Bill Atwood, SCIPP/UCSC, Jan., 2006 GLAST 1 A Time Differencing Technique for doing Blind Pulsar Searches Bill Atwood, Brian Baughman, Marcus Ziegler,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Aim: How do we find the zeros of polynomial functions?
Advertisements

ECE 8443 – Pattern Recognition EE 3512 – Signals: Continuous and Discrete Objectives: Response to a Sinusoidal Input Frequency Analysis of an RC Circuit.
RHESSI Investigations of the Neupert Effect in Solar Flares Brian R. Dennis AAS/SPD Meeting 6 June 2002.
ECE 8443 – Pattern Recognition ECE 8423 – Adaptive Signal Processing Objectives: The Linear Prediction Model The Autocorrelation Method Levinson and Durbin.
ECE 8443 – Pattern Recognition ECE 8423 – Adaptive Signal Processing Objectives: Periodograms Bartlett Windows Data Windowing Blackman-Tukey Resources:
GLAST Science Support CenterAugust 9, 2004 Progress on Pulsar Tools Development Masaharu Hirayama (GLAST SSC—GSFC/UMBC)
Sparse Array Geometry Mr. Ahmed El-makadema Professor A.K Brown.
The Fraction Geminga Alice K. Harding NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
1 Hough transform Some Fourier basics: –Nyquist frequency: 1/2 , with  the difference between time samples. If signal is bandwidth limited below Nyquist.
EGRET unidentified sources and gamma-ray pulsars I. CGRO mission and the instrument EGRET and it’s scientific goals II. Simple introduction of EGRET sources.
Bill Atwood, SCIPP/UCSC, May 8, 2006 GLAST 1 Partial validation of v9r3 - Bkg. Rej. Comparison 2000 sec. of backgrounds were run using v9r3 (heros: Tom.
Error Propagation. Uncertainty Uncertainty reflects the knowledge that a measured value is related to the mean. Probable error is the range from the mean.
GLAST LAT ProjectDC1 Closeout Workshop, Feb , Statistical Issues in Likelihood Analysis of LAT Data Seth Digel (HEPL/Stanford Univ.) & Guillaume.
HMI & Photospheric Flows 1.Review of methods to determine surface plasma flow; 2.Comparisons between methods; 3.Data requirements; 4.Necessary computational.
Marcus Ziegler SCIPP/UCSCDC2 Closeout Meeting 1 Pulsar Blind search in the DC2 data Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope Marcus Ziegler Bill Atwood Brian.
Blind search in EGRET data The bright pulsars Vele and Gminga can be found using a time difference window of only 3 hours. No scan in the frequency derivative.
Marcus Ziegler SCIPP/UCSCPulsar Meeting DC2 1 Fourier Transform with differences on Simulated and Real Pulsar Data UPDATE Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.
Marcus Ziegler SCIPP/UCSCPulsar VRVS Meeting 1 Light curves from pulsars found in a blind search in the DC2 data Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope Marcus.
Fourier Transforms on Simulated Pulsar Data Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.
GLAST LAT Project 1S. Ritz Discussion: To Where From Here? DC1 Closeout Meeting February 13, 2004 S. Ritz Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.
Fourier Transforms on Simulated Pulsar Data Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.
GLAST LAT ProjectDOE/NASA CD3-Critical Design Review, May 12, 2003 S. Ritz Document: LAT-PR Section 03 Science Requirements and Instrument Design.
Marcus Ziegler SCIPP/UCSCPulsar VRVS Meeting 1 Pulsar Blind search on DC2 data Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope Marcus Ziegler Bill Atwood Brian Baughman.
Fourier Transforms on Simulated Pulsar Data Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.
GLAST LAT ProjectI&T Meeting – Feb 12, 2003 W. Focke 1 EM timing analysis Warren Focke February 12, 2004.
Marcus ZieglerAPS April Meeting Gamma-Ray Pulsars in the GLAST Era Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope Marcus Ziegler Santa Cruz Institute for.
MACRO Atmospheric Neutrinos Barry Barish 5 May 00 1.Neutrino oscillations 2.WIMPs 3.Astrophysical point sources.
Poretti et al. (2005): –„Potential secondary target in the Anticenter dir.” –„a 2M Sun, slightly evolved object” –„High-res. spectroscopy: perturbed line.
Marcus Ziegler SCIPP/UCSCPulsar Meeting 1/17/ Fourier Transform with differences on Simulated and Real Pulsar Data Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.
Gamma-Ray Pulsars in the GLAST Era Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope Marcus Ziegler University of California Santa Cruz Bill Atwood Brian Baugmann Rober.
GLAST for Lunch 2004 Sept. 231 Fluctuation Analysis: Shadows of Invisible Sources What’s happening here?
GLAST LAT Project SLAC Jan. 12, 2004 Hammer-Aitoff map.
Correlation and spectral analysis Objective: –investigation of correlation structure of time series –identification of major harmonic components in time.
A short tutorial on LAT pulsar analysis tools Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope Massimiliano Razzano (Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, sec. Pisa)
Goals For This Class Quickly review of the main results from last class Convolution and Cross-correlation Discrete Fourier Analysis: Important Considerations.
Light Propagation in Gbit LANS John S. Abbott Engineering Associate -- Mathematics Corning Incorporated HPME Corning, NY 14831
Average Lifetime Atoms stay in an excited level only for a short time (about 10-8 [sec]), and then they return to a lower energy level by spontaneous emission.
Intervention models Something’s happened around t = 200.
Pulsar searches with known ephemeredes DC2 Closeout, 1 June 2006 David Smith for the Bordeaux 4 1 DC2 Pulsar studies using known ephemeredes David Smith.
November 8, 2005GLAST Users’ Committee Meeting — 1 Overview of Pulsar Tools Masaharu Hirayama (GLAST SSC,
Pulsars: The radio/gamma-ray Connection Prospects for pulsar studies with AGILE and GLAST Synergy with radio telescopes –Timing and follow-up –Radio vs.
Z bigniew Leonowicz, Wroclaw University of Technology Z bigniew Leonowicz, Wroclaw University of Technology, Poland XXIX  IC-SPETO.
Chapter 31 Lecture 33: Alternating Current Circuits: II HW 11 (problems): 30.58, 30.65, 30.76, 31.12, 31.26, 31.46, 31.56, Due Friday, Dec 11. Final.
ECE 8443 – Pattern Recognition ECE 3163 – Signals and Systems Objectives: Stability Response to a Sinusoid Filtering White Noise Autocorrelation Power.
GLAST DC-II kick-off, G. Kanbach, Mar 2, Periodicity Search Methods for Gamma-Ray Pulsars Developed and applied to data of SAS-2, COS-B, and EGRET.
1 SVY 207: Lecture 12 Modes of GPS Positioning Aim of this lecture: –To review and compare methods of static positioning, and introduce methods for kinematic.
Periodicity Search of Possible Counterparts to unidentified EGRET sources Periodicity as a multiwavelength tool Outline : Our method to perform periodicity.
44 th Rencontres de Moriond 1 Blind Period Search gamma-ray pulsar by Fermi-LAT F. Giordano Dipartimento Interateneo di Fisica and INFN Sez. Bari for the.
Combining Gamma and Neutrino Observations Christian Spiering, DESY.
Data Analysis Algorithm for GRB triggered Burst Search Soumya D. Mohanty Center for Gravitational Wave Astronomy University of Texas at Brownsville On.
1 Unbiased All-Sky Search (Michigan) [as of August 17, 2003] [ D. Chin, V. Dergachev, K. Riles ] Analysis Strategy: (Quick review) Measure power in selected.
Peter Shawhan The University of Maryland & The LIGO Scientific Collaboration Penn State CGWP Seminar March 27, 2007 LIGO-G Z Reaching for Gravitational.
Damien Parent – Moriond, February PSR J , PSR J , and their cousins -- young & noisy gamma ray pulsars Damien Parent on behalf of.
Algorithm Analysis Lakshmish Ramaswamy. What Constitutes Good Software? Code correctness Good design Code reusability OO design can help us in achieving.
Daniel Mazin and Nadia Tonello Max-Planck-Institut für Physik München
LECTURE 30: SYSTEM ANALYSIS USING THE TRANSFER FUNCTION
Charge in a constant uniform electric & magnetic field
Sinusoidal Excitation of Circuits
Methods of Detecting the Gravitational Wave Background
Predicting the BRAING INDEX OF INTERMITTENT AND NULLING PULSARS
Pulsar Blind search in the DC2 data
Figure 1. Three light curves of IRAS 13224–3809 in 600-s bins
A Survey of EGRET GeV Sources
The break signal in climate records: Random walk or random deviations
Robert Johnson W. Atwood, M. Ziegler, B. Baughman U.C. Santa Cruz and
NanoBPM Status and Multibunch Mark Slater, Cambridge University
Differential Emission Measure
CALET-CALによる ガンマ線観測初期解析
Event Weighted Tests for Detecting Periodicity in Photon Arrival Times
Time-Dependent Searches for Neutrino Point Sources with IceCube
Presentation transcript:

Bill Atwood, SCIPP/UCSC, Jan., 2006 GLAST 1 A Time Differencing Technique for doing Blind Pulsar Searches Bill Atwood, Brian Baughman, Marcus Ziegler, and Robert Johnson

Bill Atwood, SCIPP/UCSC, Jan., 2006 GLAST 2 Pulsar Basics at High Energies 1)The data is sparse. Crab: 1 photon every ~ 1000 turns 2)Faint sources could require months-to-years of exposure to find 3)Presents of Period Derivative compromises direct use of Fourier Transforms 4)However the Period Derivatives are very small and to lowest order cause a phase slip rather then shift the frequency significantly Differencing Concept If a time series has a periodicity – the time differences will exhibit the same. Time differences cancel out long term phase slips and glitches Differencing starts the "clock" over (and over, and over...)

Bill Atwood, SCIPP/UCSC, Jan., 2006 GLAST 3 Phase Slippage Caused by the Period Derivative Period Period elongation caused by Period Derivative: Time After N Periods Phase Slip  (in sec) after N Periods is just the sum of the  P's Or more conveniently the relative Phase Slip is Geminga Light Curve A reasonable value for  can be estimated from a "typical" light curve...

Bill Atwood, SCIPP/UCSC, Jan., 2006 GLAST 4 T(sec)  Crab Geminga Tmax(Crab) = 23k sec Tmax(Geminga) = 10 6 sec Estimation of the maximum length of the time differencing window For Geminga – an entire EGRET Viewing period can be used, while for the Crab, due to its short period and large period-derivative, only about ¼ of a day is usable. Additional Phase shift due to Frequency Drift As time progresses the period (frequency) slowly change (as well as shifting in phase). Time differences from a differencing time window started at a time t after the start of data collection will be further limited: Solving for T Diff :

Bill Atwood, SCIPP/UCSC, Jan., 2006 GLAST 5 T Diff (max) (sec) t (sec) Crab Geminga Crab – Approx. Soln. Max. Allowed Time Differencing window allowing a Phase Slip  <.1 Again – Crab is hard to find due to its short period and large period derivative An estimation of the min. flux required can be arrived at by note that for time differencing we need at least 2 photons within the diff. window. Assuming the window is opened by a source photon, then in TDiff(max) we need on average 1 photon.

Bill Atwood, SCIPP/UCSC, Jan., 2006 GLAST 6 Flux Limit for Time Differencing Blind Searches This must be compared with the overall flux limit for the mission where F 0 is mission specific Flux(cm -2 sec -1 ) t (sec) Where the 2 Flux estimates cross is the limit. Solving for t and re-inserting it for F Lim one finds:

Bill Atwood, SCIPP/UCSC, Jan., 2006 GLAST 7 The Plane from Dave Thompson's Talk LAT LAT EGRET The "one number" result is that Time Differencing requires ~ 10X higher flux then the mission's limit Finally we can sweep out contours in the plane for various values of F Lim

Bill Atwood, SCIPP/UCSC, Jan., 2006 GLAST 8 Closing Remarks 1)Real Data with noise will corrupt things – see Marcus' Talk 2)Improvements possible a)Selection of Start Photon b)More efficient freq. search alg. c)... 3)Applications to GRBs and AGN Flares if there is a common underlying frequency – differencing allows compiling statistics directly.