Naba K Mondal Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Mumbai 400005, India.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Oscillation formalism
Advertisements

Recent Results from Super-Kamiokande on Atmospheric Neutrino Measurements Choji Saji ICRR,Univ. of Tokyo for the Super-Kamiokande collaboration ICHEP 2004,
MINOS+ Starts April 2013 for three years April
Precision Neutrino Oscillation Measurements & the Neutrino Factory Scoping Study for a Future Accelerator Neutrino Complex – Discussion Meeting Steve Geer,
Recent Discoveries in Neutrino Physics: Understanding Neutrino Oscillations 2-3 neutrino detectors with variable baseline 1500 ft nuclear reactor Determining.
A long-baseline experiment with the IHEP neutrino beam Y. Efremenko detector Presented by.
Near detectors and systematics IDS-NF plenary meeting at TIFR, Mumbai October 13, 2009 Walter Winter Universität Würzburg TexPoint fonts used in EMF: AAAAA.
G. Sullivan - Princeton - Mar 2002 What Have We Learned from Super-K? –Before Super-K –SK-I ( ) Atmospheric Solar –SNO & SK-I Active solar –SK.
Sinergia strategy meeting of Swiss neutrino groups Mark A. Rayner – Université de Genève 10 th July 2014, Bern Hyper-Kamiokande 1 – 2 km detector Hyper-Kamiokande.
An accelerator beam of muon neutrinos is manufactured at the Fermi Laboratory in Illinois, USA. The neutrino beam spectrum is sampled by two detectors:
November 19, 2005 Sergio Palomares-Ruiz Physics of Atmospheric Neutrinos: Perspectives for the Future Topical Workshop on Physics at Henderson DUSEL Fort.
A Search for Point Sources of High Energy Neutrinos with AMANDA-B10 Scott Young, for the AMANDA collaboration UC-Irvine PhD Thesis:
Reactor & Accelerator Thanks to Bob McKeown for many of the slides.
First Observations of Separated Atmospheric  and  Events in the MINOS Detector. A. S. T. Blake* (for the MINOS collaboration) *Cavendish Laboratory,
The MINOS Experiment Andy Blake Cambridge University.
Atmospheric Neutrino Anomaly
INDIA-BASED NEUTRINO OBSERVATORY (INO) STATUS REPORT Naba K Mondal Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Mumbai, India NUFACT Scoping Study Meeting at.
STATUS OF INDIA-BASED NEUTRINO OBSERVATORY (INO) Naba K Mondal Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Mumbai, India.
July 19, 2003 HEP03, Aachen P. Shanahan MINOS Collaboration 1 STATUS of the MINOS Experiment Argonne Athens Brookhaven Caltech Cambridge Campinas Dubna.
Atmospheric Neutrinos
A long baseline neutrino oscillation search - MINOS Reinhard Schwienhorst School of Physics and Astronomy University of Minnesota.
Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations in Soudan 2
I have made the second half of the poster, first half which is made by tarak will have neutrino information. A patch between the two, telling why we do.
PINGU – An IceCube extension for low-energy neutrinos Uli Katz on behalf of the PINGU Collaboration European Strategy for Neutrino Oscillation.
Caren Hagner CSTS Saclay Present And Near Future of θ 13 & CPV in Neutrino Experiments Caren Hagner Universität Hamburg Neutrino Mixing and.
Resolving neutrino parameter degeneracy 3rd International Workshop on a Far Detector in Korea for the J-PARC Neutrino Beam Sep. 30 and Oct , Univ.
The Earth Matter Effect in the T2KK Experiment Ken-ichi Senda Grad. Univ. for Adv. Studies.
2 Atmospheric Neutrinos Atmospheric neutrino detector at Kolar Gold Field –1965.
Anselmo Cervera Villanueva IFIC (Universidad de Valencia & CSIC) EURODET meeting 7 December 2007 Neutrino Networking activities.
Dec. 13, 2001Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Neutrino and Anti-Neutrino Cross Sections and CP Phase Measurement Yoshihisa OBAYASHI (KEK-IPNS) NuInt01,
Karsten M. Heeger US Reactor  13 Meeting, March 15, 2004 Comparison of Reactor Sites and  13 Experiments Karsten Heeger LBNL.
The NOvA Experiment Ji Liu On behalf of the NOvA collaboration College of William and Mary APS April Meeting April 1, 2012.
Studies on PINGU’s Sensitivity to the Neutrino mass Hierarchy P. Berghaus, H.P. Bretz, A. Groß, A. Kappes, J. Leute, S. Odrowski, E. Resconi, R. Shanidze.
Counting Electrons to Measure the Neutrino Mass Hierarchy J. Brunner 17/04/2013 APC.
If  13 is large, then what ? Hisakazu Minakata Tokyo Metropolitan University.
IceCube Galactic Halo Analysis Carsten Rott Jan-Patrick Huelss CCAPP Mini Workshop Columbus OH August 6, m 2450 m August 6, 20091CCAPP DM Miniworkshop.
Search for Electron Neutrino Appearance in MINOS Mhair Orchanian California Institute of Technology On behalf of the MINOS Collaboration DPF 2011 Meeting.
Mass Hierarchy Study with MINOS Far Detector Atmospheric Neutrinos Xinjie Qiu 1, Andy Blake 2, Luke A. Corwin 3, Alec Habig 4, Stuart Mufso 3, Stan Wojcicki.
NuFact02, July 2002, London Takaaki Kajita, ICRR, U.Tokyo For the K2K collab. and JHF-Kamioka WG.
Daya Bay Reactor Neutrino Experiment On behalf of the DayaBay collaboration Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Joseph ykHor YuenKeung,
1 Luca Stanco, INFN-Padova (for the OPERA collaboration) Search for sterile neutrinos at Long-BL The present scenario and the “sterile” issue at 1 eV mass.
Michel Gonin – Ecole Polytechnique – France : SUPER NOVA SN1987A Super-Kamiokande Introduction neutrino oscillations mixing matrices Introduction.
2 July 2002 S. Kahn BNL Homestake Long Baseline1 A Super-Neutrino Beam from BNL to Homestake Steve Kahn For the BNL-Homestake Collaboration Presented at.
The Proposed India-based Neutrino Observatory (INO) Naba K Mondal Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Indian meet on linear collider Indore, April,
ORCA from ANTARES modules J. Brunner 06/10/2012. Detector Hexagonal layout a la IceCube 37 lines, distance 20m 25 ANTARES storeys  z = 4.5m Equipped.
1 Study of physics impacts of putting a far detector in Korea with GLoBES - work in progress - Eun-Ju Jeon Seoul National University Nov. 18, 2005 International.
Naba K Mondal TIFR, Mumbai ICAL ( conceptual) INO Peak at Bodi West Hills Prototype ICAL at VECC 2mX2m RPC Test Stand at TIFR ASIC for RPC designed at.
September 10, 2002M. Fechner1 Energy reconstruction in quasi elastic events unfolding physics and detector effects M. Fechner, Ecole Normale Supérieure.
A New Upper Limit for the Tau-Neutrino Magnetic Moment Reinhard Schwienhorst      ee ee
Low energy option for KM3NeT Phase 1? KM3NeT-ORCA (Oscillation Research with Cosmics in the Abyss) P. Coyle, Erlangen 23 June 2012.
MIND Systematic Errors EuroNu Meeting, RAL 18 January 2010 Paul Soler.
Hiroyuki Sekiya ICHEP2012 Jul 5 The Hyper-Kamiokande Experiment -Neutrino Physics Potentials- ICHEP2012 July Hiroyuki Sekiya ICRR,
Observation Gamma rays from neutral current quasi-elastic in the T2K experiment Huang Kunxian for half of T2K collaboration Mar. 24, Univ.
T2K Experiment Results & Prospects Alfons Weber University of Oxford & STFC/RAL For the T2K Collaboration.
Neutrino oscillation & INO Angles (mixing) are very much different than in quark sector For neutrinos weak Eigen states may be different from mass eigen.
A model for large non-standard interactions of neutrinos leading to the LMA-dark solution Yasaman Farzan IPM, Tehran.
New Results from MINOS Matthew Strait University of Minnesota for the MINOS collaboration Phenomenology 2010 Symposium 11 May 2010.
1. Outline 2 Introduction Status of Experiment Detector Magnet Trigger Electronics Simulation Laboratory site development Conclusions 4 th November 2014.
Neutrino Oscillations and T2K
India-Based Neutrino Observatory (INO)
India-Based Neutrino Observatory (INO)
Neutrino factory near detector simulation
A LARGE ATMOSPHERIC NEUTRINO DETECTOR USING RESISTIVE PLATE CHAMBERS
KM3NeT Collaboration meeting, Marseille, January 2013
Neutrino Oscillation Physics with a Neutrino Factory
Neutrino oscillations with the T2K experiment
SOLAR ATMOSPHERE NEUTRINOS
T2KK Sensitivity of Resolving q23 Octant Degeneracy
Toward realistic evaluation of the T2KK physics potential
Oscillation Physics at INO
Presentation transcript:

Naba K Mondal Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Mumbai , India

 Atmospheric neutrino experiments study neutrinos produced by cosmic ray interactions in the atmosphere.  First observed at Kolar Gold Fields (KGF), India and East Rand Proprietary Mine, South Africa in  During 1980s, massive underground detectors to search for proton decay studied atmospheric neutrinos as the major source of background.  In 1988, Kamiokande Experiment observed the deficit of atmospheric muon neutrinos compared to Monte Carlo prediction. Similar results were reported by the IMB experiment followed by Soudan-2 & MACRO.  In mid 1990s, Kamiokande data showed that the deficit of  - like events depended on zenith angle.  In 1998, Super-K-experiment concluded that atmospheric neutrino data gave evidence for  neutrino oscillation.  Atmospheric neutrino experiments have been contributing substantially in our understanding of neutrino masses and mixing angles.

Detection of atmospheric neutrino at Kolar Gold Field in 1965 The announcement of the discovery of neutrino oscillation at Neutrino 98 by T. Kajita

Honda et al, ICRC 2013

 Neutrino mass ordering – Mass Hierarchy  Is  23 maximal ? - Octant ambiguity.  CP violation in neutrino sector.  Non Standard interactions.  Violation of fundamental symmetries. Study of atmospheric neutrinos have enormous potential to answer these questions to answer these questions

PINGU HYPER-K All large long baseline neutrino detectors located underground will also contribute to atmospheric neutrino physics

r :   e flux ratio P 2 : e -->  transition probability R 2, I 2 : Oscillation amplitudes for CP even and CP odd terms For antineutrinos : P 2, R 2, I 2 obtained by replacing matter potential V by -V Solar term Interference term   resonance term   resonance term

Plot equal probabilities of oscillation for energies and angles.

Assuming  m 2 21 = 0

INO

15 INO site is located 115 km west of the temple city Madurai in the Theni district of Tamil Nadu close to the border the between Tamil Nadu & Kerala. Madurai has an international airport.

Contact us: ’ N, ’ E Pottipuram Village Theni District Tamil Nadu State

17 INO Facilities at Pottipuram Underground complex 50 kton ICAL Neutrino Detector

19

Simulation Framework NUANCE GEANT Neutrino Event Generation ν a + X -> A + B +... Generates particles that result from a random interaction of a neutrino with matter using theoretical models. Output: i) Reaction Channel ii) Vertex Information Iii) Energy & Momentum of all Particles Event Simulation A + B +... through RPCs + Mag.Field Simulate propagation of particles through the detector (RPCs + Magnetic Field) Output: i) x,y,z,t of the particles at their interaction point in detector ii) Energy deposited iii) Momentum information Event Digitisation (x,y,z,t) of A + B noise + detector efficiency Add detector efficiency and noise to the hits Output: i) Digitised output of the previous stage (simulation) Event Reconstruction (E,p) of ν + X = (E,p) of A + B +... Fit the tracks of A + B +... to get their energy and momentum. Output: i) Energy & Momentum of the initial neutrino 20

22

Thakore et al, INO collaboration, JHEP 1305, 058 (2013), arXiv:

24 Thakore et al, INO collaboration, JHEP 1305, 058 (2013)arXiv:

25 Mass hierarchy sensitivity with INO-ICAL data only using fixed Parameters - Sin 2 2    and sin 2  23 = 0.5. A. Ghosh et. al. INO collaboration, JHEP, 1304, 009 (2013), arXiv:

26 A combined analysis of all experiments including as well , T2K, Double Chooz, RENO and Daya Bay experiments A. Ghosh et. al. INO collaboration, JHEP, 1304, 009 (2013), arXiv:

27 Sin 2    Sin 2    Fully marginalised A. Ghosh et. al. INO collaboration, JHEP, 1304, 009 (2013), arXiv:

 Pre-project activities started with an initial grant of ~ 10 Million dollar  Site infrastructure development  Development of INO centre at Madurai Inter-Institutional Centre for High Energy Physics ( IICHEP) Inter-Institutional Centre for High Energy Physics ( IICHEP)  Construction of an engineering prototype module  Detector R & D is now complete.  DPR for Detector & DAQ system is ready  Will start industrial production of RPCs soon. Full project approved by Indian Atomic Energy Commission. Waiting for clearance from PM’s cabinet committee to start construction.

PINGU

 Targeting 40 additional strings of Digital Optical Modules each, deployed in the DeepCore volume m string spacing (cf. 125 m for IceCube, 73 m for DeepCore) Precise geometry under study Systematics will be better understood with additional in situ calibration devices  Cost and technical issues well  understood from IceCube experience. Start-up costs of $8M – $12M. ~$1.25M per string.

A preliminary event selection based on DeepCore analysis. 23,000 muon neutrinos per 23,000 muon neutrinos per year after oscillations. year after oscillations. Oscillation signature is the Oscillation signature is the disappearance of 12,000 disappearance of 12,000 events per year. events per year. Sufficient to measure neutrino mass hierarchy via matter effects in the 5-20 GeV range Without direct ν  – ν  ̅ Discrimination. Exploit asymmetries in Exploit asymmetries in cross sections and kinematics. cross sections and kinematics.

Method outlined in Akhmedov, Razzaque, Smirnov- arXiv: Bin, sum and subtract one hierarchy from the other i = cos (zenith) J = Energy V eff = Effective Volume It works because:

Idealized case with no Background, perfect flavor ID, 100% signal efficiency Different assumed resolutions Smear the signature but do not eliminate it.

Sensitivity depends on final detector scope, assumed analysis efficiency, detector resolution, etc. Caveat: not all systematics Caveat: not all systematics included in each study included in each study Even with pessimistic assumptions, 3 σ determination expected (median) with 2 years’ data. 5 σ in 2-4 more years 5 σ in 2-4 more years Working now to refine details and extend systematic studies arXiv:

HYPER-K

 The difference is larger for larger Sin 2   because resonance term is proportional to Sin 2    Can be used to study mass hierarchy sensitivity

 Thickness of the band corresponds to uncertainty induced from  CP.  Weakest sensitivity overall in the tail of the first octant. Normal Hierarchy

 Thickness of the band corresponds to the uncertainty from  CP  Best value of  CP = 40 degrees.  Worst value of  CP = 140 (260) degrees, for 1st (2nd ) octant   is fixed : sin 2 2   = 0.098

 Thickness of lines is from uncertainty in  23  Sensitivity to CP-violation is limited under both hierarchy assumptions.  The addition of this information to the beam data does not make much of an impact.   is fixed : sin 2 2   = 0.099

 Hyper-K has been recommended by Japanese HEP community and CR community.  Submitted the proposal to the Science Council of Japan in March  Hyper-K (far detector) construction and operation cost.  J-PARC operation w/ ~1MW and a near detector construction in the same package.  About 200 projects will be pre-selected. 25~30 projects will be selected as important large projects → ”SCJ Mater plan of large scale research projects”  This results will be important inputs to “Roadmap of large scale research projects” to be released by MEXT in  Proposal of Hyper-K R&D (photo-sensor, prototypical detector etc.) has been approved in July 2013 ($1.7M/5year, 2013~2017).

 Atmospheric neutrino experiments have contributed substantially in our understanding of neutrino masses and mixing angles.  New set of Atmospheric Neutrino Experiments going to play important role in determining the neutrino mass ordering.  Need to combine results from Accelerator/ reactor based experiments for complete understanding of neutrino oscillation parameters.

 Sandhya Choubey, Anushree Ghosh, Tarak Thakore & Amol Dighe – INO Collaboration  Dong Cowen, Tyce DeYoung, Ken Clark – PINGU collaboration  Takaaki Kajita, Masato Shiozawa – Hyper-K Collaboration Thank You