Using 3D Tracer we calculated I for particles starting at local noon, for 2 initial pitch angles (30 o and 60 o ), 4 initial distances (5 – 8 R E ) and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
 Today we will cover R4 with plenty of chance to ask questions on previous material.  The questions may be about problems.  Tomorrow will be a final.
Advertisements

Chapter 17 Earth’s Cycles
Forecasting the high-energy electron flux throughout the radiation belts Sarah Glauert British Antarctic Survey, Cambridge, UK SPACECAST stakeholders meeting,
Hydrogen Hot Ion Precipitation in the Martian Ionosphere #P13B-1317 Christopher D. Parkinson 1, Michael Liemohn 1, Xiaohua Fang 2 1 AOSS Dept., University.
Implementation of MAGNETOCOSMICS into SPENVIS L. Desorgher 1, B. Quaghebeur 2, D. Heynderickx 2, H. Evans 3, G. Santini 3 and E.O. Flückiger 1 1. Physikalisches.
Earth, Moon, and Sun.
The Importance of Wave Acceleration and Loss for Dynamic Radiation Belt Models Richard B. Horne M. M. Lam, N. P. Meredith and S. A. Glauert, British Antarctic.
IRBEM LIB Update Paul O’Brien.
Single particle motion and trapped particles
Further development of modeling of spatial distribution of energetic electron fluxes near Europa M. V. Podzolko 1, I. V. Getselev 1, Yu. I. Gubar 1, I.
Radiation Belt Loss at the Magnetopause T. G. Onsager, J. C. Green, H. J. Singer, G. D. Reeves, S. Bourdarie Suggest a pitch-angle dependence of magnetopause.
Celestial Sphere Stars seem to be on the inner surface of a sphere surrounding the Earth.
RHESSI/GOES Observations of the Non-flaring Sun from 2002 to J. McTiernan SSL/UCB.
Chapter 12 Long-Term Climate Regulation Snowball Earth.
Motion in Two Dimensions
Reinisch_ Lecture_6. reinisch_ Nonuniform B Field Gradient-B drift.
Hybrid simulations of parallel and oblique electromagnetic alpha/proton instabilities in the solar wind Q. M. Lu School of Earth and Space Science, Univ.
Problem 2 Find the torque about the left hand segment on the loop as a function of θ, the angle the plane makes with the horizontal plane.
Adiabatic Invariance. Slow Changes  A periodic system may have slow changes with time. Slow compared to periodSlow compared to period Phase space trajectory.
Identifying Interplanetary Shock Parameters in Heliospheric MHD Simulation Results S. A. Ledvina 1, D. Odstrcil 2 and J. G. Luhmann 1 1.Space Sciences.
Overview of CISM Magnetosphere Research Mary Hudson 1, Anthony Chan 2, Scot Elkington 3, Brian Kress 1, William Lotko 1, Paul Melanson 1, David Murr 1,
Geomagnetic field Inclination
F. Cheung, A. Samarian, W. Tsang, B. James School of Physics, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Geology 5640/6640 Introduction to Seismology 18 Feb 2015 © A.R. Lowry 2015 Last time: Spherical Coordinates; Ray Theory Spherical coordinates express vector.
Welcome to 306!   Today is a new marking period – a new start!   DO NOW: Please write three goals you have for yourself in Integrated Science for.
Bouncing Liquid Jets James Bomber, Nick Brewer, and Dr. Thomas Lockhart Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Wisconsin - Eau Claire
The Earth-Moon-Sun System
SPEED (VELOCITY)/ TIME GRAPHS
ASEN 5335 Aerospace Environments -- Geomagnetism 1 Geomagnetism Dipole Magnetic Field Geomagnetic Coordinates B-L Coordinate system L-Shells Paleomagnetism.
RESOLVING FOCAL DEPTH WITH A NEAR FIELD SINGLE STATION IN SPARSE SEISMIC NETWORK Sidao Ni, State Key Laboratory of Geodesy and Earth’s Dynamics, Institute.
Does Fermi Acceleration of account for variations of the fluxes of radiation belt particles observations at low altitudes during geomagnetic storms? J.
1 Electric Field – Continuous Charge Distribution As the average separation between source charges is smaller than the distance between the charges and.
ASEN 5335 Aerospace Environments -- Radiation Belts1 The Radiation Belts A radiation belt is a population of energetic particles stably-trapped by the.
Ch 9.8: Chaos and Strange Attractors: The Lorenz Equations
Computational Model of Energetic Particle Fluxes in the Magnetosphere Computer Systems Yu (Evans) Xiang Mentor: Dr. John Guillory, George Mason.
Chapter 4 Motion in Two Dimensions. Kinematics in Two Dimensions Will study the vector nature of position, velocity and acceleration in greater detail.
Motion in a constant uniform magnetic field Section 21.
Describing the motion of an object is occasionally hard to do with words. Sometimes graphs help make the motion easier to picture, and therefore understand.
Conclusions Using the Diffusive Equilibrium Mapping Technique we have connected a starting point of a field line on the photosphere with its final location.
The propagation of a microwave in an atmospheric pressure plasma layer: 1 and 2 dimensional numerical solutions Conference on Computation Physics-2006.
Radiation belt particle dynamics Prepared by Kevin Graf Stanford University, Stanford, CA IHY Workshop on Advancing VLF through the Global AWESOME Network.
GG450 April 1, 2008 Huygen’s Principle and Snell’s Law.
GG 450 Feb 27, 2008 Resistivity 2. Resistivity: Quantitative Interpretation - Flat interface Recall the angles that the current will take as it hits an.
Doc.: IEEE /0431r0 Submission April 2009 Alexander Maltsev, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Polarization Model for 60 GHz Date: Authors:
Module 6Aberration and Doppler Shift of Light1 Module 6 Aberration and Doppler Shift of Light The term aberration used here means deviation. If a light.
Representing Motion. Motion We are looking to ____________and ____________an object in motion. Three “rules” we will follow: –The motion is in a __________________.
1 Space technology course : Space Radiation Environment and its Effects on Spacecraft Components and Systems Space radiation environment Space Radiation.
Welcome to 306!   Today is a new marking period – a new start!   DO NOW: Please write three goals you have for yourself in Integrated Science for.
Relativistic MHD Simulations of jets Relativistic MHD Simulations of jets Abstract We have performed 3D RMHD simulations to investigate the stability and.
Lecture 7: Motion in 2D and 3D: II
KIT – University of the State of Baden-Wuerttemberg and National Laboratory of the Helmholtz Association INSTITUTE OF TECHNICAL PHYS An approximate.
Earth in Space. How Earth Moves Earth moves through space in two major ways: rotation and revolution.
A complete simulation of cosmic rays access to a Space Station Davide Grandi INFN Milano, ITALY.
Lecture 15 Modeling the Inner Magnetosphere. The Inner Magnetosphere The inner magnetosphere includes the ring current made up of electrons and ions in.
Mapping the Stars Section 1-3 Summary. Patterns in the sky Constellations: sections of the sky that contain recognizable star patterns – Today scientists.
On-Line Visualization Ring Current / Radiation Belt.
Electric Fields Due to Continuous Charge Distributions
Solar Magnetic Fields. Capacitors in Circuits Charge takes time to move through wire  V is felt at the speed of light, however Change in potential across.
Phases of the Moon Lab The Celestial Sphere Model One way the celestial sphere model is used explains positions in the sky as seen from YOUR position.
Section 19.1 Earth in Space.
Characterization of Field Line Topologies Near the Magnetopause Using Electron Pitch Angle Measurements D. S. Payne1, M. Argall1, R. Torbert1, I. Dors1,
M. Yamauchi1, I. Dandouras2, H. Reme2,
Single particle motion and trapped particles
One Dimensional Motion
Robert O. Duncan, Geoffrey M. Boynton  Neuron 
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages e4 (October 2017)
Particle energization by substorm dipolarizations
Space motion.
Fig. 3 Transition of adiabatic driving from the standard continuous protocol to the jumping protocol. Transition of adiabatic driving from the standard.
Presentation transcript:

Using 3D Tracer we calculated I for particles starting at local noon, for 2 initial pitch angles (30 o and 60 o ), 4 initial distances (5 – 8 R E ) and for 12 initial particle gyrophases (0 o – 330 o ). For each pitch angle we plotted the values of I for each initial distance and initial gyrophase, using different colours for each of the 4 different initial particle distances (plots 1 and 3). The x-axis corresponds to the azimuth angle of the position of the particle. In the resulting plot we marked with a solid vertical line of the corresponding colour the point were I stopped being relatively constant. We also marked with a dashed line of the same colour the point were I returned to having a constant value. We plotted the regions were I remained constant in plots 2 and 4, using the same colours for each initial distance as in plots 1 and 3. In the case of the 30 o initial pitch angle, I remains constant throughout the path of the particle around the Earth for an initial particle distance of 5 R E. For the other initial distances there appears a region at the night side where I is no longer constant. This region becomes larger further away. In the case of the 60 o initial pitch angle, I remains constant throughout the path of the particle around the Earth for initial particle distances of 4 and 5 R E. Similar to the case of a 30 o initial pitch angle particle there are regions where I is not constant and these regions are larger the longer the initial distance. Generally, the extent of these regions is smaller in the case of the 60 o initial pitch angle particle. We use a particle-tracing model that directly integrates the Lorentz-force equation in a TS05 magnetic field model to compute the second (J) and third (Φ) adiabatic invariants of particle motion as well as Roederer’s L* and the Invariant Integral I, and we compare these computations with approximations made through the neural- network-based method LANL* V2.0 [Koller and Zaharia, 2011], the IRBEM library (International Radiation Belt Environment Modeling library; ex-ONERA-DESP lib) [Bourdarie et al., 2008], and SPENVIS (Space Environment Information System) [Heynderickx et al., 2005]. L* is calculated at different particle initial locations and I also for various pitch-angles. Finally we investigate variations in I throughout a particle’s drift-shell for a set of initial particle phases and pitch angles at various locations, and we comment on the breaking of its invariance. Calculations and comparisons of the adiabatic invariants and L* using a particle-tracing model, LANL*, IRBEM-lib and SPENVIS K. Konstantinidis 1,2, T. E. Sarris 1,2 [1] Democritus University of Thrace, Space Research Laboratory, Xanthi, Greece, [2] Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics, Univ. of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics, CU, Boulder, Colorado REGIONS OF BREAKING OF THE SECOND ADIABATIC INVARIANT ABSTRACT CALCULATIONS OF L* Space Research Laboratory Democritus Univ. of Thrace, Xanthi, Greece Particle Trace, R i = 5 Re Models used: 3D Tracer is a particle tracing code we developed in Fortran. As a model for the magnetic field we used the TS05 external and IGRF internal fields from the Fortran subroutine package provided by Tsyganenko et al. LANL* V2.0 [Koller and Zaharia, 2011] is an artificial neural network (ANN) for calculating the magnetic drift invariant, L*, based on the TS05 model. IRBEM library (ex ONERA-DESP library) [Bourdarie et al., 2008] allows to compute, among other things I and L*. We used TS05 as the external field model and IGRF as the internal field model. SPENVIS [Heynderickx et al., 2005] provides access to models of the hazardous space environment through a user-friendly World Wide Web interface. Among these models is the TS05 and IGRF models. We used SPENVIS to calculate I, L* and Φ. CALCULATIONS OF I We calculated I using each of the above models and for particles starting at local noon, for 2 initial pitch angles (30 o and 60 o ) and 5 initial distances (4 – 8 R E ), as for L* above. Using the 3D Tracer we calculated I for 12 initial particle gyrophases, as above, and calculated the median and σ of I for all gyrophases. There is great coincidence in the calculations of I between all three models for both initial pitch angles. Using each of the above models we calculated L* for particles starting at local noon, for 3 initial pitch angles (30 o, 60 o and 90 o ) and 5 initial distances (4 – 8 R E ). Using the 3D Tracer we calculated Φ and then L* for 12 initial particle gyrophases (0 o – 330 o ). L* for a given distance was then calculated as the median of L* for all gyrophases. The error bars represent 1σ of L* calculations for the 12 gyrophases. Generally, the results from all the models tend to agree more at smaller distances (4 – 6 R E ) and less further away (7 – 8 R E ). Also, the smaller the initial pitch angle is, the greater the spread of the calculated L*. The results from the 3D Tracer tend to agree more with those from SPENVIS, as do the results from IRBEM LIB with those from LANL*. The calculations from LANL* seem to deviate significantly from those from the other models, except from the case of a 90 o initial pitch angle. Adiabatic invariants: Integral invariant coordinate I: For slow drift conditions, the second adiabatic invariant and the integral invariant coordinate I are given, respectively, by: and, where In 3D Tracer we calculate I by integrating along one bounce motion, according to the second formula above. Roederers L*: For slow drift conditions, the drift invariant, Φ, and Roederers L* (L- star) are given, respectively, by: and In 3D Tracer we first integrate the first equation above for one full revolution of the particle around the Earth to calculate Φ, and then we calculate L* using the second equation above. α 0 = 90 ο α 0 = 60 ο α 0 = 30 ο α 0 = 60 ο α 0 = 30 ο α 0 = 30 o α 0 = 60 o 5 R E 6 R E 7 R E 8 R E 5 R E 6 R E 7 R E 8 R E REFERENCES: 1. N.A. Tsyganenko et al., 2008, geo.phys.spbu.ru/~tsyganenko/Geopack-2008.htmlgeo.phys.spbu.ru/~tsyganenko/Geopack-2008.html 2. Koller and Zaharia, 2011, 3. Bourdarie et al., 2008, irbem.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/irbem/trunkirbem.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/irbem/trunk 4. Heynderickx et al., 2005, Plot 1 Plot 2 Plot 3 Plot 4 5 R E 6 R E 7 R E 8 R E