Apparent over-winter survival of juvenile coho in three tributaries to the lower Columbia River Trevor Johnson, Mara Zimmerman, Matthew Sturza, Patrick.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Action Effectiveness Monitoring in the Upper Columbia (Chapter 4) Karl M. Polivka, Pacific Northwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service.
Advertisements

Natural Reproductive Success and Demographic Effects of Hatchery-Origin Steelhead in Abernathy Creek, Washington Abernathy Fish Technology Center U.S.
Investigate the Life History of Spring Chinook Salmon and Summer Steelhead in the Grande Ronde River Basin Project Brian Jonasson Oregon Department.
Assessment of Bull Trout Populations in the Yakima River Watershed.
Assessing effects of Columbia River Basin anadromous fish flow management on the aquatic ecology of the Henrys Fork watershed A Proposal By The Henrys.
Evaluate juvenile salmon residence in the Columbia River Plume using micro-acoustic transmitters John Ferguson, et al. Riverine Ecology Program NWFSC,
Salmonid Population and Habitat Monitoring in the Lower Columbia/Columbia Estuary Provinces Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife.
Restoration of Columbia River Floodplain Functions to Steigerwald Lake
WRIA 8 Fish in/Fish out Monitoring Summary
Frank Leonetti, Snohomish County
1 Intensively Monitored Watersheds Validation Monitoring for Salmon Habitat Restoration.
Life History Patterns and Habitat Use in the Upper Columbia Greer Maier Science Program Manager Upper Columbia Salmon Recovery Board.
Rebecca Buchanan and John Skalski, University of Washington Gregory Mackey, Douglas County PUD Charles Snow, Washington DFW TRIBPIT: ESTIMATING SALMONID.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey New approaches afforded by PIT tag technology have yielded important answers about fish behavior.
ESCAPEMENT GOALS? WE DON’T NEED NO STINKING ‘SCAPEMENT GOALS! Hal Michael Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife
Monitoring fluvial bull trout migration and movements in the Lemhi River Subbasin, Idaho: integrating PIT tag technology with radio telemetry Kevin Poole.
Adult Steelhead Monitoring Challenges in Cedar Creek, WA Josua Holowatz & Dan Rawding.
The Use of PIT Tags in Small Streams and Non-migratory Fish Presented By Dalton Hance and Josh Murauskas 1 The Use of PIT Tags in Small Streams and Non-migratory.
Spatial and Temporal Distribution of Adult Summer Steelhead in Asotin Creek, Washington Ethan Crawford and Michael Herr Washington Department of Fish &
In-Stream PIT-Tag Detection of Resident Salmonids in Washington's White Salmon River Watershed: One System ’ s Saga. Ian G. Jezorek 1, Patrick J. Connolly.
E FFECT OF S IZE - AT T AGGING ON THE A PPARENT S URVIVAL OF C HINOOK S ALMON IN E NTIAT R IVER, W ASHINGTON PIT Tag Workshop Skamania Lodge, Washington.
Resident Fish Above Chief Joseph and Grand Coulee Dams Project No Kalispel Tribe of Indians Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Spokane.
Seasonal Usage of Off-Channel Habitats in the Entiat River by Juvenile Chinook Salmon Nicholas Albrecht and Tom Desgroseillier PIT Tag Workshop Skamania.
Drainage District #7 Pump Station Retrofits for Safe Fish Passage Ryan Bartelheimer, P.E. Snohomish Conservation District.
A SUMMARY OF ACOUSTIC TAGGING PROGRAMS FOR MIGRATORY AND RESIDENT CHINOOK SALMON IN PUGET SOUND Anna N. Kagley, Correigh Greene, Kurt Fresh & Dawn Spillsbury-Pucci.
What is Variability ? Change with location or through time in the capacity of a freshwater system to support salmon Spatial Variation –Natural variability.
Combining PIT Tags with Scale Reading to Better Understand the Life History of Snake River Fall Chinook Salmon Douglas Marsh and William Muir - NOAA Fisheries.
Emigration behavior of resident and anadromous juvenile O. mykiss: exploring the interaction among genetics, physiology and habitat Sean Hayes, Chad Hanson,
Strategy Rationale Oregon Recovery Plan Washington Recovery Plan NOAA Monitoring Guidance (includes RPAs) Integrated Status & Trends Monitoring (ISTM)
Chris Bare, Jim Latshaw, Ian Tattam, Jim Ruzycki, and Rich Carmichael Estimating Chinook escapement to the John Day River basin using a mark-recapture.
Technical Memo #2 Simulating Fall Redistribution and Overwinter Survival of Klamath River Coho Cramer Fish Sciences Nicklaus K. Ackerman Steve Cramer.
Documenting O. mykiss life histories in the White Salmon River prior to the reintroduction of anadromous fish above Condit Dam. Brady Allen and Patrick.
QUESTIONS ABOUT MARINE- DERIVED NUTRIENTS AND C&R FISHERIES TO BE ANSWERED IN THE DISCUSSION Hal Michael Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife
Monitor and Evaluate Salmonid Production in the Asotin Creek Subbasin - LSRCP (ID #200116)
A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.
Role of Tidal Saltwater Habitats for Juvenile Salmonids (Myths vs Reality in the Columbia River Estuary) Ed Casillas NWFSC, Seattle, WA (Contributors –
Adult Entry to Summer Juvenile Rearing of Klamath River Coho Randolph Ericksen Steven Cramer Ian Courter Kathryn Arendt Funded by.
Evaluating Fish Response to Habitat Restoration Overview of Intensively Monitored Watershed Research in the PNW Rationale for IMW approach Extent of current.
Oregon State University Real Time Research, Inc. USGS-Oregon Cooperative Fish & Wildlife Research Unit Pre-Management Status of Caspian Tern Colonies in.
Differential Estimates of “Survival” for PIT Tagged Fish – Evidence and Causes Jason Vogel Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resources Management.
Effectiveness of alternative broodstock, rearing and release practices at Winthrop NFH William Gale and Matt Cooper -USFWS, Mid-Columbia River Fishery.
Relationships between resident and anadromous O. mykiss in Cedar River, WA: Anne Marshall WA Dept of Fish and Wildlife improving the chances for steelhead.
Linking freshwater habitat to salmonid productivity Watershed Program 1 1. NW Fisheries Science Center 2725 Montlake Blvd. East, Seattle, WA
Adult steelhead evaluations in Imnaha River tributaries William Young, Jocelyn Hatch Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resources Management.
 Present in Snake, Clearwater, and Salmon River drainages  Provide valuable fishery  Well documented variation in ocean life history (A vs B run) 
Variation in the effectiveness of alternative broodstock, rearing, and release practices among three supplemented steelhead populations - Hood Canal, WA.
October 20 & 21, 2009 Stevenson, WA Columbia Basin Coordinated Anadromous Monitoring Strategy Workshop Lower Columbia Sub-Basin.
Objective Determine how using 9mm tags may affect our current research project in the John Day Basin.
Survival and Behavior of Juvenile Chinook Salmon in the Lower Columbia River, Estuary, and Plume G. A. McMichael 1, R. L. McComas 2, J. A. Carter 1, G.
Yakima Steelhead VSP Project: Resident/Anadromous Interactions Gabriel M. Temple 1913 “Landlocked Steelhead”
Implementation of the Lower Columbia River Recovery Plan Northwest Region August 19, 2013.
Harvest was depriving nursery lakes of nutrients from salmon carcasses.
Ocean rivers SARs LGR-LGR SARs LGR-LGR Harvest Mouth of Columbia predicted returns Mouth of Columbia predicted returns Juvenile travel time and survival.
Alsea Steelhead Acoustic Tagging Project. ODFW -Salmonid Life Cycle Monitoring Project Alsea Steelhead Acoustic Tagging Project EPA – Estuarine Habitat.
November 3-5, 2009 Stevenson, WA Columbia Basin Coordinated Anadromous Monitoring Strategy Workshop Upper Columbia Sub-Region 2 Listed ESU/DPS Steelhead-
Hood Canal Steelhead Acoustic Telemetry Studies Barry Berejikian and Skip Tezak NOAA Fisheries Northwest Fisheries Science Center Manchester Research Station.
A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.
Chelan County Lead Entity Presentation SRFB 2005 Salmon Habitat Grant Cycle.
Changes in Production of one and two year old Steelhead Trout Smolts during Drought Conditions in a Northern California Stream Michael D. Sparkman (CDFW)
This presentation was given by, Manfred Kittel, CDFW, at a meeting of the Statewide Coho Recovery Team, June 26-27, 2013.
Salmon and Steelhead Conservation through adaptive management of water levels in the Jenner estuary NOAA’S National Marine Fisheries Service.
Payette MPG Sockeye Adult Tributary Juvenile Data Tributary Data
Brown Trout Growth: Growing, Growing, or Gone
MPG Spring-Summer Chinook
James Murphy, Keith Van Den Broek, Tom Degroseillier
Snake River MPG Fall Chinook Adult Tributary Juvenile Data Tributary
Yakima River Steelhead Status and Trends RM&E Project Overview:
Paul Hoffarth, Todd Pearsons, and Russell Langshaw
Direct Survival of Migrating Salmonid Smolts in the Snake and Lower Columbia Rivers: Update with 2007 Results Northwest Power and Conservation Council.
Tucannon River Programmatic Habitat Program (a 30 mile long project)
Presentation transcript:

Apparent over-winter survival of juvenile coho in three tributaries to the lower Columbia River Trevor Johnson, Mara Zimmerman, Matthew Sturza, Patrick Hanratty Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Fish Ecology Life Cycle Monitoring Unit PIT Tag Workshop, Stevenson, Washington January 27-29, 2015

Acknowledgements Intensively Monitored Watershed Committee Joseph H. Anderson - WDFW Eric Beamer – SRSC Robert E. Bilby – Weyco William J. Ehinger – WA ECY Correigh Greene – NOAA Kirk Krueger – WDFW Mike McHenry – LEKT Timothy Quinn – WDFW Phil Roni – NOAA Collaboration and Funding Jason Walter & crew – Weyco Abernathy Fish Technology Center (USFWS) Jamie Lamperth – GIS Salmon Recovery Funding Board (funding) WDFW Data Collection Brad Allen Samantha Coty Kelly Kiyohara Nathan Miller Steve Wolthausen

Intensively Monitored Watershed (IMW) program in western Washington (Bilby et al. 2005) Four complexes (3 stream, 1 estuary) with paired reference and treatment watersheds Baseline monitoring began in 2005 (pre- restoration) Goal is to document and explain fish responses to restoration.

Small streams Stay cool through summer Low gradient Active logging in headwaters of all 3 watersheds Mill, Abernathy and Germany Creeks Tributaries to Columbia River

Apparent Overwinter Survival Spring smolt estimate Summer Parr estimate

Focus on juvenile coho salmon apparent overwinter survival and movement Compare apparent overwinter survival among watersheds Identify factors contributing to apparent overwinter survival – Population level (parr density) – Individual level (summer fork length, summer location) Compare fall versus spring movement

Focus on juvenile coho salmon apparent overwinter survival and movement Compare apparent overwinter survival among watersheds Identify factors contributing to apparent overwinter survival – Population level (parr density) – Individual level (summer fork length, summer location) Compare fall versus spring movement

Apparent overwinter survival methods Petersen mark-recapture estimator for both estimates Smolt estimate (spring) Parr estimate (summer) Apparent overwinter survival = spring smolt estimate/summer parr estimate

Apparent overwinter survival among watersheds

Focus on juvenile coho salmon apparent overwinter survival and movement Compare apparent overwinter survival among watersheds Identify factors contributing to apparent overwinter survival – Population level (parr density) – Individual level (summer fork length, summer location) Compare fall versus spring movement

Density dependence in apparent overwinter survival

Focus on juvenile coho salmon apparent overwinter survival and movement Compare apparent overwinter survival among watersheds Identify factors contributing to apparent overwinter survival – Population level (parr density) – Individual level (summer fork length, summer location) Compare fall versus spring movement

What factors contribute to apparent overwinter survival? (AIC model selection) H A : Survival & detection probability differ among years H A : Survival & detection probability differ among watersheds H A : Survival depends on fish length. H A : Survival depends on summer rearing distance from the estuary H A : Relationship of length to survival differs among watersheds H A : Relationship between rearing location and survival differs among watersheds. Detections(Y/N) ~ Year + Watershed + Fork Length + Distance + Watershed*Fork Length + Watershed*Distance

Detections(Y/N) ~ Year + Watershed + Fork Length + Distance + Watershed*Fork Length + Watershed*Distance H A : Survival & detection probability differ among years H A : Survival & detection probability differ among watersheds H A : Survival depends on fish length. H A : Survival depends on summer rearing distance from the estuary H A : Relationship of length to survival differs among watersheds H A : Relationship between rearing location and survival differs among watersheds. What factors contribute to apparent overwinter survival? (AIC model selection)

Summer fork length and apparent overwinter survival 300% 125%500%

Detections(Y/N) ~ Year + Watershed + Fork Length + Distance + Watershed*Fork Length + Watershed*Distance H A : Survival & detection probability differ among years H A : Survival & detection probability differ among watersheds H A : Survival depends on fish length. H A : Survival depends on summer rearing distance from the creek mouth H A : Relationship of length to survival differs among watersheds H A : Relationship between rearing location and survival differs among watersheds. What factors contribute to apparent overwinter survival? (AIC model selection)

Summer rearing location and apparent overwinter survival 75% 30%400%

The smaller the creek the higher the survival Tagging sites from lowest to highest in watershed Main stem sites Tributary sites

Focus on juvenile coho salmon apparent overwinter survival and movement Compare apparent overwinter survival among watersheds Identify factors contributing to apparent overwinter survival – Population level (parr density) – Individual level (summer fork length, summer location) Compare fall versus spring movement

Could fall migration contribute to apparent overwinter survival in Abernathy Creek? Year round Spring

Fall versus spring movement at Abernathy Creek array (rkm 3) Tagging FallSpring

Which direction are juvenile coho moving in the fall?

Factors contributing to spring versus fall downstream movement in Abernathy Creek Larger fish were more likely to be detected Spring movers more likely to be detected coming from Higher in the watershed and Tributaries Fall movers more likely to be detected coming from Lower main stem

Summary Apparent overwinter survival is a combined measure of survival and fish overwintering in their natal tributary Larger fish survive better than smaller fish (fall & spring migrants) Fall migrants come from lower in the watershed and spring migrants come from headwaters & tributaries

Discussion Fall coho movement also reported on Strait of Juan De Fuca IMW Longer fish (summer) have higher survival Further distance from estuary and smaller streams have higher survival

Discussion continued What happens to fall migrants? Implications for restoration activities – Summer growth (structural complexity?) – Overwinter habitat (tributaries)

Extra slides

Annual tagging effort in each watershed