Traditional Chinese Social Structure, c. 1949 Land and labor Village and clan

Why was land reform such a crucial question for the revolutionaries? Why was it so difficult?

Example: Gao village, (Hunan) 1949: 280 mu (46 acres) for 20 households 1 landlord, 45 mu (7.4 ac.) 1 rich peasant, 33 mu (5.4 ac.) Average middle peasant: 13.8 mu (2.3 ac.) Average poor peasant: 6 mu (1 ac.)

“Dig out the rotten root of feudalism” Who depends upon whom for a living? Why are the poor poor and the rich rich? Should rent be paid to the landlords? (issues raised at organizing meetings for land reform; Hinton, 1966: 128)

Why were these questions so difficult? Land and labor linked to clan system Clan structure shaped village life Relative autonomy of clan/village created basis of solidarity vs. outsiders, other clans and villages Religious ideology (esp. ancestor worship and Confucianism) supported clan structure

Clan power Small Gao village could unite with larger Gao village nearby Within clan, dominant branch or family could control more land “Feudal” exploitation obscured by religious ideology (Gao’s landlord taught Confucianism) Dilemma for communists: how to weaken this structure while maintaining peasant support

Mao Zedong to the Political Consultative Congress, Sept. 11, 1949 The People’s Republic “We have stood up.” Mao Zedong to the Political Consultative Congress, Sept. 11, 1949

What was the structure of the new state? “people’s democratic dictatorship”– (“New Democracy”) Control of key industries (like social democracy-style socialism) Democratic centralism in CCP Democratic centralism in National People’s Congress

State structure Party structure (Atlas, #21) State structure (Atlas, #19)

State structure (simplified by Shafer) Chinese Communist Party People’s Liberation Army State Council National Peoples Congress Judiciary CPPCC People (in mass organizations, social institutions)

CPPCC org chart

Cadre system Inherited from Republic, which revised imperial structure Li: “state technocrats” (37) Even more power under Jiang Jieshi Includes (Li: 48): government officials military officers managers of state-owned or even large private corporations intellectuals

Immediate tasks: Land reform Marriage law “Resist America, Aid Korea” Suppression of counterrevolutionaries Thought reform Three-Anti’s and Five-Anti’s (anti-corruption)

How were they carried out? Why these campaigns? How were they carried out?

What was the “deep contradiction”? Dietrich: institutional development vs. revolutionary transformation Bureaucracy vs. mass mobilization Rationalization (development) vs. emotion (revolutionary romanticism) Benson: nationalism and socialism

1953: Stalin dies

Socialist transition: First Five-Year Plan (1953-1957) Bourgeois stage “abruptly terminated”? (Meisner, p. 108) Soviet “aid”—with strings; loans with interest (Cf. Dietrich, p. 85, 87) Negative lessons from USSR collectivization Maoist “peasant socialism”: first, mutual aid teams, then “lower” Agricultural Producers Cooperatives (APCs), then…

First five-year plan Soviet aid actually minimal; 3% of total investment But “a drive based on the wholesale adoption of Stalinist methods” (Meisner: 109) Growth impressive; 1952-57 18% rate higher than goal (14.7%) (Meisner: 112-113) “a significant and stable modern industrial base” (ibid) But social and economic costs to peasants

Contradictions in First Five-Year Plan Two line struggle: Mao vs. “handwringers;” collectivization vs. “deep” private property concept; “old revolutionaries” vs. “new cadres” “one-man management” vs. socialist “new man” Bureaucratization vs. revolutionary transformation Also reflected in education: “indoctrination” vs. bureaucratic elitism (examination system)

High Tide 1955: caution prevails in Politburo, APCs dissolved Mao goes to masses and lower levels, predicts “imminent” mass movement for socialism Cadres investigate, enthusiastic villages held up as examples

Relations vs. forces Mao: revolutionize relations of production first Forces of production will follow Opponents argue forces first

Social forces of production New forces of production Base-Superstructure Superstructure Ideas, ideology, institutions Social reproduction New superstructure Class struggle Revolution Social forces of production Relations of production Means of production New forces of production

Socialist transition: High Tide Campaign turns to industry; even more complete reorganization By 1956, almost entire country in socialist transition

Socialist transition: Hundred Flowers Khruschev’s criticism of Stalin opens new possibilities in Third International Mao, holding firmly to mass line, advocates “big democracy”—let one hundred flowers bloom “On the correct handling..“

Why the hundred flowers campaign? “A vast and routinized bureaucratic apparatus…” (Meisner, 170) Note the role of Liu Shaoqi and Deng Xiaoping in the Party at that moment Who does Mao turn to, to counter that? Contradiction between leadership and the led Mao: “…question whether socialism or capitalism will win is still not settled.”

Who turned the flowers into poisonous weeds? One Hundred Flowers Who turned the flowers into poisonous weeds?