AEROCOM direct aerosol experiment A2 Status per 17.06.2011 Caveat: All submitted results have been run through the same analysis chain. Irregularities.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Created by Mrs Austins. Is this a right angle? YesNo.
Advertisements

Characterizing the Radiative Effects of Black Carbon Internal Mixing Charles Li Group Meeting Presentation October 1, 2014 Group Meeting 10/1/14 1.
AeroCom Phase 2 Direct Radiative Interaction Status as of Most numbers are final, a few submissions may change slightly. Effect on final numbers.
AEROCOM direct aerosol experiment A2 Status per Some model groups are still in the process of submitting results. Not all submitted results.
Alan Robock Department of Environmental Sciences Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey USA
Steps for Submitting Request for Room Reservation through website.
Direct radiative forcing and BC on snow in the Arctic region Bjørn H. Samset, Gunnar Myhre, Ragnhild B. Skeie, … Outline: - BC on snow in the Arctic region.
"Future climate impacts of direct radiative forcing of anthropogenic aerosols, tropospheric ozone, and long-lived greenhouse gases" Chen, W; Liao, H; Seinfeld,
GEOS-Chem simulation for AEROCOM Organic Aerosol Inter-comparison SIMULATED YEAR: 2006 Gabriele Curci – CETEMPS Nov
A 1 A 2 A 3 A 4 B B B
Eric M. Leibensperger, Loretta J. Mickley, Daniel J. Jacob School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University Climate response to changing.
Sensitivity of sulfate direct climate forcing to the hysteresis of particle phase transitions Jun Wang, Andrew Hoffman, Scot Martin, Daniel Jacob Present.
Rewrite With Fractional Exponents. Rewrite with fractional exponent:
COMP6215 E-Business Management 1 E-Business Management COMP6215 Introduction.
Direct Radiative Effect of aerosols over clouds and clear skies determined using CALIPSO and the A-Train Robert Wood with Duli Chand, Tad Anderson, Bob.
Graphing Lines.  The best way to learn about lines is to work with them without a calculator.  We are going to practice graphing lines by finding our.
3.5 Solution by Determinants. The Determinant of a Matrix The determinant of a matrix A is denoted by |A|. Determinants exist only for square matrices.
Direct radiative forcing of aerosols and tropospheric ozone from specific emissions sectors and locations CMAS 10/11/2010 Daven K Henze University of Colorado.
Mixing State of Aerosols: Excess Atmospheric Absorption Paradox Shekhar Chandra Graduate Student, EAS Term Paper Presentation for EAS-6410.
We have automated our vacation request form that allows each employee to calculate remaining vacation days and submit vacation requests simultaneously.
We have automated our vacation request form that allows each employee to calculate remaining vacation days and submit vacation requests simultaneously.
Morrison/Gettelman/GhanAMWG January 2007 Two-moment Stratiform Cloud Microphysics & Cloud-aerosol Interactions in CAM H. Morrison, A. Gettelman (NCAR),
MA Day 53 – April 2, 2013 Section 13.2: Finish Line Integrals Begin 13.3: The fundamental theorem for line integrals.
Clouds & Radiation: Climate data vs. model results A tribute to ISCCP Ehrhard Raschke, University of Hamburg Stefan Kinne, MPI-Meteorology Hamburg 25 years.
 A.4f Apply these skills to solve practical problems.  A.4b Justify steps used in solving equations.  Use a graphing calculator to check your solutions.
Global characteristics of marine stratocumulus clouds and drizzle
Recent activities on aerosols in TM5 Achim Strunk Twan van Noije, Michiel van Weele AeroCom-2 contribution by KNMI Preliminary source sink analysis Online.
What can we see in the sky?. IN THE SKY WE CAN SEE MUCH MORE!
Air pollution and climate change Short lived climate forcers Øystein Hov.
Aerosol Radiative Forcing from combined MODIS and CERES measurements
SCTP Nat Support. Status Wg version has been submitted (-00). Need WG feedback PLEASE! Michael Tuexen has committed to provide feedback from some of the.
ST3236: Stochastic Process Tutorial 6
Aerosol Indirect Effects in CAM and MIRAGE Steve Ghan Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Jean-Francois Lamarque, Peter Hess, and Francis Vitt, NCAR.
RFCR Tool. RFCR tool is the for handling any king of change request which is issued by RF engineers in the market. Change request can be: for parameter.
How do regional aerosol emissions affect climate? Matthew Kasoar With: Apostolos Voulgarakis (Imperial), Drew Shindell (NASA GISS/Duke), Greg Faluvegi.
Salary Increment Survey This year your Company has decided to give the increment as per your wish Please answer the following question.
NASA Langley Research Center / Atmospheric Sciences CERES Instantaneous Clear-sky and Monthly Averaged Radiance and Flux Product Overview David Young NASA.
Sensitivity of black carbon radiative forcing to vertical density profiles in AeroCom phase 2 B. Samset, G. Myhre, AeroCom modellers (full list to be filled.
Korea Institute of Atmospheric Prediction Systems (KIAPS) ( 재 ) 한국형수치예보모델개발사업단 Comparison of Radiation Schemes Using a Single Colum Model Joonsuk Lee Jung-Yoon.
Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service CAMS General Assembly, Athens, June 2016 Thomas Popp (DLR for CAMS-94 User Interaction) Who are CAMS users.
Quantifying rapid adjustments using radiative kernels
up until since Jan 2008 PhD NOAA postdoc Asst. Professor
AM and ChemClim WG - February, 2008
PDRMIP Phase 2: New experiments, first glance
Systems of Equations Lesson 41: Solve by using a matrix
Solving Systems in 3 Variables using Matrices
Using Determinants to solve systems of equations
Short-Lived Climate Forcers
Auto-Assign Led by Bethany Boyle & Dave Kritz
مفهوم السياحة المحلية في الأردن
Warm Up #6 1. Let a = 4, b = – 5, c = – 2, and d = 7. Find ad – bc.
Modelling the radiative impact of aerosols from biomass burning during SAFARI-2000   Gunnar Myhre, Terje K. Berntsen, James M. Haywood, Jostein K. Sundet,
Finding the slope of a line using a graph
Finding the Slope of a Line Unit 7.02
Latest Development on Modal Aerosol Formulation and Indirect Effects
Robert Wood, Duli Chand, Tad Anderson University of Washington
+ = Climate Responses to Biomass Burning Aerosols over South Africa
Climate response to changing United States aerosol sources
Code is on the Website Outline Comparison of Excel and R
10:00.
AEROCOM direct aerosol experiment A2 Status per
Robert Wood, Duli Chand, Tad Anderson University of Washington
Contribution of Black Carbon Aerosol to Drying of the Mediterranean
Robert Wood, Duli Chand, Tad Anderson University of Washington
Algebraic Solving Method
مديريت موثر جلسات Running a Meeting that Works
Unit 3 Review (Calculator)
Calculate 9 x 81 = x 3 3 x 3 x 3 x 3 3 x 3 x 3 x 3 x 3 x 3 x =
Stopping Criteria Is the residual check appropriate as the stopping condition? It is known that relative corrections of field variables and design variables.
POLDER vs HadGEM3: Capturing the variability of aerosol direct radiative effect Ben Johnson, Nick Davies1, Fanny Peers1, Jim Haywood1 1 University of.
Presentation transcript:

AEROCOM direct aerosol experiment A2 Status per Caveat: All submitted results have been run through the same analysis chain. Irregularities may arise both from the results themselves and from the analysis. If you see unexpected results from your own model please let us know and we will look into it. Unless otherwise stated, all values are for the anthropogenic aerosol fraction.

RF [W/m 2 ] Comp CAM4- Oslo HadGEM2 -ES MPIHAM_V 2_KZ OsloCTM 2 SPRINTARS- v384 GISS- MATRIX GISS- modelECAM5 All-0,05-0,31-0,15-0,43-0,28-0,49-0,66-2,08 SO4-0,48-0,31-0,28-0,58-0,37-0,250,26-0,18 BCFF0,370,190,140,380,140,170,220,25 OAFF-0,03-0,04-0,01-0,08-0,02-0,03 BB0,07-0,070,02-0,02 -0,01-0,16 SOA-0,02-0,07-0,02 NO3-0,11-0,03-0,13-0,26 CSum-0,07-0,33-0,15-0,41-0,27-0,240,030,02 Comp CAM4- Oslo HadGEM2 -ES MPIHAM_V 2_KZ OsloCTM 2 SPRINTARS- v384 GISS- MATRIX GISS- modelECAM5 All-0,72-0,44-1,18-0,29-0,87-0,39 SO4-0,88-0,50-1,01 BCFF0,210,110,26 OAFF-0,06 -0,12 BB-0,36-0,14-0,10 SOA-0,10 NO3-0,17-0,05 Csum-1,14 Clear sky: All sky:

RF [W/m2]

RF [W/m2] for BCFF Zonal means All sky Clear sky

Burden [mg/m2] NRF [W/g] Comp CAM4- Oslo HadGEM2 -ES MPIHAM_V 2_KZ OsloCTM 2 SPRINTARS- v384 GISS- MATRIX GISS- modelECAM5 SO BCFF OAFF BB SOA NO Comp CAM4- Oslo HadGEM2 -ES MPIHAM_V 2_KZ OsloCTM 2 SPRINTARS- v384 GISS- MATRIX GISS- modelECAM5 SO42,781,592,302,612,131,481,101,71 BCFF0,210,310,110,170,160,070,160,09 OAFF0,280,240,180,810,250,180,220,44 BB2,960,48 SOA0,360,28 NO30,440,160,33

NRF [W/g]

Burden [  g/m2], zonal means SO4 BCFF OAFF or BC NO3 BB SOA

Comp CAM4- Oslo HadGEM2 -ES MPIHAM_V 2_KZ OsloCTM 2 SPRINTARS- v384 GISS- MATRIX GISS- modelECAM5 SO BCFF OAFF BB SOA NO AOT at 550 NRF [W/m2] Comp CAM4- Oslo HadGEM2 -ES MPIHAM_V 2_KZ OsloCTM 2 SPRINTARS- v384 GISS- MATRIX GISS- modelECAM5 SO40,01990,01420,00660,02930,02200,01650,00450,0096 BCFF0,0016 0,00030,00220,00050,00090,00220,0002 OAFF0,0017 0,00550,00240,00090,00250,0029 BB0,01570,00380,00440,00080,0084 SOA0,00070,00250,0023 NO30,00510,00190,00830,0434

NRF [W/m2]

Ext.coeff [m^2/g] Comp CAM4- Oslo HadGEM2 -ES MPIHAM_V 2_KZ OsloCTM 2 SPRINTARS- v384 GISS- MATRIX GISS- modelECAM5 SO47,28,92,911,210,311,24,15,6 BCFF7,35,42,913,23,412,713,41,8 OAFF6,07,06,89,84,711,76,6 BB5,38,0 SOA6,98,1 NO311,811,325,1133,2

RF TOA all sky [W/m2 ]

Modelrsutrsutcsrsdtrsdsrsusrsdscsrsuscs* CAM4-OsloYesNoYes No GISS-MATRIXEquivYes NoYesNo GISS-modelEEquivYes NoYesNo HadGEM-ESYes MPIHAM_V2_KZYes No OsloCTM2Yes No SPRINTARS-v384Yes No CAM5-MAM3-PNNLYes No *Not requested, can be calculated from the others YesDelivered NoNot delivered EquivEquivalent variable delivered that can be used PreDelivered for PRE only CtrlDelivered for CTRL only AEROCOM A2 – TOA/surface rad flux variables, per

Modeltemphusmmr pres CAM4-OsloYes GISS-MATRIXYes No GISS-modelEYes No HadGEM-ESCtrl-indir Yes MPIHAM_V2_KZNo OsloCTM2Ctrl YesNo SPRINTARS-v384Yes CtrlYes CAM5-MAM3-PNNLYes *Not requested, can be calculated from the others YesDelivered for CTRL and PRE NoNot delivered EquivEquivalent variable delivered that can be used PreDelivered for PRE only CtrlDelivered for CTRL only AEROCOM A2 – 3D fields, per