Additional Emittance Plots The following plots are derived from Mark’s analysis of the Step 1 data taken in approx. August 2010. Mark derived the (rms,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
January 14, 2004 TJR - - UPDATED 1/25/04 1 MICE Beamline Analysis Using g4beamline Including Jan 25 Updates for Kevin’s JAN04 Beamline Design Tom Roberts.
Advertisements

1 Acceptance & Scraping Chris Rogers Analysis PC
PID Detector Size & Acceptance Chris Rogers Analysis PC
5/3/2015J-PARC1 Transverse Matching Using Transverse Profiles and Longitudinal Beam arrival Times.
J. Rudolph, Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin EuCARD 2nd ANNUAL MEETING Slice emittance measurements at the ELBE superconducting RF photoinjector.
FIGURE OF MERIT FOR MUON IONIZATION COOLING Ulisse Bravar University of Oxford 28 July 2004.
1 Angular Momentum from diffuser Beam picks up kinetic angular momentum (L kin ) when it sits in a field –Canonical angular momentum (L can ) is conserved.
Emittance Measurement: Quadrupole Scan C. Tennant USPAS – January 2011.
Particle by Particle Emittance Measurement to High Precision Chris Rogers Imperial College/RAL 17th March 2005.
M. LindroosNUFACT06 School Accelerator Physics Transverse motion Mats Lindroos.
Changing the absorbers: how does it fit in the MICE experimental programme? Besides the requirement that the amount of multiple scattering material be.
SLIDE Beam measurements using the MICE TOF counters Analysis meeting, 23 September 2008 Mark Rayner.
1 September 09Mark Rayner – Emittance measurement by The TOFs1 Emittance measurement by the TOFs Via trace space reconstruction of individual muons. Complementary.
CesrTA Low Emittance Program for Electron Cloud Studies Dan Gonnella Advisors: David Rubin, Mark Palmer Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle.
1 Chris Rogers Imperial College 18 May 2006 TOF II Justification.
PID Detector Size & Acceptance Chris Rogers Analysis PC
M.apollonioCM17 -CERN- (22/2 - 25/2 2007)1 Single Particle Amplitude M. Apollonio – University of Oxford.
K.Walaron Fermilab, Batavia, Chicago 12/6/ Simulation and performance of beamline K.Walaron T.J. Roberts.
Chris Rogers, MICE CM16 Wednesday Plenary Progress in Cooling Channel Simulation.
Beam line characterization with the TOFs1 Demonstrating the emittance-momentum matrix Mark Rayner, CM26 California, 24 March Initial.
MICE CM - Fermilab, Chicago - (11/06/2006) 1 A (short) history of MICE – step III M. Apollonio – University of Oxford.
Beam Parameter Study - preliminary findings Tim Carlisle.
MICE Experiments Introduction Introduction Disclaimers Disclaimers Assumptions Assumptions Baseline programme Baseline programme Full programme Full programme.
1 PID Detector Size & Acceptance Chris Rogers Analysis PC
Mark Rayner, Analysis workshop 4 September ‘08: Use of TOFs for Beam measurement & RF phasing, slide 1 Use of TOFs for Beam measurement & RF phasing Analysis.
18 August 09Mark Rayner – Momentum measurement by The TOFs1 Momentum measurement by the TOFs A correction to an O(4 MeV/c) bias on the current muon momentum.
M.apollonio/j.cobbMICE UK meeting- RAL - (9/1/2007) 1 Single Particle Amplitude M. Apollonio – University of Oxford.
Lattice calculations: Lattices Tune Calculations Dispersion Momentum Compaction Chromaticity Sextupoles Rende Steerenberg (BE/OP) 17 January 2012 Rende.
Diffuser Studies Chris Rogers, IC/RAL MICE VC 09 March 2005.
Analysis of MICE Chris Rogers 1 Imperial College/RAL Thursday 28 October, With thanks to John Cobb.
Quadrupole Transverse Beam Optics Chris Rogers 2 June 05.
Yichao Jing 11/11/2010. Outline Introduction Linear lattice design and basic parameters Combined function magnets study and feasibility Nonlinear dynamics.
MICE pencil beam raster scan simulation study Andreas Jansson.
Influence of the Third Harmonic Module on the Beam Size Maria Kuhn University of Hamburg Bachelor Thesis Presentation.
Introduction Miha Zgubič, summer student Scintillating fibre tracker software Analysis of performance of momentum reconstruction 1.
Results from Step I of MICE D Adey 2013 International Workshop on Neutrino Factories, Super-beams and Beta- beams Working Group 3 – Accelerator Topics.
1 Status of EMMA Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC 23 April, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
Matching recipe and tracking for the final focus T. Asaka †, J. Resta López ‡ and F. Zimmermann † CERN, Geneve / SPring-8, Japan ‡ CERN, Geneve / University.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
January Tevatron Lifetimes - P. Lebrun1 f On Tevatron Proton Lifetime at 150 December 3 Study vs Store data. Paul Lebrun Fermilab January-December.
Mark Rayner 14/8/08Analysis Meeting: Emittance measurement using the TOFs 1 Emittance measurement using the TOFs The question: can we use position measurements.
Marco apollonio/J.CobbMICE coll. meeting 16- RAL - (10/10/2006) 1 Transmittance, scraping and maximum radii for MICE STEPVI M. Apollonio – University of.
A simple formula for calculating the momentum spread from the longitudinal density distribution and RF form Recycler Meeting March 11, 2009 A. Shemyakin.
PID PC 7th Sept MICE MAGNETIC FIELDS & SHIELDS J. H. Cobb & H. Witte Oxford University Magnet fields for MICE (VI) calculated including magnetic.
PID Detector Requirements for Emittance Measurement Chris Rogers, MICE PID Review, Thursday Oct 12.
Simulation of Spin Interference and Echo Effect Abstract Successively jumping across a depolarization resonance twice produces interesting spin dynamics.
Unit: Nuclear Chemistry Half-Life Day 2 – Notes. After today you will be able to… Identify the factor that nuclear stability is dependent on. Calculate.
ELENA EXTRACTION LINES W. Bartmann, D. Barna, M. Fraser, J. Jentzsch, R. Ostojic ELENA Commissioning discussion, 23th November, 2015.
July LEReC Review July 2014 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Jorg Kewisch, Dmitri Kayran Electron Beam Transport and System specifications.
Lecture 4 - E. Wilson - 23 Oct 2014 –- Slide 1 Lecture 4 - Transverse Optics II ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2014 E. J. N. Wilson.
18 th March 2008Measuring momentum using the TOFsSlide 1 Measuring momentum using TOF0 and TOF1 Progress report Mark Rayner (Oxford/RAL) Analysis Meeting,
Mark Rayner – Analysis SessionCM25, 4 November Beam characterization by the TOFs Mark Rayner The University of Oxford MICE CM25.
LER Workshop, Oct 11, 2006Intensity Increase in the LER – T. Sen1 LHC Accelerator Research Program bnl-fnal-lbnl-slac  Motivation  Slip stacking in the.
Mark Rayner 26/8/08Analysis Meeting: Emittance measurement using the TOFs 1 Measuring emittance with the TOFs Data: –G4MICE has been used to obtain transfer.
Lecture 4 - E. Wilson –- Slide 1 Lecture 4 - Transverse Optics II ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2009 E. J. N. Wilson.
LCLS-II Injector layout design and study Feng Zhou 8/19/2015.
CKOV1 design status 1. Generation of muon and pion beam files 2. PID performances with water radiator 3. Does it help with fluorocarbon FC72 ? 4. Conclusion.
Status and plan of Beta-matching in Extraction line Kiyoshi Kubo.
Update on RF parameters A.Lachaize11 th HPPS design meeting04/09/13.
Beam Energy-Loss measurement
Step 1 Analysis: Progress Towards the Emittance Paper
Impact of Magnet Performance on the Physics Program of MICE
Multiturn extraction for PS2
Deuterons in Photoproduction at HERA
ECE539 final project Instructor: Yu Hen Hu Fall 2005
Lecture 4 - Transverse Optics II
Lecture 4 - Transverse Optics II
I-LHC NOMINAL ions beam in 2007
23C: time series.
He Zhang MEIC R&D Meeting, 07/09/2015
Presentation transcript:

Additional Emittance Plots The following plots are derived from Mark’s analysis of the Step 1 data taken in approx. August Mark derived the (rms, unnormalised) Twiss parameters and longitudinal momentum at TOF1 – see his thesis for details of the method.  The final part of his method was to apply a blind cut to the data, only considering the Gaussian- like interior region of the beam. Then remake the covariance matrix and extract the parameters.  Caveat: I only have the numbers derived from the beam’s covariance matrix before this cut was done.  Would like to discuss interesting aspects... 1

Pz vs. Momentum spread We see a similar amount of momentum spread for all the beams, increasing a little as we go to higher momentum. 2

Momentum vs. Beam Size All beams are approximately the same physical size in both dimensions. Limited by scraping in quadrupoles? 3

Momentum vs. Beta Function Beta function falls into “momentum bands”.  It looks like you can join together curves except that the data points belong to completely different beams! 4

Momentum vs. Divergence Beam divergence decreases with momentum. Again, have the “momentum bands” and the desire to “join the dots” of unrelated data (careful!). 5

Momentum vs. Emittance Emittance decreases with momentum. Positive beams have a slightly higher emittance overall (proton absorber). Again, careful with “joining the dots”. 6