Radiological Assessment - of effects from - Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant May 6, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Radiological Assessment March 29, AMS Summary Ops Summary – Aerial Measuring Systems totaled more than 130 hours of flying – Flight operations were.
Advertisements

Radiological Assessment March 25, AMS Summary 2 Ops Summary – Aerial Measurement Systems totaled more than 70 hours of flying – Flight operations.
Response to a nuclear plant incident in Wisconsin How a nuclear power plant incident could affect your county October 14, 2009.
DOE O 430.2B Metering Requirements and Status
DOE Response to Radiological Releases from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant Daniel Blumenthal, PhD, CHP Manager, Consequence Management Program.
Emergency response organization (ERO)
RPS Actions Instruct staff to put hands on all routine air monitors and report equipment status Contact sampling partners to give notice of possible.
1 NRC Meteorologists Role in Support of the Headquarters Operations Center During an International Event Kevin Quinlan Physical Scientist, NRO U.S. Nuclear.
UTAH AMRP RADIATION SAFETY PLAN by Anthony A. Gallegos.
Perspectives on USNRC Study Request Nuclear & Radiation Studies Board April 26, 2010 Ralph Andersen, CHP Senior Director – Radiation Safety & Environmental.
DOE Region 8 Radiological Assistance Program Response Capabilities
Understanding Radioactivity The Basics. This Course  This course is intended to provide a very basic understanding of radiation, radioactivity, and interacting.
Page 1 DOE/NV/ Vision Service Partnership Lessons Learned from FRMAC Participation in Ingestion Pathway Exercises RaJah Mena Alexis Reed Presented.
Radiological Assessment - of effects from - Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant May 13, 2011.
1 Radiological Effects Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident Jim Lynch NRC Region III August 24, 2011.
Radiation Exposure, Dose and Relative Biological Effectiveness in Medicine Background Image:
Northwest Area Committee Meeting June 29, 2011 C. Terada, EPA Japan 2011 US National Radiation Monitoring.
Jed Harrison Office of Radiation & Indoor Air.  Review the Incident – What Happened  Describe the EPA Response  Review EPA’s RadNet Monitoring System.
EPA’s Response to Fukushima Japan Nuclear Emergency Mike Boyd, Senior Health Physicist EPA/Office of Radiation & Indoor Air Presented at 2011 OAS Annual.
Updated NCRP Population Exposure Information and Implications to RETS-REMP Issues Ken Sejkora Entergy Nuclear Northeast – Pilgrim Station Presented at.
NADP Data Use State of Wisconsin. Spooner (WI37) Perkistown (WI35) Trout Lake (WI36) Popple River (WI09) Potawatomi (WI10) Suring (WI25) Lake Dubay (WI28)
PART IX: EMERGENCY EXPOSURE SITUATIONS Module IX.1: Generic requirements for emergency exposure situations Lesson IX.1-2: General Requirements Lecture.
Biological response and radiation safety practices
Radiological Monitoring of Air and Drinking Water in British Columbia Following the Fukushima Nuclear Incident Environmental Health Services (EHS) British.
A Radiation Primer radiation … radioactive material What are they? exposure … contamination Are they the same?
Phillip Ray Gibson NC Radon Program
[
New business Council (JCTA) in Japan FAO-IGG pre-Meeting July18 th and 19 th,2011 Mombasa,Kenya Update Japanese Tea Safety.
UNCLASSIFIED Transport of Radionuclides to the Rio Grande Bruce Gallaher Middle Rio Grande Water Quality Summit October 25, 2004 LA-UR
Radiation in Your Environment. Radiation Around You Nature –Cosmic (direct and cosmic-produced radioactivity –Terrestrial (including radon) Medical Consumer.
Ronald Warren Ecological & Environmental Monitoring National Security Technologies, LLC Community Environmental Monitoring Program Workshop July 26, 2011.
James A. FitzPatrick NPP Ingestion Pathway Exercise May and June 21-23, 2011 and LHD Radiological Plan Template Kevin Kraus Associate Radiological.
From Chernobyl to Fukushima: introduction Conveners of GI1.4 session M. Yamauchi (Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Sweden) Oleg Voitsekhovych (Ukrainian.
ANALYTICAL X-RAY SAFETY User Training Centre for Environmental Health, Safety and Security Management.
Nuclear Accident at the Fukushima Dai-ichi NPP June 2, 2011 Embassy of Japan in Bulgaria.
Internal Radiation Dosimetry Lab 9. Radiation Measurement We use different terms depending on whether: 1.The radiation is coming from a radioactive source.
RADIOACTIVITY IN VIRGIN SOILS AND SOILS FROM SOME AREAS WITH CLOSED URANIUM MINING FACILITIES IN BULGARIA Ivanka Yordanova, Lidia Misheva, Martin Banov,
Basic Survey: External dose estimation Radiation Medical Science Center for the Fukushima Health Management Survey, Fukushima Medical University The International.
PA State Participation in Liberty RadEx Randolph Easton PA BRP.
Intervention for Chronic and Emergency Exposure Situations Assessment and Response during Radiological Emergency Dose Assessment Overview Lecture IAEA.
Page 1 Vision Service Partnership U.S. Department of Energy’s Aerial Measuring System (AMS) Response Mission Provide a rapid and comprehensive worldwide.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Emergency Response Protective Actions Day 10 – Lecture 3.
FUKISHIMA Nuclear Reactors Radiological Assessment Air Measurement Surveillance AMS March 22,
Radiological Assessment March 22, AMS Summary 2 Ops Summary – Aerial Measurement Systems totaled more than 40 hours of flying Plot interpretation.
Fukushima Power Plant – Japan Post March 11, 2011
Radiation: How to address the confusion Jill Anderson Washington Internships for Students of Engineering & The American Nuclear Society.
DOE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROGRAM WORKSHOP BIOTA PROTECTION Stephen L. Domotor (202)
Part 1d: Exposure Assessment and Modeling Thomas Robins, MD, MPH.
Radiological Assessment April 4, AMS Summary Ops Summary – Aerial Measuring Systems have totaled more than 221 flight hours in support of aerial.
Radiological Assessment - of effects from - Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant April 7, 2011.
Radiological Assessment - of effects from - Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant April 18, 2011.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II Shielding Workshop R. Casey Activation Issues for NSLS-II March 28, 2007.
1 OBJ 2 Internal and External Exposure Control RPT
Air Toxics & Public Health Committee Update Heidi Hales Monitoring and Assessment Committee Meeting Troy, NH April 24, 2007.
Wed/Thurs Dec 3-4 Objective: Calculate the radiation exposure of different people. Checkpoint: How much radiation (in mSv) is a cancer risk? How much radiation.
Qualitative Exposure Assessment “How to Build a Better Plan” Dave Dickhaut UAW Industrial Hygiene – Lansing Delta Township Eltaneice Bolden GM Global.
2011 Pan American Health Organization Módulo NUCLEAR EMERGENCY IN JAPON 30 March 2011 Pablo Jiménez Regional Advisor in Radiological Health NUCLEAR.
1 Health Safety & Radiation Protection (RAD453) Course : بسم الله الرّحمن الرّحيم Chapter 3: Sources of Radiation Omrane KADRI, Ph.D.
Japanese Nuclear Accident And U.S. Response April 20, 2011.
HEALTH CARE STATISTICS AND RESEARCH HEPR 410
Anniston PCB Site Review of Risk Assessments for OU-1/OU-2
Update on EPA Regulatory and Guidance Activities
Radiation Dose.
Tan Yong Jia, Somesh, James
The “Green Run”.
Allen Chan U.S. Government Accountability Office October 2, 2018
Japanese Nuclear Accident And U.S. Response
Fission and Fukushima part 1 Gordon J
Radiological Assessment March 22, 2011
16th Annual City Tech Poster Session
Presentation transcript:

Radiological Assessment - of effects from - Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant May 6, 2011

DOE/NNSA Aerial Measuring Systems have totaled more than 490 flight hours in support of aerial monitoring operations NNSA’s Consequence Management Response Teams have collected over 218,000 total field measurements taken by DOE, DoD, and Japanese monitoring assets More than 500 air samples taken at U.S. facilities throughout Japan undergoing lab analysis in the United States 136 total in situ ground spectra taken throughout Japan for lab analysis in US 115 Japan soil samples received, in-processed, and undergoing analysis Operations Summary

3

Joint US-Japan AMS Data These results are from a joint MEXT, DOE/NNSA and USFJ survey Data based on 42 fixed wing and helicopter survey flights at altitudes ranging from 150 to 700 meters between April 6 and April 29 Exposure rates are averaged over areas 300 m to 1500 m in diameter There is no data near the Town of Inawashiro because it is mountainous and not easily accessible by low-flying aircraft The cesium deposition was determined from aerial and ground- based measurements The ratio of the amount of Cs-137 to Cs-134 is uniform across the survey region There is no aerial survey data directly over the nuclear power plant itself The survey boundary was chosen based on many preliminary measurement that showed the extent of the deposition

5

6

7 Assessment An assessment of measurements gathered through May 6 continues to show: Radiation levels continue to decrease No measurable deposit of radiological material since March 19 US bases and facilities all measure dose rates below 32 microrem/hr (32 millionths of a REM) – a level with no known health risks Agricultural monitoring and possible intervention will be required for several hundred square kilometers surrounding the site: Soil and water samples are the only definitive method to determine agricultural countermeasures Ground monitoring can give better fidelity to identify areas that require agricultural sampling

Context The Nuclear Regulatory Commission estimates that the average American absorbs 620 mRem a year* (or mRem/hour) An average transatlantic flight produces an exposure of 2.5 mRem* A typical chest x-ray produces 10 mRem per image EPA guidelines call for public health actions if exposure exceeds 1000 mRem over 4 days * Source: NRC: