Accountability Reporting for the Community Colleges 2010 Report: Moreno Valley College Calculation presented by presented by David Torres, Dean Institutional.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Peralta 2011 ARCC Report Mike Orkin, Ph.D. Office of Educational Services Peralta Community College District.
Advertisements

Scorecard: How to Improve your CDCP Outcomes Rate Association for Community and Continuing Education 2014 Annual Conference Beverly Heasley Mt. San Antonio.
STUDENT EQUITY PLAN PROGRESS PRESENTATION TO BOARD FEBRUARY 28, 2012.
Accountability Measures 2009 (based on data) Report for Central Piedmont Community College.
Student Satisfaction Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Inventory (SSI)
1 Foothill College Basic Skills College Hour Rob Johnstone, Ph.D. 10/8/03.
ARCC /08 Reporting Period Prepared by: Office of Institutional Research & Planning February 2010.
Student Success Washington State Board for Community and Technical Colleges September 2011.
Accountability Reporting for the Community Colleges (ARCC) Presentation to the Mt. San Jacinto College Board of Trustees Thursday – Oct. 9, 2008 Dr. Dennis.
Click to edit Master title style 1 What Data? California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office Dr. W. Charles Wiseley, “Chuck” Career Technical Education.
San Luis Obispo Community College District Cuesta College Institutional Effectiveness Outcomes/Student Success Scorecard Report SLOCCCD Board of Trustees.
ARCC Accountability Report for the Community Colleges Focus on Quality.
Accountability Reporting for the Community Colleges, 2012 Report Riverside Community College District Riverside Community College District Teaching & Learning.
SSTF Update: ARCC Score Card Phil Smith — ASCCC Leadership Development Committee Chair Craig Rutan — Santiago Canyon College.
The Office of Institutional Research, Planning, and Assessment Northern Virginia Community College (NOVA) AUGUST 2005.
Accountability Reporting for Community Colleges (ARCC) 2007 Report for Cerritos College Bill Farmer and Nathan Durdella.
Expenditures & Outcomes Edward R. Karpp Director of Institutional Research Glendale Community College.
Cuesta College ARCC Data Report to the San Luis Obispo Community College District Board of Trustees May 5, 2010.
Accountability Reporting The “Scorecard” Presentation to Academic Senate November 1, 2012 Rosaleen Ryan.
REPORT TO THE SAN LUIS OBISPO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES MARCH 7, 2012 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT INSTITUTIONAL.
1. ACCJC INSTITUTION-SET STANDARDS DISCUSSION 2 A “standard” is the level of performance set by the institution to meet educational quality and institutional.
RCCD Students: Challenges to Success October 30, 2012 David Torres, Dean Institutional Research.
2014 Student Success Scorecard PaRC Presentation May 7, 2014 E. Kuo FH IR&P *Formerly known as the Accountability Reporting for Community Colleges (ARCC)
Student Success Scorecard PaRC Presentation April 17, 2013 FOOTHILL COLLEGE E. Kuo FH IR&P *Formerly known as the Accountability Reporting for Community.
 California community colleges serve over 2.9 million students each year  70 to 80% of students enrolled in California community colleges need developmental.
2010 ARCC Overview Michael Orkin, Ph.D. Associate Vice Chancellor of Academic Affairs Peralta Community College District.
Accountability Measures 2008 Central Piedmont Community College.
Mallory Newell Office of Institutional Research and Planning
Student Pathways as defined exclusively by Units Earned Units Earned in Following Spring Term Units Earned in Next Fall Term Units Earned in First Fall.
Institutional Effectiveness at CPCC DENISE H WELLS.
Board of Trustees Retreat December 9, 2015 Edward Karpp Dean of Research, Planning & Grants Success Indicators and Key College Profile Data 2015.
Board of Trustees Retreat May 10, 2013 Dr. Edward Karpp Dean of Research, Planning & Grants.
Glendale Community College: Statewide Accountability Reporting Edward Karpp Associate Dean, Institutional Research & Planning January 24, 2008.
Los Angeles Valley College April 21, QUESTION 3: NEW GOALS & OBJECTIVES REFLECTING COLLEGE BASIC SKILLS INITIATIVE “ACTION PLANS”
Palomar College Presentation to Palomar College Board of Trustees March 11, 2008.
Laney College Institutional Effectiveness Goal Indicators: Proposal for Adoption Draft Proposal June 13, 2016.
Glendale Community College: Statewide Accountability Reporting 2010 Data Edward Karpp Dean of Research, Planning, and Grants November 15, 2010.
Glendale Community College: Statewide Accountability Reporting 2008 Data Edward Karpp Associate Dean, Institutional Research & Planning December 15, 2008.
1 A ccountability R eporting for the C ommunity C olleges (ARCC) 2008 Presentation to Peralta Community College Board of Trustees Merritt College Office.
Glendale Community College: Statewide Accountability Reporting 2009 Data Edward Karpp Associate Dean, Institutional Research & Planning December 21, 2009.
A ccountability R eporting for the C ommunity C olleges (ARCC ) Presentation to the Mt. San Jacinto College Board of Trustees Thursday – Feb. 11,
SLOCCCD Board of Trustees Meeting November 2, 2016
Student Success Scorecard: 2016 Report
Student Success Scorecard and Institution-Set Standards 2014
Edward Karpp Dean of Research, Planning, and Grants November 15, 2010
Student Success Scorecard Spring 2016
Edward Karpp Dean of Research, Planning, and Grants November 19, 2012
Accountability Reporting for the Community Colleges (ARCC)
January 23, 2017 Academic Senate Meeting
2016 Taft College Student Success Scorecard
Contra Costa Community College District
Educational Master Plan
Indicators Four areas of institutional effectiveness
2017 Taft College Student Success Scorecard
Board of Trustees Review
SOCCCD Board of Trustees’ Meeting
Student Success Scorecard & Other Institutional Effectiveness Metrics
Institution-Set Standards for Improvement
2008 ARCC Report Findings February 2, 2009
2009 ARCC Report Findings October 5, 2009
Accountability Reporting for the Community Colleges (ARCC)
Presentation to the Mt. San Jacinto College Board of Trustees
Student Success Metrics
Institution-Set Standards for Improvement
Student Success Scorecard
2010 ARCC Report Findings May 3, 2010
Edward Karpp Dean of Research, Planning, and Grants January 17, 2012
Glendale Community College: Statewide Accountability Reporting Data
Glendale Community College: Statewide Accountability Reporting
Highlights from the District-wide Annual Institutional
Presentation transcript:

Accountability Reporting for the Community Colleges 2010 Report: Moreno Valley College Calculation presented by presented by David Torres, Dean Institutional Research November 2, 2010

Background Accountability Reporting for the Community Colleges (or ARCC) is a set of performance indicators for the California Community Colleges (CCC) The final report was published in Spring 2010 Two level of analysis: system wide performance individual college performance student progress and achievement pre-collegiate improvement

Caveat Slide Official ARCC data is for RCCD, not MVC Present data was extrapolated at RCCD Institutional Research office Official college-level indicators may be available in 2012

Why will it take so long?

Moreno Valley College: College Level Indicators: Student Progress and Achievement Rate Percentage of first-time students who showed intent to complete and within six years: transferred to a four-year college earned an AA/AS earned a Certificate (18 units or more) achieved "Transfer Directed" status achieved "Transfer Prepared”

Moreno Valley College: College Level Indicators: Transfer “Intent To Complete” = attempted degree applicable credit math / English course.

Moreno Valley College: College Level Indicators: Awarded AA /AS “Intent To Complete” = attempted degree applicable credit math / English course.

Moreno Valley College: College Level Indicators: Became “Transfer Directed” “Intent To Complete” = attempted degree applicable credit math / English course. “Transfer Directed” means a student successfully completed at least one transfer-level Math and English course.

Moreno Valley College: College Level Indicators: Became “Transfer Prepared” “Intent To Complete” = attempted degree applicable credit math / English course. “Transfer Prepared” means student successfully completed 60 UC/CSU transferable units with a grade point average of at least 2.0 in those transferable courses.

Moreno Valley College: College Level Indicators: Earned Certificate (18+ units) “Intent To Complete” = attempted Advanced Occupational / Apprentice level Credit course.

Moreno Valley College: College Level Indicators: Percent of Students Who Earned at Least 30 Units Percentage of first-time students with intent to complete and within six years: earned at least 30 units while in the California Community College System

Moreno Valley College: College Level Indicators: Term to Term Persistence Rate Percentage of first-time students with: a minimum of six units earned in a Fall term, and returned and enrolled in the subsequent Fall term anywhere in the system.

Moreno Valley College: College Level Indicators: Annual Successful Course Completion Rate for Credit Vocational Courses Percentage of student enrollments: in credit-based classes and courses coded as “Clearly Occupational” or higher where students earned an A, B, C or CR grade

Moreno Valley College: College Level Indicators: Annual Successful Course Completion Rate for Credit Basic Skills Courses Percentage of student enrollments: in credit-based classes and courses coded as “Basic Skills” where students earned an A, B, C or CR grade

Moreno Valley College: College Level Indicators: Improvement Rates for ESL Courses Percentage of students who: successfully completed the initial basic skills course and successfully completed a higher-level course in the same discipline within three academic years

ESL Explanation: Background ESL Improvement has been the only inconsistent ARCC indicator ESL Improvement has been the only inconsistent ARCC indicator Only ESL enrollments that are below college or transfer are included Only ESL enrollments that are two or more levels below college or transfer are included Includes ESL 51, 52, any from the 70 through 99 only Includes ESL 51, 52, any from the 70 through 99 only ESL-54 and ESL-55 are college level and ESL-53 is only one level below, so they are not examined. ESL-54 and ESL-55 are college level and ESL-53 is only one level below, so they are not examined.

ESL Explanation: ESL Courses and Prior to College Levels, fall 2008

ESL Explanation: ESL Courses and Inclusion in ARCC

ESL Explanation: Pathways through ESL No clear pathway for ESL Courses No clear pathway for ESL Courses No prerequisites to clearly indicate a sequence No prerequisites to clearly indicate a sequence ESL 51, 52, and 53 constitute a clear sequence ESL 51, 52, and 53 constitute a clear sequence Prerequisites indicate the sequence Prerequisites indicate the sequence When ESL are excluded, the Improvement Rates for clear pathway courses stabilizes When ESL are excluded, the Improvement Rates for clear pathway courses stabilizes

ESL Explanation: Revised ESL Improvement Rates The overall ARCC ESL Improvement Rates are influenced by the ESL Improvement Rate.

Change the course coding of ESL 70 – 99 Change the course coding of ESL 70 – 99 Conduct independent review every year to confirm the nature of any fluctuations Conduct independent review every year to confirm the nature of any fluctuations Dependent on the cooperation of the California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office Dependent on the cooperation of the California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office ESL Explanation: Implications

Moreno Valley College: College Level Indicators: Improvement Rates for Credit Basic Skills Courses Percentage of students who: successfully completed the initial basic skills course and successfully completed a higher-level course in the same discipline within three academic years

Determine which indicators need improvement Determine which indicators need improvement Understand how the indicators are defined Understand how the indicators are defined Develop targeted treatments that are hypothesized to positively affect these indicators Develop targeted treatments that are hypothesized to positively affect these indicators Suggestions for moving forward…

End of slide show Accountability Reporting for the Community Colleges, 2010 Report: Moreno Valley College Calculation David Torres, Dean, Institutional Research