Treatment Plans and Administrative Case Reviews In a Nutshell.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TREATMENT PLAN REQUIREMENTS
Advertisements

1 Strategies for addressing challenges around Termination of Parental Rights. Presenters: Bill Stanton, Consultant, ICF Consulting Mary Coogan, Esq. Advocates.
Educational Stability for Children Placed in Resource Homes.
Overview of Child Protection Process Presented to: Task Force on Child Protection August 3, 2007 Bill Navas Office of Attorney General 13 th Judicial Circuit.
 Federal Dollars for Assurances Which Protect Children Who are in Foster Care.
Reevaluation Exceptional Children Division 1. Reevaluation NC Policies , , and
Reinstatement of Parental Rights: The Oklahoma Experience Presented by: Judge Doris Fransein Richard, Ro’derick, and Richard Jr. Hampton Kimberly Lynn.
117_PAT_CM_ Putting It All Together During this review course, you will apply the knowledge, skills, and abilities learned during your training.
Subsidized Guardianship Permanency Initiative. SG Introduction Focuses on improving permanency outcomes for children in out-of-home care through a comprehensive.
Education Outcome Measures for Courts Child Welfare Agency’s Perspective on the Need for Education Outcome Measures Kathleen McNaught ABA Center on Children.
Yes No Is the student 18 years old or older? ? Surrogate Parent Decision-Making Flowchart.
JUDY NORD STAFF ATTORNEY, STATE COURT ADMINISTRATION AND MANAGER, CHILDREN’S JUSTICE INITIATIVE Permanency Timeline.
Dependency Court – A Team Approach Presen Presented by: Judge Brantley S. Clark and Carol A. Dunaway, M.S. 1.
Child Welfare Services Family centered services to achieve well- being through ensuring self-sufficiency, support, safety, and permanence. Dual tracks-
PERMANENCY PLANNING. Permanency Planning  How is it defined?  What does it mean for parents? For children?
Return to Parent (Reunification) AdoptionPLC Fit and Willing Relative APPLA
Minnesota and Wisconsin CHIPS processes
Bethanie Barber Assistant Guardian ad Litem Program Coordinator Legal Aid Society of the O.C.B.A. 100 E. Robinson Street Orlando, Fl (407)
Services and Resources Available for Families & Children.
FTMs and Foster Care Policy Kenny A: FTMs are to be held within 3-9 days after a child comes into care Held to make any key decisions regarding placement.
Educational Champion Training MODULE 12: Mentoring Non-Minor Dependents and/or their Educational Champions © National Center for Youth Law, April 2013.
1 JUVENILE COURT PROTECTION CASES: THE PLAYERS POVERTY LAW Irene M. Opsahl.
Family/Whānau Caregiver Assessment and Approval Engaging with families to achieve better outcomes for children and young people.
1 Child Welfare Improvement Overview House Appropriations Subcommittee Kathryne O’Grady, Deputy Director Michigan Department of Human Services September.
SORT LEGAL UPDATE AND REVIEW
Memo Series Overview  Requirements  Frequently Asked Questions  Reports  Reporting to the Federal Government Did Wisconsin Make the target.
Wisconsin Indian Child Welfare Act November 5, 2009.
BRINGING COMMUNITY TOGETHER TO SUPPORT FAMILIES AND THEIR REUNIFICATION FAMILY REUNIFICATION TELECONFERENCE Strong Families Make a Strong Kansas.
Prepared by American Humane Association and the California Administrative Office of the Courts.
The Bridge to Independence Program & The Affordable Care Act Special Edition:
Maine DHHS: Putting Children First
What is the Interstate Compact? The Compact is a uniform law, adopted in all 50 states, the District of Columbia and the U.S. Virgin Islands, for the purpose.
Polk County Family Drug Court The Honorable Karla Fultz Todd Beveridge, M.S.W., M.S.
2012 Child Welfare Legislative Update Ann Ahlstrom
Foster Care Eligibility Determination Training System Century College MFWCAA Conference Title IV-E Workshop October 9, 2008 Deborah Trotter NW Region Paula.
1 The Special Education Assessment and IEP Process EDPOWER Teacher Institute 2013.
P RESENTED BY : T RACY S HEEHAN, C IRCUIT C OURT J UDGE & J ON J OHNSON, G ENERAL M AGISTRATE T HE T HIRTEENTH J UDICIAL C IRCUIT T AMPA, F LORIDA I N.
Ottawa Area Intermediate School District March, 2012 Adapted from Allegan Area ESA.
SURROGATE PARENT Information for Local District Administration Developed by Oakland Schools 2007.
1 McKinney-Vento and Special Education  Overview  Revocation of Consent  FAQ’s  Resources.
Concurrent Permanency Planning. Concurrent Permanency Planning (CPP) The process of working towards reunification while at the same time planning an alternative.
Maine DHHS, Office of Child and Family Services 1 Reinstatement of Parental Rights Policy Effective 2/1/2012.
Parent-Child Visitation: Could Practice Make a Difference? Washington State CASA Conference October 2015Washington State CASA Conference October 2015.
CT Speech Language Hearing Association March 26, 2010.
1 Transition: Part C to Part B Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia Spring/Summer 2007.
PL THE PREVENTING SEX TRAFFICKING AND STRENGTHENING FAMILIES ACT WASHINGTON STATE'S RESPONSE TO THE PREVENTING SEX TRAFFICKING AND STRENGTHENING.
1 Introduction to After 18 California Fostering Connections to Success What does After 18 mean to YOU? Version 2.0, November 28, 2012.
Intersection of Fostering Connections and McKinney-Vento What is the connection? How do we connect? Susie Greenfelder, Education Planner MI Department.
Understanding Applicable Laws in Child Protection and Child Welfare Cases: Presentation at TCAP Tribal Courts Conference – Minneapolis August 20, 2015.
SURROGATE PARENT Information for Local District Administration.
Kamala H. Shugar Assistant Attorney in Charge Oregon Department of Justice Child Advocacy Section.
Child In Need of Care (CINC) Code Guardians ad litem Nuts and Bolts October 2015.
11/28/12 1 CALIFORNIA FOSTERING CONNECTIONS TO SUCCESS ACT Version 2.0 Assembly Bill 12.
Permanency.
Case Planning Jeopardy! Tick-Tock The Main Course It’s the Law Practice Paradise GO TO FINAL OUTCOMES JEOPARDY!
Provincial Permanency Data Results for DFNAs and CFSAs Prepared by Service Analysis Branch May 27, 2009.
Child and Family Services Reviews Onsite Review Instrument.
Educational Surrogate Parents
Completing the circle: concurrent planning and the use of Family Finding, Blended perspective meetings, and family group decision making processes.
The Role of Education/Special Education Decision Makers
Hon. Karen R. Carroll February 12, 2018
The Current State of Foster Care in Virginia
Foster Care Updates and Issues
GOT PERMANENCE? DIVISION OF FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES G-FORCE MEETING
4 Domains Child Welfare, Juvenile Education and Mental/Health
Open Adoption Agreements
DIVISION E—HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES EXTENDERS
? Surrogate Parent Decision-Making Flowchart
Permanency Planning Modified Manual
Foster Care to 21 Carl E. Ayers, MSW
Presentation transcript:

Treatment Plans and Administrative Case Reviews In a Nutshell

Sources of Law Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1997 – Public Law Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1997 – Public Law U.S.C.A. 622, U.S.C.A. 622, C.F.R. § 1355, 1356, and C.F.R. § 1355, 1356, and 1357

Sources of Law Conn. Gen. Stat. § 17a-15 Conn. Gen. Stat. § 17a-15 DCF Policies DCF Policies –Chapter 36 – Treatment Planning –Chapter 24 – Administrative Case Reviews

Treatment Plans Case plans must be developed for every child under DCF supervision “within a reasonable period, to be established by the State, but in no event later than 60 days” from the date of removal. 45 C.F.R (g)(2); Conn.Gen.Stat. § 17a-15; DCF Policy No

Youth Who Turn 18 Under current state law, a youth who turns 18 but remains with DCF is entitled to a treatment plan and review of such plan in accordance with Conn. Gen. Stat. Sections 17a-11 and 17a-15. Under current state law, a youth who turns 18 but remains with DCF is entitled to a treatment plan and review of such plan in accordance with Conn. Gen. Stat. Sections 17a-11 and 17a-15.

Types of Plans Initial Individual Treatment Plan Initial Individual Treatment Plan Ongoing Treatment Plan Ongoing Treatment Plan Family Treatment Plan Family Treatment Plan

Purpose of Treatment Plans To provide a “written working agreement” between the child, family, caretaker service provider, and DCF case worker. To provide a “written working agreement” between the child, family, caretaker service provider, and DCF case worker. Document child and family needs, services to be provided, reasonable efforts to prevent removal, reasonable efforts to reunify, and progress. Document child and family needs, services to be provided, reasonable efforts to prevent removal, reasonable efforts to reunify, and progress. DCF Policy No

Timelines for Treatment Plans Treatment plan must be developed within 10 days of the treatment planning conference. Treatment plan must be developed within 10 days of the treatment planning conference. Treatment planning conference must occur within 30 days of the time the case is assigned to a treatment or voluntary services worker. Treatment planning conference must occur within 30 days of the time the case is assigned to a treatment or voluntary services worker. DCF Policy No ,

Administrative Case Reviews Each child must have a “case plan designed to achieve placement in a safe setting that is the least restrictive (most family like) and most appropriate setting available and in close proximity to the parents’ home, consistent with the best interest and special needs of the child... “ 42 U.S.C. § 675(5)(A).

Administrative Case Reviews “[D]iscussion focused on the permanency planning needs of the child” “[D]iscussion focused on the permanency planning needs of the child” Must be held for every child in the physical or legal custody of DCF. Must be held for every child in the physical or legal custody of DCF. DCF Policy No

Who Must Participate in ACRs? ACR Reviewer – Division of Quality Assurance ACR Reviewer – Division of Quality Assurance DCF Worker DCF Worker DCF Supervisor DCF Supervisor Any member of the RRG, community consultant, support-staff worker, and/or community service provider who has participated in any aspect of the case in the seven (7) months prior to the review Any member of the RRG, community consultant, support-staff worker, and/or community service provider who has participated in any aspect of the case in the seven (7) months prior to the review DCF Policy No

Who Must be Invited to ACRs Child’s parents (unless TPR’d) Child’s parents (unless TPR’d) Child, if age 12 or above Child, if age 12 or above Child’s foster parent or residential care social worker Child’s foster parent or residential care social worker Counsel for the parents Counsel for the parents Counsel for the children Counsel for the children Guardian ad litem for the children Guardian ad litem for the children DCF Policy No

May Others be Invited? Yes Yes –Any other professional involved with the case –Relatives of the child and parent if they are involved in the service provision and/or can contribute information important to case planning DCF Policy No

Timelines for ACRs Reviews must occur every 6 months. The first review must take place within 6 months of the date the child enters foster care. 42 U.S.C. § 675(5)(B).

Timelines for ACRs Must be completed no later than 30 days beyond the ongoing treatment plan date and in no event later than 6 months from the date of placement. DCF Policy No

Date of Entry Into Foster Care Date of entry into foster care = 60 days from the date of removal or the date of adjudication, whichever is first 42 U.S.C. § 675(5)(F); 45 C.F.R. § (a).