Kalanand Mishra BaBar Coll. Meeting Sept 26, 2007 0/12 Development of New SPR-based Kaon, Pion, Proton, and Electron Selectors Kalanand Mishra University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Statistical Issues at LHCb Yuehong Xie University of Edinburgh (on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration) PHYSTAT-LHC Workshop CERN, Geneva June 27-29, 2007.
Advertisements

HARP Anselmo Cervera Villanueva University of Geneva (Switzerland) K2K Neutrino CH Meeting Neuchâtel, June 21-22, 2004.
Investigations of Semileptonic Kaon Decays at the NA48 Еxperiment Milena Dyulendarova (University of Sofia “St. Kliment Ohridski”) for NA48 Collaboration.
PHYSTAT2007, CERN Geneva, June 2007 ALICE Statistical Wish-List I. Belikov, on behalf of the ALICE collaboration.
14 Sept 2004 D.Dedovich Tau041 Measurement of Tau hadronic branching ratios in DELPHI experiment at LEP Dima Dedovich (Dubna) DELPHI Collaboration E.Phys.J.
Anne Dabrowski Northwestern University Collaboration Meeting 22 nd February 2005 Update Kmu3 Branching Ratio measurement A. Dabrowski, February
Summary of downstream PID MICE collaboration meeting Fermilab Rikard Sandström.
16 May 2002Paul Dauncey - BaBar1 Measurements of CP asymmetries and branching fractions in B 0   +  ,  K +  ,  K + K  Paul Dauncey Imperial College,
Particle Identification in the NA48 Experiment Using Neural Networks L. Litov University of Sofia.
Optimization of Signal Significance by Bagging Decision Trees Ilya Narsky, Caltech presented by Harrison Prosper.
Exclusive D s Semileptonic decays using kinematic fitting.
Radiative and Rare B-Decays at BaBar All results are preliminary unless journal ref. is given limit values are 90% CL unless otherwise specified Carsten.
1 BaBar Collaboration Randall Sobie Institute for Particle Physics University of Victoria.
Preliminary Measurement of the BF(   → K -  0  ) using the B A B AR Detector Fabrizio Salvatore Royal Holloway University of London for the B A B AR.
Anne Dabrowski Northwestern University NA48/2 Semileptonics Meeting 22 nd February 2005 Update Kmu3 Branching Ratio measurement A. Dabrowski, February.
Radiative Leptonic B Decays Edward Chen, Gregory Dubois-Felsmann, David Hitlin Caltech BaBar DOE Presentation Aug 10, 2005.
Measurement of the Branching fraction B( B  D* l ) C. Borean, G. Della Ricca G. De Nardo, D. Monorchio M. Rotondo Riunione Gruppo I – Napoli 19 Dicembre.
10/24/2005Zelimir Djurcic-PANIC05-Santa Fe Zelimir Djurcic Physics Department Columbia University Backgrounds in Backgrounds in neutrino appearance signal.
PPR meeting - January 23, 2003 Andrea Dainese 1 TPC tracking parameterization: a useful tool for simulation studies with large statistics Motivation Implementation.
Systematic errors associated with PID Milind V. Purohit BaBar Analysis Tools Workshop October, 2005.
E. Devetak - LCWS t-tbar analysis at SiD Erik Devetak Oxford University LCWS /11/2008 Flavour tagging for ttbar Hadronic ttbar events ID.
GlueX Particle Identification Ryan Mitchell Indiana University Detector Review, October 2004.
Irakli Chakaberia Final Examination April 28, 2014.
1 A Preliminary Model Independent Study of the Reaction pp  qqWW  qq ℓ qq at CMS  Gianluca CERMINARA (SUMMER STUDENT)  MUON group.
C.ClémentTile commissioning meeting – From susy group talk of last Wednesday  Simulation and digitization is done in version (8) 
DE/dx measurement with Phobos Si-pad detectors - very first impressions (H.P Oct )
Search for Direct CP Violation in 3-body Cabibbo Suppressed D 0 Decays Kalanand Mishra, G. Mancinelli, B. T. Meadows, M. D. Sokoloff University of Cincinnati.
B-tagging Performance based on Boosted Decision Trees Hai-Jun Yang University of Michigan (with X. Li and B. Zhou) ATLAS B-tagging Meeting February 9,
Gavril Giurgiu, Carnegie Mellon, FCP Nashville B s Mixing at CDF Frontiers in Contemporary Physics Nashville, May Gavril Giurgiu – for CDF.
Kalanand Mishra April 27, Branching Ratio Measurements of Decays D 0  π - π + π 0, D 0  K - K + π 0 Relative to D 0  K - π + π 0 Giampiero Mancinelli,
Status of GlueX Particle Identification Ryan Mitchell September 10, 2004.
Kalanand Mishra Kaon Neural Net 1 Retraining Kaon Neural Net Kalanand Mishra University of Cincinnati.
Kalanand Mishra BaBar Coll. Meeting December, /11 New Kaon Neural Net Selectors Kalanand Mishra University of Cincinnati  Overview  New selectors’
Physics of the B-factories, MVA chapter 12nd workshop, KEK, May 2010 José Ocariz LPNHE – IN2P3 et Université Paris Diderot On behalf of the MVA chapter.
A measurement of the B 0 B 0 oscillation frequency and determination of flavor-tagging efficiency using semileptonic and hadronic B 0 decays S. Bolognesi.
I.BelikovCHEP 2004, Interlaken, 30 Sep Bayesian Approach for Combined Particle Identification in ALICE Experiment at LHC. I.Belikov, P.Hristov, M.Ivanov,
Particle Identification. Particle identification: an important task for nuclear and particle physics Usually it requires the combination of informations.
Kalanand Mishra BaBar Coll. Meeting February, /8 Development of New Kaon Selectors Kalanand Mishra University of Cincinnati.
Search for High-Mass Resonances in e + e - Jia Liu Madelyne Greene, Lana Muniz, Jane Nachtman Goal for the summer Searching for new particle Z’ --- a massive.
Cincinnati, May Kalanand Mishra Kalanand Mishra University of Cincinnati Branching Ratio Measurements of Decays D 0  π - π + π 0, D 0  K - K.
Flavor tagging – status & prospects M. Bruinsma, UCI Tools Workshop Oct 1 st 2005, SLAC
Kalanand Mishra June 29, Branching Ratio Measurements of Decays D 0  π - π + π 0, D 0  K - K + π 0 Relative to D 0  K - π + π 0 Giampiero Mancinelli,
3rd ROOT Workshop, M. Kunze1 The Neural Network Objects RhoNNO: A ROOT package for general use Marcel Kunze Institut für Experimentalphysik 1 Ruhr-Universität.
Kalanand Mishra February 23, Branching Ratio Measurements of Decays D 0  π - π + π 0, D 0  K - K + π 0 Relative to D 0  K - π + π 0 decay Giampiero.
Search for H  WW*  l l Based on Boosted Decision Trees Hai-Jun Yang University of Michigan LHC Physics Signature Workshop January 5-11, 2008.
M. Brooks, 28-Mar-02 Heavy/Light meeting 1 Muon Analysis Work Getting Code ready for first data pass - DONE Get ready for second pass on DSTs - muon identification.
Tau31 Tracking Efficiency at BaBar Ian Nugent UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA Sept 2005 Outline Introduction  Decays Efficiency Charge Asymmetry Pt Dependence.
 reconstruction and identification in CMS A.Nikitenko, Imperial College. LHC Days in Split 1.
Studies of the Higgs Boson at the Tevatron Koji Sato On Behalf of CDF and D0 Collaborations 25th Rencontres de Blois Chateau Royal de Blois, May 29, 2013.
E. Soldatov Tight photon efficiency study using FSR photons from Z  ll  decays E.Yu.Soldatov* *National Research Nuclear University “MEPhI”
Converted photon and π 0 discrimination based on H    analysis.
Low Mass Standard Model Higgs Boson Searches at the Tevatron Andrew Mehta Physics at LHC, Split, Croatia, September 29th 2008 On behalf of the CDF and.
Study of the electron identification algorithms in TRD Andrey Lebedev 1,3, Semen Lebedev 2,3, Gennady Ososkov 3 1 Frankfurt University, 2 Giessen University.
(LHE) tracking and PID packages
Parameterization of EMC response for
Yet another approach to the ToF-based PID at PANDA
TNSmooth: Root Multi-dimensional PDFs
Marco Incagli – INFN Pisa
Theoretical Motivation Analysis Procedure Systematics Results
B Decays with Invisibles in the Final State
Implementing Boosting and Convolutional Neural Networks For Particle Identification (PID) Khalid Teli .
Search for WHlnbb at the Tevatron DPF 2009
Pure  exposure for e/ separation
Check of Lambda Simulations in TOF-West
Rare and Forbidden Charm Meson Decays in FOCUS
For the BaBar Collaboration
Study of e+e- pp process using initial state radiation with BaBar
Hadronic recoil analysis:
Extreme Penguins: Tools requirements at the analysis frontier
Samples and MC Selection
Presentation transcript:

Kalanand Mishra BaBar Coll. Meeting Sept 26, /12 Development of New SPR-based Kaon, Pion, Proton, and Electron Selectors Kalanand Mishra University of Cincinnati

Kalanand Mishra BaBar Coll. Meeting Sept 26, /12 Two New Classes of Selectors 1. BdtKaon Selectors: will replace the kaon neural net (KNN) selectors, currently being used in B-tagging use Bagger Decision Tree algorithm (implemented in StatPatternRecognition package developed by Ilya Narsky) to separate kaon signal from pion background will continue to provide kaon identification at 4 levels of strictness: Very Loose, Loose, Tight, Very Tight 2. KM Selectors: are brand new selectors separate kaon, pion, proton, electron from one another use multi-class learning with bagger decision tree will provide particle identification at 6 levels of strictness: Extra Loose, Very Loose, Loose, Tight, Very Tight, Extra Tight

Kalanand Mishra BaBar Coll. Meeting Sept 26, /12 Why New Selectors ? - For B-tagging, need new Kaon selector to replace the old KNN selectors. - The KNN selectors haven’t been trained since circa 2001; there have been many changes in the detector performance since then (e.g., Track Fix up, Sasha Telnov’s corrections for dE/dx in DCH and SVT). - Trained on Monte Carlo, but are used to evaluate performance in real data. - Give degraded performance for high-momentum tracks. - Need a general-purpose high-performance Kaon selector for Physics analysis. - For kaons, protons and pions, there is only one selector of choice for analysis: the LH selectors. There is room for improvement in performance. - For electron, the selector of choice at the moment is again the LH selector. - It provides electron selection at only one level of strictness. - Analysts have been asking for both looser and tighter level selections. - Also some analyses and AWGs (notably Leptonic) will benefit enormously from high-performance selectors for both low and high momentum tracks. - The improvement in performance of this selector will be very important for crucial BaBar analyses looking for New Physics, rare decays, CP violation ….

Kalanand Mishra BaBar Coll. Meeting Sept 26, /12 What is New in the New Selectors ? Training on “real data”. Include Sasha’s corrections for dE/dx in DCH and SVT. Employ powerful statistical tools to separate signal and background, use bagging on weak classifier and multi- class training. For each class of particle hypothesis: “kaon”, “pion”, “proton”, and “electron”, the other three classes are treated as background for classifier training. The only veto we need to apply is “muon veto” for ‘tight’ and ‘very tight’ selections. No additional vetoes. Include many additional useful input variables, including P and  after flattening the two-dimensional P:  distribution. No need for separate trainings in P,  bins.

Kalanand Mishra BaBar Coll. Meeting Sept 26, /12 StatPatternRecognition Classifier Output Events For details on the algorithms: arXiv:physics/ (by Ilya Narsky) Decision Tree splits nodes recursively until a stopping criteria is satisfied. Bagger decision tree divides the training data sample into a number of bootstrap replicas, and trains on each one of them separately. The final classification is done by majority vote. Sgnl. Bkgd. For illustration only

Kalanand Mishra BaBar Coll. Meeting Sept 26, /12 Performance of Bdt Kaon selectors Includes all momentum and  ranges and all tracks.

Kalanand Mishra BaBar Coll. Meeting Sept 26, /12 Bdt Kaon Performance in select mom. bins dE/dx - DRC transition: 0.8 < P < 1 GeV/c Intermediate range: 1.9 < P < 2.1 GeV/c High momentum: 3.0 < P < 3.2 GeV/c The higher curve/ point represents better performance Caveat: I have changed the definition of the Y-axis variable.

Kalanand Mishra BaBar Coll. Meeting Sept 26, /12 Tracks in DIRC Tracks passing through cracks between the DIRC bars Bdt Kaon Performance by Track Quality Conclusion: Improvement in performance everywhere. Tracks passing through cracks between the DIRC bars: P > 1 GeV/c Caveat: The separation between the two categories is a bit fuzzy in my code !

Kalanand Mishra BaBar Coll. Meeting Sept 26, /12 Performance of KM selectors Number of data events used for each category = 1.22 x 10 5

Kalanand Mishra BaBar Coll. Meeting Sept 26, /12 Performance of Kaon selector  LH V.Loose LH Loose: Efficiency = 0.87 Pi Rej. = 0.96 LH Tight / VeryTight: Efficiency = 0.82 Pi Rej. = 0.98 Caveat: These numbers are very crude approximations !

Kalanand Mishra BaBar Coll. Meeting Sept 26, /12 Performance of Pion selector   LH Tight / Very Tight LH Loose Caveat: The numbers for LH selectors are very crude approximations !

Kalanand Mishra BaBar Coll. Meeting Sept 26, /12 Proton & Electron selectors Looks good…. But again need to see performance for the entire P,  spectrum. Proton Electron

Kalanand Mishra BaBar Coll. Meeting Sept 26, /12 A new selector class implemented in the latest version(s) of BetaPid. Six levels of strictness: “extra loose”, “very loose”, “loose”, “tight”, “very tight”, “extra tight”. Waiting for the new set of PID ntuples in 24 series. After production on next set of PID ntuples, I plan to add additional discriminating variables: Likelihood Ratios. Will do one final training and tune the “strictness” selection cuts for the final selectors. The new selectors will be ready for deployment in Run 7 analysis series. Status  Deployment of New Selectors