AIGKC Model North Pacific Fishery Management Council Crab Modeling Workshop Report.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Markov Chain Monte Carlo Convergence Diagnostics: A Comparative Review By Mary Kathryn Cowles and Bradley P. Carlin Presented by Yuting Qi 12/01/2006.
Advertisements

Report of the 10 th Meeting of the Scientific Working Group Port Vila, Vanuatu, 19 – 23 September 2011.
An Overview of the Key Issues to be Discussed Relating to South African Sardine MARAM International Stock Assessment Workshop 1 st December 2014 Carryn.
Growth in Age-Structured Stock Assessment Models R.I.C. Chris Francis CAPAM Growth Workshop, La Jolla, November 3-7, 2014.
C3: Estimation of size-transition matrices with and without molt probability for Alaska golden king crab using tag–recapture data M.S.M. Siddeek, J. Zheng,
Black Sea Bass – Northern Stock Coastal-Pelagic/ASMFC Working Group Review June 15, 2010.
The current status of fisheries stock assessment Mark Maunder Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission (IATTC) Center for the Advancement of Population.
Harmonisation of Data. Objectives Develop a standard data description applicable to all fisheries Provide data necessary for the estimation of theoretical.
458 More on Model Building and Selection (Observation and process error; simulation testing and diagnostics) Fish 458, Lecture 15.
458 Fitting models to data – II (The Basics of Maximum Likelihood Estimation) Fish 458, Lecture 9.
Hierarchical Bayesian Analysis of the Spiny Lobster Fishery in California Brian Kinlan, Steve Gaines, Deborah McArdle, Katherine Emery UCSB.
Chapter 51Introduction to Statistical Quality Control, 5th Edition by Douglas C. Montgomery. Copyright (c) 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Danish Institute for Fisheries Research The overlap between Science and Advice; the example of North Sea cod.
1 For-Hire Survey Survey Design Recommendations Presented by Jim Chromy
R. Sharma*, A. Langley ** M. Herrera*, J. Geehan*
WP4: Models to predict & test recovery strategies Cefas: Laurence Kell & John Pinnegar Univ. Aberdeen: Tara Marshall & Bruce McAdam.
Joint assessment of demersal species WG demersal spp Sept Graham Pilling Cefas.
Population Dynamics Mortality, Growth, and More. Fish Growth Growth of fish is indeterminate Affected by: –Food abundance –Weather –Competition –Other.
ASSESSMENT OF BIGEYE TUNA (THUNNUS OBESUS) IN THE EASTERN PACIFIC OCEAN January 1975 – December 2006.
Where does my data go? Preparation of files for the assessments of IOTC stocks and use of data for the assessments of IOTC species Mauritius, March.
CPT Overfishing Working Group Crab Plan Team Presentation, September 2005.
Where does my data go? IOTC Data Revisions. Role of the IOTC Data section  The IOTC Secretariat Data Section plays an important role in assessing the.
Spatial issues in WCPO stock assessments (bigeye and yellowfin tuna) Simon Hoyle SPC.
STANDARDIZATION OF CPUE FROM ALEUTIAN ISLANDS GOLDEN KING CRAB FISHERY OBSERVER DATA M.S.M. Siddeek 1, J. Zheng 1, Doug Pengilly 2, and Gretchen Bishop.
Chapter 6. Control Charts for Variables. Subgroup Data with Unknown  and 
Productivity Micro-economic Analysis Division 1 Productivity Micro-economic Analysis Division Statistics Canada January 2008.
The Stock Synthesis Approach Based on many of the ideas proposed in Fournier and Archibald (1982), Methot developed a stock assessment approach and computer.
Workshop on Stock Assessment Methods 7-11 November IATTC, La Jolla, CA, USA.
GIANNOULAKI M., SOMARAKIS S., MACHIAS A., SIAPATIS A., PAPACONSTANTINOU C. Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, PO Box 2214, Iraklion 71003, Greece Department.
Chapter 8 Lecture 1 Software Testing. Program testing Testing is intended to show that a program does what it is intended to do and to discover program.
USING INDICATORS OF STOCK STATUS WHEN TRADITIONAL REFERENCE POINTS ARE NOT AVAILABLE: EVALUATION AND APPLICATION TO SKIPJACK TUNA IN THE EASTERN PACIFIC.
Fisheries 101: Modeling and assessments to achieve sustainability Training Module July 2013.
M.S.M. Siddeeka*, J. Zhenga, A.E. Puntb, and D. Pengillya
Extending length-based models for data-limited fisheries into a state-space framework Merrill B. Rudd* and James T. Thorson *PhD Student, School of Aquatic.
Using distributions of likelihoods to diagnose parameter misspecification of integrated stock assessment models Jiangfeng Zhu * Shanghai Ocean University,
Estimation of selectivity in Stock Synthesis: lessons learned from the tuna stock assessment Shigehide Iwata* 1 Toshihde Kitakado* 2 Yukio Takeuchi* 1.
CAN DIAGNOSTIC TESTS HELP IDENTIFY WHAT MODEL STRUCTURE IS MISSPECIFIED? Felipe Carvalho 1, Mark N. Maunder 2,3, Yi-Jay Chang 1, Kevin R. Piner 4, Andre.
Yellowfin Tuna Major Changes Catch, effort, and length-frequency data for the surface fisheries have been updated to include new data for 2005.
Modelling population dynamics given age-based and seasonal movement in south Pacific albacore Simon Hoyle Secretariat of the Pacific Community.
Likelihood profiling of differently weighted models Doug Kinzey, George M.Watters, and Christian S. Reiss NOAA SWFSC Antarctic Ecosystem Research Division.
Application of Data-Limited Methods (SEDAR 46) and Potential Use for Management Shannon L. Cass-Calay, Nancie Cummings, Skyler Sagarese, Tom Carruthers.
Data weighting and data conflicts in fishery stock assessments Chris Francis Wellington, New Zealand CAPAM workshop, “ Data conflict and weighting, likelihood.
Influence of selectivity and size composition misfit on the scaling of population estimates and possible solutions: an example with north Pacific albacore.
Data requirement of stock assessment. Data used in stock assessments can be classified as fishery-dependent data or fishery-independent data. Fishery-dependent.
Day 4, Session 1 Abundance indices, CPUE, and CPUE standardisation
Day 3 Session 1 Model fitting. So, how do you assess a stock assessment model? There are five key questions you should ask yourself: 1.Assumptions What.
Population Dynamics and Stock Assessment of Red King Crab in Bristol Bay, Alaska Jie Zheng Alaska Department of Fish and Game Juneau, Alaska, USA.
Survey Data Conflicts and Bias and Temporal Variation of Model Parameters of St. Matthew Island Blue King Crab J. Zheng, D. Pengilly and V. A. Vanek ADF&G,
Chapter 61Introduction to Statistical Quality Control, 7th Edition by Douglas C. Montgomery. Copyright (c) 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Goliath Grouper South Atlantic Fishery Management Council Scientific and Statistical Committee meeting April 6, 2011.
Fish stock assessment Prof. Dr. Sahar Mehanna National Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries Fish population Dynamics Lab November,
Statistical Quality Control, 7th Edition by Douglas C. Montgomery.
MARAM International Stock Assessment Workshop
Pacific-Wide Assessment of Bigeye Tuna
Copyright (c) 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Sardine Two-Stock Hypothesis: Results at the Posterior Mode
Policy Evaluation II (Feedback strategies)
Effects of Catch-at-Age Sample Size on Gulf of Mexico Gray Triggerfish Spawning Stock Biomass Estimates Jeff Isely SEFSC Miami.
Setting ABC in Scallop A15 Summary of updated ACL section since Feb SSC meeting August 11, 2009.
Update on previous year’s discussion on Descriptor 3
SEAPODYM.
Rachael Bedford Mplus: Longitudinal Analysis Workshop 23/06/2015
John Hampton & Shelton Harley SPC Oceanic Fisheries Programme
Bristol Bay Red King Crab Assessment in Spring 2019
Eastern Bering Sea snow crab
Aleutian Islands Golden King Crab Model-Based Stock Assessment
Observer data, catch estimation, and future assessment needs
Pribilof Island red king crab
Norton Sound Red King Crab SAFE2019 Jan
U.S. NMFS contracts the CIE to review assessments
Presentation transcript:

AIGKC Model North Pacific Fishery Management Council Crab Modeling Workshop Report.

Highlights Progress on development, but not acceptable for management advice. Model code & data was provided for independent review by CPT members (this work continues). Population dynamics for new/old shell, extreme sensitivity to molting probability parameter(s). Time series data split pre and post 2004 (rationalization). Molting probability based prior distribution (derived from tagging study), these data should be included in the model. Retained and discarded CPUE data are not independent. CPUE standardization using GLMs is high priority and will be reviewed May 2012.

Summary of Model Workshop Discussions Discussions focused primarily on the input data into the model. – Tagging data – Length composition data – CPUE data Model runs were requested to examine sensitivities and to better understand structural assumptions.

Tagging data Tagging studies conducted in the eastern area. – growth information imputed for both areas – data used to estimate exploitation rates of LMB in the eastern area. – Quality of data is questionable with 5-8% recovery rates. Workshop agreed that tagging data should not be used as priors for exploited legal male biomass due to lack of information on reporting rates and other tagging related uncertainties.

Length Composition data Length composition data may be over- weighted. Suggestion to use multinomial rather than robust-normal likelihood. Need better diagnostic tools to characterize if these data are being over or under fitted. Fit to dockside length comps and use the model to differentiate between discards and landings (consistent with Tanner crab model).

CPUE data Discard and retained CPUE are not independent observations (made by observers, and divided by the same effort units). Dockside CPUE is not used, and may be preferable (after standardization). More details on raw CPUE data (samples sizes, number of vessels, etc.) are necessary.

Model runs Model Runs examined influence of the Retained and Discarded CPUE and the use of Dockside CPUE. General results: – Trends were similar using dockside CPUE and down weighting discard CPUE. – Results were counter intuitive, but considered preliminary due to lack of time during the workshop.

Recommendations for AIGKC model Near term (prior to May 2012): – Length data compilations: Observer vs dockside (as in the case of Tanner crab) Examine issues that dockside might be difficult to associate to area. – Comparative analysis of dockside and observer length frequencies (is there + covariance in legal males?). – CPUE standardizations – Develop method for including tagging data to jointly estimate growth.

Recommendations for AIGKC model Long Term: – Improve documentation of data compilation. – Include rationales for selection of weighting components used in the likelihoods. – Use SAFE report guidelines – Modeling: Adopt a more generalized framework to avoid area specific code and compile-dependent changes to explore alternative hypotheses. Standardized output diagnostics (e.g. SDNRs MADs). R-Scripts for producing standardized outputs. Examine alternative likelihoods for length composition data. Two-area model with shared parameters.