KEKB Design 1.Parameters 2.Collider Ring 3.Interact Region 4. Magnet, RF, Instabilities 5.Recent progress with crab crossing.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Crab Waist Studies for SuperB and KEKB Y. Ohnishi/KEK SuperB Workshop V Paris 10/May/2007.
Advertisements

ILC Accelerator School Kyungpook National University
Bunch compressors ILC Accelerator School May Eun-San Kim Kyungpook National University.
1 ILC Bunch compressor Damping ring ILC Summer School August Eun-San Kim KNU.
Linear Collider Bunch Compressors Andy Wolski Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory USPAS Santa Barbara, June 2003.
Lattice Status SuperB Project Workshop SLAC, October 6-9, 2009 Yuri Nosochkov for the SuperB Lattice Team Major recent updates by P. Raimondi and S. Sinyatkin.
SuperKEKB Lattice and Dynamic Aperture H. Koiso Apr. 20, 2005 Super B Factory Workshop in Hawaii.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Considerations for Nonlinear Beam Dynamics in NSLS-II lattice design Weiming Guo 05/26/08 Acknowledgement: J. Bengtsson.
Super B-Factory Workshop, Hawaii, April 20-22, 2005 Lattice studies for low momentum compaction in LER M.E. Biagini LNF-INFN, Frascati.
CESR-c Status CESR Layout - Pretzel, Wigglers, solenoid compensation Performance to date Design parameters Our understanding of shortfall Plans for remediation.
Wilson Lab Tour Guide Orientation 11 December 2006 CLASSE 1 Focusing and Bending Wilson Lab Tour Guide Orientation M. Forster Mike Forster 11 December.
Beam-beam studies for Super KEKB K. Ohmi & M Tawada (KEK) Super B factories workshop in Hawaii Apr
Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 Super-B IR design M. Sullivan 1 Interaction Region Design for a Super-B Factory M. Sullivan for the Super-B.
July 22, 2005Modeling1 Modeling CESR-c D. Rubin. July 22, 2005Modeling2 Simulation Comparison of simulation results with measurements Simulated Dependence.
1 Optics and IR design for SuperKEKB Y.Ohnishi 1/19-22, 2004 Super B Factory Workshop in Hawaii.
Beam-Beam Optimization for Fcc-ee at High Energies (120, 175 GeV) at High Energies (120, 175 GeV) Dmitry Shatilov BINP, Novosibirsk 11 December 2014, CERN.
Future Very High Luminosity Options for PEP-II John T. Seeman For the PEP-II Team e+e- Factories Workshop October 13-16, 2003.
January 13, 2004D. Rubin - Cornell1 CESR-c BESIII/CLEO-c Workshop, IHEP January 13, 2004 D.Rubin for the CESR operations group.
Y. Ohnishi / KEK KEKB-LER for ILC Damping Ring Study Simulation of low emittance lattice includes machine errors and optics corrections. Y. Ohnishi / KEK.
Beam dynamics on damping rings and beam-beam interaction Dec 포항 가속기 연구소 김 은 산.
October 4-5, Electron Lens Beam Physics Overview Yun Luo for RHIC e-lens team October 4-5, 2010 Electron Lens.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat HERA The Only Lepton-Hadron Collider Ever Been Built Worldwide Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
ELIC Low Beta Optics with Chromatic Corrections Hisham Kamal Sayed 1,2 Alex Bogacz 1 1 Jefferson Lab 2 Old Dominion University.
November 14, 2004First ILC Workshop1 CESR-c Wiggler Dynamics D.Rubin -Objectives -Specifications -Modeling and simulation -Machine measurements/ analysis.
1 Proposal for a CESR Damping Ring Test Facility M. Palmer & D.Rubin November 8, 2005.
SuperB Lattice Studies M. Biagini LNF-INFN ILCDR07 Workshop, LNF-Frascati Mar. 5-7, 2007.
Study and Optimization of Dynamic Aperture for the SuperKEKB LER E.Levichev and P.Piminov, BINP SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia.
1 NICA Collider: status and further steps O.S. Kozlov LHEP, JINR, Dubna for the NICA team Machine Advisory Committee, JINR, Dubna, October 19-20, 2015.
KEKB lattice Taken from LATTICE DESIGN FOR KEKB COLLIDING RINGS By H. Koiso and K. Oide.
Plan for Review of FCC- ee Optics and Beam Dynamics Frank Zimmermann FCC-ee Design Meeting 31 August 2015.
ILC Damping Ring Alternative Lattice Design ( Modified FODO ) ** Yi-Peng Sun *,1,2, Jie Gao 1, Zhi-Yu Guo 2 Wei-Shi Wan 3 1 Institute of High Energy Physics,
E Levichev -- Dynamic Aperture of the SRFF Storage Ring Frontiers of Short Bunches in Storage Rings INFN-LNF, Frascati, 7-8 Nov 2005 DYNAMIC APERTURE OF.
February 5, 2005D. Rubin - Cornell1 CESR-c Status -Operations/Luminosity -Machine studies -Simulation and modeling -4.1GeV.
Beam-beam Simulation at eRHIC Yue Hao Collider-Accelerator Department Brookhaven National Laboratory July 29, 2010 EIC Meeting at The Catholic University.
Present MEIC IR Design Status Vasiliy Morozov, Yaroslav Derbenev MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
Compensation of Detector Solenoid G.H. Wei, V.S. Morozov, Fanglei Lin JLEIC Collaboration Meeting Spring, 2016.
Workshop on Accelerator R&D for Ultimate Storage Rings – Oct Nov.1 – Huairou, Beijing, China A compact low emittance lattice with superbends for.
Introduction of Accelerators for Circular Colliders 高亮度 TAU-CHARM 工厂 & 先进光源, 2014/09.
Optics with Large Momentum Acceptance for Higgs Factory Yunhai Cai SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Future Circular Collider Kick-off Meeting, February.
HF2014 Workshop, Beijing, China 9-12 October 2014 Challenges and Status of the FCC-ee lattice design Bastian Haerer Challenges.
MDI and head-on collision option for electron-positron Higgs factories
NSLS-II Lattice Design Strategies Weiming Guo 07/10/08
Beam-beam effects in eRHIC and MeRHIC
Large Booster and Collider Ring
First Look at Nonlinear Dynamics in the Electron Collider Ring
Pretzel scheme of CEPC H. Geng, G. Xu, Y. Zhang, Q. Qin, J. Gao, W. Chou, Y. Guo, N. Wang, Y. Peng, X. Cui, T. Yue, Z. Duan, Y. Wang, D. Wang, S. Bai,
Jeffrey Eldred, Sasha Valishev
Electron collider ring Chromaticity Compensation and dynamic aperture
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat Other Electron-Ion Colliders: eRHIC, ENC & LHeC Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
Status of SuperKEKB Design: Lattice and IR
XII SuperB Project Workshop LAPP, Annecy, France, March 16-19, 2010
Comparison of the final focus design
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Interaction Region Design Options e+e- Factories Workshop
Collider Ring Optics & Related Issues
Design of Interaction Region
PEPX-type BAPS Lattice Design and Beam Dynamics Optimization
M. E. Biagini, LNF-INFN SuperB IRC Meeting Frascati, Nov , 2007
Update on CEPC pretzel scheme design
Sawtooth effect in CEPC PDR/APDR
Yuri Nosochkov Yunhai Cai, Fanglei Lin, Vasiliy Morozov
Fanglei Lin, Yuhong Zhang JLEIC R&D Meeting, March 10, 2016
Status and plans for crab crossing studies at JLEIC
Update on JLEIC Electron Ring Design
Compensation of Detector Solenoids
G.H. Wei, V.S. Morozov, Fanglei Lin Y. Nosochkov (SLAC), M-H. Wang
JLEIC Electron Ring Nonlinear Dynamics Work Plan
Upgrade on Compensation of Detector Solenoid effects
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
Presentation transcript:

KEKB Design 1.Parameters 2.Collider Ring 3.Interact Region 4. Magnet, RF, Instabilities 5.Recent progress with crab crossing

1. Basic Parameters

Parameter List in the Design Report (1995)

RF-related Parameters

2. Collider Rings Layout Ring lattice design Other straight sections

Wiggler (LER): reduce the longitudinal damping time from 43ms to 23ms, same as that for HER. Bypass: make the circumference of LER and HER same. Layout of KEKB

Ring Lattice Design Guideline -realize beam parameters listed in the table - sufficiently large dynamic aperture for high injection efficiency and a long beam lifetime, particularly the Touschek lifetime in LER -wide range of tunability for beam parameters, especially horizontal emittance -reasonable tolerance for machine errors -small synchrotron tune (so as to find adequate working point in tune space) Dynamic Aperture requirement -momentum aperture +/- 0.5% transverse aperture > 1.2x10 -5 m

Comparison of the performances of the cell structures and chromaticity correction schemes for the LER Dynamic aperture of the LER with five types of beam optics

Transverse aperture limitation --nonlinearity of sextupole magnets used for chromaticity correction. Vertical aperture limitation --the kinetic terms of drift space around the IP -- the fringe field of the final quad magnets at the edge facing IP. Cause of limitation of Dynamic Aperture

Momentum aperture limitation -- Beta functions at cavities have dependencies on momentum  change of energy at RF causes mismatch between beam and the betatron phase space ellipse  excites synchro-betatron resonances  exponential growth of betatron amplitude  choose small synchrotron tune (small momentum compaction) -- Chromaticity in the x-y coupling terms, because of non- perfect compensation of detector solenoid at IP ---Chromo-geometric aberration caused by a breakdown of the -I transformer for off-momentum particles

Noninterleaved 2.5 Cell HER LER 5 pi/2 cells with 4 bend to form 2 dispersion bumps: keep dispersion small at bends Successive SF(SD) pairs have a relative phase of 3pi/2

Dynamic Aperture of the HER with the 2.5 pi cell Since the dynamic aperture requirement on the HER is less demanding, a local Chromaticity correction is not implemented in HER.

Chromaticity correction with the 2.5 pi cell with and without local chromaticity correction

LER has four 12m long chicanes, to adjust bunchlength which is changed due to wigglers. Other Straight Sections

3. Interaction Region IR layout IR Chromaticity correction Magnets

Layout of the IR + Chromatic Correction Sections

IR Optics with Chromaticity Correction

Features of Local Chromaticity Correction It is practically difficult to install two sextuple pairs for correcting both the horizontal and vertical planes in the IP striaght section Sources of the horizontal chromaticity are not so strongly localized as the vertical. Thus, the design only places one sextupole pair for the vertical corrrection in the straight section on each side of IP The last sextupole pairs at the end of the arc are used for the horizontal correction

Feature of the Interaction Region Finite angle crossing -allows small bunch spacing - minimize the bending of income beams (reduce SR background) Superconducting final focusing magnet systems (including compensation solenoids) -introduces flexibility of machine tuning

Layout of the beam line near the IP Compensation of x-y coupling generated by the detector solenoid field =>use counter solenoid

Geometric Condition The interaction point relative to the detector center is shifted towards the left by 470 mm This is for increasing the solid angle coverage in the forward direction, while taking into account of the Lorentz boost of the final state particles in the asymmetric collision. The accelerator components must fit within a cone-shaped space with an opening angle of 17 deg forward and 30 degree backward, clipped by the CDC inner radius. The high precision particle tracking using silicon micro strips requires a small vacuum chamber around the IP with an inner radius of 20mm for -80<z<80mm. Detector Boundry Condition

Top View of Layout at IR Detector solenoid : 1.5 Tesla

Magnet Condition The solenoid field created by the detector magnet for charged particle tracking is 1.5 T, extended in length of +/- 2.5m. Correction with skew quad magnets are exact only for on-energy particles - the remaining chromatic coupling term will result in increased vertical emittance. -Use of skew quad will cause extra chromaticity, its correction will reduce available dynamic aperture, and consequently the expected beam lifetime. Luminosity will be reduced if solenoid field compensation is not sufficient.

It has been found that if the integral of the axial field Bz is cancelled to zero on the average, the reduction of the dynamic aperture and its effects on the beam lifetime are negligible. As an example of incomplete field compensation, a left-over field of will result in a 30% beam lifetime reduction because of the reduced dynamic aperture. Goal: net value of Superconducting compensation solenoid magnet S-L and S-R are implemented for this. Compensation of Detector Solenoid Field

Management of Leak Field Magnetic fields from S-L, S-R, QCS-L and QCS-R will leak into the detector volume, and distorts its solenoid tracking field. Simulation shows that these effects are manageable. QCS-L is not in line with the detector axis and it may couple with the detector iron to create nonsymmetric multipole field and affect on the beam dynamics. It has been found their adverse effects are negligible. Efforts on reducing the detector leak field near QC1E-L and QC1E-R

5. Special Topics magnet requirement RF system Collective Effects

Requirement on the Magnet Quality Criteria: 2% reduction of the dynamic aperture integrated in both the momentum and transverse phase space

RF System A straight-forward way to avoid coupled-bunch instabilities due to HOM is devise cavity where no HOMs are excited by the beam. KEKB uses two kinds of HOM-free cavities: Normal conducting cavities for LER and HER ARES (Accelerators Resonantly coupled with Energy Storage) three coupled cavities operated in the pi/2 mode Features: large stored energy suitable for heavy beam loading no HOM excited by the beam SRF cavities for HER High energy storage and immune to beam loading The diameters of the beam pipes are chose so that the frequencies of all modes, except for the fundamental mone, become higher than the cut-off freq. of the pipes. HOMs propagate towards beam pipes and are eventually absorbed by ferrite dampers attached to the inner surfaces of the pipes.

Electron Cloud - most serious instability which limits KEKB performance, observed in LER -SR from the beam hits the inner wall of the vacuum chamber and produce photoelectrons. -The clouds then excite head-tail type oscillation within a bunch and the beam blow up -wound solenoids of total length of 800m Coupled Bunch Instability Beam-beam Effects Beam Instability

Solenoid Effect on Electron Cloud

Beam Instability (con’d) Coupled bunch instabilities (transv. & long.) -HOM of RF cavity -accelerating mode of RF cavity -resistive wall of vacuum chambers (transverse) Solutions -damped cavity to reduce Q value for NCRF -use SRF for small detuning freq. of the fundamental mode -bunch-to-bunch feedback system TCBI may still a limitation to high current operation with short bunch spacing to achieve high luminosity

Growth rate of TCBI vs Beam Current

Luminosity vs. working point (from beam-beam simulation)

Effect of Solenoid Field Compensation on Luminosity

Recent Progress at KEKB ---crab crossing

Crab crossing: achieved L predicted by simulation Prediction: L(with crab)=2 x L(without crab) Reality: L(with crab)=1.2 x L(without crab) Reason: – Short beam lifetime at high current (horizontal physical aperture at crab due to beam-beam at tune close to 0.5) – Machine errors not fully compensated by turning knobs – Chromaticity of the x-y coupling at IP could reduce luminosity through the beam-beam interaction (adding skew sextuple increase luminosity by 15%) – Long. wake in Beam-beam simulation (CSR microwave instability in LER at I=1.0mA)

On May 6, 2009, KEKB broke the world luminosity record and achieved a luminosity of 1.96 x 1034/cm2/sec using the crab cavitie