“Knowing the Growth Efficiency Potential in the Lamb Crop ” Dr. Jeff Held South Dakota State University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
I OWA S TATE U NIVERSITY Department of Animal Science U.S – 2012 Pork Industry Productivity Analysis C. E. Abell 1, C. Hostetler 2, and K. J. Stalder.
Advertisements

Lambs from Birth to Harvest Feeding and Managing
Utilizing Performance Data for Livestock Selection Developed by: Celina Johnson University of Florida.
Co-product Feeds are “Taylor Made” for Sheep Jeff Held SDSU Extension Sheep Specialist.
Mongastric Production Swine Section Breeding and Selection of Swine.
I OWA S TATE U NIVERSITY Department of Animal Science U.S – 2012 Pork Industry Productivity Analysis C. E. Abell 1, C. Hostetler 2, and K. J. Stalder.
Sheep Industry - US and Michigan. Fall 2002 Michigan Sheep Production u Purebred production –Greatest proportion of the industry –Produce and sell seedstock.
Lecture 3-22 Exam 3 Breeds FineMediumCoarse Most important breeds? Why so many in US?
Meat Goat Carcass Merit Dr. Dwight Loveday University of Tennessee-Knoxville Department of Food Science & Technology.
Beaver Small Ruminant Production Systems Stephan Wildeus Virginia State University.
Precision Sheep Farming Reid Redden NDSU Extension Sheep Specialist.
Controlling Feed costs big challenges big changes DGM:ISU Dr. Dan Morrical Iowa State University
ROLE OF COMPOSITES IN CROSSBREEDING Jim Gosey University of Nebraska.
Genetics.
Modern Swine Industry Modern Swine Production is Extremely Complex –Feeding strategies involve Feed ration formulation – nutrient levels Choice of number.
Applied Beef Cattle Breeding and Selection Composite Populations Larry V. Cundiff ARS-USDA-U.S. Meat Animal Research Center 2008 Beef Cattle Production.
Selecting Swine 3121 Adam Nash. The Incredible Pig Did you know? Fat from the pig was used to make nitroglycerine for War explosives After war, consumers.
Animal Selection and Evaluation Livestock Evaluation.
Ractopamine, Response, Economics, and Issues Allan P. Schinckel Purdue University Department of Animal Sciences.
Value Difference of Feeder Cattle
Improvement of Beef Cow Biological Efficiency
Principles of Livestock Judging University of Florida H/FFA Livestock Judging Clinic Full presentation online at
Chad Hagen, PhD. Source: Agristats 2011  What is Best Cost Nutrition?  Importance of Feed Conversion  Importance of Throughput  Herd Health Effects.
Breeding Season Management Dan Morrical Iowa State University Ames IA.
Ram Management November 21, 2003 Jeff Held, SDSU.
Hair Sheep: Enhancing Farm Profitability
Profit Drivers for Small Farrow to Finish Operations Prepared by Dave Stender, ISU Swine Field Specialist For Iowa Pork Congress 1/24/08.
Breed and Trait Selection Considerations Dan W. Moser Dept. of Animal Sciences and Industry Kansas State University.
Economically Relevant Traits Mark Enns Colorado State University.
Straightbreeding – A simple way to reduce your bottomline D. A. Daley California State University, Chico NCBCEC Brown Bagger Session October 17, 2012.
Livestock and Poultry Evaluation Animal Science II.
The Brown Bagger Beef Cattle Adaptability Current Tools of Assessment John L. Evans Oklahoma State University 1.
CROSSBREEDING SYSTEMS for BEEF CATTLE By David R. Hawkins Michigan State University.
 Mating animals to produce certain characteristics  Low Birthweight  Heavier Weaning Weight  Color  Horned or Polled  Temperment.
1 The Value of SimGenetics to Retail Carcass– a New York case study M. J. Baker, G. Jacimovski, M. E. Hannon, L. Bliven.
The effects of continuous-suckling and supplementation on growth performance of crossbred Katahdin lambs (Birth weight 4.2 ± 0.2 kg) were investigated.
Nutrition and Reproduction in Beef Cows Cattlemen’s College January 29, 2003 David Lalman Oklahoma State University.
1 Scientific Farm Animal Production, 10 th ed Field and Taylor Copyright ©2012, 2008 by Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey All.
Genetics.
Dan Morrical Iowa State University Extension Sheep Specialist Carcass Component Growth DGM:ISU.
B66 Heritability, EPDs & Performance Data. Infovets Educational Resources – – Slide 2 Heritability  Heritability is the measurement.
AG PRODUCTION III MR. DEBORD Breeding Flock Nutrition.
SUMMER SUPPLEMENTATION: PLANT AND ANIMAL RESPONSE – A KANSAS PERSPECTIVE Lyle Lomas and Joe Moyer KSU SE Agricultural Research Center Parsons.
The Swine Industry. Objectives Understand importance of the swine industry Overview of the structure of the swine industry Become familiar with terms.
Developmental Stages of Lambs
 Objective 7.03: Apply the Use of Production Records.
EPD’s: What They Are and How to Use Them. Introduction EPDs = Expected Progeny Differences Progeny = Offspring, usually the offspring of the sire Differences.
Genetics for Producing Profitable and Sustainable Grass-Fed Beef Dr. Scott M. Barao Executive Director The Jorgensen Family Foundation Hedgeapple Farm.
Feeding Productive Ewes n Realistic and practical n Facilities and equipment n Flock size.
Selection & Judging of Beef Cattle
Youth Livestock Specialist
Adding weight to lambs is the value added portion of most sheep operations. Goal is to do it as cheap as possible. Feeding Lambs DGM:ISU.
Advanced Animal Breeding
Improving Carcass Merit while maintaing profit. Industry Challenge Muscle weight as a % of LW LW Muscle as % of LW Cattle Deer22039 Pig20032 Sheep8128.
Pasture-Based Nutritional Considerations for Beef Cattle Lawton Stewart Grazing School May 6, 2010.
 Genes- located on chromosomes, control characteristics that are inherited from parents.  Allele- an alternative form of a gene (one member.
Principles of Agricultural Science – Animal 1. 2 Heritability and the Environment Principles of Agricultural Science – Animal Unit 7 – Lesson 7.2 Predicting.
KSU Cattle Value Optimization Seminar What Feedyards Are Looking For in Cattle They Buy By Tom Brink.
Bull Selection: Beef Kay Farmer Madison County High School edited by Billy Moss and Rachel Postin July 2001.
David L. Thomas Department of Animal Sciences University of Wisconsin-Madison Basics of Sheep Breeding for Commercial Flocks.
Developmental Stages of Lambs
Fundamentals of the Eurostar evaluations
Feeding Lambs Goal is to do it as cheap as possible.
Feeding Productive Ewes
Key Factors in Profitable Sheep Production
Profitable Sheep Production in the Biofuels Era
Genetics.
Evaluation of terminal sire breeds for hair sheep production systems on lamb birth, weaning and grazing performance: Year 3 A.R. Weaver1, D.L. Wright1,
Definition of EBVs of Economically Relevant Traits in Sheep Production
Expected Progeny Difference EPD
Presentation transcript:

“Knowing the Growth Efficiency Potential in the Lamb Crop ” Dr. Jeff Held South Dakota State University

Flock Management Goals High ewe reproductive efficiency genetics, nutrition and health Lower unit cost of production reduce feed cost – ewe flock feed efficiency (F/G) and cost of gain – lamb performance Lower labor requirement facilities and feeding management more mechanical applications Risk/marketing management enter marketing agreements utilize wool LDP and LRP-Lamb

Lamb Feed Efficiency and Cost of Gain Growth performance (ADG) Optimum economic finished weight (YG2/3)

Growth Performance (ADG) Genetics / Frame size –Growth trait selection –Crossbreeding (hybrid vigor) Sex of animal – R>W>E Age Health status

AVERAGE DAILY GAIN Daily Gain (lb) Live Weight (lb) Large Frame Small Frame

Ave Wt = 91 lb Sire and Dam were a Wool Breed No Crossbreeding

Ave Wt = 99 lb -Terminal Breed Sired -Heterosis (6%)

Heritability of Selected Traits Lambs born per ewe lambing10 Pounds of lamb weaned per exposed ewe Day weight20 Post Weaning Gain ( days)25 Weight of trimmed retail cuts45 Loin eye area35

How do you select the the best terminal sire?

Terminal Sire Farm Flock Performance Information Individual Sire Performance - Hampshire IDB DateB TypeW TypeWW120- D Wt WDAPW ADG 3011/24SS /24TW Exp Diff *Pipestone LW Sire Evaluation

Terminal Sire Farm Performance Information Hampshire Sired Progeny Performance IDWWAdj. WWMarket Wt Rate of Gain Days to Market *Pipestone LW Sire Evaluation

Lamb Feed Efficiency (F:G) Feed Efficiency Pounds of Feed Intake Cost/ Lamb Average Daily Gain Days to Market 4.5: : : : : : Assume Feed Intake 4% 4.5 lb/hd/d Feed cost = $0.10 per pound ($200/ton) Pounds gained = 60 lb (80 lb feeder lamb fed to 140 lb)

Cost of Gain (CG) Expression 1 = cents/pound of gain Expression 2 = (feed cost(cents/lb)) * (daily feed intake, lb) average daily gain (ADG), lb Expression 3 = feed cost(cents/lb) * feed efficiency (F:G) *CG=Economic Expression For Feed Efficiency

Key Variables in Cost of Gain Feed Costs –Price ingredients on nutrient basis (E, CP) –For every 1% CP + $10-15 per ton –Nutritionally sound and palatable Feed Efficiency (F:G) –Ad lib feed intake at 4% of body weight –Growth performance (ADG) **CG equally affected by $15/ton = 0.1 ADG

Standard - Corn and Protein Pellet

Mixed Ingredient Finishing Diet

Mixed Lamb Finishing Diet - DDGS

Mixed Diet with DDGS

High Forage Lamb Diet

Whole Corn MDGS Liquid Supplement

Relationship of Cost of Gain and Optimum Finished Weight

USDA Lamb Yield Grades Yield Grade % Cutability Adj. Fat Depth over 0.45

USDA YG 2

USDA YG 4

Predicting Optimum Economic Lamb Finished Weight Following graph illustrates the relationship of dam weights on predicting lamb finished weight at constant lamb carcass merit. USDA Yield grade 1 (0.15 in. adj. fat depth) Average mature weight of the dams for both the ewe and sire breed multiplied by 64 %. (mature body size) For example: Suffolk = 210 lb Hampshires = 190 lb Suffolk-Hamp cross lambs would have a predicted finished weight: (( )/2) x 0.64 = 128 lb **For every 10 lb increase = 0.1 in. more fat depth

Using Dam Frame Size to Predict Lamb Finished Weight Sire Breed Mature Ewe Weight (lb) Ewe Breed Mature Ewe Weight (lb)

LAMB PROFIT POTENTIAL Small frame Large frame Live Weight (lb) Cost of Gain/Value per lb YG 2/3 Frame size

Large Frame YG 2/3 Profit Feed Cost

LAMB PROFIT POTENTIAL Live Weight Cost of Gain/Value per lb Large Frame YG 1-2 Live Price YG 2-3

Key Points: Lamb Profit Potential Optimum profit – when live price and cost of gain are equal!! Profit – CG less than live price Loss – CG greater than live price »ADG less than 0.6 lb/day

Lamb Profit Summary Degree of finish (YG) is an indicator for optimum economic finished weight – in. fat depth (YG 2/3) Frame-size is the most significant factor to determine the optimum finished weight –Impact on average daily gain cost of gain

Overall Summary  Feed efficiency (F:G) is the profit generator.  Growth performance (ADG) is the key variable in F:G.  Select superior growth genetics.  Utilize hybrid vigor for growth performance.  Recognize the relationship between growth efficiency, cost of gain and carcass merit. -”Lamb Profit Potential”  Lambs are not created equal!!!

Questions???????