National Mammography Database

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Breast Cancer Screening What’s New to Know? The Issue of Breast Density Catherine Babcook MD Partner, Mountain Medical Physician Specialists Medical Director.
Advertisements

1 FDA Radiological Devices Panel Meeting March 4-5, 2008 Mammography CAD Devices Robert C. Smith, MD, JD Medical Officer (Radiologist) Division of Reproductive,
Breast MR Imaging Workshop th September 2014 High-Risk Screening Evidence-based Clinical Indications for Breast MRI Dr. Muhamad Zabidi Ahmad, AMDI.
ACR and SBI Statement Margarita Zuley, MD Associate Professor, Radiology Medical Director, Breast Imaging University of Pittsburgh.
Dose Index Registry CT Stakeholders Meeting November 30, 2010 Richard L. Morin, PhD, FACR Mayo Clinic Florida Chair, DIR Subcommittee.
Practice Quality Improvement (PQI) Summit Harvey L. Neiman, M.D., FACR Executive Director August 18, 2007.
RADPEER™ Hani Abujudeh MD, MBA, FSIR Associate Professor of Radiology
LIFTING ALL BOATS: Quality Improvement as a Means to Reducing Racial Health Disparities Anne Marie Murphy, PhD 1, Danielle Dupuy, MPH 2, Garth Rauscher,
SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY PROGRAM Screening Mammography in 2014: Still Controversial? Dr. Christine Wilson MEDICAL DIRECTOR, SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY.
Clinical Solutions for Lung Cancer Screening (LCS)
February 13, 1997CWU B.Kovalerchuk1 DESIGN OF CONSISTENT SYSTEM FOR RADIOLOGISTS TO SUPPORT BREAST CANCER DIAGNOSIS.
Role of MRI in Breast Cancer Angela Kong Princess Margaret Hospital.
Breast Cancer 101 Barbara Lee Bass, MD, FACS Professor of Surgery
Breast Imaging Made Brief and Simple
ADVANCED IMAGING IS OVERUSED PRIOR TO REFERRAL TO A MUSCULOSKELETAL ONCOLOGIST: A PROSPECTIVE, MULTI-CENTER INVESTIGATION Benjamin J. Miller, MD, MS on.
Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Cancer Incidence, Survival and Treatment Linda C. Harlan, PhD, MPH National Cancer Institute Division of Cancer Control and.
Uncovering Age-Specific Invasive and DCIS Breast Cancer Rules Using Inductive Logic Programming Houssam Nassif, David Page, Mehmet Ayvaci, Jude Shavlik,
ACRIN Protocol 6666 ACRIN Protocol 6666 Screening Breast Ultrasound in High-Risk Women Made possible by grants from the Avon Foundation and National Cancer.
Outcomes of screening mammography among women aged 40 to 43 Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences Toronto, Canada (2006)
Prevention and Early Detection of Breast Cancer: Weighing the Risks and Benefits Kathy J. Helzlsouer, M.D., M.H.S. Prevention and Research Center, Women’s.
DUAL ENERGY CONTRAST ENHANCED SPECTRAL MAMMOGRAM : AS A PROBLEM SOLVING TOOL IN EQUIVOCAL CASES Abstract ID IRIA-1121.
Imaging examinations of breasts
Introduction to Breast Imaging BREAST RAD LAB Directions: Please answer all the questions prior to interactive conference. 1.
CANCER INCIDENCE IN NEW JERSEY BY COUNTY, for the Comprehensive Cancer Control Plan County Needs Assessments August 2003 Prepared by: Cancer.
1 CAP Audio Conference on the CMS 2009 Physician Quality Reporting Initiative Jonathan Myles, MD, FCAP College of American Pathologists December 17, 2008.
CASEFINDING Debra W. Christie, MBA, RHIA, CTR, CCRP Director, Cancer Research & Data Center University of Mississippi Medical Center.
2014 Cancer Program Performance Outcomes. Introduction Saint Agnes Medical Center has proudly maintained a American College of Surgeons’ Commission on.
Edward A. Sickles, M.D. Clinical Diagnostic Mammography Benchmarks.
Improvement in Screening Radiologists’ Performance in an Organized Screening Program Nancy A. T. Wadden, MD, FRCPC Gregory Doyle, BSc, MBA Breast Screening.
Breast Cancer Breast Cancer DR/FATMA AL-THOUBAITY ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR SURGICAL CONSULTANT.
Targeting HER2 and Focusing on Patients With Gastric Cancer Jose Maria Vieitez, MD, PhD Assistant Professor of Oncology Department of Medical Oncology.
The OVA1 Test Improves the Preoperative Assessment of Ovarian Tumors Frederick Ueland, Chris Desimone, Leigh Seamon, Rachel Ware, Scott Goodrich, Iwona.
Understanding Factors That Affect Mammography Performance: Contribution of the BCSC Bonnie C. Yankaskas, PhD Professor of Radiology University of North.
Lung Cancer Case Presentation Presenter Date:. Educational Objectives.
FAVOR F actors A ssociated with V ariability O f R adiologists (2000 to present) Supported by grants from the National Cancer Institute (R01 CA ;
Measuring and Improving Radiologists’ Interpretative Performance on Screening Mammography Karla Kerlikowske, MD Diana Buist, PhD Patricia Carney, PhD Berta.
CE-1 IRESSA ® Clinical Efficacy Ronald B. Natale, MD Director Cedars Sinai Comprehensive Cancer Center Ronald B. Natale, MD Director Cedars Sinai Comprehensive.
Toward “Best Practices” in Radiology Reporting
Breast Cancer in the Women’s Health Initiative Trial of Estrogen Plus Progestin For the WHI Investigators Rowan T Chlebowski, MD., Ph.D.
American College of Radiology Imaging Network ACRIN 6664 ACRIN 6664 – Protocol Review The National CT Colonography Trial Name(s) of presenters.
BREAST CANCER: Half a million women later… Amy Miglani M.D September 3, 2004.
Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (BCSC): sponsored by the National Cancer Institute Cancer Screening Surveillance in Clinical Practice Tracy Onega,
Screening Mammography Benchmarks – Modified Angoff: Screening Performance and Guidelines for Practice  Robert D Rosenberg and Patricia Carney for Breast.
2015 Cancer Program Performance Outcomes. Introduction Saint Agnes Medical Center has proudly maintained a American College of Surgeons’ Commission on.
Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (BCSC): A Research Infrastructure sponsored by the National Cancer Institute Breast Cancer Risk Models William Barlow,
Treatment Patterns in the Management of Prostate Cancer: Lessons Learned from the Florida Cancer Data System Vonetta L. Williams, PhD, MPH, CTR June 23,
Practice Quality Improvement - The Role of Subspecialty Societies.
1 OncoCollect ™ Collection of Real World Data in Oncology Dr Ramesh B V Nimmagadda Director, Medical Oncology Apollo Speciality Cancer hospital, Chennai.
Mammography Regulations and Standards in the U.S.: The Basics of the Mammography Quality Standards Act Helen J. Barr, MD Director, Division of Mammography.
Breast Density: Black, White and Shades of Gray Jen Rusiecki, MD VA Pittsburgh Health System Women’s Health Fellow AMWA Hot Topic 2016.
Breast Cancer 1. Leukemia & Lymphoma New diagnoses each year in the US: 112, 610 Adults 5,720 Children 43,340 died of leukemia or lymphoma in
Breast Thermography Len Saputo, MD Maurice Bales Merritt Hospital Tumor Board Presentation August 27, 2014.
Linking Electronic Health Records Across Institutions to Understand Why Women Seek Care at Multiple Sites for Breast Cancer Caroline A. Thompson, PhD,
Iraj Khalkhali M.D., F.A.C.R., F.A.C.N.M.
Assessing Quality of Pathology Reporting: The Case of Tongue Cancer Lihua Liu 1, PhD Wesley Y. Naritoku 2, MD, PhD Juanjuan Zhang 1, MS Lenard Berglund.
TMIST A Breast Cancer Screening Trial
Number of women referred for further investigation in relation to all imaged women – recall rate
Quality of Electronic Emergency Department Data: How Good Are They?
Using Data to Drive Care Team Transformation
Breast Cancer Screening/Imaging
Coordination (benign lesions)
Integration of Positron Emission Mammography (PEM)
Maintenance of Certification
The American College of Radiology Mammography Accreditation
Lung Cancer Screening:
Semiannual Report, March 2015
Presenter: Wen-Ching Lan
Stamatia Destounis, MD, FACR, FSBI, FAIUM
Pulmonary nodules discovered on CT scan of the chest
Hospitalization rates of children diagnosed with a single CCC and children diagnosed with more than 1 CCC. Hospitalization rates were adjusted for race,
Presentation transcript:

National Mammography Database Margarita Zuley, MD Associate Professor of Radiology University of Pittsburgh Medical Director Breast Imaging Magee Womens Hosp of UPMC

Credit and thanks to Mythreyi Bhargavan Chatfield, PhD Director, Data Registries for sample report slides

NMD American College of Radiology (ACR) Initiative Part of the NRDR ( National Radiology Data Registry) Collects MQSA required data Provides comparative information back to participating sites every 6 months Allows sites to do national and regional benchmarking

nrdr.acr.org

What is NRDR? Information system Provides objective measures of practice processes and outcomes Designed by radiologists Includes National Oncologic PET Registry (NOPR) CT Colonography Registry General Radiology Improvement Database (GRID) IV Contrast Extravasation Registry (ICE) National Mammography Database Registry Quality Improvement Registry for CT scans in Children (QuIRCC) Dose Index Registry

Benchmark Data National benchmark data provided by Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (BCSC) are used for comparisons with facility data in the semi-annual reports provided to NMD participants Also uses NMD results of all participating facilities as benchmarks Facilities receive facility level and provider level data

Benefits ABR has qualified the NMD for practice quality improvement (PQI) for ABR Maintenance of Certification (MOC) Program 3 PQI projects are required every 10 years for all radiologists who have not been given a lifetime certificate by the ABR

Joining Any radiology facility can participate A participation agreement and a business associate’s agreement between ACR and the facility must be signed first

Upload from facility to NMD Obtained through input of data elements into facility RIS/ HIS The RIS/HIS vendor must support the NMD platform (HL-7) fields Vendor software must be approved by NMD Facility requests upgrade to NMD version Assign one person to upload data Upload is one click

NMD-Certified Software Partners                                                                                                                                                                                             10 10

Data Security PHI, NPI is uploaded Encryption of all incoming traffic to NRDR Firewalls to secure data Has third party safety monitoring Data on individual patients stay property of facility Aggregate, anonomyzed data from registry are property of ACR

Data Elements Patient Identifiers Race, ethnicity Gender Patient name, SSN, facility MRN, zip code Race, ethnicity Gender LMP, height, weight Family and personal h/o breast cancer Biopsy and surgical history

Data Elements Mmg date Radiologist NPI number Reason for exam Clinical symptoms Prior mmg date, was it compared at read Breast density

Data Elements BI-RADS category (7 point) Recommendations Mmg only Combined assessment Recommendations Classification of most significant finding S/F or digital Use of CAD or double read

Data Elements Biopsy results Modality used Biopsy result ( benign, HR, malignant) If cancer Type ( invasive or DCIS) Size Nodal status Stage at diagnosis

Goals PPV1 5-10% PPV2 25-40% Tumors found- stage 0 or 1 >50% Tumors found- minimal >30% (1cm or less invasive or DCIS) Node positive rate <25% From Linver et al AJR;1995;165:19-25

Goals CDR (Ca/1000) 2-10 Recall rate 10% or less Sensitivity >85% Prevalent 6-10 Incident 2-4 Recall rate 10% or less Sensitivity >85% Specificity >90% From Linver et al AJR;1995;165:19-25

SAMPLE FACILITY REPORT 18 18

Data Presented Initial upload can be last 6 months or year Can elect to upload prior data if you like Initial older data can be incomplete First report back will only give data results that you upload Will get 2 reports going forward, data with at least 1 year follow up and preliminary data that does not yet have 1 year follow up

SAMPLE PHYSICIAN REPORT 32 32

Summary NMD will help with MQSA audit NMD will help with required PQI NMD provides a feedback mechanism for radiologists and facilities to see if their practice can be improved