Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Regional Transportation Plan Guidelines Work Group Meeting presented by Christopher Wornum Cambridge.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to Transportation Systems. PARTIII: TRAVELER TRANSPORTATION.
Advertisements

Tysons Tysons Corner Circulator Study Board Transportation Committee June 12, 2012.
Mass Transit OSullivan Chapter 11. Outline of the Chapter Analyze some empirical facts about public transit in the United States Analyze the commuters.
Blueprint for Transportation Excellence Downtown CAG January 16, 2014.
Transit Capacity & Quality of Service Manual, 3rd Edition Fixed Route Quality of Service.
In Portland, Oregon TRB Planning Applications Conference Reno, Nevada Mark Bradley Research & Consulting.
ANYBODY CAN RIDE! Examples of successful rural transit programs and practices elsewhere in the United States.
Abstract The SEPTA Regional Rail system serves as an important network for the Philadelphia region, moving many commuters during the peak hours on suburb-to-city.
SR 50/UCF Connector Alternatives Analysis Orange County Board of County Commissioners January 13, 2015.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to TRB Planning Applications Conference presented by Elizabeth Sall Maren Outwater Cambridge Systematics,
October 4-5, 2010 TCRP H-37: Characteristics of Premium Transit Services that Affect Choice of Mode Prepared for: AMPO Modeling Subcommittee Prepared by:
Demand for bus and Rail Analyzing a corridor with a similar Level Of Service 5 th Israeli-British/Irish Workshop in Regional Science April, 2007.
GREATER NEW YORK A GREENER Travel Demand Modeling for analysis of Congestion Mitigation policies October 24, 2007.
Lec 3, Ch. 2 Transp Systems & Organization Understand the nation’s transportation system is the result of independent actions (through reading) Understand.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Understanding Changes in Ridership Unit 7: Forecasting & Encouraging Ridership.
Lec 11 TD-Part 4: & 5.5.1, H/O pp.491: Mode Usage (modal split) and Intro to trip assignment Understand why modal split needs to be done (5.4.3)
Modelling Service Quality for Public Transport Contracts: Assessing Users’ Perceptions Gabriela Beirão José Sarsfield Cabral 9th Conference on Competition.
Presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Estimating Commuter Rail Station- Level Ridership Using American Community Survey Journey to Work.
Will Segway Change The Industry? Team II-A Two Key Facts: Transportation Industry must change Human transporter will provide unique solution "Segway human.
Transit Market Research Using Attitudinal Market Segmentation, Structural Equation Modeling and Mode Choice Modeling Yoram Shiftan, The Technion Maren.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Regional Transportation Plan Guidelines Work Group presented by Ron West Cambridge Systematics, Inc.
Recent Evidence on Mass Transit Demand Ian Savage Northwestern University.
1 Using Transit Market Analysis Tools to Evaluate Transit Service Improvements for a Regional Transportation Plan TRB Transportation Applications May 20,
1 Presentation to TAC June 17, 2009 Overview of Rapid Bus Measures and Effectiveness And Case Studies.
11 May, 2011 Discrete Choice Models and Behavioral Response to Congestion Pricing Strategies Prepared for: The TRB National Transportation Planning Applications.
Auckland’s Travel Demand Initiatives Sustainable Mobility & Healthy Communities Summit 2014.
Alasdair Cain & Jennifer Flynn National Bus Rapid Transit Institute Center for Urban Transportation Research University of South Florida Mark McCourt &
Transport Modelling– An overview of the four modeling stages
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING. TOPICS 1.ROADS AND PUBLIC GOODS 2.RATIONALE TO JUSTIFY ROAD BUILDING 3.URBAN PLANNING AND TRAFFIC CONGESTION (UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES)
Paul Roberts – TIF Technical Manager Presentation to the TPS – 3 June 2009.
Transit Estimation and Mode Split CE 451/551 Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Session 7.
1 Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Customer Satisfaction Measurement FY 2006 Q3 Comparison April 28, 2006.
Steve Polzin & Mark Mistretta, Center for Urban Transportation Research Rodney Brunner, Gannett Fleming, Inc. Steve Polzin & Mark Mistretta, Center for.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. TRB Applications Conference – Freight Committee May 7, 2013.
Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee December 14, 2010 Draft Long-Range Transportation Plan Destination 2035.
Modelling of Trips using Strategic Park-and-Ride Site at Longbridge Railway Station Seattle, USA, Oct th International EMME/2 Users Conference.
A New Policy Sensitive Travel Demand Model for Tel Aviv Yoram Shiftan Transportation Research Institute Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to TRB Planning Applications Conference presented by Vamsee Modugula Cambridge Systematics, Inc. May.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Service Planning & Standards Unit 4: Service Planning & Network Design.
Characteristics of Weekend Travel in the City of Calgary: Towards a Model of Weekend Travel Demand JD Hunt, University of Calgary DM Atkins, City of Calgary.
Innovative ITS services thanks to Future Internet technologies ITS World Congress Orlando, SS42, 18 October 2011.
23e Congrès mondial de la Route - Paris 2007 Public Transport in Gauteng Province: Order out of Chaos Prof Nevhutanda Alfred Department of Transport(South.
Technology Impacts on the Future of Transportation Mark Hallenbeck, Director of the Washington State Transportation Center, University of Washington 1.
North Utah County Transit Study
David B. Roden, Senior Consulting Manager Analysis of Transportation Projects in Northern Virginia TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
Cal y Mayor y Asociados, S.C. Atizapan – El Rosario Light Rail Transit Demand Study October th International EMME/2 UGM.
FDOT Transit Office Modeling Initiatives The Transit Office has undertaken a number of initiatives in collaboration with the Systems Planning Office and.
1. Variety of modes (types) of transport (public and private) 2. Density of transport networks more nodes and.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Safety Data Analysis Tools Workshop presented by Krista Jeannotte Cambridge Systematics, Inc. March.
Transit Quality of Service Applications Comprehensive Planning November 2, 2007 Florida Department of Transportation Public Transit Office.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to 12th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference presented by Arun Kuppam, Cambridge.
Presented to MTF Transit Committee presented by David Schmitt, AICP November 20, 2008 FSUTMS Transit Model Application.
Weighing the Scenarios: The Costs and Benefits of Future Transit Service Produced for MTDB by The Mission Group © 2000 by The Mission Group. 1 Dave Schumacher.
Center for Urban Transportation Research | University of South Florida Developing Customer Oriented Transit Performance Measures National Transit GIS Conference.
TPB CLRP Aspirations Scenario 2012 CLRP and Version 2.3 Travel Forecasting Model Update Initial Results Ron Kirby Department of Transportation Planning.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Florida Transit Modeling Workshop presented by Thomas Rossi Cambridge Systematics, Inc. April 8,
Transit Pricing Programs Value Pricing for Transportation in the Washington Region June 4, 2003 Richard F. Stevens Washington Metropolitan Area Transit.
The Advantage of a Single Shared Ride Concession at Small and Mid Size Airports AGTA 2008 Fall Conference James R Gleich Regional Vice President Veolia.
Walk Statistics.  The question has been asked: “Is Lomas a better BRT corridor than Central?”  The purpose of this analysis is to compare the two corridors.
May 9, th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference – Session 18 1 IMPROVING CONSISTENCY BETWEEN TRANSIT PATH- BUILDING AND MODE.
Lecture 2: Improving Transit Service Through Planning, Design, and Operations This lecture was originally prepared by Dr. Kari Watkins, Georgia Institute.
Impacts of Free Public Transport – An Evaluation Framework Oded Cats Yusak Susilo Jonas Eliasson.
ACCESS TO DESTINATION: DEVELOPMENT OF ACCESSIBILITY MEASURES Ahmed M. El-Geneidy David M. Levinson University of Minnesota.
Preconditions for the introduction of free public transport in Tallinn Dago Antov Tallinn University of Technology Professor on transport planning 1 Tasuta.
Regional Transit Framework Study Regional Council September 24, 2008.
MODULE 4, LESSON 2 Fundamentals of Transit Service and Networks.
Public transport quality elements – What really matters for users? By Dimitrios Papaioannou and Luis Miguel Martinez Presentation for the 20 th ECOMM in.
Service Routes and Community Transit Hubs: Right Sizing Transit
Experience The Availing Advantages Of Private Transportation Services.
Transit Competitiveness and Market Potential
Presentation transcript:

Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Regional Transportation Plan Guidelines Work Group Meeting presented by Christopher Wornum Cambridge Systematics, Inc. June 28, 2007 New Approaches to Understanding the demand for Transit

Market-Based Planning Process From Private Sector to Public Sector Private Sector Toyota Mobility Services

Door-to-Door Service Consistent Customer Experience Walk Wait Board Pay Seat Ride Arrival Walk Errands Distance Esthetics Barriers Weather Headway Arrival information Shelter Comfort Safety Low floor Queuing Speed Fare Convenience Transfer Availability Comfort Privacy Speed Comfort Productive Reliability Way Finding Transfer Distance Esthetics Barriers Alternative modes Weather Access Emergencies Modes Schedule Home Work Relative Importance

Branding & Marketing Competitive Positioning Understand Customers Market Segmentation Mode Choice Analysis Understand Markets Origin – Destination Volumes Other Travel Market Conditions Service Planning Tool (SPT) Transit Competitiveness Factor (TCF) Roadmap From Market Research to Service Planning Service Planning (Product Development)

Determine Traveler Attitudes Value of Time & Productivity Transportation Costs CrowdsStress Personal Safety Concern for the Natural Environment Need for Flexibility and Speed Personal Travel Experience

Key Attitude Number 2 The people who ride the trolley are like me The people who ride city buses are like me The people who ride the Coaster commuter train are like me I would (not) prefer to drive than to be driven I don’t mind delays as long as I am comfortable Generally I make the same types of trips at the same times of day The type of transportation that people use (does not) reflect their social status Sensitivity to Personal Travel Experience 100% 96% 67% 27% 22% 10% 8%

Concern for Environment Universal Design Service Attributes Important for Entire Service Population Flexibility & Speed Range of Attitudes for all Potential Customers All Market Segments Combined More Sensitive Less Sensitive Indifferent0 Personal Travel Experience Personal Safety Time & Productivity Cost Stress Crowds

High Sensitivity to Experience Road Runners Medium Sensitivity to Experience Structure of Market Segments San Diego Region Residents in SANDAG Service Area Less Need For Flexibility & Speed More Need For Flexibility & Speed High Sensitivity to Experience Conventional Cruisers Low Sensitivity to Experience Easy Goers High Sensitivity to Personal Safety Cautious Runabouts Low Sensitivity to Experience Flexible Flyers Low Sensitivity to Personal Safety Intrepid Trekkers “Need for flexibility and speed” “ Personal travel experience” “Sensitivity to personal safety”

Quantifying Tradeoffs How Much Do Flexible Flyers Value Different Options? Having real time arrival information Save 5 minute in-vehicle travel time Improve peak headway by 5 min Save 5 minute driving access Reduce cost by 50 cents Shuttle No transfer Guaranteed seat Save 5 minute parking search time Improve off-peak headway by 5 min Save 5 minute walking access time

Competitive Positioning Existing Assets Local government cooperation Financial resources Understand Customers Market Segmentation Mode Choice Analysis Service Planning Tool (SPT) Strategic Roadmap Understanding Markets

Service Planning Tool Segmentation & SEM Segment Locations & Characteristics Travel Demand Model Output Trip Tables Base LOS IVTT Frequencies Transit Network Parking Supply Fares Seat Availability Census Data or Travel Model Socioeconomics Service Planning Tool ArcGIS User Interface Network Structure Performance Variables Customer Experience Ridership Mode Peak vs. Off-peak Trip Purpose Segment-Specific Mode Choice Models Quantify Tradeoffs between Service Characteristics

Understand Customers Market Segmentation Mode Choice Analysis Understand Markets Origin – Destination Volumes Other Travel Market Conditions Transit Competitiveness Factor (TCF) Strategic Roadmap Understanding Markets

Understanding Markets Identify Places Where Transit is Competitive Trip Intensity  Trip generation & attraction  Time of day  Trip purpose Competitive Advantage for Transit  Congestion  Transit priority  Parking scarcity and Price Concentration of Target Market Segments

Transit Competitiveness Factor (TCF) Each Factor Weighted by Ability to Generate Transit Trips Transit Competitiveness Factor Transportation Land Use Factors Customer TypesTrip Purposes  Trip Density  Parking Search Time  Parking Cost  Auto Access, Egress Time  Congestion  Pedestrian Friendliness  Road Runners  Cautious Runabouts  Intrepid Trekkers  Flexible Flyers  Conventional Cruisers  Easy Goers  Work  School  Other

Origin TCF – Santa Clara County Transit Competitive

11 percent of trips go to transit competitive destinations Destination TCF Transit competitive threshold = 30 jobs per gross acre

Questions and Answers