TRP Chapter Chapter 5.3 Safe operations and safety management.
Hazard Communication Healthcare Workers. © Business & Legal Reports, Inc Session Objectives You will be able to: Understand chemical hazards Interpret.
Production of Nitric Acid Environmental Impact Assessment Erik TolonenNick Poulin Environmental Engineering Environmental Planning and Decision Making.
Information provided by: Texas Workers’ Compensation Commission.
Safety Training Presentations
Cholinesterase Testing: Reporting Requirements and the Role of the WA State Department of Health (DOH) Cheryl J. Hanks, RN WA State Pesticide Surveillance.
Reregistration of Consumer Pesticides: US Environmental Protection Agency December 13, 2005 US Environmental Protection Agency December 13, 2005 Mosquito.
Control of Substances Hazardous to Health
Copyright  Progressive Business Publications Hazard Communication.
Pesticide Drift: Views from Beyond the Fence Line Susan E. Kegley, Ph.D. Pesticide Action Network Californians for Pesticide Reform.
Protections for Handlers & Workers (2010) Module 5 Soil Fumigant RED Requirements.
-Emergency Preparedness and Response - Difficult to Evacuate Sites - Notice to State Lead Agencies (2011) Module 8 Soil Fumigant RED Requirements.
Registrant Requirements (2010 & 2011) Module 9 Soil Fumigant RED Requirements.
Methyl Bromide Update: Reregistration and Montreal Protocol April 23, 2009 Reddick Fumigants.
New Requirements For Soil Fumigant Pesticide Products EPA - August 2010 Soil Fumigant RED Requirements Training Program Module 1: The EPA Regulatory Process.
Copyright © Business & Legal Reports, Inc. BLR’s Safety Training Presentations Hazard Communication 29 CFR
NEW PHOSTOXIN LABELING
Worker Protection Standard 40 CFR –
Hazard Communication Graphic
HAZWOPER: Awareness Level. Why is Hazardous Waste Dangerous? Chemical spills or releases can –Injure you or your co-workers –Contaminate drinking water.
Revised Spring 2007 Hazard Communication And Your Right - To - Know Dept of Environmental Safety Services.
Understanding Spray Drift Robert E. Wolf Extension Specialist Application Technology Biological and Agricultural Engineering.
The Worker Protection Standard is a regulation issued by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for the protection of agricultural workers that are.
1 Emergency and Disaster Response to Chemical Releases Site Control Module 7.
Pesticide Jeopardy Created By: Purdue Pesticide Program
Pesticides and Chemicals
Mangan Inc. Hazard Communication 11/15/2012
Fumigation Updates Presented by: Blanca Enriquez-Pratt
Benzene.
Fumigant Reregistration New Labels, Applicator / Handler Training
Presentation transcript:

Overview of Risk: The Need for New Requirements Module 3 Soil Fumigant RED Requirements

Module 3: Overview of Risk Risk Assessments for Soil Fumigants

3 Focus = Acute Risks to Bystanders Wind blows emissions from an application to a receptor of concern (e.g., house or school) Wind Module 3: Overview of Risk

4 Hazard Identification  Chloropicrin Eye, nose, throat, and upper respiratory irritation Completeness of Database: Moderate-High  Methyl Isothiocyanate (MITC) generators (Metam sodium/potassium and Dazomet) Eye irritation, systemic, and respiratory effects Completeness of Database: Low  Methyl Bromide Odorless and colorless Developmental and neurological effects Skin cancer resulting from ozone-depletion Completeness of Database: High Module 3: Overview of Risk

Target Air Concentration Risks for Bystanders  Methyl Bromide 0.33 ppm (developmental rabbit study)  Chloropicrin 0.15 ppm (human study)  MITC ppm (human study) Module 3: Overview of Risk

Exposure Assessments Monitoring studies – Concentrations measured in/around fields and within handler breathing zone Modeling – Predict concentrations under different weather and field conditions Information from exposure incidents – Effects observed are consistent with risk assessment predictions – Causes of exposure

Module 3: Overview of Risk Overview of Incidents  Low incident rate, but some with severe effects Major incidents involved many people Most causes: equipment failure, applicator error, or atmospheric conditions Workers more than bystanders  Difficult to “reconstruct” incidents to determine exact factors involved

Data on Acute Illnesses  Data obtained from Sentinel Event Notification System for Occupational Risks (SENSOR) - Pesticides Program and the CDPR (1998–2006)  Cases 11 states 2,945 illnesses 643 “drift” events (included volatilization)  Fumigants Small percent of events (8%) Largest proportion (44%) of illness cases Common factors: weather issues, improper measures to prevent fumigant from escaping, and applicator carelessness Module 3: Overview of Risk

Florida Incidents  3 incidents involving workers applying methyl bromide- chloropicrin products were caused by equipment failure, human error, and/or poor planning Case 1: Hose disconnected from shank during application - repaired while operation continued. Handler working behind rig later hospitalized with chest pain. Case 2: Handler kneeled in fumigant puddle while repairing disconnected hose - waited to change clothing before leaving site. Treated at hospital for swollen, blistered knee. Case 3: After application, handler opened drain line to rig located in barn - unaware line was pressurized. Fumigant splashed on floor. Workers exposed. Module 3: Overview of Risk

Florida Incidents Relevant mitigation  Safe handler information  Certified applicator training  Mandatory good agricultural practices (GAPs)  Fumigant management plans Module 3: Overview of Risk

2007 Nevada Incident  100% chlorpicrin formulation applied at 200 lbs ai/A to adjacent 42 and 31 acre fields by shank injection (untarped at 12” depth)  121 workers harvesting onions in two fields 1/3 mile away experienced respiratory irritation - 12 needed emergency room care  Nevada Dept. of Agriculture – contributing factor was temperature inversion 1-day after application  Workers unaware of application - WPS requires notifying workers within ¼ mile Module 3: Overview of Risk

2007 Nevada Incident Relevant Mitigation  The maximum rate for untarped chloropicrin applications will be 175 lbs ai/A  The buffer zone would have prohibited the workers from being in the nearby field.  Buffer zones for multiple blocks can not overlap if they are both treated within 12 hours  Buffer zones must be posted at usual points of entry and along likely routes of approach  Registrants will be required to work through community outreach and education programs to ensure that emergency responders have the information and training they need to respond to fumigant incidents. Module 3: Overview of Risk

2008 Washington Incident  In 2008; 35 gallons/A of Metam 42% CLR product applied to 150 acres field using center pivot after harvest  Family of 17 lived 380 ft from field  19 reported symptoms (including sheriff deputy)  12 sought medical attention (including 2-week old infant)  WA. Dept. of Health - contributing factors were: Inversion conditions Low wind speed (< 2 mph) Home down gradient (150 ft drop down slope) of field Inadequate field preparation (crop residues in field) Residents unaware of application Improper emergency response Module 3: Overview of Risk

2008 Washington Incident Relevant Mitigation  Home located with 380 ft would be in the buffer zone and application scenario from incident would be prohibited unless occupants provided written agreement to voluntarily vacate home during buffer zone period  New labels have specific requirements related to wind speed, weather, and indentifying unfavorable weather conditions  Depending on size of buffer and proximity to homes, applicator is required to either monitor the air between the buffer zone and homes or provide response information to the neighbors Module 3: Overview of Risk

Review Questions True or False? 1. The route of exposure that is of primary concern is acute inhalation. 2. EPA based the risk assessments on a few severe incidents. 3. It is difficult to pinpoint all factors involved in an incident. Module 3: Overview of Risk

16 Summary  Assessments based on Best available data and information Multiple lines of evidence Human and animal toxicity studies Exposure based on monitoring and modeling Incidents – distances, causes, and effects observed  EPA’s Conclusion  Risk to workers and bystanders are a concern Module 3: Overview of Risk

EPA Contact Information  General Contact: John Leahy (703)  Team Leaders: Steven Weiss (703) Cathryn O’Connell (703)  Chemical Review Managers: Methyl bromide: Susan Bartow (703) Metam sodium: Dana Friedman (703) and »Dirk Helder (208) Dazomet: Dana Friedman (703) ,3-D & Chloropicrin: Andrea Carone(703) Module 3: Overview of Risk Web site: