The PHENEX Experiment Results in 2006 and Future Plan S. Gunji* a, Y. Kishimoto a,H. Sakurai a, F. Tokanai a, M. Kanno a, Y. Ishikawa a, Hayashida b, N.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pulsars Multi-Accelerator Radiation model Peking University.
Advertisements

The best collimator configuration (material, number of collimators, collimator shape) is determined by minimizing the ratio R, where N ae is the number.
Evolving X-ray Polarimetry towards high energy and solar science Sergio Fabiani Università degli Studi di Roma “Tor Vergata” INAF / IAPS I A P S Istituto.
1 T. Mizuno et al. August 23, 2014 HEAPA Symposium on Future T. Mizuno (Hiroshima Univ.) on behalf of the SGD team and Polarization team.
Abstract We describe development of a Thomson X-ray polarimeter for a small satellite mission of the Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO). A laboratory.
IEEE_2007Nov.ppt Tsunefumi Mizuno 1 High Sensitivity Balloon-Borne Hard X-Ray/Soft Gamma-Ray Polarimeter PoGOLite November 2 nd, 2007 IEEE Nuclear Science.
The HEROES Balloon- borne Hard X-ray Telescope Colleen A. Wilson-Hodge, J. Gaskin, S. Christe, A. Shih, K. Kilaru, D.A. Swartz, A. F. Tennant, B. Ramsey.
X-ray polarisation: Science
A Muon Veto for the Ultra-Cold Neutron Asymmetry Experiment Vince Bagnulo LANL Symposium 2006 Outline ● UCNA Experiment ● Muon background ● Proposed Veto.
Main detector types Multi Pixel Photon Counter (MPPC) and Charge Coupled Devices (CCDs) How does it work? 1. Photon hits a pixel producing electron hole.
MACRO Atmospheric Neutrinos Barry Barish 5 May 00 1.Neutrino oscillations 2.WIMPs 3.Astrophysical point sources.
The ANTARES Neutrino Telescope Mieke Bouwhuis 27/03/2006.
PoGOandGlast_ ppt 1 Hard X-ray Polarimeter PoGO and GLAST mission ( 硬 X 線偏光観測 PoGO 計画と GLAST との連携 ) November 25, 2005, GLAST Science Workshop.
X-ray Polarimetry with gas proportional counters through rise-time K. Hayashida, T. Horikawa, Y. Nakashima, H. Tsunemi (Osaka University, Japan)
PAIR SPECTROMETER DEVELOPMENT IN HALL D PAWEL AMBROZEWICZ NC A&T OUTLINE : PS Goals PS Goals PrimEx Experience PrimEx Experience Design Details Design.
The Project of Space Experiment with Wide Field Gamma-Ray Telescope (“GAMMASCOPE”) Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics, Moscow State University.
ON THE EFFICIENCY OF A LIDAR-TYPE SINGLE-SIDED GAMMA-RAY TOMOGRAPHY APPROACH Tanja Dreischuh, Ljuan Gurdev, Dimitar Stoyanov, Christo Protochristov*, Orlin.
The Hard X-ray Modulation Telescope Mission
Problems associated with Earth based observation Optical band = stars and planets and nebulae. Infrared band = low energy heat sources. Radio band = dust.
Gamma-Ray Burst Polarimeter – GAP – aboard the Solar Powered Sail Mission Gamma-Ray Burst Polarimeter – GAP – aboard the Solar Powered Sail Mission Daisuke.
Annual Modulation Study of Dark Matter Using CsI(Tl) Crystals In KIMS Experiment J.H. Choi (Seoul National University) SUSY2012, Beijing.
X.-X. Li, H.-H. He, F.-R. Zhu, S.-Z. Chen on behalf of the ARGO-YBJ collaboration Institute of High Energy Physics Nanjing GRB Conference,Nanjing,
The Konus-FG experiment for gamma-ray burst studies in GAMMA-400 M.V. Ulanov, R.L. Aptekar, D.D. Frederiks, S.V. Golenetskii, E.P. Mazets, and V.D. Pal’shin.
1 Report on analysis of PoGO Beam Test at Spring-8 Tsunefumi Mizuno July 15, 2003.
Celestial Sphere. Earthly Sphere Latitude measures the number of degrees north or south of the equator. –DeKalb at 41° 55’ N Longitude measures degrees.
Hard X and Gamma-ray Polarization: the ultimate dimension (ESA Cosmic Vision ) or the Compton Scattering polarimetery challenges Ezio Caroli,
2000/11/101 X-ray polarimetry experiment with balloon borne gas proportional counters K.Hayashida, H. Tsunemi, T. Koike, T. Horikawa (Osaka University),
PoGO_G4_ ppt1 Study on Key Properties of PoGO by Geant4 Simulator January 28, 2004 Tsunefumi Mizuno History of changes:
We report the result of a beam test on a prototype of Astronomical hard X-ray/soft gamma-ray Polarimeter, PoGO (Polarized Gamma-ray Observer). PoGO is.
1 Report on analysis of PoGO Beam Test at Spring-8 Tsunefumi Mizuno July 15, 2003 July 21, 2003 revised August 1, 2003 updated.
Hard X-ray Polarimeter for Small Satellite Design, Feasibility Study, and Ground Experiments K. Hayashida (Osaka University), T. Mihara (RIKEN), S. Gunji,
Future Polarization Missions K. Hayashida (Osaka University)
X-ray Polarimetry with gas proportional counters through rise-time
High sensitivity all sky X-ray monitor and survey with MAXI Mihara, M. kohama, M. Suzuki (RIKEN), M. Matsuoka, S. Ueno, H. Tomida (JAXA), N. Kawai, J.
What does mean neighbours ? At the same epoch –simultaneous (transient phenomenae) –before (can affect the SIMBOL-X observing plan) –after (can complement.
Light bending scenario for accreting black holes in X-ray polarimetry 王 炎 南京大学天文系 2011 年 4 月 11 日 arXiv: M. Dovciak, F. Muleri, R. W. Goosmann,
BES-III Workshop Oct.2001,Beijing The BESIII Luminosity Monitor High Energy Physics Group Dept. of Modern Physics,USTC P.O.Box 4 Hefei,
Monte Carlo Simulation Study of In-orbit Background for the Soft Gamma-ray Detector onboard ASTRO-H Mizuno T., Hiragi K., Fukazawa Y., Umeki Y. (Hiroshima.
RCCN International Workshop sub-dominant oscillation effects in atmospheric neutrino experiments 9-11 December 2004, Kashiwa Japan Input data to the neutrino.
Polarization Characteristic of Multi-layer Mirror for Hard X-ray Observation of Astrophysical Objects T. Mizuno 1, J. Katsuta 2, H. Yoshida 1, H. Takahashi.
1 Possibility to obtain a polarized hydrogen molecular target Dmitriy Toporkov Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics Novosibirsk, Russia XIV International.
Monitor of All-sky X-ray Image MAXI mission on ISS Covering fraction of the sky 160 deg (long) ×1.5 deg (FWHM) × 2.FO.V. F.O.V. 2 % Scans 90 ~ 98% with.
N. Kawai 河合誠之, J. Kataoka ( 東京工業大学: Tokyo Institute of Technology) M. Matsuoka, S. Ueno, H. Tomida, (NASDA) H. Tsunemi, E. Miyata (Osaka Univ.) T. Mihara,
Search for GRBs Using ARGO Data in Shower Mode Guo Y.Q. For ARGO-YBJ Collaboration BeiJing 2008/09/26.
1. 2 Contents The “Tsubame” Project Description of Hard X-ray Polarimeter (HXCP) Results of X-ray Beam Test Summary.
In high energy astrophysics observations, it is crucial to reduce the background effectively to achieve a high sensitivity, for the source intensity is.
Exploring an evidence of supermassive black hole binaries in AGN with MAXI Naoki Isobe (RIKEN, ) and the MAXI
PoGO_G4_ ppt1 Study of optimized fast scintillator length for the astronomical hard X- ray/soft gamma-ray polarimeter PoGO November 1, 2004 Tsunefumi.
Deuteron polarimetry from 1.0 to 1.5 GeV/c Ed Stephenson, IUCF EDM discussion April 14, 2006 Based on work from: France:POMME B. Bonin et al. Nucl. Inst.
PoGO_G4_ ppt1 Study of BGO/Collimator Optimization for PoGO August 8th, 2005 Tsunefumi Mizuno, Hiroshima University/SLAC
PoGOLiteMC_ ppt 1 Updated MC Study of PoGOLite Trigger Rate/BG January 30, 2007 Tsunefumi Mizuno (Hiroshima Univ.)
ArgonneResult_ ppt1 Comparison of data and simulation of Argonne Beam Test July 10, 2004 Tsunefumi Mizuno
2001/9/111 X-ray polarimetry with balloon borne gas proportional counters K.Hayashida, H. Tsunemi, T. Horikawa, Y. Nakashima (Osaka University, Japan),
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy The Department.
A. Takada (Kyoto University)  Our motivation   -PIC and MeV gamma-ray telescope   -PIC applications  New type  -PIC.
ArgonneResult_ ppt1 Results of PoGO Argonne Beam Test PoGO Collaboration meeting at SLAC, February 7, 2004 Tsunefumi Mizuno
1 Report on analysis of PoGO Beam Test at Spring-8 Tsunefumi Mizuno July 15, 2003 July 21, 2003 revised.
O Tsunefumi Mizuno, Tuneyoshi Kamae, Jonny Ng, Hiroyasu Tajima (SLAC), John W. Mitchell, Robert Streitmatter (NASA GSFC), Richard C. Fernholz, Edward Groth.
1 Alushta 2016 CROSS SECTION OF THE 66 Zn(n,α) 63 Ni REACTION at CROSS SECTION OF THE 66 Zn(n, α) 63 Ni REACTION at E n = 4.0, 5.0 and 6.0 MeV I. Chuprakov,
X-ray Polarimeter - POLIX: Design and development status
Solar gamma-ray and neutron registration capabilities of the GRIS instrument onboard the International Space Station Yu. A. Trofimov, Yu. D. Kotov, V.
John Tomsick UC Berkeley/Space Sciences Lab for the COSI collaboration
Double Beta Decay of 48Ca with CaF2(Eu) - ELEGANT VI -
Sr-84 0n EC/b+ decay search with SrCl2 crystal
R. Bucˇık , K. Kudela and S. N. Kuznetsov
Monitor of All sky X-ray Image (MAXI)
Balloon observation of electrons and gamma rays with CALET prototype
Energy Response of the X-ray Imaging Spectrometer (XIS) on Suzaku
Design of A New Wide-dynamic-range Neutron Spectrometer for BNCT with Liquid Moderator and Absorber S. Tamaki1, I. Murata1 1. Division of Electrical,
First demonstration of portable Compton camera to visualize 223-Ra concentration for radionuclide therapy Kazuya Fujieda (Waseda University) J. Kataoka,
Presentation transcript:

The PHENEX Experiment Results in 2006 and Future Plan S. Gunji* a, Y. Kishimoto a,H. Sakurai a, F. Tokanai a, M. Kanno a, Y. Ishikawa a, Hayashida b, N. Anabuki b, H. Tsunemi b, T. Mihara c, M. Kohama c, M. Suzuki c, Y. Saito d, T. Yamagami d a Yamagata University, Kojirakawa Yamagata-city, Japan b Osaka University, 1-1 Yamadaoka Suita-city Osaka Japan c RIKEN, 2-1 Hirosawa Wako-city Japan d JAXA, Yoshinodai Sagamihara-city Japan S. Gunji* a, Y. Kishimoto a,H. Sakurai a, F. Tokanai a, M. Kanno a, Y. Ishikawa a, Hayashida b, N. Anabuki b, H. Tsunemi b, T. Mihara c, M. Kohama c, M. Suzuki c, Y. Saito d, T. Yamagami d a Yamagata University, Kojirakawa Yamagata-city, Japan b Osaka University, 1-1 Yamadaoka Suita-city Osaka Japan c RIKEN, 2-1 Hirosawa Wako-city Japan d JAXA, Yoshinodai Sagamihara-city Japan Polarimetry for High ENErgy X rays

Table of Contents I omit the Introduction. Probably it is not necessary. The Performance of PHENEX Polarimeter The abstract for the balloon-borne experiments in 2006 The results of the polarization observation for the Crab Nebula Future plan for PHENEX and the other Japanese polarimeters I omit the Introduction. Probably it is not necessary. The Performance of PHENEX Polarimeter The abstract for the balloon-borne experiments in 2006 The results of the polarization observation for the Crab Nebula Future plan for PHENEX and the other Japanese polarimeters

2. Unit Counter Side ViewTop View The PHENEX polarimeter consists of several unit counters which are Compton scattering type polarimeters. Detecting the scattering and absorbing positions, the two dimensional scattering angle is determined and the information on the polarization is acquired. The azimuthal scattering angle depends on the direction of the polarization for incident hard X rays. The opening angle is 4.8°(FWHM) and CsI(Tl) scintillators are surrounded by passive shields (Sn and Pb).

Performance of the unit counter Energy range40 keV ~ 200 keV Geometrical area of one unit counter ~11cm 2 Modulation factor53% (at 80 keV) Detection efficiency20% (at 80keV) Experimental setupModulation curve Irradiating the unit counter with polarized beam, we measured the modulation factor and the detection efficiency, respectively. Side view Front view

3. Prototype Flight Model Four unit counters and one monitor counter are installed and they are surrounded by active shields made of CsI(Tl). The monitor counter has the same collimator as unit counters and the line of the sight is co-aligned to that of unit counters. It is only used to monitor the flux from the Crab Nebula. The whole detector is installed in the pressure vessel. The pressure vessel rotates around the line of sight. It is useful to reduce spurious modulation. The mounted sun sensor is used to control the attitude and to monitor the line of the sight.

4. Balloon Flight At 5:13(JST) in Jun , the prototype PHENEX polarimeter was launched. It achieves level flight of 38km for about 6 hours. 38km ~6 hours height time launch Level flight The PHENEX polarimeter operates well on level flight and is recovered safely on the sea after the cutting. However, the attitude control system did not function correctly. As the sun sensor operates well, we can identify the line of the sight. Even so we achieve the observation of the Crab Nebula for about one hour and the background for about one hour.

5. Counting rates The counting rates for the monitor counter well correlate with the acceptance by the collimator. Monitor counterFour unit counters The counting rates for the unit counters well correlate with the acceptance by the collimator. The increase of 0.2Hz on the observation of the Crab Nebula is shown in this figure. The PHENEX detected the flux from the Crab Nebula with 8σ. 0.2Hz OFF source ON source

6.1 modulation curve for off-source observation North East South West Scattering angle The data were fitted with the following equation. Counts = A+B×sin(2θ+C) (A,B, and C are free parameters) The degree of modulation (B/A) was Considering the modulation factor (53%) of the PHENEX polarimeter, the degree of the polarization for the blank sky is only 3.3%. It indicates that the PHENEX polarimeter does not make much spurious modulation. Equatorial coordinates 6. Data analysis for polarization

6.2 for on-source observation 6.3 for the Crab Nebula Counts = A+B×sin(2θ+C) A=348, B=9.7, C=312 The degree of modulation was (=9.7/348). Counts = A+B×sin(2θ+C) A=65.9, B=14.4, C=323 The reduced   for the degrees of freedom 9 was 0.65.

Considering the effects that the line of the sight wandered, the degree and the direction of the polarization were calculated to be 33±26% and 154 ±43 degrees, respectively. Though we can not discuss the polarization in detail due to the large error, it is not inconsistent with the previous results for soft X rays (degree:20%, direction:155degrees). Moreover, we do not also exclude the results of INTEGRAL. Results in 2006 Y.Kishimoto etal IEEE Trans. on Nucl. Sci. 54, Issue 3, pp561 – 566(2007) S. Gunji etal. Proc. of SPIE. Vol.6686 pp18-1 〜 9 (2007) M. Kanno etal. IEEE Nuclear Symposium Proceedings (2007)

18’’ N S E W Soft X-ray map energy 偏光方向 Observation region optical162°Within 30’’ (without pulsar) optical123°Within 2’’ (without pulsar) 5.2keV152.6±4.0°Total region (without pulsar) 50 〜 1 6 0keV 154±43°Total region (with pulsar) 0.1 〜 1MeV 123±11°Total region? (without pulsar) Rotation axis of the pulsar is 124±0.1° By Dr. Weisskopf Standard scenario: For more inner region, the direction of the polarization is more co-aligned to the axis of the pulsar. Hard X-ray map By Dr. Makishima Conflict ?

7. Future Plan of PHENEX In Spring 2009, increasing the number of unit counters and reinforcing the shields, we plan to observe the Crab Nebula again and will measure the polarization at accuracy. Computer simulations ON source observation ON - OFF Assumption: the degree is more than 30%. 6 hours obsrevation. The degree and direction of the polarization can be determined to ±7% and ±14 degrees, respectively.

8.Other Japanese Projects GAP(GRB polarimeter) launched in 2010. POLARIS to be designed for small satellite Preflight Model It is very small (3.4kg) The polarization for 2 〜 3 GRB s will be measured at accuracy per year. We proceed basic studies with the help of Italian.

9. Conclusions To open the new window for hard X-ray astronomy, we developed the PHENEX polarimeter. It obtains the detection efficiency of 20% and the modulation factor of 53% at 80keV, respectively. Constructing the prototype flight model, we carried out balloon borne experiment in Jun Though the PHENEX polarimeter operated well, the attitude control system did not function correctly. Even so we succeeded in observing the Crab Nebula for about 1 hour and the blank sky for about 1 hour. We detected the flux from the Crab Nebula with 8σ by 4 unit counters. From the analysis, the degree and the direction of the polarization for the Crab Nebula were determined to be 33±26% and 154±43 degrees. Unfortunately, for the shortage of the observation time and the small detection area, the precise value can not be determined. We plan to carry out balloon-borne experiment with improved PHENEX polarimeter next year. It will determine the degree and the direction at accuracy. Moreover, we will launch the GAP in 2010 and are developing the POLARIS to observe a hundred stellar objects. To open the new window for hard X-ray astronomy, we developed the PHENEX polarimeter. It obtains the detection efficiency of 20% and the modulation factor of 53% at 80keV, respectively. Constructing the prototype flight model, we carried out balloon borne experiment in Jun Though the PHENEX polarimeter operated well, the attitude control system did not function correctly. Even so we succeeded in observing the Crab Nebula for about 1 hour and the blank sky for about 1 hour. We detected the flux from the Crab Nebula with 8σ by 4 unit counters. From the analysis, the degree and the direction of the polarization for the Crab Nebula were determined to be 33±26% and 154±43 degrees. Unfortunately, for the shortage of the observation time and the small detection area, the precise value can not be determined. We plan to carry out balloon-borne experiment with improved PHENEX polarimeter next year. It will determine the degree and the direction at accuracy. Moreover, we will launch the GAP in 2010 and are developing the POLARIS to observe a hundred stellar objects.

Rome was not built in a day neither PHENEX…. I hope the PHENEX measures the polarization at accuracy next year because the observation in hard X-ray region is the key. Grazie mille per suo attenzione My Italian makes sense?