November 7th 2002Jim Libby (CERN/SLAC)1 Opposite Polarity Signals in Wide Pitch Sensors Jim Libby (CERN/SLAC) Introduction to the R&D in LHCb The test-beam.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Micron detector testing in Liverpool G. Casse – O. Lodge Laboratory, University of Liverpool.
Advertisements

10/09/2002IWoRID; Niels van Bakel1 A collaboration between the ASIC-lab Heidelberg, NIKHEF Amsterdam and the University of Oxford Beetle; a front-end chip.
Sci-Fi tracker for IT replacement 1 Lausanne 9. December 2010.
1 ACES Workshop, March 2011 Mark Raymond, Imperial College. Two-in-one module PT logic already have a prototype readout chip for short strips in hand CBC.
May 14, 2015Pavel Řezníček, IPNP Charles University, Prague1 Tests of ATLAS strip detector modules: beam, source, G4 simulations.
LHCb PatVeloTT Performance Adam Webber. Why Upgrade?  Currently we de-focus the beams o LHCb Luminosity ~ 2x10 32 cm -2 s -1 o ~ 1 interaction per bunch.
Solid State Detectors- 4 T. Bowcock 2 Schedule 1Position Sensors 2Principles of Operation of Solid State Detectors 3Techniques for High Performance Operation.
Department of Physics VERTEX 2002 – Hawaii, 3-7 Nov Outline: Introduction ISE simulation of non-irradiated and irradiated devices Non-homogeneous.
Status on Testbeam Analysis Jianchun Wang Syracuse University VELO meeting, August 28, 2007.
Striplet option of Super Belle Silicon Vertex Detector Talk at Joint Super B factory workshop, Honolulu 20 April 2005 T.Tsuboyama.
LHCC referees meeting, 10 October 2005Børge Svane Nielsen, NBI1 Status of the FMD LHCC referees meeting, 10 October 2005 Børge Svane Nielsen Niels Bohr.
ATLAS SCT module performance: beam test results José E. García.
Andrea Giammanco CMS Tracker Week April DS ROD Prototype: “final” optohybrids “final” CCUM integrated in the rod with new FEC_to_CCUM adapter (Guido.
The LHCb Inner Tracker LHCb: is a single-arm forward spectrometer dedicated to B-physics acceptance: (250)mrad: The Outer Tracker: covers the large.
Performance of the DZero Layer 0 Detector Marvin Johnson For the DZero Silicon Group.
SPiDeR  First beam test results of the FORTIS sensor FORTIS 4T MAPS Deep PWell Testbeam results CHERWELL Summary J.J. Velthuis.
Performance test of STS demonstrators Anton Lymanets 15 th CBM collaboration meeting, April 12 th, 2010.
11 th RD50 Workshop, CERN Nov Results with thin and standard p-type detectors after heavy neutron irradiation G. Casse.
Jeroen van Hunen The LHCb Tracking System. May 22, 2006 Frontier Detectors for Frontier Physics, Elba, Jeroen van Huenen 2 The LHCb Experiment LHCb.
Installation and operation of the LHCb Silicon Tracker detector Daniel Esperante (Universidade de Santiago de Compostela) on behalf of the Silicon Tracker.
Testbeam Studies of the LHCb Vertex Locator Modules Lisa Dwyer.
The ALICE Forward Multiplicity Detector Kristján Gulbrandsen Niels Bohr Institute for the ALICE Collaboration.
Diamond detectors for the LHCb upgrade M. Artuso, A. Borgia, J. Garofoli, R.Mountain, P.Urquijo, J. Wang, Z. Xing 5/5/20101Marina Artuso Velo Upgrade Meeting.
Design and development of micro-strip stacked module prototypes for tracking at S-LHC Motivations Tracking detectors at future hadron colliders will operate.
LHCb VErtex LOcator & Displaced Vertex Trigger
June 22, 2009 P. Colas - Analysis meeting 1 D. Attié, P. Colas, M. Dixit, Yun-Ha Shin (Carleton and Saclay) Analysis of Micromegas Large Prototype data.
NA62 Gigatracker Working Group 28 July 2009 Massimiliano Fiorini CERN.
Apollo Go, NCU Taiwan BES III Luminosity Monitor Apollo Go National Central University, Taiwan September 16, 2002.
Valerio Re, Massimo Manghisoni Università di Bergamo and INFN, Pavia, Italy Jim Hoff, Abderrezak Mekkaoui, Raymond Yarema Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory.
26 June 2006Imaging2006, Stockholm, Niels Tuning 1/18 Tracking with the LHCb Spectrometer Detector Performance and Track Reconstruction Niels Tuning (Outer.
- Performance Studies & Production of the LHCb Silicon Tracker Stefan Koestner (University Zurich) on behalf of the Silicon Tracker Collaboration IT -
IEEE October 16-22, 2004 First Look at the Beam Test Results of the FPIX2 Readout Chip for the BTeV Silicon Pixel Detector First Look at the Beam Test.
LHCb Vertex Detector and Beetle Chip
LC Power Distribution & Pulsing Workshop, May 2011 Super-ALTRO Demonstrator Test Results LC Power Distribution & Pulsing Workshop, May nd November.
Abstract Beam Test of a Large-area GEM Detector Prototype for the Upgrade of the CMS Muon Endcap System V. Bhopatkar, M. Hohlmann, M. Phipps, J. Twigger,
-1-CERN (11/24/2010)P. Valerio Noise performances of MAPS and Hybrid Detector technology Pierpaolo Valerio.
VELO Decisions Thomas Ruf LHCb week February 2001 Interference with LHC machine   LEMIC, January 2001: Presentation of the VELO Vacuum Chamber design.
The LHCb Vertex Locator Lars Eklund LHCb VELO Group of the LHCb Collaboration CERN (Geneva), EPFL (Lausanne), NIKHEF (Amsterdam), University of Glasgow,
P.F.Ermolov SVD-2 status and experimental program VHMP 16 April 2005 SVD-2 status and experimental program 1.SVD history 2.SVD-2 setup 3.Experiment characteristics.
Giulio Pellegrini Actividades 3D G. Pellegrini, C. Fleta, D. Quirion, JP Balbuena, D. Bassignana.
I.Rashevskaya- SVT Meeting - Frascati SuperB SVT Strip Pairing: impact on the capacitance value Irina Rashevskaya, Luciano Bosisio, Livio.
1/20 LHCb upgrade, Jeroen van Tilburg Nikhef Jamboree, 14 Dec 2015 Preparing for the LHCb upgrade.
V.Aulchenko 1,2, L.Shekhtman 1,2, B.Tolochko 3,2, V.Zhulanov 1,2 Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, , Novosibirsk, Russia Novosibirsk State University,
TCT measurements with strip detectors Igor Mandić 1, Vladimir Cindro 1, Andrej Gorišek 1, Gregor Kramberger 1, Marko Milovanović 1, Marko Mikuž 1,2, Marko.
Performance of the LHCb Vertex Locator Thomas Latham (on behalf of the LHCb VELO group) 11/06/20111TIPP Chicago.
0 Characterization studies of the detector modules for the CBM Silicon Tracking System J.Heuser 1, V.Kyva 2, H.Malygina 2,3, I.Panasenko 2 V.Pugatch 2,
Aras Papadelis. NIKHEF 1 Aras Papadelis B-physics meeting 15/ Results from the Nov2004 VELO test beam (and what followed…)
Use of Silicon Detectors for Proton Diagnostics Tomasz Cybulski
June T-CAD Simulations of 3D Microstrip detectors a) Richard Bates b) J.P. Balbuena,C. Fleta, G. Pellegrini, M. Lozano c) U. Parzefall, M. Kohler,
Silicon microstrip detector for imaging of fast processes at high intensity synchrotron radiation beam. Budker INP V.Aulchenko1,2, L.Shekhtman1,2, B.Tolochko3,2,
Fabio, Francesco, Francesco and Nicola INFN and University Bari
Developing Radiation Hard Silicon for the Vertex Locator
Wide Dynamic range readout preamplifier for Silicon Strip Sensor
Simulated vertex precision
Preparation of LHCb for data taking
Roberto Chierici - CERN
Timepix for the AIDA Telescope
TIB module performance at X5 Test beam – preliminary studies
Quarkonium production in ALICE
Performance of a Multigap RPC prototype for the LHCb Muon System
Vertex Detector Overview Prototypes R&D Plans Summary.
Niels Tuning (Outer Tracker Group LHCb)
The LHCb vertex detector
Beam Test Results for the CMS Forward Pixel Detector
The LHCb VErtex LOcator
Engineering Design Review
Aras Papadelis NIKHEF Vertex 2005, Nikko, Japan
Clustering-based Studies on the upgraded ITS of the Alice Experiment
Igor Mandić1, Vladimir Cindro1, Gregor Kramberger1 and Marko Mikuž1,2
Presentation transcript:

November 7th 2002Jim Libby (CERN/SLAC)1 Opposite Polarity Signals in Wide Pitch Sensors Jim Libby (CERN/SLAC) Introduction to the R&D in LHCb The test-beam and the data Opposite polarity signals Other detectors Simulation and conclusions

November 7th 2002Jim Libby (CERN/SLAC)2 Introduction to the R&D Floating strip R&D has begun for the beyond the baseline VELO, which will be a replacement after 2-3 years Will improve resolution of the outer region of the Φ-sensor VELO important for tracking: will aid extrapolation to the rest of the spectrometer Wanted to study wide pitch n- on-n detectors read out at 40 MHz After irradiation needs to be studied as well For more LHCb details see presentation of Juan Palacios

November 7th 2002Jim Libby (CERN/SLAC)3 Detector and data-set Tested detector was a double-sided silicon strip manufactured by Canberra ALICE prototype donated by P. Kuijer at NIKHEF 128 n-strips with a pitch of 95  m FOXFET biasing, with V dep ~60-70V Regions bonded with and without floating strips to a SCT128A hybrid Operated at SPS in 120 GeV  /  beam Track extrapolation error 24  m Sample of 90k events at V bias =100 V

November 7th 2002Jim Libby (CERN/SLAC)4 Charge sharing: I Measure:  =Q left / Q left + Q right from track intercept No clustering Clear charge sharing in region with floating strips compared to region with adjacent strips For floating strips peaks below 0 and above 1 when charge collected on a single strip Floating strip region Adjacent strip region

November 7th 2002Jim Libby (CERN/SLAC)5 Charge sharing: II The charge collected on the floating strip is ~60% of that collected on a connected strip Corresponds to a C b /C inter-implant ~ 2.65 In an LHCb design we would aim to reduce this Pitch is wider in ALICE prototype than LHCb scenario (20-60  m)

November 7th 2002Jim Libby (CERN/SLAC)6 Opposite polarity signals: I As noted  biased to higher and lower values, when charge is collected mainly on left or right strip respectively Correlation of opposite polarity signal on neighbouring strip Look at relative charge on neighbouring connected strips Large coherent deviations over many strips, and significant distances Signals integrate to 0 within errors 1 mm 6%

November 7th 2002Jim Libby (CERN/SLAC)7 Opposite polarity signals: II Looked at adjacent strip region – a hint but limited statistics Otherwise: –Looked at O(1  s) integration times –Looked at 40  m pitch –Electronics No indication of any effect See some dynamics as a function of sampling (TDC) time and voltage (Asynchronous trigger used)

November 7th 2002Jim Libby (CERN/SLAC)8 Other detectors: I LHCb testing a GLAST detector with SCT128A readout for all Si tracking station (see F. Lehner) 400  m thick, p-on-n and 208  m pitch Strips studied are bonded consecutively Approx 1 million triggers collected with tracks in the acceptance Results from D. Eckstein Analysis of neighbouring strips repeated Interesting results as a function of sampling time

November 7th 2002Jim Libby (CERN/SLAC)9 Other detectors: II Signal/Signal Strip 0 Relative strip number 80ns to 85ns 90ns to 95ns 115ns to 120ns 125ns to 130ns TDC time [ns] Signal [ADC counts] Signal/Signal Strip 0 Relative signals vary between ±13% Near maximum sampling time effect is signal on neighbouring strips zero No large distance effects Central Neighbour Ratio

November 7th 2002Jim Libby (CERN/SLAC)10 Conclusions and simulation Significant opposite polarity signals on neighbouring strips have been observed in a wide pitch n-on-n sensor with floating strips Signals around -7% and over significant distances Behaviour dependent on sampling time Varying capacitances at LHCb make us sensitive to these effects Unique to n-on-n: in a wide pitch p-on-n detector signals on neighbouring strips vary with time. No long distance effect. An explanation with Ramo’s theorem (Brodbeck and Chilangarov NIM A395 (1997) 29) Simulation (Univ. of Glasgow) underway

November 7th 2002Jim Libby (CERN/SLAC)11 Cross-checks Integration time: LHCb n-on-n prototypes with ~90  m pitch readout with VA2 electronics 2.2  s shaping time Fine pitch: LHCb n-on-n prototype with 40  m pitch readout with SCT128A No effect Electronics: across chips and between chips Analysis: without common-mode correction Effect remains