BUSINESS SENSITIVE 1 The Economic Impact of the Arizona Biosciences Sector Walter H. Plosila, Ph.D. Senior Advisor Battelle’s Technology Partnership Practice.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Input-Output Analysis. Input-Output analysis creates a picture of a regional economy describing flows to and from industries and institutions.
Advertisements

Prepared for the Committee for Health Care for Massachusetts December 14, 2005 ACTION COSTS LESS The Health Care Amendment Standards and Options for Reform.
The Long-Term Squeeze on Municipal Finances Massachusetts Association of School Business Officials Michael J. Widmer, President Massachusetts Taxpayers.
Animal Agriculture Economic Analysis: The National Overview United Soybean Board June 2013.
Animal Agriculture Economic Analysis: The National Overview United Soybean Board June 2013.
The Economic and Community Impact of the University of Washington (FY14) Research and analysis completed by:
Economic and scientific impacts of the externalities of the wine industry: Tony Battaglene.
The Impact of the Aerospace Industry in Washington State
Manufacturing and the New Hampshire Economy Ross Gittell James R. Carter Professor University of New Hampshire.
Regional Analysis Methods Benchmarking, Location Quotients, Shift-share.
1 Section 1: Minnesota Health Care Spending and Cost Drivers Minnesota health care spending by source of funds Minnesota health care spending by type of.
Contribution of Grain Production to the Washington Economy T. Randall Fortenbery Professor and Grain Commission Endowed Chair, School of Economic Sciences,
Animal Agriculture Economic Analysis: The National Overview United Soybean Board June 2013.
Economic Impact of Medical Education Expansion in Nevada & Recommended Approach FUTURE 1.
Economic Impact of Marshall County Hospital. KY Rural Health Works Program Eric A. Scorsone, Ph.D. UK Department of Agricultural Economics UK Cooperative.
How Rural Health Services Build Local Economies: Indiana Examples February 21, 2003 Indiana Rural Health Association Public Policy Forum Indianapolis,
The Hilltop Health Care Reform Simulation Model Hamid Fakhraei, Ph.D. July 2012.
1 George Goodno Communications Director for State Policy, International Affairs and Intellectual Property BioForward 2014 Bioscience Vision Summit October.
Economic Contributions of Florida Agriculture, Natural Resources, Food & Kindred Product Manufacturing, Distribution and Service Industries: 2008 Update.
Input-Output Model Basics Tom Harris University of Nevada, Reno University Center for Economic Development MS 204 Reno, NV and Gerald A. Doeksen.
Robert Wells Head, Biotechnology Unit Oslo, Norway 11 October Life Sciences for Health and Innovation: An OECD Perspective.
Measuring Economic Activity
1 Iowa’s Charitable Nonprofit Organizations The Impact of Charitable Nonprofit Organization on Iowa’s Economy and Quality of Life.
Bae Economic Impact of San Francisco’s Cruise Industry June 8, 2007.
Economic Impact of the Health Care Industry on Communities By: Gerald A. Doeksen, Ph.D. Regents Professor, Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service Oklahoma.
July 2012 The Economic Impact of Tourism in Clark County, Ohio.
The Economic Contributions of Oregon’s Physician Practices Jo Isgrigg, Ph.D. Oregon Healthcare Workforce Institute Rural Health Policy Summit June 11,
Animal Agriculture Economic Analysis: The National Overview United Soybean Board June 2013.
Chapter 2 Measuring economic activity
Animal Agriculture Economic Analysis: The National Overview United Soybean Board June 2014.
Animal Agriculture Economic Analysis: The National Overview United Soybean Board June 2013.
Agribusiness Library LESSON L060002: THE SCOPE AND IMPORTANCE OF AGRIBUSINESS.
Animal Agriculture Economic Analysis: The National Overview United Soybean Board June 2013.
Revisiting the Economic Impact of the Fayetteville Shale Kathy Deck, Director Center for Business and Economic Research June 7, 2012.
ECONOMIC & LABOR MARKET CHARACTERISTICS & PROJECTIONS Pam Bodwell EVT 7066 Foundations of Career & Workforce Education University of South Florida October,
Animal Agriculture Economic Analysis: The National Overview United Soybean Board June 2013.
Animal Agriculture Economic Analysis: The National Overview United Soybean Board June 2013.
Economic growth Chapter 8 4/23/2017 4/23/
Animal Agriculture Economic Analysis: The National Overview United Soybean Board June 2013.
The Green of Gray: THE NEW ECONOMY of an Aging Population Michael D. Alexander, AICP “Mike” Research and Analytics Division Manager Atlanta Regional Commission.
Animal Agriculture Economic Analysis: The National Overview United Soybean Board June 2013.
Animal Agriculture Economic Analysis: The National Overview United Soybean Board June 2013.
Animal Agriculture Economic Analysis: The National Overview United Soybean Board June 2013.
Animal Agriculture Economic Analysis: The National Overview United Soybean Board June 2013.
Animal Agriculture Economic Analysis: The National Overview United Soybean Board June 2014.
Animal Agriculture Economic Analysis: The National Overview United Soybean Board June 2013.
Lesson L060002: The Scope and Importance of Agribusiness
Tourism Satellite Account Calendar Year 2014 The Economic Impact of Tourism in Finney County, Kansas.
Animal Agriculture Economic Analysis: The National Overview United Soybean Board June 2013.
State Fiscal Policy and Job Creation Laurel Lucia UC Berkeley Center for Labor Research and Education September 2011
Animal Agriculture Economic Analysis: The National Overview United Soybean Board June 2013.
Animal Agriculture Economic Analysis: The National Overview United Soybean Board June 2014.
Animal Agriculture Economic Analysis: The National Overview United Soybean Board June 2014.
Animal Agriculture Economic Analysis: The National Overview United Soybean Board June 2014.
Animal Agriculture Economic Analysis: The National Overview United Soybean Board June 2013.
Animal Agriculture Economic Analysis: The National Overview United Soybean Board June 2014.
Animal Agriculture Economic Analysis: The National Overview United Soybean Board June 2013.
The Bioscience Industry in Douglas County Joshua L. Rosenbloom David Burress Patricia Oslund.
Overall objective -- to estimate the economic impact of the Medicaid program on Alaska’s economy. More specifically, the report will: 1.provide a brief.
Animal Agriculture Economic Analysis: The National Overview United Soybean Board June 2014.
Mar-16 © 2007 IDC 11 IT Economic Impact and Microsoft Country Footprint Portugal Prepared for Microsoft Corporation October 2007.
1.02 ~ ECONOMIC ACTIVITIES AND CONDITIONS CHAPTER 2 MEASURING ECONOMIC ACTIVITY.
State of the States Brian Sigritz Director of State Fiscal Studies NASBO NASACT Middle Management April 12, 2016.
North Carolina’s Supply Chain US70 Corridor Commission / May 26, 2016 Charles HW Edwards, Director – Logistics Strategy.
As an Engine for Economic Growth and Employment September 2014 Dr. Robert J. Shapiro.
Agricultural Industry Profile
Agricultural Industry Profile
Tennessee Graduate Schools: Building the Workforce for the Future
The Economic Impact of the Conceptual Plan for the Redevelopment of the Green Bay Correctional Institution Site Commissioned by the Village of Allouez.
FACT CARD 1: ECONOMIC IMPACT OF LONG-TERM CARE
Presentation transcript:

BUSINESS SENSITIVE 1 The Economic Impact of the Arizona Biosciences Sector Walter H. Plosila, Ph.D. Senior Advisor Battelle’s Technology Partnership Practice April 7, 2009

BUSINESS SENSITIVE 2 Assessing the Economic Impact of the Biosciences in Arizona Battelle prepared this analysis to answer the following questions –What is the contribution of the biosciences, including non-hospital biosciences, hospitals, and academic bioscience R&D to the Arizona economy today (2007 data)? –How much has this contribution grown since the Arizona Bioscience Roadmap was adopted in 2002? –What is the future impact of the biosciences likely to be? Analysis uses the IMPLAN input-output model –Measures how a dollar spent on a specific economic activity, such as health care or research, makes its way through the economy –Generates 3 measures of economic impact -Output, i.e. value of production or sales -Employment -Employee compensation

BUSINESS SENSITIVE 3 Economic Impact Methodology Four Measures of Economic Impacts Direct effects. The change in economic activity being analyzed—in this case the activities of the bioscience sector Indirect effects. The changes in inter-industry purchases, for example the purchase of raw materials by a biotechnology manufacturer, in response to the change in demand from the directly affected industries Induced effects. The changes in spending from households as income and population increase due to changes in production Total effects. The combined total of direct, indirect and induced effects

BUSINESS SENSITIVE 4 Data and Projections Two Inputs to Modeling Effort –Biosciences Sector Employment -Battelle analysis of and projections based on Bureau of Labor Statistics QCEW data from the Minnesota IMPLAN Group. –Bioscience-Related R&D -Battelle analysis of NIH and NSF Data.

BUSINESS SENSITIVE 5 Findings

BUSINESS SENSITIVE 6 The bioscience sector has become a key contributor to Arizona’s economy The bioscience sector contributed $12.5 billion in economic activity in 2007 Total impact was $21.1 billion accounting for more than 155,600 jobs or 4 % of all employment in the state The bioscience sector generated $765.7 million in state and local taxes ItemDirect ImpactIndirect ImpactInduced impactTotal Impact Output$12,539.3$4,286.8$4,359.0$21,185.0 Employment87,41731,136 37,079155,631 Employee Compensation$5,327.5$1,239.9$1,262.8 $7,830.2 State and Local Tax Revenues–––$765.7 Source: Battelle TPP and IMPLAN The Economic Contribution of the Entire Biosciences Sector Including the Non- Hospital Bioscience Sector, Hospitals and Academic Research To the Arizona Economy in 2007 ($ in millions; current 2007)

BUSINESS SENSITIVE 7 The bioscience sector grew significantly during the last 6 years and as a result annual economic impact has soared Annual total economic activity generated by the biosciences increased 46.6% from $14.5 billion to $21.2 billion Jobs from the total impact of the biosciences rose by almost 15,000 from 140,654 to 155,631 Annual state and local taxes generated grew 35% to $765.7 million Item Direct Impact 2002 Direct Impact 2007 % Change Total Impact 2002 Total impact 2007 % Change Output$7,975.7$12, %$14,451.2$21, % Employment72,85587, %140,654155, % Employee Compensation $3,203.6$5, %$5,176.6 $7, % State and Local Tax Revenues ––$566.9$ % Source: Battelle TPP and IMPLAN Total and Percent Change in Direct and Total Impacts of the Entire Bioscience Sector, ($ in millions)

BUSINESS SENSITIVE 8 The non-hospital bioscience sector was the growth driver for the last 6 years Annual total economic activity generated by the non-hospital biosciences sector increased 61.6% from $3.6 billion to $5.8 billion. Jobs from the total impact of the non-hospital biosciences rose by 17.6% - 4,440 jobs from 25,231 to 29,671. Annual state and local taxes generated grew 34% to $177.8 million Item Direct Impact 2002 Direct Impact 2007 % Change Total Impact 2002 Total impact 2007 % Change Output $2,147.3 $3, %$3,615.3$5, % Employment 10,895 13, %25,23129, % Employee Compensation $494.1 $ %$949.5$1, % State and Local Tax Revenues – – $132.5$ % Source: Battelle TPP and IMPLAN Total and Percent Change in Direct and Total Impacts of the Non-Hospital Bioscience Sector, ($ in millions)

BUSINESS SENSITIVE 9 The hospital sector also grew significantly during the last 6 years Annual total economic activity generated by the hospital sector increased 42.2% from $10.3 billion to $14.6 billion Jobs from the total impact of the hospital biosciences rose by 11.1% - 12,029 jobs from 107,716 to 119,745. Annual state and local taxes generated grew 37% to $561.6 million Item Direct Impact 2002 Direct Impact 2007 % Change Total Impact 2002 Total impact 2007 % Change Output $5,537.7 $8, %$10,251.0$14, % Employment 57,410 70, %107,716119, % Employee Compensation $2,522.6 $4, %$3,949.2$6, % State and Local Tax Revenues – – $409.1$ % Source: Battelle TPP and IMPLAN Total and Percent Change in Direct and Total Impacts of the Hospital Sector, ($ in millions)

BUSINESS SENSITIVE 10 Projecting future growth levels is challenging Employment and research growth projections are based on Battelle’s long-term involvement in analyzing the growth, importance and role of biosciences in the State and with the Roadmap Optimal projections are based on historical performance of biosciences in the state and the goals established in the Roadmap Optimal projections show what could happen if the goals of the Roadmap are attained, not what will happen. They are predicated on continued support and investment in the biosciences by the state as well as national and local economic conditions

BUSINESS SENSITIVE 11 Significant growth is projected during the 2007 – 2020 time period if the goals of the Arizona Bioscience Roadmap are attained The bioscience sector would generate a total impact of $34.3 billion in 2020, 62% higher than ,676 jobs would result from the total impact of the biosciences sector The bioscience sector would generate more than $1.2 billion in state and local taxes ItemDirect ImpactIndirect ImpactInduced impactTotal Impact Output$20,298.0$6,901.8$7, ,281.8 Employment142,01850,419 60,239252,676 Employee Compensation$8,630.6$2,009.3$2,052.2 $12,692.1 State and Local Tax Revenues–––$1,238.7 Source: Battelle TPP and IMPLAN The Economic Contribution of the Entire Biosciences Sector Including the Non-Hospital Bioscience Sector, Hospitals and Academic Research To the Arizona Economy in 2020 ($ in millions; current 2007)

BUSINESS SENSITIVE 12 Proposed Process for Reassessing Bioscience Roadmap Economic Assumptions bioscience progress is impressive The Flinn Foundation remains committed to advancing the biosciences in Arizona Economic conditions in 2009 indicate that a review of the Bioscience Roadmap economic assumptions is indicated Battelle will conduct a series of sessions with Bioscience Steering Committee members to develop a range of projections and options for consideration The June 3rd Bioscience Steering Committee meeting will be devoted to reaching consensus on a refined action plan

BUSINESS SENSITIVE 13 Impact by Bioscience Sector Area 2007

BUSINESS SENSITIVE 14 Impact by Bioscience Sector Area 2002

BUSINESS SENSITIVE Growth Assumptions The core assumptions of the biosciences employment and R&D activity 2020 projections are as follows: 1.Agricultural Feedstock & Chemicals Employment is projected to grow at the 0.2 percent annual rate of growth experienced in the 2002–2007 period 2.Drugs & Pharmaceuticals Employment is projected to grow at the 3.2 percent annual rate of growth experienced in the2002–2007 period. 3.Medical Devices & Equipment Employment is projected to grow at the level required to attain an “above average” level of specialization in employment in this sector—or a Location Quotient (LQ)[of Research, Testing, & Medical Laboratories Employment is projected to grow at the level required attain an “above average” level of specialization in employment—or a LQ of Hospital Employment is projected to grow at the level required to attain the “average” national level of specialization in employment—or a LQ of Arizona Bioscience-related Research growth was projected at two levels: 1) National Institutes of Health R&D was projected to grow at the level necessary to catch up and attain the NIH research funding goals established in the 2002 Roadmap; and 2) All other Biosciences-related R&D was projected to grow at 7 percent annually, or the recent rate of growth in overall bioscience-related R&D activity.

BUSINESS SENSITIVE 16 Impact by Bioscience Sector Area 2020